Wall St brokerages start SailPoint coverage with broadly bullish view, but see competition risk
March 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street brokerages on Monday started coverage on SailPoint Technologies (SAIL.O), opens new tab with broadly bullish views, but some analysts warned that the identity security provider could face increased competition.
SailPoint, which was previously listed in 2022 before being taken private by growth capital firm Thoma Bravo, made a tepid return to the stock market in February. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs led the underwriting for the initial public offering.
With the mandated "quiet period" over, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan started coverage of the stock with a "neutral"-equivalent rating, citing competition from CyberArk (CYBG.F), opens new tab, Okta (OKTA.O), opens new tab and Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab.
Despite competition risks, Morgan Stanley and Goldman called the firm a 'category leader' in the identity governance and administration (IGA) space. Brokerages like Jefferies, RBC and Piper Sandler had bullish views on the stock, projecting it to gain more market share.
"SailPoint is a share gainer in the growing identity security market ... however, we see limited upside near term as the multi-product story is still coming into fruition," Morgan Stanley analysts said in a note on Monday.
Shares of Thoma Bravo-backed SailPoint were last down nearly 5% at $20.97, below the company's market debut price of $23.
The tightening of data privacy regulations, an increase in global cyberattacks and the emergence of AI-driven cybersecurity threats have boosted demand for services offered by businesses like SailPoint.
The company, with clients like General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab and Hershey (HSY.N), opens new tab, helps them design and manage their security processes.
The U.S. IPO market's recovery has been rocky this year as investors are awaiting more policy clarity from U.S. President Donald Trump's new administration.
Following are the ratings and price targets for SailPoint from some of the major brokerages;
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Summertime data to pave way for Fed rate cuts, or further conflict with Trump
WASHINGTON, June 27 (Reuters) - An unexpected pickup in underlying inflation last month nudged price pressures further from the Federal Reserve's 2% target, putting this summer's data in the spotlight for whether the central bank can resume cutting interest rates and ease ongoing tension with President Donald Trump. Friday's Commerce Department data painted a potentially worrisome picture for Fed policymakers. Personal spending and income both dropped in May, a possible sign of weakening economic growth, while core inflation increased at a 2.7% annual rate, faster than in April and higher than anticipated. Overall inflation, used to set the Fed's inflation target, grew more modestly at 2.3%, but still moved away from target, and April's rate was revised higher. Investors initially keyed on the spending weakness, boosting bets the Fed would cut rates by 75 basis points this year, faster than Fed policymakers project. With households pulling back after a surge of preemptive buying to avoid Trump's import tariffs, "I think the real worry here is personal income and spending moving lower," said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities. "All signs point to a weakening economy." The report, though, provided little clarity for Fed policymakers worried inflation pressures may build in coming months in response to Trump's import taxes, not all of which are fully set. "The report is a wash for the FOMC and won't alter its wait-and-see stance," wrote Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets. "The slightly warmer core price increase doesn't settle the debate about how much tariffs will impact inflation." Ahead of their September meeting, Fed officials will receive reports on consumer prices for June, July and August that Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week said should show whether tariffs are flowing through to consumer prices, as many economists anticipate, or whether those concerns prove overblown. In addition, jobs reports for those three months will show whether the labor market remains solid, or whether slowing job growth and rising joblessness offer a different reason to consider cutting rates. Referring to the Fed's current outlook that inflation is about to rise due to tariffs, Powell in a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday said "we should start to see this over the summer, in the June number and the July we don't we are perfectly open to the idea that the pass-through (to consumers) will be less than we will matter for policy." It could also figure into Trump's approach to Powell's final months as Fed chair, with his term ending in May 2026. The Fed's benchmark rate has remained between 4.25% and 4.50% since December. Trump has said repeatedly it should be much lower and is angered by Powell's approach. Trump and his aides have mused since last year about naming a successor earlier than usual, hoping the nominee could exert pressure on Powell through public comments that try to steer other policymakers or financial markets toward different outcomes. It is an untested strategy, and not without risks. "Would I put any weight on a shadow Fed rates strategy that deviates from what Powell has articulated? Not really," said Ed Al-Hussainy, senior interest rate and currency analyst for Columbia Threadneedle. The "big caveat," he said, is that "market psychology could shift meaningfully in some unpredictable way," and not necessarily in ways beneficial to the economy or Trump. "The reward strikes me as very small, and the risk very large," said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. "To anoint a shadow chair who spends months and months outside the Fed seems like a bad idea for the president. Odds are it would push up longer rates, not down," if markets began pricing in the implications of a less independent Fed on expected U.S. inflation. The clock is also ticking on the idea, with just seven Fed meetings until Powell's term expires. Trump does have an opportunity to name a Fed governor in February, when the term of Adriana Kugler expires, but that would potentially add a dissenting voice only a couple of months before Powell's term as chair ends. Among those thought to be on Trump's short list for chair, the only one currently at the Fed is Governor Christopher Waller, a Trump appointee who is already influential in the policy debate. Since the time of four-term Fed Chair Alan Greenspan, presidents generally have nominated a new Fed leader in October or November just before the existing chair's term expires, with Senate confirmation following and the new leader assuming office in February. President Barack Obama renominated Ben Bernanke as chair early, in August 2009, while Powell's second term started late, in May 2022, after controversy over other Fed nominees delayed Senate confirmation. By this year's September meeting, the conversation is likely to have changed, with the Fed either proven correct in anticipating higher inflation, or coalescing around rate cuts as Trump has wanted. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari said on Friday before the data was released that with little impact from tariffs on inflation so far he is ready to cut in September "barring some surprising development before then." If inflation shows up later, he said, "we could hold the policy rate at the new level until we gained greater confidence that inflation was headed back to our target."
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Beijing deal will speed China's export of minerals to US
Washington and Beijing have signed a trade agreement that will make it easier for American firms to obtain magnets and rare earth minerals from China that are critical to manufacturing and microchip production, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday. The agreement comes after China retaliated against steep import tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Chinese goods, and moved to slow the export of rare earth minerals and magnets much needed by US industrial interests. Advertisement Mr Bessent said on Fox Business Network's Mornings With Maria that US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping 'had a phone call' previously 'and then our teams met in London, ironed this out, and I am confident now that we, as agreed, the magnets will flow'. 'Part of the agreement was tariffs coming down and rare earth magnets starting to flow back to the US,' Mr Bessent said. 'They formed the core of a lot of our industrial base. They were not flowing as fast as previously agreed.' His comments come after Mr Trump announced two weeks earlier an agreement with China that he said would ease exportation of magnets and rare earth minerals Advertisement That pact cleared the way for the trade talks to continue. The US has previously suspended some sales to China of critical US technologies like components used for jet engines and semiconductors. But it has also agreed to stop trying to revoke visas of Chinese nationals on US college campuses. Mr Bessent added of critical mineral exports: 'What we're seeing here is a de-escalation.' Advertisement Commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg TV that the deal was signed earlier this week. China's commerce ministry said on Friday that the two sides had 'further confirmed the details of the framework', though its statement did not explicitly mention US access to rare earths that have been at the centre of the negotiations. 'China will, in accordance with the law, review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items. In turn, the United States will lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China,' it said. Initial talks in Geneva in early May led both sides to postpone massive tariff hikes that were threatening to freeze much trade between the two countries. Advertisement Later talks in London set a framework for negotiations and the deal mentioned by Mr Trump appeared to formalise that agreement, setting the stage for Mr Bessent's comments on Friday.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
US Senate referee allows measure to slash CFPB budget, lawmakers say
June 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's nonpartisan referee has allowed Republicans to proceed with a measure to slash funding for the government's top watchdog agency for consumer finance by almost half, a week after blocking an effort to eliminate funding completely, top lawmakers said late on Thursday. If adopted, the measure could add to Republican efforts this year to cut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's workforce and substantially limit its powers. A top Democrat immediately vowed to try to block the measure. Republican Tim Scott, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, said Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough had ruled that a measure to lower the legal cap on CFPB funding could be approved by a simple majority vote, paving the way for its inclusion in a sweeping tax-cut and spending bill driven by President Donald Trump. MacDonough's role is to ensure lawmakers follow proper legislative procedure. If approved, the measure would cut maximum CFPB funding to 6.5% of the Federal Reserve's earnings from 12%, meaning the agency would likely employ many fewer people and have a more limited reach. Last week, MacDonough had found that a measure reducing this limit to 0% was ineligible for consideration via a simple majority vote as the House and Senate work to reconcile their spending bills. Scott said in a statement that the change would help cut "waste and duplication in our federal government and save hardworking taxpayer dollars." The CFPB is funded by the Federal Reserve, so is not supported by taxpayers. The central bank earns income from services it provides the financial system and from interest income on securities it owns. Republicans have attacked the CFPB since its creation more than a decade ago, saying it is a burden on free enterprise. President Donald Trump called this year for its elimination, accusing it without providing evidence of politicized enforcement. Democrats have said that since the agency was set up it has returned more than $20 billion to harmed consumers. Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee and a key proponent of the CFPB, said in a separate statement that Democrats would introduce a measure to eliminate the funding cut. The Republican move amounted to slashing CFPB funding "so they can hand out more tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations," she said.
