logo
‘Make a larger profit': Pope Leo's childhood home is for sale

‘Make a larger profit': Pope Leo's childhood home is for sale

Herald Sun13-05-2025

Newly elected Pope Leo XIV arrives on the main central loggia balcony of St. Peter's Basilica for the first time, after the cardinals ended the conclave, in the Vatican, on May 8, 2025. Picture:This house of God is a total real-estate blessing!
The owner of Pope Leo XIV's childhood home in the suburbs of Chicago yanked the humble abode off the market overnight with potential plans to jack up the price — after learning the Catholic Church's new world leader once lived there, The New York Post reports.
The eyes of the world were fixated on the Sistine Chapel on May 8, when white smoke began billowing from its chimney, indicating that a new pope had been selected on the second day of the historic religious process.
Pope Leo XIV's childhood home was swiped off the market just hours after he was elected to be the next pope, having been listed for $199,000 prior to the conclave. Picture: Realtor.com
MORE: Iconic 'Spite House' hits market for $1.2m
Soon after, Chicago-born cardinal Robert Francis Prevost stepped out onto the Vatican balcony, his first appearance as the newly appointed Pope Leo XIV.
Focus quickly turned to the small three-bedroom, three-bathroom abode in which the Prevost family spent many years during his childhood, with property records revealing that the dwelling had actually been listed for sale in January with an asking price of $219,000 ($A343,800).
White smoke billowed through the Sistine Chapel chimney on May 8, indicating that a new pope had been selected. Picture:'[The real-estate agent] called me and said, 'Hey, the pope used to live in your house.' I'm like, 'Stop joking,' ' said Pawel Radzik, a property flipper who was ready to unload the home for around $200,000 before realising it's now a gold mine.
'I'm going to keep it for now,' Radzik said. 'I'm excited. … I'm lucky to have it.'
His Realtor, Steve Budzik, told The New York Post, 'It's like a winning lottery ticket.
'What are the chances?'
After learning of the pad's now-famous roots late Thursday, Radzik is increasing the price before putting it back on the market or even potentially turning it into a museum or another historic landmark.
MORE: Common item banned from royal homes
The inside of the home. Picture: Realtor.com
The three-bedroom, three-bathroom property is set to become a historical landmark thanks to its past, which saw the new leader of the Catholic Church growing up there. Picture: Realtor.com
The property, which is listed under an LLC, offers 111.5 sqm of living space and has a humble exterior surrounded by lush greenery.
Inside, there is an open floor plan that accentuates the main living area and cozy fireplace.
The average-sized kitchen comes complete with a marble countertop and ample cabinet space.
On Thursday — after the world learned Chicago native Robert Prevost was named the first American pope — Radzik received four offers on the five-bedroom, two-bathroom house.
Radzik, who moved from Poland in 2006, said he was at a doctor's appointment with his pregnant wife when his Realtor called with the jaw-dropping news of his property's provenance.
The homeowner — a father of two who was quick to note he and his wife will not be calling their soon-to-be-born third child, a boy, Leo — said the house had been essentially gutted for resale.
MORE: Exposed: Costco's hidden detail in Aus stores
The average-sized kitchen has a marble countertop and ample cabinet space. Picture: Realtor.com
The only thing still original are the walls,'' he said.
'Everything else was replaced.'
Previous residents of the home were known for bringing trouble to the block by dealing drugs from it, neighbours told The New York Post.
'[There was] drug-trafficking. Then it stopped. Then another family moved in, and there was a lot of violence,' said next-door neighbour Donna Sagna-Davis, adding she often felt 'harassed.'
'We prayed and prayed,' she said, adding news of the pope's pad could help the area. 'This is going to make it even better.'
Sagna-Davis wants the home to become 'a special landmark for our community, for people to come here and pray.'
The modest-looking abode — which the pope's family bought in 1949, paying a $US42 monthly mortgage — had previously been on the market for more than 100 days.
'It was listed for 200 [thousand dollars], but there is no way he's going to sell it for 200 with all the value it has now,' Budzik said.
'I'm sure people have a similar idea to make it for tours.'
However, US residents were quick to slam the opportunistic owner, calling him out for his 'greed'.
'This kind of price gouging should be illegal. Just because a house has historical or celebrity value doesn't justify inflating the price to outrageous levels,' said Mario.
'Personally I'd avoid it like the plague,' said Arabella.
'Ah yes, good old fashioned American Greed never goes out of style,' said Whodat.
Radzik, who was seen Friday cleaning up the house as a throng of media flocked to the property, said renovators painted floors and added bedrooms to the house.
'It's been quite interesting the last 24 hours,'' Budzik added.
'Just with all the activity and people are making offers and calling and wanting to see it.'
Parts of this story first appeared in Realtor and The New York Post and were republished with permission.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Volkswagen Group's first Australian EV hatch says adios for now
Volkswagen Group's first Australian EV hatch says adios for now

The Advertiser

time13 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Volkswagen Group's first Australian EV hatch says adios for now

The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from: The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from: The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from: The Cupra Born is no longer on the company's Australian website, and Volkswagen Group Australia (VGA) confirmed the electric hatch is no longer on sale in Australia now that local stocks of the car have run dry. That said, the Born may not be away for too long. In March this year, Cupra said it was pushing back the launch the Born VZ hot hatch from May to December 2025. "Planning for the next evolution of the Born – including the performance VZ – continues," said VGA in a statement. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. With the Born gone from the local range, Cupra's only pure electric offering right now is the Tavascan SUV. The Born made its global debut in 2021, and was launched in Australia at the end of 2022. While the Born is available in Europe with a variety of motor and battery options, local models all come equipped with a 77kWh battery and a 170kW motor driving rear wheels. A 240kW/545Nm motor drives the rear wheels in the Born VZ currently sold in Europe. Under the skin, the Born uses the Volkswagen Group's MEB all-electric architecture, which underpins all of the German automaker's EVs apart from a few models from Audi and Porsche. The Born's closest relation is the Volkswagen ID.3 hatch, which is not sold here. Both cars share their drivetrains, overall silhouette, much of their underlying structure, and doors. From its launch in December 2022 to the end of May 2025, 1654 Borns have been sold in Australia. The Born's best sales performance was in 2023, its first full year on sale, when 887 found new homes. For this calendar year until the end of May, the Born (301) is Cupra's second-best selling model behind the Formentor SUV (686). In the broader EV context, the Born is well behind the market leaders: Tesla Model Y (6974), Model 3 (2583), and Kia EV5 (2212). But if we look at just electric hatchbacks, its performance isn't too bad. It's behind the MG 4 (2017), BYD Dolphin (776), and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (364), but ahead of the Kia EV6 (228), GWM Ora (271), Renault Megane E-Tech (138), and Nissan Leaf (62). We know this list includes an eclectic range of models across a variety of sizes and price points, some of which are marketed as SUVs, but pinning down price points can a little tricky as EV pricing tends to move around quite a bit. Priced at $59,990 before on-road costs since its local launch, the Born had been available for the last few months for $47,090 drive-away. MORE: Everything Cupra Born Content originally sourced from:

Donald Trump and Elon Musk must continue making progress together for good of the United States
Donald Trump and Elon Musk must continue making progress together for good of the United States

Sky News AU

time13 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Donald Trump and Elon Musk must continue making progress together for good of the United States

The relationship between President Donald Trump and tech titan Elon Musk factors among the most consequential political relationships in American history and it must be repaired, quickly, for the good of the United States and the continued support of the Republican Party base. There is too much at stake in America today for their division to disrupt the process of the MAGA movement in reversing the incredible harms that were wrought on the country and the world by the Biden Administration. Five months into Trump's second term in the White House, he has taken the country by storm with a string of major accomplishments that, a year ago, most in the country despaired could never be achieved. As a result, his approval rating has reached its highest point in months, Americans are expressing greater satisfaction with the direction of the country than at any time in recent history, and Democrats have fallen even deeper into disarray. The public feud between the president and Musk threatens to upend the successes of the Trump Administration and create an opening for Democrats to regroup and take advantage of a fractured MAGA movement. The rift originated from a spending bill recently passed by the House of Representatives, which Trump is now promoting and referring to as the 'big beautiful bill.' It will soon go up for a vote in the Senate. Just days after the president gave him a celebratory farewell at the Oval Office, Musk wrote on X, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In a subsequent post, Musk threatened that 'we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' by supporting the bill. House Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House have closed ranks around the legislation, touting it as the best solution to reform government while extending Trump's tax cuts. But Musk's criticisms have emboldened other Republicans who believe the bill is anything but conservative and will only further help to bankrupt a nation that is already $37 trillion in debt. Congressman Thomas Massie voted against the bill, along with three other House Republican colleagues, because it would add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit and raise the debt ceiling by trillions. Now, amid Musk's criticisms of the legislation, it appears to be "losing momentum" on the Senate side. Musk took his criticisms beyond just the spending bill: He claimed that Trump was in the Epstein files and that's why they haven't been released to the public. In response to the attacks, Trump said the relationship with Musk is over. The impacts of the Trump-Musk relationship ending badly could be catastrophic. Musk's influence in today's MAGA movement cannot be overstated, and it should not be underappreciated. The billionaire played a bigger role in electing Trump president than anyone other than Trump. His visibility on the campaign and in the administration, as well as his recent commitment to supporting and funding right-of-center candidates, has made him a superstar in the MAGA community. Even Vice President JD Vance, a Trump loyalist, conceded in an interview that he "understands" Musk's frustration with the spending bill. Musk was instrumental in convincing Trump to choose Vance as his running mate, and when the Trump-Musk spat spilled out into the open, Musk indicated support for a viewpoint circulating on X that Vance should take over as president. Vance also knows that Elon's deep pockets could be critical in helping him clinch the MAGA mantel as the GOP candidate for president when Trump's second term concludes. Musk's influence is not limited to donation-seeking politicians. A massive base of conservative supporters, many of them young voters, follow him zealously. Nearly 70 per cent of young men have a favorable view of Musk. Now many of those supporters are defending Musk on X, and in the process criticising the president. Ask an average voter to name one figure in the country who is most symbolic of the MAGA movement, and they will either name Trump… or Musk. By publicly clashing, and forcing supporters to choose a side, Trump and Musk risk disunifying the Republican Party—and that's just what the Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media want. Since Musk's first combative post on X challenging Trump's spending bill, the feud has dominated news coverage and commentary. At this moment, the country is no longer talking about the administration's tremendous wins at the southern border, its accomplishments in returning safety to America's streets, the de-weaponisation of our Department of Justice, or its courageous efforts to bring manufacturing back the United States. Instead, the media can keep viewers' and readers' blood pressure high with incessant headlines about division, confusion, and 'chaos!' While the Democratic Party may be foundering and at a loss for a strategy to defeat the GOP in 2028, this is the media's strategy: to distract the public from Trump's wins, while compelling Americans to feel anxious and exhausted by a constant perception that Washington is disorganised and full of mayhem. Then, the Democrats can enter stage left and urge voters to elect them on the platform of an ostensible 'return to normalcy,' unity, and order. The White House likely made a mistake by allowing Musk to have so much visibility in the administration at the beginning. It was obvious from the start that while Trump and Musk were aligned on many fronts, there were many points of difference that would be impossible to reconcile despite their desire to collaborate. All of that, plus there were obvious concerns to be had about the risks and pitfalls of putting the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man in the same building from day to day. But for Trump and Musk to end the relationship in this way, and to do so while trashing each other publicly no less, is a grave mistake. Both men have unique and vitally important abilities to offer the country. Democrats significantly eroded the quality of life in the United States under the Biden Administration. More than 10 million illegal immigrants came through our open border, bringing drugs and crime. Millions of Americans worried about filling their cars with gas or buying groceries for their families due to inflation. Violent crime skyrocketed in American cities and towns. Leftists used lawfare to target and imprison their political enemies. We cannot afford to return to those dark days. Trump and Musk must bury the hatchet now and continue making progress together.

‘A significant risk': Prime Minister Albanese warned not budge on beef import rules during trade negotiations with President Trump
‘A significant risk': Prime Minister Albanese warned not budge on beef import rules during trade negotiations with President Trump

Sky News AU

time14 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘A significant risk': Prime Minister Albanese warned not budge on beef import rules during trade negotiations with President Trump

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being warned not to cave to US demands on beef imports during upcoming trade negotiations with President Donald Trump. The Prime Minister is expected to meet with President Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit this week in order to discuss the tariffs imposed on Australian goods earlier this year. America's 47th President has imposed a massive tariff regime since taking office in January, including a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium and a 10 per cent across the board tax on all Australian imports. Trump's tariffs are a breach of the existing Australia-US free trade agreement, but White House officials have defended the President's decision by claiming Australia bans the importation of US beef. A blanket ban on US beef imports - imposed in 2003 - was repealed in 2019, however biosecurity rules remain in place and no American beef has been imported under the new scheme. Mr Albanese has previously ruled out watering down the rules, but reports indicate government officials have been reviewing the scheme in order to provide the Prime Minister with a bargaining chip. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Monday, Nationals Leader David Littleproud said weakening Australia's biosecurity regime was 'not something we should entertain', as he called on the Prime Minister to again rule it out. Mr Littleproud said there were 'strict protocols' around the importation of US beef because Australia needed to ensure the cattle had been 'born in the United States and bred all the way through to their slaughter in the United States'. 'What Anthony Albanese and his departments were (considering)… was a relaxation of beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, where we don't have the traceability that we have over the US production system,' he said. 'Cattle can come into Mexico and then end up in a slaughterhouse in the United States, and then end up in Australia. 'We could be seeing those pests and diseases like mad cow… that's not something that we should entertain.' 'That's why Anthony Albanese needs to rule out straight away that he would open that up to those cattle that were born in Canada, Mexico or anywhere else in the Americas, because that poses a significant risk unless we can trace those cattle.' The former agriculture minister acknowledged the Prime Minister had previously ruled out weakening the biosecurity rules but that recent reports had called this into question. 'When you see reports from departments saying this is what's on the table in terms of negotiations where there's smokeless fire, and that's why the Prime Minister needs to rule this out,' Mr Littleproud said. The Nationals Leader said Australia had been 'fair' in its restrictions, which were based on science, and that traceability is also a requirement imposed on Australian beef. 'Every beast here in Australia has an ear tag from the moment they're marked through to the time they go to slaughter. They've got an ear tag that we can trace, what property they've been on, where they are, what they come into contact with,' he said. 'We have traceability in this country, and all we're saying to our foreign competitors is, if you're going to bring a product in this country, we need to know where your animals have been so that we can… protect our environment and our production.' Cattle Australia boss Chris Parker also backed standing firm on traceability, describing it as a 'pretty simple requirement' and adding that the US had similar requirements for the importation of Australian beef. "They insist that we provide that level of traceability for our beef going to their country and it's not unreasonable for us to have a requirement where we want to see at least equivalence of traceability so we have a good sense of where this is coming from,' Mr Parker told the ABC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store