
Towards US Strategic Bitcoin reserve: first reactions and mixed feelings: By Carlo R.W. De Meijer
In march 2025 the new elected US present Trump signed an executive order establishing a Strategic Bitcoin reserve as part of the Bitcoin Act of 2025. This announcement has sent an enormous wave around the world. The idea of creating a Strategic Bitcoin reserve has also gained momentum in other countries worldwide..
The establishment of the reserve signals a paradigm shift in US financial policy, positioning the nation as a leader in digital asset adoption, but it also raises concerns about market volatility, regulatory frameworks, and geopolitical implications.
In this blog we will go into more detail what this Strategic Bitcoin reserve is, its main objectives and how it is structured. What are the first reactions on the markets, how are US states reacting and how is this plan received in other countries around the world. But also what are the potential economic and financial implications of this Strategic Bitcoin reserve if it would be accepted.
US Bitcoin Act of 2025
The Bitcoin Act of 2025 (S.954), introduced in the 119th Congress (2025–2026), proposes the establishment of a Strategic Bitcoin reserve. At the core of the bill the US government will purchase 1 million Bitcoin over five years and hold it for 20 years. The aim is to position Bitcoin as a long-term store of value and national economic hedge, especially in the face of rising global inflation and fiat currency devaluation.
According to recent data, the bill has gained substantial traction, with a majority in both Senate and House of Representatives. With strong bipartisan support and momentum building, this act could reshape the role of Bitcoin in national economic and geopolitical strategy.
Trump Strategic Bitcoin reserve plan
On March 6, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order launching a US Strategic Bitcoin reserve and establishing a broader national Digital Asset Stockpile, to serve as a secure account for the management of federally held digital assets, thereby aiming to position the US as the 'Crypto Capital of the World'.
What are Strategic Bitcoin Reserves
The new Strategic Bitcoin reserve are government-owned Bitcoin assets designed to offer economic stability and financial resilience. Compared to traditional final assets, Bitcoin can't be confiscated or controlled.
The US essentially aims to use Bitcoin as a 'digital' gold reserve, alongside petroleum, dollars, gold, and foreign currencies, that could hedge against fiat currency devaluation. Just like gold, Bitcoin possesses many robust qualities that could make it a suitable reserve currency. It is independent and decentralized from traditional finance and it is secure. According to opponents this Bitcoin supply 'could benefit and become a hedge for US debt crisis, for inflation, and for a number of other economic downsides that the US is facing as a country'.
U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile
In parallel to the Strategic Bitcoin reserve, Trump's Executive Order also calls for the establishment of a US Digital Asset Stockpile, that could serve as a secure account for orderly and strategic management of the US' other digital asset holdings obtained through forfeiture, enabling strategic disposition or sale over time.
Next to Bitcoin, this reserve comprises cryptocurrencies seized through legal proceedings, including, Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano. The Presidential Working Group on Digital Assets is directed to manage these non‐Bitcoin digital assets seized by Treasury, to diversify its strategic reserves beyond gold and foreign currencies.
The order gives 30 days for agency heads to provide a full accounting of all digital assets in their possession, including those that might need to be transferred into either the Strategic Bitcoin reserve or the US Digital Asset Stockpile.
Main objectives of a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
This initiative underscores the Trump's commitment to integrating digital assets into the national financial infrastructure and is marking a major milestone in the country's bid toward becoming a global cryptocurrency hub and the world leader in the evolving digital economy.
The US government's decision to establish a Strategic Bitcoin reserve reflects a proactive approach to integrating digital assets and positioning Bitcoin as a cornerstone of national financial strategy, one that could serve as a hedge against inflation and economic volatility, while enhancing the state's long-term financial resilience.
This strategic Bitcoin reserve could be used as a means of reducing the government's massive debt and strengthening the US economy. If Bitcoin continues to grow, having a strategic reserve backed by this asset can help pay off debt and provide economic security.
The main objective of the Trump administration using this strategic Bitcoin reserve is as a proactive measure to bolster national security in an increasingly digital world, thereby mitigating risks associated with cyber threats and economic instability.
They further aim to mitigate potential vulnerabilities by incorporating Bitcoin into its reserve strategy, reducing its dependence on foreign currencies, thereby offering a hedge against the risks associated with centralized foreign fiat currencies, asserting greater control over its monetary policy.
It may also be used as a catalyst for innovation in financial technologies, paving the way for more efficient and secure financial systems, positioning the US at the forefront of the digital asset revolution.
As a result, the US can maintain the dollar's dominance as the world's top reserve currency. It could also potentially hedge against the global adoption of Bitcoin.
Funding of US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
The establishment and expansion of the Strategic Bitcoin reserve are intended to be budget-neutral. Aim is to expand the reserve's holdings without imposing additional financial burdens on taxpayers.
Government Bitcoin deposited into the Strategic Bitcoin reserve shall not be sold and shall be maintained as reserve assets of the United States utilized to meet governmental objectives in accordance with applicable law, ensuring they serve as long-term strategic resources.
Initially the reserve will be capitalized with approximately 200,000 BTC, valued at over $20 billion, owned by the federal government that was forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings. A second funding method is redirecting surplus funds returned to the Treasury from the Federal Reserve, potentially repurposing these funds for Bitcoin acquisitions. A third one is revaluing US gold certificates from their statutory value of $43 per ounce to current market prices, with the proceeds earmarked exclusively for Bitcoin purchases.
The reserve's composition may extend beyond Bitcoin to include other cryptocurrencies including Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano, forming a diversified digital asset portfolio, under the condition that they have averaged a $500B market cap over the past year. This diversification aims to bolster the reserve's resilience and strategic value.
Management of these assets
The Department of the Treasury will take affirmative steps to centralize ownership, control and management of these assets within the federal government. They will establish a dedicated office to administer the reserves, with authority to deploy various strategies—such as dollar‐cost averaging and hedging—to manage holdings.
The amount held will be publicly attested and visible on the blockchain as proof-of-reserve. Importantly, the governing framework prohibits any sale of held bitcoin; all holdings must be maintained as a strategic store of value. This will ensure proper oversight, accurate tracking and a cohesive approach to managing the government's cryptocurrency holdings
Custody and Security Frameworks
The Department of the Treasury is also tasked with developing a robust custody and security framework aimed at ensuring security. That will include maintaining clear ownership and control by ensuring that government Bitcoin reserves are strictly segregated from other assets.
Multisig wallets will be employed that require multiple private keys for transaction authorization, enhancing security against unauthorized access. Offline storage methods will be used to protect assets from cyber threats and hacking attempts, while comprehensive insurance policies will be secured.
Market reactions: Bitcoin price jumped to $110.000
The cryptocurrency market has already felt the impact of news of the bill. The announcement triggered an immediate market surge, leading to a swell in cryptocurrency valuations, with Bitcoin's price jumping by 15% to $ 110.0000, adding almost $200 billion to its market capitalization. With other cryptocurrencies including XRP, Solana, Cardano, and Ethereum showing remarkable surges, the total crypto market capitalization increased by over $300 billion.
This phenomenon reinforces the view that the involvement of governments and official institutions can boost market confidence and wider adoption of cryptocurrencies.
Mixed Reactions by US federal states
The reactions in the US, both in the political and public world on Trump's plan to introduce a Strategic Bitcoin reserve remain divided.
While some express enthusiasm for the government's pro-active approach to digital assets acknowledging the potential benefits of a national digital asset reserve and view the move as a forward-thinking strategy to enhance national financial security.
Others express concerns about the implications of holding volatile digital assets, remaining sceptical about the risks associated with such investments.
Proponents
According to the proponents the establishment of this Strategic Bitcoin reserve could have significant implications for the financial landscape.
It could signal US leadership in digital finance. They argue that the Bitcoin reserve measure would position the US at the forefront of digital asset integration, thanks to greater diversification, thereby reducing dependence on traditional assets.
It would also help address the US national debt. By integration digital assets into public investment portfolios, the US may achieve greater diversification and as a result could generate higher returns, potential offsetting national debt.
Supporters also believe holding bitcoin reserves could enable states to hedge against inflation and economic stability thereby protect the state's savings.
Critics
Despite support from crypto advocates, the proposed reserve plan has faced resistance from a number of political and financial leaders
Critics argued that Bitcoin remains a volatile and unproven asset class for public funds, necessitating careful risk management and regulatory oversight. They highlight the risk of financial losses for taxpayers when holding large quantities of a highly volatile asset.
Critics also say it offers little strategic value. They warn that it makes little sense for the US government to hold a volatile asset that has no intrinsic value (like gold) or key strategic commercial application (like oil)
Critics further caution that both political donations and the Trump family's financial interests in crypto pose potential conflicts of interest.
Some US states said 'yes' to a Strategic Crypto Reserve
Twenty US states had proposed a Bitcoin reserve bill as of February 2025. In the past weeks, the governors of three US states including New Hampshire, Arizona and Texas, have officially signed bills, which now make it legal for the states to establish Strategic Bitcoin reserves. Other states such as Utah, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Pennsylvania and North Carolina are considering similar policies but are moving slower, waiting for further progress.
New Hampshire became the first US state to have signed a Strategic Bitcoin reserve bill
New Hampshire became the first US state to have officially signed a Strategic Bitcoin reserve bill, House Bill 302(HB 302) into law on May 6. This allows investment into Bitcoin and other digital assets that has averaged a $500B market cap over the past year. Bitcoin is the only digital asset that passes the said provision. Neither Ethereum nor XRP, or any other crypto asset has reached the required market capitalization average.
Furthermore, the regulations set a maximum limit of 5% of the total state reserves for investments in Bitcoin, thus ensuring that this cryptocurrency serves as a complement, but not a dominant component of the state's financial strategy.
The state's SBR law also ensured that custodial arrangements for New Hampshire's Bitcoin holdings are robust. The regulation requires that any Bitcoin or digital asset held by the treasurer be maintained in regulated custody in the United States. Assets must be held in state-controlled multisig wallet system, directly controlled by the state, or through qualified custodians or products traded exclusively on US exchanges, maximizing security and transparency.
Arizona has become second state to establish Strategic Bitcoin reserve
Arizona has becoming the second state in the US to create a Strategic Bitcoin reserve, alongside New Hampshire. Arizona recently advanced its own Bitcoin reserve legislation further than any other state. The Digital Assets Strategic Reserve bill would have allowed Arizona to invest seized funds into Bitcoin.
On May 3, Arizona's House Bill 1025, which would have created a state-managed Bitcoin reserve using seized funds, was vetoed. The Governor signed House Bill 2749 into law, a budget-neutral approach that channels profits from unclaimed property into Bitcoin and other top-tier digital assets. By putting otherwise unused funds to work, the state is taking a strategic, forward-looking approach to safeguard its treasury without raising taxes or using the general fund. Additionally, Senate Bill 1373, which would permit the state treasurer to allocate up to 10% or $31,5 bn assets was further approved.
Texas: step nearer of official Strategic Bitcoin reserve
The state of Texas is one step closer to create a state-level Bitcoin reserve, after Bill SB 21 successfully passed its second reading in the Texas House of Representatives, where it received broad cross-party support. If enacted, Texas will become the third state in the US to establish an official Bitcoin reserve, following in the footsteps of New Hampshire and Arizona.
This Bill would authorize the state Texas to buy, hold, and manage Bitcoin as part of a government-run reserve. The reserve would be funded through a mix of legislative appropriations, investment earnings, and voluntary donations from Texas residents. It would also include any Bitcoin or other qualifying crypto assets received via forks or airdrops. The fund will be used to invest a portion of public funds in Bitcoin as part of Texas' financial diversification strategy.
However, the bill sets strict eligibility criteria. The bill stipulates that any digital assets included in the reserve must have a market cap of at least $500 billion, and be maintained for two consecutive years, to ensure only established and stable cryptocurrencies can be included in the portfolio, a threshold currently met only by Bitcoin.
The bill authorizes the Office of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts to manage the state's Bitcoin reserves, in collaboration with the state's finance department and budget office.
While Eight US federal states have Said 'No' To a Crypto Reserve
US federal states are increasingly exploring cryptocurrency legislation, yet most are encountering roadblocks in the form of political resistance, public scepticism, or executive vetoes.
Eight US states have officially said no to a Strategic Bitcoin reserve of which Florida was the last one. On May 6 this US state has officially withdrawn two bills (House Bill 487 and Senate Bill 550) that were aimed at establishing a Strategic Bitcoin reserve, designed to allocate up to 10% of select public funds to Bitcoin. These bills were part of a broader movement among several U.S. states aiming to diversify public fund portfolios with digital assets, particularly Bitcoin.
The cautious approach to digital assets is not unique to Florida. The US Florida's withdrawal from the state-level crypto investment race aligns it with several other states - such as Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Montana, and Oklahoma - that have similarly seen their Bitcoin-focused bills fail to progress. The stalling of these bills indicates a broader hesitancy among state legislators to embrace digital assets as part of official financial strategies.
Mixed reactions nations worldwide
The international response to the US Strategic Bitcoin reserve proposal has also remained mixed. With the US leading the way, the world is already seeing a number countries planning to adopt digital assets into their monetary systems.
In Europe several countries are exploring Bitcoin as a strategic reserve to diversify . A Ukrainian lawmaker expressed intentions to introduce a national Bitcoin reserve bill, with support from Binance as a strategic partner. The Ukrainian plan may be the first in Europe, but it likely will not be the last. In Ireland, former UFC fighter Conor McGregor pushed for plans to establish a national Bitcoin reserve. Last month, two Swedish lawmakers urged the government to seriously consider Bitcoin as a part of the nation's financial strategy. The prospect of holding the leading cryptocurrency has also gained momentum lately in countries like the Czech Republic.
But also other countries outside Europe are beginning to see Bitcoin as a strategic resource. The Brazilian Central Bank has said that it is interested in researching digital reserves. Brazil is moving to establish a sovereign Bitcoin reserve, with high crypto adoption rates bolstering its potential. In Africa the Central African Republic 'joined the fray' of Bitcoin, which became a legal tender after El Salvador paved the way a few years back. While in Asia countries like China, Hong Kong and Japan are showing interest.
A large number of countries worldwide however are more reluctant, using a wait-and see attitude. In Europe the UK has ruled out holding Bitcoin as a national reserve asset. Meanwhile the Swiss National Bank has echoed similar concerns. The crypto currency market liquidity and volatility continue to present risks for long-term value preservation.
Forward thinking: shift the balance of power in global finance
But this mixed attitude by both US federal states and nations worldwide could fundamentally change if the US government succeeds in implementing this Strategic Bitcoin reserve plan.
This may mark an unprecedented step toward integrating digital currencies into the national financial architecture, reducing the reliance on traditional fiat currencies, and potentially stabilize its financial system making Bitcoin a geopolitical asset, not just a speculative investment.
With the US leading the charge, this move could pressure other global economies to react swiftly reconsidering their stance on digital currencies, potentially accelerating global adoption. The US approach may thereby serve as a model for other countries, influencing global standards and practices in digital asset management.
The creation of a US Strategic Bitcoin reserve may greatly influence the future of global finance, with nations worldwide reassessing their reserve assets in light of US's move. Experts say that as additional countries embrace Bitcoin, it could become an important part of global finance. It might be able to hold national wealth, underwrite international trade, or even stand in for parts of conventional foreign reserves. The Strategic Bitcoin reserve could shift the balance of power in global finance, making digital assets like Bitcoin part of public finance strategies.
This could also lead to clearer regulatory frameworks for digital assets, potentially leading to more institutional participation and mainstream adoption.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Trade Secretary to meet US counterpart in bid to secure steel tariff exemption
The meeting will come after Mr Trump said he was doubling tariffs on imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. Trade officials and negotiators are planning to speak to the US as soon as they can to understand the implications of Mr Trump's latest steel tariffs. They want to secure a timeline for the UK-US deal to be implemented as quickly as possible in the coming weeks. Jonathan Reynolds will meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer to discuss timings for the deal to be in place when both attend the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) meeting in Paris next week. Earlier this week, a federal court blocked many of the sweeping Trump tariffs imposed on imports from countries around the world, but left some in place, including those on foreign steel and aluminium. On Thursday, a federal appeals court said it was allowing Mr Trump to continue collecting import taxes for now. On Friday, Mr Trump announced he would double the tariff rate on steel to 50%, starting on June 4. A Government spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel. 'We are engaging with the US on the implications of the latest tariff announcement and to provide clarity for industry.' The agreement, known as the economic prosperity deal, is expected to be presented to Parliament before it comes into force.


The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump reignites feud with CBS over ‘deleted' Colbert interview - years after his claim was debunked
President Donald Trump posted a video claiming that CBS 'deleted' his 2015 interview with Stephen Colbert, resurfacing a debunked claim against one of his favorite recent rivals. Late on Friday, the president reposted a Facebook video on his Truth Social account containing heavily edited clips of his September 2015 interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. A message next to the video states: 'You are not supposed to see this video. CBS DELETED this entire episode from their official website. You will not find these segments on YouTube either.' However, a quick search on YouTube showed otherwise. Clips from the Trump-Colbert interview are still available to be watched on the official Late Show account. One video has 17 million views. The Independent has reached out to the White House and CBS for comment. Both the YouTube video and Trump's post include a portion of the interview in which Trump, then a candidate, touts his plans to build a wall, prompting the audience to cheer. 'Oh, listen to this, even with your crowd –' Trump begins. Colbert interjects: 'They love the wall. People love the wall.' Strangely, this isn't the first time that Trump has made this claim. The president appears to have reposted that same video in his first term in October 2018. Hours later, Colbert posted on X: 'I don't know why the president would take time on a National Day of Mourning to retweet something weird like this, but the original clips have always been online. 16 million views.' The comedian attached two links to YouTube clips from the episode in question. A CBS spokesperson at the time told the Associated Press that full episodes of The Late Show are only available to stream online 30 days after the initial airing. Trump's Friday Truth Social post marked the latest move in his feud with CBS. The president has repeatedly expressed his ire at CBS' 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. He has sued the network for $20 million, claiming it used 'deceitful editing' to advantage the then-vice president. CBS filed a motion to dismiss the case earlier this month, arguing: 'This lawsuit is an affront to the First Amendment and is without basis in law or fact.' In response, this week Trump's lawyers claimed he suffered 'mental anguish' as a result of the interview. His legal team also accused to the network of seeking 'to wield the First Amendment as a sword, arguing that they cannot be held responsible for illegal conduct, intended to mislead the masses and undertaken in the pursuit of profit, because such conduct was the result of 'editorial judgment.''


The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
California track-and-field championships draw limited protest over trans student's participation
A transgender teen will compete in the California high school track-and-field finals on Saturday, one day after advancing in the competition as a protest plane circled above the meet drew national attention, including criticism from President Donald Trump. AB Hernandez — a trans student who on Friday advanced in the girls high jump, long jump and triple jump — will be in the finals Saturday, competing under a new rule change that may be the first of its kind nationally by a high school sports governing body. The new California Interscholastic Federation announced the new policy earlier this week in response to Hernandez's success. According to the policy, the CIF will let an additional student compete and medal in the events where Hernandez qualified. The two-day championship kicked off in the sweltering heat at high school near Fresno. The atmosphere was relatively quiet Friday despite critics — including parents, conservative activists and President Donald Trump — calling for Hernandez to be barred from girls competition leading up to the meet. There was some pushback Friday. A group of fewer than 10 people gathered outside the stadium ahead of the meet to protest Hernandez's participation. Some of them wore 'Save Girls' Sports' T-shirts. At one point as Hernandez was attempting a high jump, someone in the stands yelled an insult. An aircraft circled above the stadium for more than an hour during the events, carrying a banner that read, 'No Boys in Girls' Sports!' Two groups, the Independent Council on Women's Sports and Women Are Real, that oppose transgender athletes participating in women's sports took credit for flying the banner. Separately, one person was arrested outside the competition on Friday after getting in a confrontation with another protester that turned physical, according to the Clovis Police Department. The rest of the night ran smoothly for Hernandez, who finished the triple jump with a mark close to 41 feet (13 meters), nearly 10 inches (25 centimeters) ahead of her closest competitor, San Francisco Bay Area junior Kira Gant Hatcher. Hernandez also led in the long jump with a mark close to 20 feet (6 meters) to advance to the final. She advanced in the high jump, clearing 5 feet, 5 inches (1.7 meters) with ease. She did not address the press. California at center of national debate The CIF rule change reflects efforts to find a middle ground in the debate over trans girls' participation in youth sports. 'The CIF values all of our student-athletes and we will continue to uphold our mission of providing students with the opportunity to belong, connect, and compete while complying with California law,' the group said in a statement after announcing its rule change. A recent AP-NORC poll found that about 7 in 10 U.S. adults think transgender female athletes should not be allowed to participate in girls and women's sports at the high school, college or professional level. That view was shared by about 9 in 10 Republicans and roughly half of Democrats. The federation announced the rule change after Trump threatened this week to pull federal funding from California unless it bars trans female athletes from competing on girls teams. The CIF said it decided on the change before then. The U.S. Department of Justice also said it would investigate the state federation and the district that includes Hernandez's high school to determine whether they violated federal sex discrimination law by allowing trans girls to compete in girls sports. Some California Republicans also weighed in, with several state lawmakers attending a news conference to criticize the federation for keeping Hernandez in the competition and a Republican gubernatorial candidate planning to attend Saturday's finals. California law allows trans students to compete on sex-segregated sports teams consistent with their gender identity. The federation said the rule would open the field to more 'biological female' athletes. One expert said the change may itself be discriminatory because it creates an extra spot for 'biological female' athletes but not for other trans athletes. The federation did not specify how they define 'biological female' or how they would verify whether a competitor meets that definition. Hernandez told the publication Capital & Main earlier this month that she couldn't worry about critics. 'I'm still a child, you're an adult, and for you to act like a child shows how you are as a person,' she said. Another student breaks a record California's state championship stands out from that of other states because of the number of competitors athletes are up against to qualify. The state had the second-largest number of students participating in outdoor track and field in the nation during the 2023-2024 school year, behind Texas, according to a survey by the National Federation of State High School Associations. Olympians Marion Jones and Tara Davis-Woodhall previously set state championship records in the long jump in 1993 and 2017, respectively, both surpassing 22 feet (6.7 meters). The boys 100-meter dash heats were also a highlight Friday. Junior Jaden Jefferson of De La Salle High School in Concord finished in 10.01 seconds, about .2 seconds faster than a meet record set in 2023. Jefferson's time won't count as a record unless he can replicate his results in the final. ___