Airport security will start checking for a REAL ID in 75 days. Here's what you need to know.
A sample of a REAL ID compliant South Carolina driver's license. (Photo courtesy of the S.C. Department of Motor Vehicles)
COLUMBIA — Starting in 75 days, South Carolinians without a passport will need a gold star on their driver's license to show it's a REAL ID to get through airport security.
Federal identification requirements passed by Congress 20 years ago will actually be enforced starting May 7 for people boarding a commercial flight within the United States or entering secure federal buildings and military installations.
Anyone needing the identification for those reasons should not procrastinate, said Mike Fitts, a spokesman for the state Department of Motor Vehicles.
'We would definitely advise, especially if you have plans to take a domestic flight, not to wait,' he said.
Congress passed The REAL ID Act in 2005 as a way to standardize ID verification in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.
South Carolina initially refused to comply.
But the Legislature reversed course in 2017, when it appeared enforcement would be imminent. The law signed by Gov. Henry McMaster that year overturned the state's decade-old ban and directed the DMV to make the license, which became available at all 67 branches in early 2018.
The federal government has postponed the deadline multiple times, for reasons including the COVID-19 pandemic.
But May 7 is supposed to be the day when security will really start checking for a REAL ID.
Of the 4.5 million IDs issued by the DMV, which includes roughly 400,000 photo IDs that aren't driver's licenses, more than 2.7 million, or 60%, are REAL ID-compliant, as of Friday, Fitts said.
REAL IDs expire after eight years. Under the 2017 law that allowed for their creation in South Carolina, driver's licenses are only good for eight years too. All licenses issued in South Carolina after Oct. 1. 2017, expire in eight years, rather than 10 as they previously did.
The ID that meets federal identification requirements remains an option, not a mandate.
It won't be needed to drive, vote or access benefits such as Social Security in South Carolina.
But people without a valid U.S. passport or military ID will need it by May 7 if they want to fly, get onto a military base or enter a secured federal building.
For anyone unsure whether their license is a REAL ID, check the top right corner.
A REAL ID has the gold star, while noncompliant state driver's licenses issued since 2017 will have a message that reads 'Not for Federal Identification.'
For most South Carolinians, the cost of getting a REAL ID is $25, the same fee that a standard license renewal requires. For children ages 5 to 16, the cost is $15. The DMV doesn't issue ID cards for children under 5, who don't need a REAL ID to get through security anyway.
A REAL ID modernization law passed by Congress in December 2020 as part of a pandemic aid package made the documentation process easier. It's no longer necessary to provide an actual Social Security card as proof. Instead, the number will be electronically verified at the DMV with the Social Security Administration.
The following is what's still needed, with examples:
Proof of identity and citizenship, such as a government-issued birth certificate or unexpired U.S. passport
Two proofs of address, such as an unexpired South Carolina driver's license and a utility bill showing the same name and address
Proof of all legal name changes (if applicable), such as a marriage license, divorce papers, or court order. If an unexpired passport contains the current legal name, that can be shown instead.
You can get your REAL ID at all DMV branches. Check here for locations and wait times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks may hit a dead end under Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
If you're considering buying an electric vehicle, now may be the time to act. A sweeping Republican-led proposal, referred to as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' is charging through Congress and threatens to wipe out the popular electric vehicle (EV) tax credit for most vehicles in 2025. The credit was originally launched in 2008, but received a major overhaul under former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. That legislation supercharged incentives, expanding the $7,500 credit for new EVs and rolling out a $4,000 credit for used electric vehicles. 'The purpose of the tax incentives was simply to spur EV adoption by giving a literal 'incentive' for people to buy EVs,' says Dave Thomas, director of content marketing and automotive industry analyst at CDK Global, a technology firm serving car dealerships. However, President Donald Trump and other Republicans have vowed to eliminate the credit, but analysts say the tax credit has been a driving force behind the EV boom. According to J.D. Power's E-Vision Intelligence Report, 87 percent of EV shoppers in 2024 took advantage of the tax credit — many citing it as a key reason for their purchase. That momentum could stall if the bill clears the Senate and makes its way to the president's desk. Here's what's at stake under the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Learn more: Should you buy an electric car? How to decide in 2025 Under the current law, which covers cars purchased in 2023 or later, taxpayers can claim the electric vehicle tax credit if they meet specific income and purchase requirements. For new electric vehicles, you may qualify for a credit of up to $7,500, as long as the vehicle is primarily used in the United States. To be eligible, your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) must fall below the following limits: $300,000 for married couples filing jointly or a surviving spouse $225,000 for head of household filers $150,000 for all other filers The IRS allows taxpayers to apply the income limit based on the year they take possession of the vehicle or the prior year — whichever is more favorable. For used electric vehicles purchased in 2023 or later, the credit is worth up to $4,000 or 30 percent of the purchase price, whichever is less. The vehicle's purchase price must not exceed $25,000, and you must buy the car from a licensed dealer. Also, the car must be at least two years old when you purchase it; for example, if you bought the car in 2025, it would have to be a 2023 model or older to qualify for the credit. Used EVs have lower income limitations than newer EVs as follows: $150,000 for married couples filing jointly or a surviving spouse $112,500 for head of household filers $75,000 for all other filers Another benefit: You can receive the credit at the time of the purchase instead of waiting until tax time to claim it, by transferring the tax credit to the dealer. If you choose this option at the dealership, you must still meet all the IRS requirements when filing your tax return. Learn more: 10 easy tax deductions and credits to cut your tax bill Much like the House-approved tax bill, the Senate proposal seeks to eliminate the electric vehicle tax credit for both new and used vehicles. But the Senate's timeline moves even faster. Here's how the two versions compare: House version Senate version Value of tax credit $0 for all EVs $0 for all EVs Expiration date End of 2025 for most EVs 180 days after bill becomes law for new EVs90 days after bill becomes law for used EVs New federal annual fee for EV owners $250 for EVs $100 for hybrids $0 The main difference between the House-approved bill and the Senate's version is how quickly the EV tax credit would end. Under the Senate's proposal, the $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles would expire 180 days after the bill becomes law. The $4,000 credit for used EVs would phase out even sooner — just 90 days after enactment. By contrast, the House bill would end the EV tax credit for most vehicles at the end of 2025. However, some vehicles could still qualify through the end of 2026. Plus, the House version includes a manufacturer-based phaseout. Automakers that have sold fewer than 200,000 EVs could still offer the credit until the end of 2026. 'So, Tesla for example will not have any incentives on its vehicles after the bill passes,' Thomas says. 'It will likely be hard for car shoppers to track this in real-time, and they will have to rely on research or their local car dealer to keep on top of it.' MORE: New charitable giving tax deduction worth up to $2,000 may be on way for millions While the House-approved bill includes a $250 annual fee, the Senate's version omits any mention of an annual EV charge. The House's proposed fee for electric vehicle owners is a measure aimed at ensuring all drivers contribute equally to maintaining the nation's roadways. Currently, owners of gas-powered cars help fund highway infrastructure through the 18.4 cents per gallon federal gas tax. But that tax has remained unchanged since 1993, even as the cost of maintaining roadways has skyrocketed. Plus, cars have become more fuel-efficient — and some drivers have switched to electric cars. But some experts argue the proposed $250 EV fee is excessive. The proposed fee would be nearly three times what the average driver pays annually in gas taxes, according to a Consumer Reports study. 'The proposal of an annual fee for EVs makes sense on its face as those owners don't pay the federal or local gasoline taxes,' Thomas says. 'However, most calculations say the average driver pays around $100 in gas taxes a year and this fee is clearly more than that.' And EV owners often do pay state and local fees tied to their cars, depending on the tax rules of the state where they live. While the Senate bill wouldn't charge EV owners an annual fee and the House includes it, both chambers agree on one thing: Eliminating the federal EV tax credit altogether. With the EV credit potentially ending soon, drivers considering an EV purchase may want to act quickly. Waiting could mean missing out on valuable tax incentives that can help lower the cost. Learn more: 5 tax deductions you can claim without itemizing Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Texas Democrats ask Tesla to delay robotaxi rollout
A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is urging Tesla to delay the rollout of its robotaxis in Austin, as the driverless cars prepare to hit the streets this weekend. In a letter to Tesla's director of field quality, Eddie Gates, the seven lawmakers asked the electric vehicle maker to push back its launch until September, when a new Texas law is set to take effect. The law, which revises earlier state guidelines for autonomous vehicles, requires the operators of self-driving cars to receive prior authorization from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). To secure authorization, companies need to show their cars can operate in compliance with state traffic laws, are equipped with a recording device, comply with federal standards, are properly registered and insured and can 'achieve a minimal risk condition' if the autonomous driving system stops working. 'As members of the Austin delegation in the Texas Senate and Texas House of Representatives, we are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the lawmakers wrote in the letter, shared on X by Texas state Sen. Sarah Eckhardt. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations,' they continued. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said earlier this month that the company was 'tentatively' aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, although he noted that they 'are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.' The robotaxi launch marks a key moment for Tesla, as it seeks to make a strong showing after months of turmoil. The electric vehicle maker became a political symbol for Musk during his fourth-month stint in the Trump administration, dragging down the company's stock price and attracting both peaceful and destructive demonstrations. If Tesla goes ahead with its planned launch over the weekend, the Texas lawmakers asked the company to respond to their letter with 'detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law upon the launch of driverless operations in Austin.'
Washington Post
3 days ago
- Washington Post
Why America's experiment to make the batteries of the future could soon fail
Over the past three years, companies have invested tens of billions of dollars toward making electric vehicles in the United States, buoyed by tax incentives aimed at helping American businesses compete with China. Now, those companies are facing a strange problem: too much manufacturing capacity, not enough demand. As sales of electric vehicles slow and congressional Republicans take aim at EV tax credits and incentives, the United States is slated to have more battery and EV manufacturing than it needs, according to a report released Wednesday by the Rhodium Group, a research firm. That could leave factories — many of which are already operating or under construction — stranded if car sales continue to slump.
