New survey from Wolters Kluwer reveals finance leaders plan to increase agentic AI adoption by 6x in next 12 months
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Wolters Kluwer, a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services, has released compelling survey findings on the current levels of adoption, future plans and key drivers related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the office of the CFO.
The survey shows that while 6% of finance leaders are currently employing agentic AI, a further 38% intend to adopt agentic AI in the next 12 months. With 44% of finance teams set to be using agentic AI in 2026, this represents an increase of over 600%.
Karen Abramson, CEO of Wolters Kluwer Corporate Performance & ESG, said: 'At Wolters Kluwer, we are committed to continuous innovation for the office of the CFO. Last year, we launched the market's first AI-powered corporate performance management platform - the CCH Tagetik Intelligent Platform with Ask AI. We have evolved Ask AI to an embedded super agent; it now mobilizes cutting-edge agentic technology across multiple use cases, including responding to voice commands in multiple languages, drilling into data without the need for IT skills, and testing assumptions and running analysis. Agentic AI represents an evolutionary leap in how finance leaders operate.'
Additional survey findings and announcements from CCH Tagetik inTouch 25:
Finance leaders turn to AI and new hires to manage economic volatility
As a result of economic volatility, 67% of finance leaders reported that they would be using AI for the first time for Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A). A further 14% of respondents plan to increase their AI adoption due to current economic volatility, and 8% plan to continue their AI usage.
When looking at team resources and structure, 33% of respondents said they will consider hiring new team members to manage economic volatility, with 24% considering restructuring. Notably, 22% of finance leaders shared that they did not have the optimum team resources and structure but were unable to make changes.
Unlocking the potential of AI through hiring and data readiness
The survey showed that 85% of finance leaders would consider AI skills as important when recruiting for their finance function, with 11% considering AI skills to be of essential importance.
44% of respondents identified data readiness as the key driver for increasing AI adoption. 25% highlighted the need for AI-powered corporate performance management (CPM) technologies and 23% cited the need for AI training.
To support this shift, Wolters Kluwer has launched a dedicated Learning Hub designed to help finance professionals build skills including greater AI fluency and data proficiency – empowering them to optimise our innovative technology and drive productivity.
Efficiency and accuracy, the key advantages of AI adoption
40% of finance leaders cited increasing accuracy and reducing human error as the key advantage of AI adoption, with 36% identifying efficiency and productivity gains as the primary benefit.
Focusing on efficiency and productivity, 42% of respondents reported they expected to save 10% of working time (26 days) through AI usage in the next 12 months, enabling a greater focus on strategic outputs. 24% expected to see timesaving of 20% (52 working days) and 22% expected to save 5% (13 working days).
To help facilitate higher productivity in familiar tools, Wolters Kluwer has launched a new Excel 365-based experience within its Intelligent Analytics solution. This new capability evolves the widely used cell-based retrieval approach, providing the necessary comfort for users coming from SmartView or similar tools. The add-in is designed to accelerate productivity for finance teams without disrupting the way they work. What makes it stand out is the seamless integration of Ask AI, which enhances the experience with natural language interaction: users can now pull data from CCH Tagetik and shape analysis-ready visualizations as needed.
The award-winning, AI-powered CCH® Tagetik Intelligent Platform digitally transforms the efficiency, accuracy, and strategic ability of the Office of the CFO. At the heart of this evolution is Ask AI —an emerging super agent that embodies Agentic AI with a Finance Brain™. Designed to address finance-specific needs, Ask AI supports a growing range of use cases: from self-service analytics through natural language–driven data exploration and visualization, to tasks execution with diagnostic checks for financial close and consolidation, and intelligent assistance in configuring data transformation processes.
The survey was conducted with 392 finance leaders on May 21, 2025, during CCH Tagetik inTouch25, an annual conference focused on innovation in corporate performance management.
About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in information, software solutions and services for professionals in healthcare; tax and accounting; financial and corporate compliance; legal and regulatory; corporate performance and ESG. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with technology and services.
Wolters Kluwer reported 2024 annual revenues of €5.9 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 21,600 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
For more information, visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cathie Wood sells $22.8 million of hot stock near all-time highs
Cathie Wood sells $22.8 million of hot stock near all-time highs originally appeared on TheStreet. Cathie Wood has long been aggressive in hunting tech stocks that she believes will have a 'disruptive' impact on the future world. However, she sometimes sells a stock when it is high to secure gains. In the past week, the head of Ark Investment Management sold a popular AI stock that has surged nearly 70% year-to-date. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰💵 Cathie Wood's investments have had a volatile ride this year, swinging from strong gains to sharp losses, and now back to outperforming the broader market. In January and February, the Ark funds rallied as investors bet on the Trump administration's potential deregulation that could benefit Wood's tech bets. But the funds stumbled in the following weeks, underperforming sharply as several of its top holdings —especially Tesla, its largest position — declined amid macroeconomic and trade policy uncertainties. Now, the fund is regaining momentum. As of June 6, the flagship Ark Innovation ETF () is up 6.11% year-to-date, outpacing the S&P 500's 2.02% gain. Wood gained a remarkable 153% in 2020, which helped build her reputation and attract loyal investors. Still, her long-term performance has made many others skeptical of her aggressive style. As of June 6, Ark Innovation ETF, with $5 billion under management, has delivered a five-year annualized return of negative 0.5%. In comparison, the S&P 500 has an annualized return of 15.18% over the same period. Wood's investment strategy is straightforward: Her Ark ETFs typically buy shares in emerging high-tech companies in fields such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, biomedical technology and robotics. Wood says these companies have the potential to reshape industries, but their volatility leads to major fluctuations in Ark funds' Ark Innovation ETF wiped out $7 billion in investor wealth over the 10 years ending in 2024, according to an analysis by Morningstar's analyst Amy Arnott. That made it the third-biggest wealth destroyer among mutual funds and ETFs in Arnott's ranking. Wood said the U.S. is coming out of a three-year 'rolling recession' and heading into a productivity-led recovery that could trigger a broader bull market. In a letter to investors published on April 30, she dismissed predictions of a recession dragging into 2026, as she expects "more clarity on tariffs, taxes, regulations, and interest rates over the next three to six months." "If the current tariff turmoil results in freer trade, as tariffs and non-tariff barriers come down in tandem with declines in other taxes, regulations, and interest rates, then real GDP growth and productivity should surprise on the high side of expectations at some point during the second half of this year," she wrote. She also struck an optimistic tone for tech stocks. "During the current turbulent transition in the US, we think consumers and businesses are likely to accelerate the shift to technologically enabled innovation platforms including artificial intelligence, robotics, energy storage, blockchain technology, and multiomics sequencing," she said. But not everyone shares Wood's bullish outlook. Her flagship Ark Innovation ETF has seen $2.23 billion in net outflows over the past year through June 5, including nearly $154 million in the last month alone, according to ETF research firm VettaFi. From June 2 to June 5, Wood's Ark funds sold 179,846 shares of Palantir Technologies () , which was valued at roughly $22.8 million. Palantir is known for providing AI-driven data analytics software to the U.S. government, military, and commercial clients worldwide, including JPMorgan Chase, Airbus, and Merck. The company reported stronger-than-expected first-quarter revenue in early May and raised its full-year outlook as demand for AI tools increased. 'We are delivering the operating system for the modern enterprise in the era of AI,' CEO Alex Karp said. While many tech stocks have struggled this year, Palantir has stood out. Its shares are up roughly 69% in 2025 and just hit a record close of $133.17 on June of the recent momentum comes from its government work. Back in May 2024, Palantir won a $480 million, five-year U.S. Army contract to build its Maven Smart System, which is a battlefield AI prototype. Last month, the Defense Department modified the contract, increasing the licensing ceiling from $480 million to $1.275 billion. Palantir's Foundry platform has been adopted by at least four federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Health and Human Services, according to a New York Times report published May 30. Fannie Mae also announced a partnership with Palantir in May to work on AI-based fraud detection. However, the New York Times article also raised concerns about the company's relationship with the Trump administration, alleging that the U.S. president could use Palantir's technology to target immigrants and political opponents. The article also claimed that some Palantir employees felt uncomfortable with the company's decision to work with the Trump administration and that it "risks becoming the face of Mr. Trump's political agenda." Palantir responded in a June 3 post on X, denying the accusations. More Palantir Palantir gets great news from the Pentagon Wall Street veteran doubles down on Palantir Palantir bull sends message after CEO joins Trump for Saudi visit 'The recently published article by The New York Times is blatantly untrue,' the company wrote. 'Palantir never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans.' Palantir remains a core position for Wood even after recent trims. The stock is now the 9th largest holding in the ARK Innovation ETF, accounting for 4.54%. Wood's latest trades in the past week include buying shares of Advanced Micro Devices () , () , Guardant Health () and Veracyte () . At the same time, she trimmed positions in Tesla () , Roblox () , Robinhood () , and Meta Platforms () .Cathie Wood sells $22.8 million of hot stock near all-time highs first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 8, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why We Need Global Prosocial AI Governance — Now
Abstract image of a person's profile symbolically composed of dials of different sizes. Concept man, ... More time, space The artificial intelligence revolution isn't coming — it's here. But unlike previous technological waves, AI's transformative power is being concentrated in the hands of remarkably few players, creating global imbalances that threaten to entrench existing inequalities for generations. As AI systems increasingly shape our economies, societies, and daily lives, we face a critical choice: Will we allow narrow market forces and geopolitical power dynamics to dictate AI's development, or will we proactively steer this technology toward benefiting humanity as a whole? It is late to set the stage for global prosocial AI governance, but it is not too late – yet. Before examining governance frameworks, we must confront an uncomfortable truth: the AI revolution is built on a foundation of extreme market concentration that makes Big Tech's dominance look almost quaint by comparison. Nvidia controls approximately 80 percent of revenues and shipments for datacenter GPU computing, the essential infrastructure powering modern AI systems. This isn't just market leadership — it's approaching technological hegemony. The implications extend far beyond corporate balance sheets. Collectively, the global south is home to just over 1 percent of the world's top computers, and Africa just 0.04 percent. Meanwhile, the U.S. government further restricts AI chip and technology exports, dividing up the world to keep advanced computing power in the United States and among its allies. This creates what development economists call a digital colonialism scenario — entire regions become structurally dependent on technology controlled by a handful of corporations and governments. The concentration isn't limited to hardware. Three cloud providers — Amazon, Microsoft, and Google — control over 65% of global cloud infrastructure, creating additional bottlenecks for AI access. When you need specialized chips from one company, hosted on infrastructure controlled by three others, and governed by regulations written primarily in wealthy nations, the barriers to entry become virtually insurmountable for most of the world's population. This hardware concentration translates into stark global inequalities that dwarf previous technological divides. The economic and social benefits of AI remain geographically concentrated, primarily in the Global North. But unlike the gradual rollout of previous technologies like the internet or mobile phones, AI's infrastructure requirements create immediate exclusion rather than delayed adoption. Consider the practical reality: training a state-of-the-art AI model requires computational resources that cost millions of dollars and consume as much electricity as entire cities. The rise of AI could exacerbate both within-country and between-country inequality, placing upward pressure on global inequality as high-income individuals and regions benefit disproportionately while resource-poor regions risk being left behind. This creates a vicious cycle. Countries and regions without access to AI infrastructure become less competitive economically, reducing their ability to invest in the very infrastructure they need to participate in the AI economy. Meanwhile, AI-enabled automation threatens to disrupt traditional export industries that many developing economies rely on, from manufacturing to service outsourcing. The result is what economists call premature deindustrialization — developing countries losing industrial competitiveness before achieving full industrialization. But now it's happening at digital speed, compressed from decades into years. Yet maybe the fundamental challenge with AI isn't the technology itself — it's the intention behind its development and deployment, now amplified by a sharpened concentration of control. Today's AI systems are predominantly designed to maximize engagement, extract value, or optimize narrow business metrics determined by a small number of actors. Social media algorithms amplify divisive content because controversy drives clicks. Hiring algorithms perpetuate bias because they're trained on historical data that reflects past discrimination. Financial AI systems may optimize for short-term profits while creating systemic risks. This is where prosocial AI governance becomes essential. Unlike traditional regulatory approaches that focus on constraining harmful outcomes, prosocial AI governance aims to actively incentivize beneficial behaviors from the outset. ProSocial AI can enhance access to essential services, improve efficiency in resource use, and promote sustainable practices across all levels of society — but only if we design governance systems that prioritize broad-based benefits over narrow optimization. The global AI regulation landscape is fragmented and rapidly evolving. Earlier optimism that global policymakers would enhance cooperation and interoperability within the regulatory landscape now seems distant. The European Union has pioneered comprehensive AI regulation through its AI Act, while other jurisdictions take vastly different approaches — from the United States' innovation-first philosophy to China's state-directed development model. This fragmentation creates several problems. First, it allows AI developers to engage in regulatory arbitrage, developing systems in jurisdictions with the most permissive rules. Second, it prevents the emergence of global standards that could ensure AI systems operate prosocially across borders. Third, it creates competitive disadvantages for companies that voluntarily adopt higher ethical standards. Given the borderless nature of this issue, an internationally coordinated response is necessary. AI systems don't respect national boundaries — a biased hiring algorithm developed in one country can perpetuate discrimination globally, while misinformation generated by AI can destabilize societies worldwide. Traditional regulatory approaches tend to prove inadequate for rapidly evolving technologies. By the time regulators identify and respond to harms, the damage has already been done. Prosocial AI governance offers a different approach: building beneficial outcomes into the DNA of AI systems from the beginning. This means designing AI systems that actively promote human flourishing rather than merely avoiding harm. Instead of social media algorithms that maximize engagement at all costs, we need systems that promote constructive dialogue and community building. Rather than AI systems that automate away human jobs without consideration for displaced workers, we need technologies that augment human capabilities and create new opportunities for meaningful work. Companies with strong environmental, social, and governance frameworks, enhanced by AI, outperform competitors financially and foster greater brand loyalty. This suggests that prosocial AI isn't just morally imperative — it's also economically advantageous for businesses that adopt it early. Forward-thinking business leaders are beginning to recognize that prosocial AI governance isn't a constraint on innovation—it's a competitive advantage. Organizations that proactively embed prosocial values into their AI systems build stronger relationships with customers, employees, and communities. They reduce regulatory risk, attract top talent who want to work on meaningful problems, and position themselves as leaders in an increasingly values-driven marketplace. Moreover, prosocial AI often leads to better technical outcomes. Systems designed with diverse stakeholders in mind tend to be more robust, adaptable, and effective across different contexts. AI systems built with fairness and transparency as core requirements often discover innovative solutions that benefit everyone. The economic argument becomes even stronger when considering systemic risks. AI systems that prioritize narrow optimization over broader social welfare can create negative externalities that ultimately harm the very markets they operate in. Financial AI that ignores systemic risk can contribute to market crashes. Recommendation systems that polarize societies can undermine the social cohesion that stable markets depend on. Establishing global prosocial AI governance requires coordinated action across multiple levels. International bodies need to develop frameworks that incentivize prosocial AI development while allowing for innovation and adaptation to local contexts. These frameworks should focus on outcomes rather than specific technologies, creating space for diverse approaches while ensuring consistent prosocial objectives. At the organizational level, companies need to move beyond compliance-based approaches to AI ethics. This means embedding prosocial considerations into product development processes, establishing clear accountability mechanisms, and investing in the technical infrastructure needed to build genuinely beneficial AI systems. Technical standards organizations should develop metrics and evaluation frameworks that measure prosocial outcomes, not just traditional performance metrics. We need ways to assess whether AI systems actually promote human flourishing, environmental sustainability, and social cohesion. The urgency cannot be overstated. As AI systems become more powerful and pervasive, the window for establishing prosocial governance frameworks is rapidly closing. Once entrenched systems and business models become established, changing them becomes exponentially more difficult and expensive. We're at a pivotal moment where the next generation of AI systems will be designed and deployed. The decisions we make now about how to govern these systems will shape society for decades to come. We can either allow narrow economic interests to drive AI development, or we can proactively steer this technology toward broadly beneficial outcomes. The challenge of prosocial AI governance isn't someone else's problem — it's a defining challenge of our time that requires leadership from every sector of society. Business leaders, policymakers, technologists, civil society organizations and ultimately each of us have roles in the AI-infused play that society has become. Prosocial AI governance isn't a constraint on innovation — it's the foundation for sustainable technological progress that benefits everyone. The time to act is now, before today's AI solutions become tomorrow's entrenched problems.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scale AI's 30-year-old billionaire founder still shops at Shein and pulls up to work in a Honda Civic: ‘Act broke, stay rich,' Lucy Guo says
Billionaire college dropout Lucy Guo is reportedly the youngest self-made woman on the planet—knocking Taylor Swift off the top spot. But even with a $1.3 billion reported net worth, the 30-year-old cofounder of Scale AI tells Fortune she still pinches the pennies and shops at Shein. Despite founding and retaining a $1.3 billion stake in an AI unicorn, you won't catch Lucy Guo wasting her billions on a lavish lifestyle to match her new status. 'I don't like wasting money,' the frugal 30-year-old tells Fortune. Of course, sometimes Guo will splurge—like if she's got a 16 hour flight to endure, she says she'll opt for business class. And there's the odd designer dress hanging in her closet for when she needs it. 'But in terms of like daily life, my assistant just drives me in a pretty old Honda Civic. I don't care,' she says. 'Everything I wear is free or from Shein… Some of them aren't going to be that great quality, but there's always like two pieces or so that really work out, and I just wear them every day,' the billionaire founder laughs. 'I still literally buy buy-one-get-one-free on Uber Eats.' Guo, who is currently the founder and CEO of the creator community platform Passes, adds that a quote she stumbled on on the morning of our interview perfectly summarises her approach: 'It's like, act broke, stay rich.' Guo hit the jackpot after the AI startup she cofounded, Scale AI, was reportedly valued at $25 billion in April as part of a share sale. Although she left the company in 2018 (two years after founding it), the 5% stake she held onto is now worth an estimated $1.2 billion—making the millennial one of just 5 female billionaires under 40 according to Forbes' latest ranking, including Rihanna and Anthropic's cofounder Daniela Amodei. It's why Guo no longer feels the need to prove her wealth with a Patek Philippe everyday watch, or a Hermès Birkin to carry her laptop. That, she says, is the behaviour of millionaires. 'Who you see typically wasting money on, designer clothes, a nice car, et cetera, they're technically in the millionaire range,' Guo explains. 'All their friends are multimillionaires, or billionaires and they feel a little bit insecure, so they feel the need to be flashy to show other people, 'look, I'm successful.'' 'I'm not showing off to anyone, right?' Indeed, for our interview, she's makeup-free, dressed down, and could pass for any other millennial. But earlier in her career, Guo admits she, too, may have been dripping in designer gear. 'I do think that this is actually something that I personally went through, and I think a lot of people go through when you're in that middle ground of you're successful, but not as successful as you want to be.' 'And I think the reason most billionaires dress in a t-shirt, jeans, hoodies, is that they can. They don't need to be in the suit 24/7 because they're done proving themselves to the rest of the world. The rest of the world is just sucking up to them,' she adds. 'And I think that's kind of how I like feel, where I'm past that hump. I don't really have to prove myself to anyone.' 'No one's going to look at me and point at me like, 'Haha, she's so broke' when I'm pulling up in a Honda Civic because whatever, it doesn't matter.' Guo's not the only ultra-wealthy to admit she's 'pretty frugal.' The world's most powerful have been boasting about their quiet luxury lifestyle for some time now. They've been donning logo-less angora wool jumpers and linen trousers that could be from anywhere to the unassuming eye. Experts say their wealthy peers can tell who is wearing Zara from who is in Loro Piana, but the point is to resemble people in lower tax brackets. Others, like KeKe Palmer and Warren Buffet, have been less subtle about how they lead very normal lives, despite their huge net worths—with the world's most famous investor going as far to call himself 'cheap'. But in Guo's eyes, she's one of the few who actually are as cheap as they say they are. 'I think that people want to fit into society. Specifically in America, I do think there is a 'we hate billionaires situation.' So because of that, people want to show, 'look, I'm not your typical billionaire. I'm frugal,'' she explains. 'I'm not saying it to be like, 'let me show you the world that I'm not like other billionaires,' Guo adds. 'I fully admit it, I have gone through that spending spree when I was more insecure, and I felt like I needed to show something.' And those who really aren't spending their millions? They aren't doing it to be relatable, she says it's because like her they had their flashy era—then reached the inevitable realisation: 'Why am I wasting my money on something that doesn't matter?' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
