One legislator blocks bill to prevent dumping sewage on farmland
Kenton Patzkowsky, R-Balko, is the Oklahoma state representative for District 61, the largest and most rural of the state's districts. He states that his 'legislative priorities include the protection and sustainability of Oklahoma agriculture.' However, this noble sentiment is belied by his recent actions in the 2025 Oklahoma legislative session. Before we get to specifics of this charge, some background information is needed.
More: As officials consider 'forever chemical' regulation, see where PFAS is found in Oklahoma
A bill, Senate Bill 3, submitted in the current legislative session would have placed a moratorium on the application of biosolids (solids separated from the liquid waste stream at sewage processing plants) onto farmlands. So what's the concern here? For decades, farmers across America have been encouraged by the federal government and state officials to spread municipal sewage on millions of acres of farmland as fertilizer. Converting sewage to fertilizer saves cities money on landfill costs, is a cheaper nutrient-rich fertilizer for farmers, and has become a billion-dollar industry for a handful of companies.
We now know, though, that sewage sludge isn't a green plant food. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, it harbors a mishmash of all kinds of dangerous substances that leach into soil, plants, water and even the food we eat, including:
Heavy metals such as lead, copper and mercury.
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which can harm our reproductive systems, suppress our immune systems, and increase our risk of cancer.
Microplastics, which spread the various chemicals added to plastic, such as flame retardants and endocrine disruptors.
And most concerning, sludge is a huge conveyor of PFAS, known as 'forever chemicals,' because of their longevity. They are linked to a range of serious health problems, including increased risk of certain cancers, thyroid disease, liver damage, immune system effects and reproductive issues.
According to Investigate Midwest, more than 80% of Oklahoma's wastewater sludge ends up on crop fields. Presently, there are no viable means to remove PFAS from sludge at scale or to remediate the farm soils that sludge contaminates.
So let's return to SB 3. It passed the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee on a nonpartisan basis and moved to the Senate chamber for a vote. The Senate passed the measure overwhelmingly with 44 votes 'For' and only 4 votes 'Opposed.' Then the bill went to the House Agriculture Committee for consideration. Here is where Rep. Patzkowsky enters the picture. As chairman of the committee, he serves as a gatekeeper and has the discretion to either put a bill on the committee's agenda for a vote or not. If he decides not to put the bill on the agenda, the bill does not receive a vote and dies in committee. His decision was to kill the bill.
More: What can we do about 'forever chemicals' in Oklahoma's drinking water? | Opinion
There is certainly an issue here as to whether a state representative in a district with a population of about 37,500 should be in a position to obstruct legislation that could affect 4 million Oklahomans. We can also play armchair psychologist and question why Rep.e Patzkowsky would potentially put his constituents, indeed, all Oklahomans, in harm's way. Perhaps he is simply uninformed about what science says about the dangers of biosolids. Perhaps he feels beholden to Synagro, a company that handles much of the biosolid material produced by Oklahoma City's wastewater system and turns it into fertilizer for farms and money for shareholders. We will probably never know.
What we do know is that Rep. Patzkowsky knowingly or unknowingly has put the health of Oklahomans and the environment at risk. Regarding his stated priority of 'the protection and sustainability of Oklahoma agriculture,' there will be at least one more year of poisoning farmlands, livestock, crops. Another year of PFAS infiltrating ground, surface and drinking water supplies. Further out, there will be law suits, condemnation of farmland, medical costs entailed by affected farming families.
For a glimpse of that future, look no further than Johnson County, Texas, when on Feb. 11, 2025, it declared a state of disaster due to PFAS contamination on agricultural land. The county says test results showed an 'immediate threat to the county's agricultural sector, drinking water supplies, and public health.' Farmers in Johnson County, who said they were no longer able to make a living off their land due to the contamination, have filed lawsuits against the EPA and Synagro.
Concern is increasing across the nation regarding biosolids contamination in general and PFAS in particular. The Johnson County situation is being closely watched nationwide as some of the first litigation involving fertilizer PFAS contamination. Let's hope Rep. Patzkowsky is also paying close attention.
(Editor's Note: The Oklahoman requested, but did not receive, a response to this columnist's viewpoint from Rep. Patzkowsky.)
Mike Altshuler is a retired educator and environmental activist who lives in Edmond.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: A missed opportunity to halt farm sewage dumping | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Environment and Public Works panel releases ‘big beautiful bill' text
The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee released text for its portion of the Trump legislative agenda policy bill that Republicans are trying to get across the finish line, becoming the first Senate panel to do so. The EPW bill appears similar to provisions passed by the House. It's not one of the committees that deals with thorny issues like Medicaid or energy tax credits that is likely to undergo changes in the upper chamber. Like the House version of the bill, the text released by Senate Republicans on Wednesday repeals numerous green programs passed by the Democrats in 2022. This includes a $20 billion program that seeks to provide financing for climate-friendly projects and a $3 billion program that provides grants for underserved communities that want to fight air pollution and climate change. It also repeals other grant programs related to air pollution monitoring and reducing air pollution at schools – as well as a program that seeks to charge oil and gas companies for their excess methane emissions. Like the House version, the Senate bill also includes a provision criticized by Democrats as 'pay-for-play' that allows companies to pay for expedited reviews of energy or other infrastructure projects. And it seeks to repeal a Biden-era regulation that's expected to push the auto market toward selling more electric vehicles. The ultimate text could still change as the parliamentarian has to decide which programs can actually be passed through reconciliation – a process by which the Senate can pass legislation with a simple majority instead of the 60 votes it usually needs. However, since the green programs it seeks to repeal were passed in a similar manner in 2022, those are likely to make it into the final version. 'This legislative text puts in motion plans that Senate Republicans pledged to take, like stopping Democrats' natural gas tax and rescinding unobligated dollars from the so-called Inflation Reduction Act,' said EPW Chair Shelley Moore Capito ( in a written statement. 'I look forward to working with my colleagues to move our legislative package forward to enact President Trump's agenda, which the American people overwhelmingly support,' she added.
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Our ‘big, beautiful bill' will provide New Yorkers tax relief they desperately need
Whether it's a constituent contacting my office, shaking my hand along a parade route, coming up to me at Sunday mass or sitting next to me at the barbershop, the one issue I hear more than any other is how damn hard it is for people to make ends meet in the Hudson Valley. The affordability crisis is real, and it's severe. Well, here's some good news: The House just took a significant step toward doing something about it. The passage of HR 1, a k a 'the Big, Beautiful Bill,' quadrupled the SALT cap to $40,000 and is poised to deliver significant tax relief to nearly every home and business owner in the Hudson Valley (and beyond). It was a hard-fought victory for middle-class and working families, already drowning under the tax-and-spend policies in Albany that have made New York the highest-taxed state in the nation. Quadrupling the SALT cap will be a lifeline for the teachers, nurses, small-business owners and first responders who keep our communities strong, and for all of the working-class families and retirees on fixed incomes across the Hudson Valley. That's why I took on House leadership and members of my party to secure this win, and to block efforts to cut the federal share of Medicaid funding to the state. These changes would have resulted in a massive tax increase. For those who falsely claim lifting the SALT cap was only a tax cut for the rich, that's a bunch of bull. Over 93% of Hudson Valley home and business owners will see a tax cut if this bill is signed into law. Those are the facts. Better still, we achieved more than just increasing the SALT cap to help ease the affordability crisis for local families and seniors. The bill eliminates federal taxes on tips and taxes on overtime pay, directly helping restaurant workers, firefighters and other hourly employees who rely on these earnings. It prevents a looming middle-class tax hike by preserving key provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, like the $2,500 Child Tax Credit for nearly 88,000 families in NY-17 and the Small Business Deduction for over 78,000 businesses in our district. Without this legislation, families earning our district's median income would have faced a tax increase of nearly $4,000 starting next year. We also made health care more affordable by preventing harmful cuts to safety-net hospitals, boosting physician reimbursements and cracking down on pharmacy benefit managers to lower prescription-drug costs. Sadly, instead of working with us to deliver much-needed tax relief for New Yorkers, hyperpartisan politicians like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries continue to sit on the sidelines and launch bogus, class-warfare attacks that have no basis in fact or truth. Frankly, to hear them criticizing an increase in the SALT cap is truly astonishing. When they had complete and total power to raise or scrap the cap, they sat on their hands and chose to let it stay in place, once again being held hostage by radical leftists like AOC and Bernie Sanders. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters And this bill doesn't stop at tax relief. We expanded Pell Grants to include workforce training and eased access to out-of-state pediatric care for kids on Medicaid and CHIP. Plus, despite the lies being told, we protected Medicaid for those who genuinely need it, like seniors, single parents and those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The so-called 'cuts' you hear about were actually common-sense reforms that require able-bodied adults without dependent children to work, volunteer or go to school 20 hours a week. They were enhanced eligibility checks to cut waste, fraud and abuse, so people can no longer scam the system, including registering in two different states. And they were citizenship verifications that prevent illegal immigrants from siphoning benefits from this critical program. These are practical and popular solutions that reflect the values of the Hudson Valley. Anyone who tells you differently is lying. Plain and simple. As an independent voice in Washington, I've never been afraid to challenge my own party or work across the aisle to get results. This bill is a historic step forward — a tax cut that rewards hard work, supports families and levels the playing field. I'll always keep fighting for NY-17. Now let's just hope the Senate passes the bill soon. Mike Lawler represents New York's Hudson Valley area in the House of Representatives.
Chicago Tribune
28 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
How to protect yourself from the bad air caused by Canada's wildfires
Plumes of smoke are blanketing large swaths of the U.S. and parts of Europe, which presents risks for those breathing it. The Midwest, Northeast and Great Lakes regions of the U.S. have 'very unhealthy' air quality, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, and experts say people should take precautions. The EPA's Air Quality Index converts all pollutant levels into a single number. The lower the number, the better. Anything below 50 is classified as 'healthy.' Fifty to 100 is 'moderate' while 100-150 is unhealthy for 'sensitive groups,' and anything above 150 is bad for everyone. The Air Quality Index was around 160 in many parts of the Upper Midwest on Wednesday. Sensitive groups include people with asthma, lung disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, said Dr. Sanjay Sethi, chief of the division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at the University of Buffalo's medical school. 'If you have heart or lung problems, then you've got to be definitely more careful,' Sethi said. 'I would either avoid going outside or wear an N95 (mask) or at least a dust mask.' Canadian wildfire smoke causes 'very unhealthy' conditions in American Midwest and reaches EuropeSometimes the air is bad enough to see or smell the smoke. Even if you don't see the pollution, it can be unhealthy to breathe. The EPA maintains a website with up-to-date, regional air quality information. PurpleAir, a company that sells air quality sensors and publishes real-time air quality data, has a citizen scientist, air quality monitoring network with a more granular map of street-by-street air quality readings. The best way to get indoor air quality readings is to buy a monitor, said Joseph Allen, director of Harvard University's Healthy Buildings Program. 'You can find these low-cost, indoor air quality monitors just about everywhere online now. They don't cost all that much anymore,' he said. For most people, going outside for just a short time won't have a negative long-term impact, said Sethi. Wearing an N95 mask, which became common during the coronavirus pandemic, will help filter out the pollution. 'N95 is going to get rid of 90-95% of the particles,' said Jennifer Stowell, a research scientist at Boston University's Center for Climate and Health. 'If you have access to a mask that has a respirator-type attachment to it, then that's the very best.' If you must be outside and you experience symptoms, experts say you should head indoors or somewhere else with better air quality. Even if you are healthy, it's good to take precautions. 'If you start wheezing, which is like this whistling sound of the chest, or if you're feeling short of breath, that's definitely more concerning,' Sethi said. Close the windows and turn on the air conditioner, if you have one, setting it to circulate the indoor air. Use blankets to cover cracks that allow outside air into your home, such as under doors. Finally, swapping the air conditioner's filter for a MERV 13 filter can help, though you should make sure it's installed correctly. 'If you happen to have access to an air purifier, even if it's just a room air purifier, try to keep it running and in the room that you're doing most of your activities in,' said Stowell.
