logo
Summertime data to pave way for Fed rate cuts, or further conflict with Trump

Summertime data to pave way for Fed rate cuts, or further conflict with Trump

Reuters4 hours ago

WASHINGTON, June 27 (Reuters) - An unexpected pickup in underlying inflation last month nudged price pressures further from the Federal Reserve's 2% target, putting this summer's data in the spotlight for whether the central bank can resume cutting interest rates and ease ongoing tension with President Donald Trump.
Friday's Commerce Department data painted a potentially worrisome picture for Fed policymakers. Personal spending and income both dropped in May, a possible sign of weakening economic growth, while core inflation increased at a 2.7% annual rate, faster than in April and higher than anticipated. Overall inflation, used to set the Fed's inflation target, grew more modestly at 2.3%, but still moved away from target, and April's rate was revised higher.
Investors initially keyed on the spending weakness, boosting bets the Fed would cut rates by 75 basis points this year, faster than Fed policymakers project.
With households pulling back after a surge of preemptive buying to avoid Trump's import tariffs, "I think the real worry here is personal income and spending moving lower," said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities. "All signs point to a weakening economy."
The report, though, provided little clarity for Fed policymakers worried inflation pressures may build in coming months in response to Trump's import taxes, not all of which are fully set.
"The report is a wash for the FOMC and won't alter its wait-and-see stance," wrote Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets. "The slightly warmer core price increase doesn't settle the debate about how much tariffs will impact inflation."
Ahead of their September meeting, Fed officials will receive reports on consumer prices for June, July and August that Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week said should show whether tariffs are flowing through to consumer prices, as many economists anticipate, or whether those concerns prove overblown. In addition, jobs reports for those three months will show whether the labor market remains solid, or whether slowing job growth and rising joblessness offer a different reason to consider cutting rates.
Referring to the Fed's current outlook that inflation is about to rise due to tariffs, Powell in a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday said "we should start to see this over the summer, in the June number and the July number...If we don't we are perfectly open to the idea that the pass-through (to consumers) will be less than we think...That will matter for policy."
It could also figure into Trump's approach to Powell's final months as Fed chair, with his term ending in May 2026.
The Fed's benchmark rate has remained between 4.25% and 4.50% since December. Trump has said repeatedly it should be much lower and is angered by Powell's approach.
Trump and his aides have mused since last year about naming a successor earlier than usual, hoping the nominee could exert pressure on Powell through public comments that try to steer other policymakers or financial markets toward different outcomes.
It is an untested strategy, and not without risks.
"Would I put any weight on a shadow Fed rates strategy that deviates from what Powell has articulated? Not really," said Ed Al-Hussainy, senior interest rate and currency analyst for Columbia Threadneedle. The "big caveat," he said, is that "market psychology could shift meaningfully in some unpredictable way," and not necessarily in ways beneficial to the economy or Trump.
"The reward strikes me as very small, and the risk very large," said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. "To anoint a shadow chair who spends months and months outside the Fed seems like a bad idea for the president. Odds are it would push up longer rates, not down," if markets began pricing in the implications of a less independent Fed on expected U.S. inflation.
The clock is also ticking on the idea, with just seven Fed meetings until Powell's term expires. Trump does have an opportunity to name a Fed governor in February, when the term of Adriana Kugler expires, but that would potentially add a dissenting voice only a couple of months before Powell's term as chair ends.
Among those thought to be on Trump's short list for chair, the only one currently at the Fed is Governor Christopher Waller, a Trump appointee who is already influential in the policy debate.
Since the time of four-term Fed Chair Alan Greenspan, presidents generally have nominated a new Fed leader in October or November just before the existing chair's term expires, with Senate confirmation following and the new leader assuming office in February. President Barack Obama renominated Ben Bernanke as chair early, in August 2009, while Powell's second term started late, in May 2022, after controversy over other Fed nominees delayed Senate confirmation.
By this year's September meeting, the conversation is likely to have changed, with the Fed either proven correct in anticipating higher inflation, or coalescing around rate cuts as Trump has wanted.
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari said on Friday before the data was released that with little impact from tariffs on inflation so far he is ready to cut in September "barring some surprising development before then." If inflation shows up later, he said, "we could hold the policy rate at the new level until we gained greater confidence that inflation was headed back to our target."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Furious Trump walks away from Canada trade talks
Furious Trump walks away from Canada trade talks

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Furious Trump walks away from Canada trade talks

Donald Trump has walked away from trade talks with Canada in response to a digital services tax he described as a 'blatant attack on our country'. The president said he had immediately ended discussions taking place to address the series of tariffs he placed on the country earlier this year. In a post on Truth Social, Mr Trump said his administration had been informed that Canada was planning to proceed with a three per cent tax on technology companies such as Meta, Uber, Amazon and Google, on revenue earned from Canadian customers. Because the tax is retroactive, the American companies could face a bill of as much as $2bn by the end of the month. On Thursday, Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, said the Group of Seven nations would put a pause on the taxes for US tech companies. In exchange, he said Republicans in Congress were planning to halt a so-called revenge tax on foreign investors. 'Based on this egregious tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Mr Trump wrote. 'We will let Canada know the tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.' Canada is the US's second biggest trading partner after Mexico, and bought around $350bn (£255) worth of American goods last year, according to official data. In exchange, it exported $412bn (£300) of goods. Canadians were stunned when Mr Trump announced major tariffs on its northern neighbour, as well as Mexico. Canada hit back at the 25 per cent levy on steel and aluminium, with a similar tariff on a range of US items. Mark Carney has said the trading relationship between the two countries had been changed forever. Anger over the tariffs was one of the reasons Mr Carney's beleaguered Liberal Party was re-elected, despite being poised to lose to the Conservative Party in a general election in May. Mr Carney who previously led both the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada, took a hard line against the US president as he continued to make '51st state' jibes. There was no immediate response from Mr Carney's office on Friday's development. It comes as Mr Trump's government is set to reimpose a number of high tariffs that he announced in April on almost all of America's trading partners. Of those nations, only two countries, Britain and China, have agreements with the US to even a framework of a trade deal.

Big banks all pass the Federal Reserve's stress tests, but the tests were less vigorous this year
Big banks all pass the Federal Reserve's stress tests, but the tests were less vigorous this year

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Big banks all pass the Federal Reserve's stress tests, but the tests were less vigorous this year

All the major banks passed the Federal Reserve 's annual 'stress tests" of the financial system, the central bank said Friday, but the test conducted by the central bank was notably less vigorous than it had been in previous years. All 22 banks tested this year would have remained solvent and above the minimum thresholds to continue to operate, the Fed said, despite absorbing roughly $550 billion in theoretical losses. In the Fed's scenario, there would be less of a rise in unemployment, less of a severe economic contraction, less of a drop in commercial real estate prices, less of a drop in housing prices, among other metrics compared to what they tested in 2024. All of these less harmful, but simulated, drops mean there would be less damage to these banks' balance sheets and less risk of these banks of potentially failing. Since the banks passed the 2024 tests, it was expected that the banks would pass the 2025 tests. 'Large banks remain well capitalized and resilient to a range of severe outcomes,' said Michelle Bowman, the bank's vice chair for supervision, in a statement. An appointee of President Trump, Bowman became the Fed's vice chair of supervision earlier this month. It's not clear why the Fed chose to go with a less vigorous test this year. In a statement, the bank said previous tests had shown 'unintended volatility' in the results and it plans to seek public and industry comment to adjust stress tests in future years. The Fed also chose to not test the banks as heavily on their exposure to private equity assets, arguing that private equity assets are typically held for the long term and are not typically sold at times of distress. The Fed also didn't test for any bank exposure to private credit, a $2 trillion asset class that even Fed researchers themselves have observed to be growing alarmingly quickly. The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston recently pointed out that private credit could be a systemic risk to the financial system under a severe adverse scenario, which is exactly what the stress tests are supposed to test for. There was no wording or phrasing in the Fed's press release, reports or methodology about testing or measuring private credit or private debt in this year's test. The Fed's 'stress tests' were created after the 2008 financial crisis as a way to gauge whether the nation's 'too big to fail' banks could withstand another financial crisis like the once that happened nearly 20 years ago. The tests are effectively an academic exercise, where the Fed simulates a scenario in the global economy and measures what that scenario would do to bank balance sheets. The 22 banks that are tested are the biggest names in the business, such as JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, which hold hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and have wide-ranging businesses that touch every part of the U.S. and global economy. Under this year's hypothetical scenario, a major global recession would have caused a 30% decline in commercial real estate prices and a 33% decline in housing prices. The unemployment rate would rise to 10% and stock prices would fall 50%. In 2024, the hypothetical scenario was a 40% decline in commercial real estate prices, a 55% decline in stock prices and a 36% decline in housing prices. With their passing grades, the major banks will be allowed to issue dividends to shareholders and buy back shares of stock to return proceeds to investors. Those dividend plans will be announced next week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store