Gayton McKenzie gives away FREE Springbok tickets
As of Friday, tickets remained available across several sections of the stadium, with prices ranging from R1 050 to R4 000, according to the official Ticketmaster website.
The steep pricing has raised eyebrows, especially when compared with a full DStv subscription, which offers access to the entire Test series – including the second clash in Cape Town next weekend – for roughly the same cost as the cheapest match ticket.
In an effort to boost attendance, the Department of Sports, Arts and Culture, led by Minister Gayton McKenzie, was distributing 2 000 free tickets as recently as Thursday morning.
Speaking at Loftus Versfeld during the launch of Vodacom's new telecoms sponsorship deal with SA Rugby, Oberholzer claimed that the match had already met financial projections.
'We've hit our targets in terms of budgeting for the event,' said Oberholzer.
'When we did our forecasts, we worked on an 85% capacity. We're well over that. After the United Rugby Championship, we'll review our programme and how we drove it.'
He added that any shortcomings in the campaign would be evaluated and addressed ahead of the 2026 season.
'If we've made any mistakes, we'll rectify them before the season starts next year.'
Saturday's fixture continues a recent trend of under-capacity Springbok Test matches, following lukewarm ticket sales for July Tests against Italy in Pretoria and Port Elizabeth, and Georgia in Nelspruit.
Despite this, SA Rugby maintains confidence in the Springboks' commercial pull.
The team continues to generate strong TV viewership and remains a major drawcard following their 2023 Rugby World Cup victory.
The final chance for local fans to watch the Springboks live in South Africa this year will come on 27 September, when they take on Argentina at Hollywoodbets Kings Park in Durban.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
6 hours ago
- The South African
Springbok fan WEEPS after loss to Wallabies
A die-hard Springbok fan dramatically wept after the thrice World Cup-winning champions lost their match to the Wallabies at Ellis Park over the weekend. The national team faced off against their rugby rivals in the first of their Rugby Championship series games, where they were beaten 38-22. The loss has knocked South Africa out of World Rugby's number one ranking and into third place behind New Zealand and Ireland. In a TikTok video, a Springbok fan is seen loudly weeping after the final whistle is blown, signalling the Wallabies' victory. @tiffanyambermoses My mom after today's #rugby game ☠️ #springboks ♬ original sound – Tiffany-Amber Moses The woman was among many rugby fans who were left sad and disappointed by the shock loss. Some had travelled to watch the game live in action at Ellis Park. One Springbok supporter told rugby commentator Robbie Gillett: 'I travelled all the way from Dublin, Ireland, to watch South Africa beat Australia. But they didn't deliver today. It was disappointing…make it make sense!' Another added: 'It was a terrible night, coming all the way from Potchefstroom'. @_lakaka_25 #fyp #foryou #foryoupage #springboks #funny #kuwait #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp ♬ original sound – _lakaka_25 @robbiegillettrugby What do you guys think? 🤔 #rugby #springboks ♬ original sound – robbiegillettrugby The Springboks game wasn't the only sporting loss South Africans were licking their wounds over. On the same day as the rugby game, the Proteas cricket team also lost to their Australian counterparts. MMA fighter Dricus du Plessis being dethroned as the UFC Middleweight World Champion was another hard blow. Dricus du Plessis was dethroned by Khamzat Chimaev at the UFC 319. Image via UFC. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Ellis Park collapse gives the Erasmus-era Boks two choices — fade away or rise again
How the Springboks respond to the Ellis Park debacle against Australia will reveal if the successful era is over, or whether it's a chance to reset. Rassie Erasmus smiled through the obligatory media conference following the Springboks' 38-22 loss to the Wallabies in their Rugby Championship opener at Ellis Park. It wasn't a smile emitting any warmth. It was a nervous reaction to complete embarrassment laced with confusion. He was like a passenger after a car accident, trying to make sense of the wreck. After a lengthy mea culpa, in which he blamed himself, the other coaches, the tactics and even the players – 'there was a stage where I felt our heads were dropping and our shoulders were slumping'. Erasmus eventually resorted to plain language: 'We were dogshit on the day.' That was perhaps inaccurate. Because the Boks were anything but 'dogshit' for the first 20 minutes. If the game had been stopped just before Australia's opening try in the 29th minute, the story would have been about one of the greatest performances in history. From Kurt-Lee Arendse's opening try, which went through multiple phases and was scored with only 1:33 on the clock, to Siya Kolisi's 18th-minute try, which gave them a 22-0 lead, the Boks have seldom played better. The foundation of brute strength and contact dominance was there, laced with bold attacking flair and accuracy. It was sensational. Wallaby coach Joe Schmidt admitted he and his team were helpless. 'When they were accurate, like you saw that first 20 minutes, we were in trouble with wave after wave coming. It was impressive.' But rugby games are not played over 20 minutes. The Boks lost control, especially after halftime, and the Wallabies, through their own composure and resilience, secured a win for the ages. Losing is one thing. Conceding six tries and 38 unanswered points against a team that has struggled for several years, at a venue where the Boks usually thrive, is what is so staggering. That's why Erasmus looked dazed. An hour after the final whistle, he was unable to make sense of it. There are cases of teams overcoming heavy deficits to eke out a win. But how many have overcome such a heavy margin and gone on to win by miles? Answers welcome. In many ways, it was the weirdest game of rugby in memory due to the complete dominance by both teams at different stages of the game. Soul searching Some of the reasons for the collapsing performance were partially obvious to all who watched – the lineout malfunctioned, the Boks lost the breakdown battle after the first quarter, and they abandoned their kicking game. Essentially, after such a great start, they played too much rugby and moved away from the guiding principles of their game plan – command set pieces, play for field position, dominate contact and defend tightly. The reasons are visible, but the nagging, serious question is, why did it happen? What led to such an implosion – the Wallabies must take some of the credit for creating problems – and how can it be remedied? There is a growing sense of hubris in this Bok team. It might be a function of years of success, which was heightened by such a blistering opening quarter. The sight of the Boks attempting one of those midfield lineout mauls late in the game bordered on pathetic, considering they were 11 points behind with only minutes remaining on the clock. Innovation has been one of their trademarks in the Erasmus era, and much of it has paid off. At the right moment, in the right circumstances, their innovation has taken rugby forward. But producing trick plays for the sake of it, when the game was gone, looked arrogant. This isn't the first time it's happened this season, either. The Boks led Italy 28-3 at halftime in Pretoria but 'lost' the second half 21-14. Against Georgia, despite winning 55-10, the Boks needed until late in the game to break free. 'It's very concerning, and it's something we have to fix,' Erasmus said in response to the 'soft' periods in Tests. 'You know, we lost a few lineouts with some bad throws, sometimes bad timing, and sometimes the wrong call. 'We had three weeks to prepare for the game. I can sit here and give excuses, but I must point the finger straight at me, because I really thought we were well prepared for this game. 'A player doesn't go and play by his own devices and just do what he wants to do. We (the coaches) guide them and select the team. Maybe combinations were wrong, maybe plans were wrong, and maybe the halftime talk was terrible.' Positives It's a single loss – albeit a staggering one – so how the Boks bounce back in Cape Town for the return clash against the Wallabies will be telling. Can they produce 80 minutes of the controlled rugby that made them the best team in the world? Because if you take that opening 20 minutes in isolation, potentially the Boks are on the brink of a sensational attacking transformation. Had they scored additional tries late in the first half and early in the second half when they came within a metre of the Wallaby line, would there be so much navel gazing? 'We probably got a little bit lucky,' Schmidt admitted afterwards. 'Even when André (Esterhuizen) went down the left-hand touch a couple of times, one of the times, there was a loose pass, and Tom Wright went 70 metres and scored at the other end. 'So, we're realistic about how we had to hang in there, but I'm really proud of the way we did.' The controlled blitz in the opening quarter was unlike anything Bok followers have seen. There were many problems relating to game management and attitude in the face of Australia's commendable fightback, but there was also much to admire in the Bok performance. The issue appears to be marrying the new attacking intent and structure with a more conservative approach. Essentially, balancing their tactical approach is problematic. Manie Libbok remains a key player in unleashing the Boks' attack, but he failed to recognise a shift in momentum and therefore change tack. He needed to be the general that said, 'Right, now we're playing for territory, slowing things down.' The senior leadership on the field, once Siya Kolisi departed with a knee injury, also needs to look in the mirror. Where were Pieter-Steph du Toit, Eben Etzebeth and Jesse Kriel to acknowledge the game situation and problem-solve in real time? It was a chastening loss and an early wake-up call for the rest of the 2025 Rugby Championship as well as for Rugby World Cup 2027. Whether this loss and overall performance is viewed in future as a game that ended the dominance of the Erasmus-era Boks, or as the moment that set them on a new path of success, is up to them. DM
The South African
11 hours ago
- The South African
Rude awakening must spark Springbok response
It was supposed to be a Springbok statement, a powerful start to their Rugby Championship title defence at the venue where they traditionally dominate. Instead, it turned into a sobering reminder: reputations don't win Test matches. The Wallabies didn't just survive the altitude and the crowd; they thrived in it. They scored six tries to three, ran in 532 metres to South Africa's 580, and made 26 defenders miss. Australia didn't just take their chances, they made their own. Statistically, the Springboks edged some categories. They carried the ball more (139 carries to 97), gained more metres, and even broke the line more often with 14 clean breaks to Australia's 10. But the key numbers don't lie. South Africa conceded six turnovers, more than Australia's three, and managed just five offloads compared to the Wallabies' 14. That tells the real story: Australia kept the ball alive, moved it quicker, and adapted better. Even more telling, the Boks had 77 more passes than the visitors but couldn't translate that into scoreboard pressure. The Wallabies' 38 points came from variety, ruthlessness and unpredictability, everything the Springboks lacked. South Africa hadn't lost to Australia at home since 2011. They hadn't lost to anyone at Ellis Park in years. But the Wallabies, ranked sixth in the world and desperate to shake their underachiever tag, didn't flinch. They came to spoil the party and did just that. While the Springboks tried to wear them down, the Wallabies were direct, clinical, and fearless. Every time South Africa threatened a comeback, the Aussies hit back with sharp, simple rugby. Rassie Erasmus' men usually dominate through the forwards. But on Saturday, they couldn't. The rolling maul barely functioned. The scrum was neutralised. Eben Etzebeth was energetic, but he couldn't carry workload of the entire pack on his shoulders. In the backline, there was pace but no punch. Despite all the carries, the likes of Kurt-Lee Arendse and Edwill van der Merwe rarely found real space. The connection between nine and ten felt disjointed. Too often, the Boks passed sideways and waited for impact; it never came. This wasn't a lucky win. It was a blueprint. The Wallabies brought controlled chaos and executed it perfectly. From quick tap penalties to skipping wide channels, they stretched South Africa in ways few teams do. Yes, it's only round one. But in the Rugby Championship, every result matters. With the All Blacks lying in wait, the pressure rises immediately. Erasmus and his staff won't panic, but they will be concerned. The numbers show effort, not execution. The game showed a team slightly off the pace, outsmarted and outscored. If the Springboks want back-to-back Rugby Championship titles for the first time ever, this loss must be the alarm bell they answer loudly next weekend. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
