‘Peace Needs Palestine': Canada Joins France And UK, To Back Statehood Recognition At UNGA Meet
Standing beside Foreign Minister Anita Anand, Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed the decision on Wednesday. 'Canada has long been committed to a two-state solution. An independent, viable and sovereign Palestinian state living side by side with the State of Israel in peace and security – that is the vision we are reaffirming,' he said.
Canada's decision comes on the heels of similar announcements from European powers. France has already said it will formally recognise Palestine during the UNGA meeting in September. Under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the United Kingdom has also laid down a roadmap for recognition, contingent on Israeli action, including an end to the ongoing military campaign in Gaza.
'We are taking cue from global partners who believe peace is only possible when Palestine is treated as a legitimate state actor,' Carney added.
He clarified that Canada's upcoming recognition rests on what he described as 'important assurances' from the Palestinian Authority. He cited direct conversations with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
'The Palestinian Authority has committed to lead much needed reform. President Abbas assured me his administration will conduct long-overdue national elections in 2026. Hamas will play no part,' he stated.
The Canadian leader also noted Abbas's 'clear commitment' to keep the future Palestinian state demilitarised.
With international eyes trained on the Gaza Strip, where hunger and devastation continue to mount under Israeli blockade, Ottawa's stance is a marked pivot in its Middle East posture. Carney's move adds weight to growing frustration among global leaders over the humanitarian crisis and the lack of progress toward a diplomatic resolution.
'Canada will always steadfastly support Israel's existence as an independent state in the Middle East, living in peace and security. But any path to lasting peace for Israel also requires a viable and stable Palestinian state, one that recognises Israel's inalienable right to security,' he said.
Carney mentioned that the announcement followed a call with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The two leaders exchanged views on Gaza's spiraling humanitarian disaster and the UK's evolving position on Palestinian recognition.
Israel's government wasted no time in pushing back. In a statement posted to X (formerly Twitter), the Foreign Ministry blasted Canada's decision, calling it 'a reward to Hamas'.
'The change in the position of the Canadian government at this time is a reward for Hamas and harms the efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of the hostages,' the ministry said.
That argument echoes prior criticism from both Israel and the United States when France and the United Kingdom announced similar plans.
While supporting a two-state solution, Washington has so far declined to follow the same path.
Canada, in fact, had only recently joined a coalition of allies, including the United Kingdom, Norway, New Zealand and Australia, in slapping sanctions on two far-right ministers in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet. That move signalled growing frustration among Western partners over Israel's escalating settler violence and continued expansion of West Bank settlements.
A joint statement from the five nations at the time read, 'We are steadfastly committed to the two-state solution, which is the only way to guarantee security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians and ensure long term stability in the region, but it is imperiled by extremist settler violence and settlement expansion.'
Still, not everyone is on board. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed the sanctions move as unhelpful. He argued it does little to 'advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'.
But for Carney, the calculus appears to be shifting fast. With each passing week of bloodshed in Gaza, the political space for symbolic neutrality is shrinking. By stepping into the ring alongside Paris, London and others, Ottawa is now openly backing a path that sees Palestinian statehood not only as an aspiration, but as a diplomatic reality waiting to be recognised.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Trump tariffs India: Doesn't it reveal America's double standards?
On August 6, about a week after issuing a sweeping 25 per cent tariff on all Indian imports, US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent additional tariff on India over its imports of Russian oil. The new measure raises tariffs on some Indian goods to as high as 50 per cent. This is a wake-up call. This wasn't just a trade policy decision. What started as strong bilateral cooperation has now become a strategic risk point. The US has been one of India's most important defence partners recently, providing equipment and technology transfers. However, this relationship has also led to asymmetries. In times of diplomatic strain, these asymmetries turn into leverage. In a single stroke, the US has demonstrated its willingness to apply pressure on India for geopolitical ends. The tools may be economic, but the target is strategic. This sets a dangerous precedent. In an era of great-power competition, India must keep the ability to make decisions in its national interest without fearing retaliation. Other than economic consequences, the tariffs also hold symbolic significance. They indicate a change in US expectations and a more assertive stance toward India's foreign policy independence. India's increasing trade with Russia is being criticised, yet Western powers maintain stronger economic ties with Moscow. In 2024, India's trade with Russia rose to $68.7 billion, mainly due to energy imports such as crude oil, coal, and fertilisers. That's a tenfold rise compared to 2021 levels. Meanwhile, the EU maintained approximately $78 billion in total trade with Russia during the same period, with about $25 billion spent on fossil fuels alone. Despite sanctions and vocal opposition to Moscow's actions, Europe remains one of Russia's largest trading partners. The United States, while engaging in much less trade, still imported around $5.2 billion in goods and services from Russia in 2024, primarily industrial inputs. Even in the first half of 2025, US imports from Russia totalled approximately $2.5 billion. The contrast is clear: India, while pressured to reduce its ties with Russia, is not operating in isolation. The extent of US and EU trade with Moscow underscores a geopolitical double standard. India faces penalties for engaging in trade that others continue to pursue secretly. This context is crucial when evaluating India's strategic choices. What one country sees as a national security concern, another may view as an economic necessity. India's ongoing partnership with Russia, especially in energy and defence, has become a point of controversy. But the real lesson here isn't about oil. It's about resilience. In the current geopolitical climate, where alliances are fluid and strategic alignments unpredictable, overreliance on any single partner, even the United States, is risky. Strategic autonomy offers a path to a more secure future, demanding diversified dependencies, redundant supply lines, and domestic capacity. After all, India's armed forces operate in a complex threat environment with active, contested borders with both China and Pakistan. A sudden disruption in critical defence supply chains could have immediate, even disastrous, consequences. Here are five steps to prevent that from happening: Accelerate indigenous engine development: India must expedite engine R&D programmes. From the High Thrust Fuel Efficient Engine series to combat jet power plants, local capability should become a top-priority national goal. This effort should involve public sector R&D, private companies, and international co-development on India's terms. Diversify strategic partners: India must strengthen ties with other like-minded democracies, such as France, Japan, Israel, and South Korea, to foster systems, tech, and joint ventures. Diversifying strategic partners not only guards against supply shocks but also encourages technological innovation and knowledge exchange. Relying on multiple sources reduces the risk of any single country weaponising dependency, thereby boosting India's strategic autonomy. Secure critical subsystems locally: From radar modules to guidance chips and propulsion control units, India must develop and produce critical subsystems domestically. Even imported platforms should be gradually 'de-Americanised' wherever feasible through local or alternative integration. Invest big in defence innovation: India's defence R&D spending remains low compared to global standards. A significant increase is needed not only for DRDO but also for startup ecosystems, university labs, and private manufacturing. Flexible funding, efficient trials, and transparent procurement processes are crucial. Implement import substitution at scale: India's negative import list and domestic procurement categories must be enforced strictly. By 2026, India should aim to produce 80-90 per cent of core military systems and subsystems domestically or through balanced joint ventures. If India does not act decisively, the next round of tariffs or sanctions could have immediate operational effects. Delays in sourcing, halted upgrades, or frozen systems might impair India's capacity to respond to crises, military or otherwise. Beyond economics or diplomacy, this concerns warfighting capability, sovereign decision-making, and the ability to defend national interests without foreign interference. The situation also raises broader questions: What is the actual cost of sovereignty? How should a rising power shield its security system from geopolitical unpredictability? And how can India future-proof its defence industry without sacrificing capability? This moment demands more than tactical fixes. It requires a clear national doctrine: no vital system should be entirely dependent on an external power. The writer is a lieutenant colonel, former Armoured Corps officer, defence analyst and strategic thinker
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Daily Briefing: Tariff trouble and a snooping scandal
Good morning! It's yet another day of Trump tariff chaos. But first, let's look at the latest Express Investigation into 'illegal snooping' under the BRS regime in Telananga. The matter first came to light in March 2024, when an Additional Superintendent of Police of the state's Special Intelligence Bureau lodged a complaint against the now-former DSP for unauthorised phone tapping. In just 15 days leading up to the November 30, 2023, Assembly polls, at least 600 phones were tapped, including those of politicians, party workers, and even a High Court judge, among others. The case unravelled after a 'top secret' letter from Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. surfaced, asking whether it should continue surveillance on a list of numbers. Here's what we found. On that note, let's get to the rest of today's edition. Sowing fresh mayhem, US President Donald Trump has doubled the tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent — the highest worldwide, and at par with fellow BRICS member Brazil. Trump had earlier announced a 25 per cent tariff, which comes into effect today (August 7). He has offered a 21-day window before the additional 25 per cent tariff kicks in. India has criticised the action as 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. The government said it would take 'all actions necessary' to 'protect its national interests'. Briefly: The additional tariffs were prompted by India's purchase of Russian oil, an issue that has triggered a volley of criticism from the US and other Western nations. India, in response, has flagged the US and the EU's continued trade with Russia. It also stated that the US had earlier endorsed its purchase of Russian oil to stabilise the global market. Red line: In reprimanding India, Trump has issued a warning to other countries. The latest executive order states that senior Trump administration officials can recommend action against countries importing Russian oil 'directly or indirectly', including the additional ad valorem import duty of 25 per cent. It is believed that by targeting Russia's trading partners, Trump hopes to force the Kremlin's hand in ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Looking ahead… With trade already dampened due to the tariff-related uncertainty, exporters warn that India cannot absorb the higher rates. Moreover, India loses its edge over most competitors, including China, Bangladesh and Vietnam. Notably, China is the largest buyer of Russian oil. Beijing is already in advanced stages of its negotiations with the US, and there are fears that it might buy concessions to escape the secondary tariffs. Meanwhile, India's own trade deal with the US has been stuck on New Delhi's refusal to open up sensitive sectors, such as agriculture, to the US. Interestingly, though, as my colleague Harish Damodaran reports, trade in farm produce between the two countries is booming and poised to touch a new record this year. Tragic: Flash floods and a debris avalanche on Tuesday have ravaged the town of Uttarkashi in Uttarakhand. At least 60 people are estimated to be missing, while two bodies have been recovered so far. Rescue operations are underway, complicated by heavy rains lashing the state. Dharali, the ground zero of the flash floods, is located in the fragile Bhagirathi eco-sensitive zone. Experts believe that unregulated activities, like construction on the river floodplains, could have worsened the disaster. 🎧 For more on the Uttarkashi floods, tune in to the latest '3 Things' podcast episode. Neighbourhood walk: Prime Minister Narendra Modi may be set to visit China after a long span of seven years for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, scheduled from August 31 to September 1. The meeting comes as India and China look to improve ties, especially in the face of rising tensions with the US. A nightmare? The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls, just months away from the Assembly elections, has set off a political storm. RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad recently said that his party could 'consider boycotting' the polls altogether, while the Congress said 'every option' is open for discussion. In our Opinion pages today, former Chief Election Commissioner of India, S Y Quraishi, writes why boycotting elections is a 'political blunder'. '…in a democracy, absence is not protest — it is abdication.' Fraud trail: Industrialist Anil Ambani is once again under the scrutiny of investigative agencies, five years after he was questioned in the Yes Bank loan fraud case. The Enforcement Directorate suspects that thousands of crores of rupees, obtained in loans, were diverted to group companies and shell firms, bypassing norms. We explain the ED's case and actions against Ambani. While Saiyaara has been a hit at the Box Office, with fans crying (literally) in theatres, Dhadak 2's success has paled in comparison. But in his weekly column, 'Post Credits Scene', my colleague Rohan Naahar writes that Dhadak 2 may be the best Karan Johar production since Jigra. In an unusual comparison, Naahar writes that Shazia Iqbal's newest venture has more in common with Joaquin Phoenix's billion-dollar-grossing Joker movie than you'd imagine. That's all for today, folks! Until tomorrow, Sonal Gupta Sonal Gupta is a Deputy Copy Editor on the news desk. She writes feature stories and explainers on a wide range of topics from art and culture to international affairs. She also curates the Morning Expresso, a daily briefing of top stories of the day, which won gold in the 'best newsletter' category at the WAN-IFRA South Asian Digital Media Awards 2023. She also edits our newly-launched pop culture section, Fresh Take. ... Read More
Mint
a few seconds ago
- Mint
Amid racist attacks in Ireland, man asks Indians to adjust to ‘the culture of the country'
Amid a string of racist attacks in Ireland – with a six-year-old girl from Kerala being the latest victim – an Indian expat living in the island nation has asserted that Indians relocating to Ireland should adapt to local Irish culture instead of trying to turn the Western country into 'another India'. 'Shouldn't we as migrants adjust to the culture of the country we are living in? I have seen a lot of Indians trying to make the country they are living in feel like India, even though they left India for a reason. I am not saying you should abandon your culture, but we should respect the culture of the country we are living in and not try to turn it into another India,' reads part of the Reddit post. The user also shared a picture of an Indian passport, claiming that it shows they were born in India. The post has garnered mixed reactions from social media users. Here's how people responded: One individual commented, 'From what I have seen, I think there are two types of Indian migrants: one who understands this and acts accordingly, and the other who knows it but doesn't care and continues to do things his/her way. By that, I mean I have seen people littering on beaches, playing loud music on public transport, etc. I have never seen a well-educated foreign national do it. That's the sad part. And the latter will, of course, irritate the natives, which in turn affects the former as well.' Another added, 'Indian people who make their home in Ireland should absolutely bring their culture with them, but they should also work to integrate with Irish society. Your kids should learn Irish in school. They should play hurling/camogie as well as cricket. Indian food producers should take stalls at Irish farmers' markets. Indian festivals should feature Irish artists as well. Don't shut yourselves off – integrate and help improve this place we call home.' A third user expressed, 'I am not Indian, but I am curious about what you mean by this. I have worked with lots of Indians for 16 years in Ireland, and I haven't met a single one who tried to make Ireland like India. If anything, I have seen the opposite – Indians enjoying the different opportunities and cultural exposure they get in Ireland.' A fourth wrote, 'For context, I'm Irish. That being said, this is pretty much expected of any immigrant in a nation, but even then, it wouldn't really change anything. Racists will still attack people. Harassment will still happen. As far as I know, most immigrants adjust pretty well to Irish culture. A lot of people on the far right just associate cultural assimilation with complete abandonment of your own culture, which is obviously idiotic.' In a recent disturbing incident, a six-year-old girl from Kottayam, Kerala, was subjected to racist abuse by a gang of children aged between 12 and 14 while playing outside her house in Waterford City, in southeast Ireland. According to her mother, the gang punched her daughter in the face, called her 'dirty,' and hit her private parts with a bicycle. This was not the first racist attack targeting someone of Indian origin in Ireland. The country is still reeling from recent incidents in Dublin's Tallaght and Clondalkin areas. In light of the increasing number of racial attacks, the Indian Embassy in Dublin has issued a statement urging Indian citizens in the country to exercise caution.
