logo
Trump's end-game on Iran a mystery as clock ticks on nuclear talks

Trump's end-game on Iran a mystery as clock ticks on nuclear talks

The Hill23-04-2025

The clock is ticking on President Trump's two-month timeline to reach a deal with Iran over its nuclear program, with the president signaling optimism ahead of a third round of talks later this week.
But it's still unclear if Trump and Iran's leaders can find common ground between eliminating Iran's nuclear program, the maximalist U.S. demand, and returning to something more like the Obama-era nuclear agreement that restricted Tehran's ability to create a weapon, but left much of its nuclear infrastructure intact.
Trump has long trashed the Obama deal as weak, and both hawkish Republicans and Israel are likely to oppose any deal with similar terms. But Iran is certain to reject any deal that eliminates its nuclear program completely.
The stakes are high. Trump has suggested he may greenlight an Israeli military offensive on Iran's nuclear facilities if the talks fail.
Technical experts from the U.S. and Iran are expected to meet in Oman on Saturday.
Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told reporters on Wednesday both Iran and the Trump administration appear committed to reaching a deal.
'I think these are negotiations that are very, very serious. Are very, very serious,' he said during a visit to Washington, following meetings in Tehran last week. 'I don't see any improvisation here, not at all.'
Both sides have incentive to reach an agreement, least of which is avoiding deadly, destructive, conflict. Iran's economy is suffocating under sanctions and Trump, focused on expanding any lucrative business opportunities, is keen to avoid escalating military action in the Middle East.
'I'm not speaking for President Trump, but I believe President Trump's position is that he wants to exhaust all options short of military force first, before he considers any type of military action or possibly a naval blockade of Iran,' said Fred Fleitz, vice chair of the America First Policy Institute and who served as chief of staff of Trump's first National Security Council.
'He has always taken the approach to national security, to keep our nation out of new and unnecessary wars, if at all possible.'
Trump reportedly sent a letter to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in March, laying out a two-month deadline for reaching a new nuclear deal. He has offered vague threats if no deal is reached.
'Something is going to happen very soon. I would rather have a peace deal than the other option, but the other option will solve the problem,' he said last month.
Experts say, given the short-time frame, a narrow framework is more achievable than a full-fledged deal aimed at being more robust than the JCPOA. But even that has its challenges.
'The closest fish to the boat is clearly the nuclear piece, but I'm not sure how you get there in 60 days,' said Christopher Ford, who served as Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Non-Proliferation in Trump's first term.
Ford, speaking on a panel hosted by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace on Monday, said while Iran may be willing to ship out its stockpiles of enriched uranium – the fuel needed for a nuclear weapon – it is unlikely to give up its capacity to enrich completely.
Ali Vaez, the International Crisis Group's Iran Project Director, said Iran may be open to compromise on issues beyond the nuclear file because of the reality on the ground – Israel has greatly weakened its proxy forces of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and destroyed its air defense systems in an October strike.
'They will not go for full dismantlement, they will probably go for restrictions and trust-building measures,' Vaez said on the CEIP panel.
Iran is also facing an October deadline of even harsher international sanctions if it fails to reach an agreement.
Under the terms of the Obama-era deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), European signatories can petition the United Nations Security Council to snapback sanctions on Iran. The only way to block the reimposition of sanctions would be through passage of a resolution in the Security Council, a move that the veto-holding powers of the U.S., France and U.K. could invoke.
'My impression from talking informally with European interlocutors is that the Europeans are actually potentially willing to invoke snapback, but probably only if they feel that the U.S. is approaching this with a serious negotiating strategy,' said Ford.
'I don't think they're very eager to sort of roil their own relationships with Iran by doing snapback unless it contributes usefully to a negotiating answer.'
But Iran still holds leverage with the scope of its nuclear program, with Tehran assessed to be able to make enough fuel for one bomb within a week. Experts say its nuclear infrastructure is far more advanced and expansive compared to what it was in 2018, when Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Obama-era deal, and has only sped up since Trump was re-elected last year.
'They [Iran] haven't taken any measure to reduce its enrichment production, its enrichment production since November 2024 has increased at a pace of sevenfold,' said Director General Grossi.
The IAEA chief said Iran has moved from producing 60 percent enriched uranium at a rate of approximately six to seven kilograms per month, to now 40 kilograms per month. Grossi also pointed to Iranian public statements of adding new cascades of centrifuges – increasing its capacity to enrich uranium.
And nuclear inspectors are being stonewalled from accessing sites under construction near its nuclear facility of Natanz where more advanced centrifuges are expected to be placed.
'Since it is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the program is taking place, we're asking them, 'what is this for?' And they are telling us 'it's none of your business,'' Grossi said.
'It's a bit of a ping-pong, but the dealing continues, the building continues, and we are looking into this and we'll continue looking into this.'
Grossi said that the IAEA is standing by to verify any deal that may emerge between Washington and Tehran.
Trump and his top negotiator, Steve Witkoff, say they want to eliminate Iran's ability to enrich uranium and weaponize its nuclear material. But those statements came after Witkoff suggested Iran could maintain enrichment to 3.67 percent, the amount accepted in the JCPOA – the mixed messages raising concern in Israel.
'For us in Israel…our red line was always not Iran actually rushing to the bomb, but developing the capacity to rush to the bomb in short order. And that's why Israelis are concerned about Iran maintaining its nuclear infrastructure,' Israel's former ambassador to the U.S. Michael Herzog, said in a discussion with the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) on Monday.
'I don't know exactly where the U.S. administration is headed in this respect. The fact we hear different statements may indicate that there is still an internal argument within the administration.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Johnson, heckled by Democrats, backs censure for Padilla
Johnson, heckled by Democrats, backs censure for Padilla

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Johnson, heckled by Democrats, backs censure for Padilla

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Thursday said Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) should be censured after he tried to approach and question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference in Los Angeles, prompting federal agents to forcibly remove him from the room and handcuff him. Video of the altercation — captured by reporters on the scene — sent shockwaves through the Capitol, with Democrats slamming the way law enforcement personnel handled Padilla, and Republicans condemning the senator's conduct at the media availability. Pressed on whether Padilla should face consequences, Johnson initially demurred — 'it's not my decision to make, I'm not in that chamber' — before endorsing censure for the California Democrat. 'I think that that behavior at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' Johnson told reporters. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do, that's not what we're going to act.' 'We're not gonna have branches fighting physically and having senators charging Cabinet secretaries,' he added. 'We got to do better and I hope that we will.' The comments came during a press availability in the Capitol after House Republicans narrowly passed a bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending for public broadcasting and foreign aid. Johnson staged the gaggle to discuss the legislation, but was swarmed with questions about the altercation in Los Angeles. 'I saw the same video, a very brief video, that I think many people did — I think the senator's actions, my view, is it was wildly inappropriate,' he said. 'You don't charge a sitting Cabinet secretary, and everybody can draw their own conclusions, you can see it's a heated debate here.' As he delivered those remarks, a long line of House Democrats — including many in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and from the California delegation — walked behind the Speaker and heckled him and he spoke. Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-Calif), who represents the San Francisco bay area, shouted 'Mike, that's absurd.' Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) yelled 'why don't you stand up for Congress?' Another House Democrat exclaimed 'that's a lie.' Asked if he would respond to some of the comments, Johnson declined. 'I'm not gonna respond to that,' the Speaker said. 'I think the American people can draw their own conclusions. They saw a senator acting like a, wildly inappropriate, I'll leave it at that.' 'What I saw was agents asking him to quiet down so that the secretary could continue her press conference. He refused to do so. What were they supposed to do? They have to restrain someone who is engaging in that kind of behavior. They moved him out of the room,' Johnson later added. 'A sitting member of Congress should not act like that, it is beneath a member of Congress, it is beneath a U.S. senator. They are supposed to lead by example and that is not a good example.' Earlier on Thursday, Padilla interrupted a press conference Noem was holding in Los Angeles amid widespread protests against the Trump administration's deportation efforts and against Trump mobilizing the National Guard and Marines to protect agents. Multiple men forcibly removed him from the room and handcuffed him. 'I'm Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla is heard saying as he struggled with officers holding him back. As he was aggressively moved out two double doors the senator can be heard saying 'Hands off!' 'Senator Padilla is currently in Los Angeles exercising his duty to perform Congressional oversight of the federal government's operations in Los Angeles and across California,' Padilla's office said in a statement immediately after the altercation. 'He was in the federal building to receive a briefing with General Guillot and was listening to Secretary Noem's press conference. He tried to ask the Secretary a question, and was forcibly removed by federal agents, forced to the ground and handcuffed. He is not currently detained, and we are working to get additional information.

Democrats slam military parade as Trump's multimillion-dollar 'birthday party'

time7 minutes ago

Democrats slam military parade as Trump's multimillion-dollar 'birthday party'

Congressional Democrats and at least one high-profile Republican are slamming the multimillion-dollar cost of the Army 's 250th anniversary parade on Saturday that President Donald Trump has long sought to celebrate the military. Trump has said the cost -- projected to be as much as $45 million for the Army alone, not counting security and other expenses -- will be "peanuts compared to the value of doing it." However, his critics argue the money could be better spent elsewhere. "If it was really about celebrating military families, we could put $30 million toward helping them offset the cost of their child care, food assistance and tuition," Sen. Tammy Duckworth said on X. "But it isn't. Trump is throwing himself a $30 million birthday parade just to stroke his own ego." The Army said it has accounted for spending between $25 million and $45 million on the parade, which will include 6,700 troops and dozens of tanks, military fighting vehicles and aircraft staged on or near the National Mall. "Money should be put in medical defense research instead of wasted on some pomp and circumstance for the president," Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday. "This is not consistent with what the men and women in uniform deserve." Saturday's parade also falls on Trump's 79th birthday, and when it ends near the White House, the Army's Golden Knights parachute team will present him with an American flag, after which he'll administer the constitutional oath to Army enlistees. "We all like to enjoy a nice birthday party," Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., posted on X. "But most of us don't celebrate with a $45 million taxpayer-funded military parade. "Save taxpayer money. Have a birthday cake and blow out a few candles," he said. "Don't shut down the capital and roll out 60-ton tanks through the streets." "I wouldn't have done it," Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul said. "We were always different than, you know, the images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that." Some Democrats echoed that criticism. "It's outrageous," Rep. Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., said. "This is something that would happen in North Korea, not the United States of America. Donald Trump thinks he's a king. He's not. He was elected as president of the United States, and he should act as such." Army spokesman Steve Warren defended the parade, saying, "It is a lot of money, but I think that amount of money is dwarfed by 250 years of service and sacrifice that American soldiers have given this country. "We're looking at this as an opportunity to really strengthen the connection between America and her Army," he added. "So, yeah, it's a lot of money, but it pales in comparison to what we're selling." The White House this week also requested a flyover by the Air Force Thunderbirds. When asked Thursday what he hopes the public will remember about the parade, Trump said, "How great our country is, very simple, and how strong our military is." "We have the strongest military in the world," he added. The White House has not responded to requests for a total cost estimate that would include money spent on security and other arrangements. Several Republicans say they're skipping the parade due to prior commitments, including House Speaker Mike Johnson. Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she would attend and defended the display. "Washington D.C. is the safest it's ever been!!" she wrote. "I wish our great military men and women could just stay here. I am so excited for the parade celebrating the 250th anniversary of our United States Army!!" Protests of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown are planned across the country to counterprogram the parade, with the flagship "No Kings" protest occurring in Philadelphia. Nine small protests are also expected in Washington, according to the Secret Service and local officials. Trump has warned protesters will be met with "heavy force." On Friday, he disputed the characterization of him as a king. "I don't feel like a king. I have to go through hell to get stuff approved," he said, adding, "No, no, we're not a king. We're not a king at all."

Jobless claims data, broadening stock gains: Market Takeaways
Jobless claims data, broadening stock gains: Market Takeaways

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jobless claims data, broadening stock gains: Market Takeaways

US stocks (^DJI, ^IXIC, ^GSPC) closed Thursday's session in positive territory after the latest inflation data and President Trump announcing plans for unilateral tariffs against trade partners. Yahoo Finance senior markets reporter Josh Schafer examines several of the prominent market themes in the trading day, including this week's initial jobless claims and the broadening of the market's outperformance across sectors. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store