Growing threat of teenage boys targeting girls online for sexual abuse and violence, says NCA
Teenage boys are grooming young girls into sexual abuse, self-harm and even suicide after forming 'sadistic and violent online gangs', the National Crime Agency has warned.
The gangs - formed mainly of boys - are sharing misogynistic posts, images of violence and gore, and child sexual abuse pictures in so-called 'com networks'.
The NCA says it has seen a surge of reports – increasing six-fold - in the UK between 2022 and 2024, covering thousands of victims and culprits.
The crime-fighting agency spoke out on Tuesday alongside Government Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls Jess Phillips to warn about the emerging phenomenon.
It comes after Netflix drama Adolescence – the most talked-about show this year - thrust on to the national agenda the impact of social media on children and the negative influences of the 'manosphere'.
The Stephen Graham drama, which depicts the fallout from the murder of a schoolgirl by a 13-year-old boy, has led Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to welcome calls for it to be shown in schools.
The NCA has now published its annual National Strategic Assessment, which outlines the dangers of 'com networks' and social media which 'routinely share harmful content and extremist or misogynistic rhetoric'.
It said: 'Extreme and illicit imagery depicting violence, gore and child sexual abuse material is frequently shared amongst users, normalising and desensitising participants to increasingly extreme content and behaviours.
''Com' networks use extreme coercion to manipulate their victims, who are often children, into harming or abusing themselves, their siblings or pets, and re-victimising them by doxing or appropriation by other offenders.
'Members of 'Com' networks are usually young men who are motivated by status, power, control, misogyny, sexual gratification or an obsession with extreme or violent material.
'The emergence of these types of online platforms are almost certainly causing some individuals, especially younger people, to develop a dangerous propensity for extreme violence.'
It comes shortly after Kyle Clifford was jailed for the rest of his life for the murders of his ex-girlfriend Louise Hunt, her sister Hannah, and her mother Carol in a horrific attack at their family home.
Clifford, 26, launched the attack with a crossbow and a knife after Louise had ended their relationship, after concerns about his controlling behaviour and racist views. Detectives then discovered he had watched a video from misogynist influencer Andrew Tate prior to the killings.
Graeme Biggar, director general of the NCA, said 'deeply concerning' networks online are competing for notoriety by sharing increasingly disturbing content and inflicting escalating harm on their victims.
'Young people are being drawn into these sadistic and violent online gangs where they are collaborating at scale to inflict, or incite others to commit, serious harm', he said.
'These groups are not lurking on the dark web, they exist in the same online world and platforms young people use on a daily basis.
'It is especially concerning to see the impact this is having on young girls who are often groomed into hurting themselves and in some cases, even encouraged to attempt suicide.'
Mr Biggar urged parents and carers to speak to children about what they are doing online, and added that some victims may not realise a crime has been committed against them because they have been groomed.
Ms Phillips hit out at the 'absolutely horrific' online abuse and called for a 'co-ordinated response to tackle this global issue.
'We have seen the heartbreaking impact of crimes such as grooming and sextortion on victims around the world - many of them children who have been blackmailed and manipulated into sharing images of themselves, which has devastatingly led to some children taking their own lives.'
She added: 'My message to parents is to have open conversations with your children and to seek support if you are concerned about child sexual abuse.
'My message to tech companies is simple: this is your responsibility too. You must ensure your platforms are safe for children, so that we can protect the most vulnerable and put predators behind bars.'
Undercover police officers have been deployed to track down online networks and expose offenders, and police forces have echoed calls for social media companies to do more to help tackle the problem.
Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, called on the Government and regulator Ofcom to take action over extreme material online.
He said: 'These horrendous groups pose a deeply disturbing and sharply growing risk to children, especially teenage girls who are being sadistically groomed into acts of self-harm and even suicide online.
'Despite being repeatedly warned of the threat posed by these groups, Ofcom has failed to introduce a single targeted measure to tackle disturbing suicide and self-harm offences. This glaring gap in its regulatory regime must be closed.
'The Prime Minister must now take decisive action to ensure the Online Safety Act is fit for purpose in the face of new online risks and the threat posed by the fluid ideologies that are fuelling this troubling wave of extreme violence.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Judge restricts DOGE access to federal databases, finding 'breach of law and trust'
A federal judge has restricted the Department of Government Efficiency's access to federal databases, citing a "breach of law and trust." Led by the American Federation of Government Employees, a group of current and former federal government employees and their unions in February sued the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and DOGE for alleged "breach of privacy." U.S. District Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York granted the plaintiffs' April 25 motion for a preliminary injunction Monday, but said the scope of the injunction would be addressed in a separate order. "Following President Trump's inauguration, OPM granted broad access to many of those systems to a group of individuals associated with the Department of Government Efficiency ('DOGE'), even though no credible need for this access had been demonstrated. In doing so, OPM violated the law and bypassed its established cybersecurity practices," Cote wrote in a 99-page opinion on Monday. "In brief, the OPM records at issue concern the plaintiffs' most sensitive private affairs," the opinion says. "They include social security numbers, health care information, banking information, and information about family members. For some people, disclosure of information in OPM systems could subject them to danger." An appointee of President Bill Clinton, Cotes said plaintiffs "have shown they are entitled to" a preliminary injunction, which "would stop disclosure of OPM records to individuals associated with DOGE and require the destruction of any copies of personal information that have been obtained through such disclosure." "The plaintiffs have shown that the defendants disclosed OPM records to individuals who had no legal right of access to those records," Cotes wrote. "In doing so, the defendants violated the Privacy Act and departed from cybersecurity standards that they are obligated to follow. This was a breach of law and of trust. Tens of millions of Americans depend on the Government to safeguard records that reveal their most private and sensitive affairs." The judge further criticized the Trump administration's handling of OPM records. "The Government could have acknowledged that in its rush to accomplish a new President's agenda mistakes were made and established, important protocols were overlooked. It has not," Cote wrote. "The Government has defended this lawsuit by repeatedly invoking a mantra that it adhered to all established procedures and safeguards. It did not. Without a full-throated recognition that the law and established cybersecurity procedures must be followed, the risk of irreparable harm will continue to exist." In a May hearing, Justice Department lawyers reportedly argued that any preliminary injunction granted should include exceptions for high-level OPM officials and cited how a separate judge had walked back initial restrictions placed on DOGE access to Treasury Department records in February so long as DOGE staffers have the appropriate training and vetting, according to the Federal News Network. Justice Department lawyers filed a separate motion in the case on Friday, citing the Supreme Court's latest decision related to DOGE access to Social Security Administration (SSA) records. DOGE's future remains uncertain amid a rocky public fallout between its former leader, tech billionaire Elon Musk, and President Donald Trump, though both men previously said they want the waste-cutting entity's work to continue. The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two victories on Friday in cases involving DOGE, including giving it access to Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The three liberal justices dissented in both cases. The justices also separately reined in orders seeking transparency at DOGE. In one case, the high court halted an order from a judge in Maryland that had restricted the team's access to the SSA under federal privacy laws. The Trump administration says DOGE needs access to carry out its mission of targeting waste in the federal government. Musk had been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The entrepreneur has described it as a "Ponzi scheme" and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending. But U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a "fishing expedition" based on "little more than suspicion" of fraud, and allowing unfettered access puts Americans' private information at risk. Her ruling did allow access to anonymous data for staffers who have undergone training and background checks, or wider access for those who have detailed a specific need. The Trump administration has said DOGE cannot work effectively with those restrictions. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer also argued that the ruling is an example of federal judges overstepping their authority and trying to micromanage executive branch agencies.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Progress 'being made on violence against women'
Jersey's government is making progress in tackling recommendations from the island's Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) Taskforce, a report says. In 2023, the group made 77 recommendations to government after its research found "most women" in Jersey experienced some form of gender-based violence. The government's progress report has shown 27 of the recommendations were complete, 42 were in progress, six weare awaiting reporting and eight had not been started. Minister for Justice and Home Affairs Mary Le Hegarat, who launched the taskforce in 2022, said she was proud of the progress but added there was still "considerable work ahead". The taskforce undertook research with victims, children and young people, professional services and the general public in Jersey. Recommendations were made to the government and its key partners in categories including training, independent reviews and education. The government report showed completed recommendations included creating a dataset on harmful sexual behaviour and increasing a police presence in certain areas. Recommendations not started included developing an education programme for parents and a review of the domestic abuse law. In March 2024, the government committed to publishing annual updates on progress toward implementing all 77 recommendations. Deputy Le Hegarat said the first annual report shows the government has made "significant progress". She said: "I believe that we can be proud of the progress achieved so far. But there is considerable work ahead to achieve lasting change, and we remain committed to seeing through the implementation of all the recommendations. "The taskforce identified that VAWG in Jersey was 'a hidden problem', and that this lack of awareness, or lack of priority, was a fundamental aspect of the problem that needed to be addressed to effectively understand and address the issue." Le Hegarat added: "My hope is that this annual report, and those that follow it, will serve to ensure that the issue remains at the forefront of our minds." More news stories for Jersey Listen to the latest news for Jersey Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to March calls for end to violence against women and girls Jersey government accepts women violence report 'Shocking' report reveals violence against women Taskforce to tackle violence against women Government of Jersey - Violence against women and girls

Wall Street Journal
13 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Xi Tightens Leash on Officials' Boozing and Lavish Living
Local officials gathered in China's central city of Xinyang in March for a seminar about regulations requiring them to be frugal. Over lunch, five officials consumed four bottles of baijiu, a fiery sorghum-based spirit, flouting the very rules they had studied. One of them died that afternoon, according to an official account, which didn't state the cause of death. The officials at the lunch tried to hide the illicit consumption of alcohol, the account said, by paying off the deceased official's family and omitting the drinking in their reports to superiors.