
Rwanda planning to attack Burundi, President Évariste Ndayishimiye tells BBC
Burundi's President Évariste Ndayishimiye tells the BBC he has seen "credible intelligence" that Rwanda plans to attack his country, and that Rwanda had tried to launch a coup a decade ago in Burundi akin to "what it's doing in the Democratic Republic of Congo" now.Rwanda has already hit back, calling the president's comments "surprising" and insisting the two neighbours are cooperating on security plans for their shared border, which has been shut for over a year.Despite extensive UN evidence, Rwanda has always denied arming and backing the M23 rebel group, which has recently seized large parts of eastern DR Congo alongside Rwandan troops. Rwanda has also denied links to the resurgent Red Tabara rebel group, which President Ndayishimiye says is a proxy force similar to the M23 and is being supported by Rwanda to destabilise Burundi."They would say it's an internal problem when it's Rwanda [who is] the problem. We know that he [Rwanda's President Paul Kagame] has a plan to attack Burundi," Ndayishimiye added. "Burundians will not accept to be killed as Congolese are being killed. Burundian people are fighters.""But now we don't have any plans to attack Rwanda. We want to resolve that problem by dialogue."At the heart of Ndayishimiye's comments was a call for peace and the full implementation of an agreement between the two nations - a peace deal that had been signed in previous years but, according to Burundi, had not been honoured by Rwanda."The people who did the 2015 coup [were] organised by Rwanda, and then they ran away. Rwanda organised them – it went to recruit the youth in Mahama camp. It trained them, it gave them arms, it financed them. They are living in the hand of Rwanda," he alleges."If Rwanda accepts to hand over them and bring them to justice, the problem would be finished."
"We are calling on our neighbours to respect the peace agreements we have made," Ndayishimiye added. "There is no need for us to go to war. We want dialogue, but we will not sit idle if we are attacked.""We don't have anything to ask [of] Rwanda [in return], but they refuse because they have a bad plan - they wanted to do what they're doing in the DRC."The Rwanda-Burundi border remains closed long after Red Tabara rebels carried out several attacks on Burundian soil.While the situation with Rwanda is critical, it is not Burundi's only problem.To the west, the ongoing conflict in mineral-rich DR Congo has reached a boiling point with rebel groups, militias, and foreign parties vying to control the country's valuable resources."External forces are responsible for perpetuating this conflict. They do not want peace in the DRC because they want to continue looting its resources," Ndayishimiye tells the BBC."The crisis in the DRC is not about the people - it is about the minerals."The solution, he argues, is to bring all parties to the table, including "all opposition political parties and armed groups", who must "sit together and see together how they can create the best future for all citizens."But in his view it all depends on whether Rwanda will show willing."The problem between Rwanda and the DRC is a small problem, they can resolve it without killing people. For example, I hear that Rwanda says it is going there [to DRC] because of the FDLR [a Rwandan rebel group accused of links to the 1994 genocide]. "But who [is being] killed? All I see is Congolese - why do they kill Congolese when they say they are looking for FDLR?"Since M23 rebels and Rwandan troops began seizing cities in eastern DR Congo in January, war has forced many hundreds of thousands of Congolese people to flee the violence and their homes.So desperate are they to find safety that some have even crossed the Rusizi river in makeshift vessels or swum to reach Burundi, despite the dangerous journey killing many people including a three-year-old child.
Living precariously in refugee camps, some say they want to go back to their country but complain that the Burundi-DR Congo border is closed. This is something Burundi's president denies."No, our border with the Congo is not closed. Where did they pass to come into Burundi? Even today they can use [the Rusizi river] to go back."When told by the BBC that crossing the Rusizi rivers puts refugees in a position of danger, Ndayishimiye replies: "You know, we didn't invite them."They can go back, we will not refuse them to go back. But when they are here, they are as our visitors. If a visitor comes your house – it's you who chooses the room where he will stay. Even the food they have is what we share. They can't say I will eat meat when you are eating fish."For the war to end and the Congolese to achieve lasting piece, Ndayishimiye says the mandate of international forces in DR Congo should be expanded so that they can engage the rebels. He has also stated that Burundi forces will not be withdrawn from DR Congo until Burundi is assured that its borders are safe.Earlier this month, Southern Africa leaders announced that their forces would be withdrawn from DR Congo where they were helping fight the M23, after at least 19 were killed.
More about the conflict in DR Congo:
'I risked drowning to escape being recruited by Congolese rebels'Is Trump mulling a minerals deal with conflict-hit DR Congo?'They killed all these young people' - BBC investigates alleged massacre in rebel-held Congolese city
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
21 minutes ago
- Times
Labour MP U-turns on migrant age numbers after Question Time boos
A cabinet minister was forced to issue a clarification after claiming that the majority of migrants crossing the Channel were 'children, babies and women'. Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, was booed by some members of the audience as he made the claim on Thursday night's episode of the BBC's Question Time. Home Office figures show that 73 per cent of all migrants who have arrived on small boats since 2018 have been men aged 18 and above. A further 9 per cent were women, while 16 per cent were under-18 and the ages of the remaining 2 per cent were unknown. The ratio of men was even higher for those crossing this year. Of the 6,642 migrants who arrived in the first three months of the year, 78 per cent (5,183) were men. Some 531 migrants were aged under 18, of whom 80 per cent were male. Jones has since insisted that he was sharing the example of a specific dinghy that arrived while he was on a visit to Border Security Command. He said: 'Of course the overall majority of people arriving illegally on small boats are men — but not 'north of 90 per cent', as Reform claimed. 'On Question Time I shared a story from my visit to the Border Security Command about a dinghy that arrived mostly carrying women, children and babies who had suffered horrific burns. I'm happy to clarify this, given how this is now being misrepresented.' However, the prime minister's spokesman earlier refused nine times to correct the record when asked at the daily Downing Street briefing on Friday. The spokesman said: 'Our focus is tackling these vile gangs that trade in human misery. We've seen additional funding committed at the spending review in order to support Border Security Command … The focus of the government is tackling the gangs.' The spokesman confirmed that Jones retained the full confidence of the prime minister. A member of the audience in Fleetwood, Lancashire, asked Jones whether asylum seekers should be allowed to live rent-free in hotels when 'working families' were 'struggling with substandard housing'. Jones responded: 'You're told never to challenge the audience on Question Time but I'm going to. When there are babies and children put into that position by human trafficking gangs that are coming across in the Channel with skin burns from the oil of those boats mixing with the salt and seawater, I would ask any of you to look at those babies and children and say, 'Go back to where you came from'.' Zia Yusuf, head of Reform UK's anti-waste Doge unit, was also on the Question Time panel. In response to Jones, he said: 'I made the case that the government prioritises foreign citizens over citizens of the United Kingdom. After that testimony I rest my case. The vast majority of people making the journey from France by small boat are fighting-age, military age men. Male. They're not women and children.' The Conservatives accused Jones of being 'completely out of touch with reality'. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'No wonder this is shaping up to be the worst year on record for small boat crossings. If this is what passes for reality inside the Labour government, Britain is in serious trouble.' Rupert Lowe, the independent MP for Great Yarmouth, who was suspended from Reform UK in March over allegations of bullying, has written an open letter calling for Jones to issue an 'urgent public correction'. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, called Jones 'another clueless Labour minister' and said his claims were 'simply not true'. More than 1,000 migrants are estimated to have crossed the Channel on Friday as people smugglers took advantage of calmer conditions and warm weather. On Wednesday and Thursday 452 migrants arrived on small boats after ten days without crossings. They will add to the 15,264 migrants who have arrived on small boats in 2025, a record for this point in the year and more than a third higher than this time last year. The most on a single day this year was recorded on May 31, when 1,195 people arrived in 19 boats. Hundreds more migrants are expected to attempt the crossing on Tuesday and Wednesday next week, when weather and marine conditions are forecast to be good.


Glasgow Times
24 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
BBC will not appeal against Adams' defamation case victory
Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Fein, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Fein press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
BBC will not appeal against Adams' defamation case victory
Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Fein, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Fein press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'