Growing threat of teenage boys targeting girls online for sexual abuse and violence, says NCA
The gangs - formed mainly of boys - are sharing misogynistic posts, images of violence and gore, and child sexual abuse pictures in so-called 'com networks'.
The NCA says it has seen a surge of reports – increasing six-fold - in the UK between 2022 and 2024, covering thousands of victims and culprits.
The crime-fighting agency spoke out on Tuesday alongside Government Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls Jess Phillips to warn about the emerging phenomenon.
It comes after Netflix drama Adolescence – the most talked-about show this year - thrust on to the national agenda the impact of social media on children and the negative influences of the 'manosphere'.
The Stephen Graham drama, which depicts the fallout from the murder of a schoolgirl by a 13-year-old boy, has led Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to welcome calls for it to be shown in schools.
The NCA has now published its annual National Strategic Assessment, which outlines the dangers of 'com networks' and social media which 'routinely share harmful content and extremist or misogynistic rhetoric'.
It said: 'Extreme and illicit imagery depicting violence, gore and child sexual abuse material is frequently shared amongst users, normalising and desensitising participants to increasingly extreme content and behaviours.
''Com' networks use extreme coercion to manipulate their victims, who are often children, into harming or abusing themselves, their siblings or pets, and re-victimising them by doxing or appropriation by other offenders.
'Members of 'Com' networks are usually young men who are motivated by status, power, control, misogyny, sexual gratification or an obsession with extreme or violent material.
'The emergence of these types of online platforms are almost certainly causing some individuals, especially younger people, to develop a dangerous propensity for extreme violence.'
It comes shortly after Kyle Clifford was jailed for the rest of his life for the murders of his ex-girlfriend Louise Hunt, her sister Hannah, and her mother Carol in a horrific attack at their family home.
Clifford, 26, launched the attack with a crossbow and a knife after Louise had ended their relationship, after concerns about his controlling behaviour and racist views. Detectives then discovered he had watched a video from misogynist influencer Andrew Tate prior to the killings.
Graeme Biggar, director general of the NCA, said 'deeply concerning' networks online are competing for notoriety by sharing increasingly disturbing content and inflicting escalating harm on their victims.
'Young people are being drawn into these sadistic and violent online gangs where they are collaborating at scale to inflict, or incite others to commit, serious harm', he said.
'These groups are not lurking on the dark web, they exist in the same online world and platforms young people use on a daily basis.
'It is especially concerning to see the impact this is having on young girls who are often groomed into hurting themselves and in some cases, even encouraged to attempt suicide.'
Mr Biggar urged parents and carers to speak to children about what they are doing online, and added that some victims may not realise a crime has been committed against them because they have been groomed.
Ms Phillips hit out at the 'absolutely horrific' online abuse and called for a 'co-ordinated response to tackle this global issue.
'We have seen the heartbreaking impact of crimes such as grooming and sextortion on victims around the world - many of them children who have been blackmailed and manipulated into sharing images of themselves, which has devastatingly led to some children taking their own lives.'
She added: 'My message to parents is to have open conversations with your children and to seek support if you are concerned about child sexual abuse.
'My message to tech companies is simple: this is your responsibility too. You must ensure your platforms are safe for children, so that we can protect the most vulnerable and put predators behind bars.'
Undercover police officers have been deployed to track down online networks and expose offenders, and police forces have echoed calls for social media companies to do more to help tackle the problem.
Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, called on the Government and regulator Ofcom to take action over extreme material online.
He said: 'These horrendous groups pose a deeply disturbing and sharply growing risk to children, especially teenage girls who are being sadistically groomed into acts of self-harm and even suicide online.
'Despite being repeatedly warned of the threat posed by these groups, Ofcom has failed to introduce a single targeted measure to tackle disturbing suicide and self-harm offences. This glaring gap in its regulatory regime must be closed.
'The Prime Minister must now take decisive action to ensure the Online Safety Act is fit for purpose in the face of new online risks and the threat posed by the fluid ideologies that are fuelling this troubling wave of extreme violence.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

4 hours ago
Sean Combs doesn't deserve a new trial, prosecutors argue
Sean "Diddy" Combs doesn't deserve a new trial because 'there was more than a sufficient basis' to support his conviction on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, federal prosecutors argued in a new court filing overnight, submitted in response to a July 31 defense motion requesting acquittal or a new trial. Attorneys for Combs, who was found not guilty on July 2 of more serious charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, asked the judge four weeks later to acquit him of the prostitution-related counts or grant him a new trial, arguing in part that the Mann Act – the law under which Combs was convicted – was too broadly interpreted to apply to him, that the evidence used to support his conviction was lacking, and that "spillover prejudice" from evidence introduced to support the charges on which Combs was acquitted – evidence the defense argued "would have been inadmissible" if Combs had been tried only under the Mann Act – was "inflammatory." The Mann Act is a federal law that makes it a criminal offense to "knowingly [transport] any individual, male or female, in interstate or foreign commerce or in any territory or possession of the United States for the purpose of prostitution or sexual activity which is a criminal offense under the federal or state statute or local ordinance." Combs doesn't dispute hiring male escorts but his attorneys argued in their July motion that the Mann Act doesn't prohibit Combs' conduct "because he lacked a commercial motive and did not intend for paid escorts to have sex with him," but rather to watch and video record them them having sex with girlfriends in sexual encounters referred to in trial testimony as so-called "freak-offs," which his attorneys contended is "protected First Amendment activity." Prosecutors argued in their 58-page response that the law doesn't distinguish between voyeurism and profit. 'He transported escorts across state lines to engage in Freak Offs for pay. He directed the sexual activity of escorts and victims throughout Freak Offs for his own sexual gratification. And he personally engaged in sexual activity during Freak Offs,' prosecutors said of Combs in their filing. 'There was more than a sufficient basis, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, to support the counts of conviction.' The "freak-offs," as former Combs girlfriend Cassie Ventura testified they were called and which another former Combs girlfriend testifying under the pseudonym "Jane" referred to as "hotel nights," took place at different residences or in hotels in New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Ibiza, and Turks and Caicos, according to trial testimony. 'Escorts traveled to these Freak Offs with Ventura and hotel nights with Jane. The defendant discussed the escorts' travel with Ventura and Jane,' prosecutors said in their filing, further noting that "the travel arrangements were generally made at the defendant's direction" including by using a travel agent, having an escort service coordinate it, or by having Ventura and "Jane" handle arrangements.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin better-placed than courts to release Epstein files, judge says
By Luc Cohen NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge said on Wednesday that the Trump administration is in a better position than federal courts to release materials that would satisfy public curiosity about the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. In rejecting the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted Epstein in 2019, Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Richard Berman wrote that the 70-odd pages of materials the grand jury saw paled in comparison to the 100,000 pages the government has from its Epstein investigation but is not releasing. The judge said the bid to persuade him to unseal the records was an apparent distraction from the Justice Department's decision in July not to release its files and directly cited another judge's decision earlier this month not to release similar materials from the grand jury that indicted Epstein's longtime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. "The instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has faced criticism from his conservative base of supporters and congressional Democrats over the Justice Department's decision not to release the files from its Epstein investigation. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. 'DIVERSION' To try to quell the discontent, Trump in July instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Justice Department investigations typically collect more material than prosecutors ultimately present to grand juries. Some of that evidence is sometimes eventually disclosed to the public during criminal trials. The Justice Department does not routinely disclose its evidence in cases where a defendant pleads guilty or, like Epstein, never faces trial, but it would not require judicial approval to release such materials. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and saw a PowerPoint presentation and call logs, Berman wrote. On Aug. 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied the Justice Department's request to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from Maxwell's case, writing that the material was duplicative of public testimony at her 2021 trial. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein. "A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such," Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case.


New York Times
11 hours ago
- New York Times
A Rail Platform Becomes a Lab to Identify 6,000 Bodies Sent From Russia
The bodies arrive by the hundreds on a dusty railroad platform, nameless, mutilated, unearthed from mud, sand or collapsed trenches. In quick procession, they are unloaded in their white bags from a refrigerated car and wheeled to a trackside field lab, where they are examined and documented with quiet efficiency. This vast shipment of the dead, returned by Russia in a swap with Ukraine, is one of the few results of three rounds of American-orchestrated cease-fire talks. Those negotiations and a summit on Friday between President Trump and the Russian leader, Vladimir V. Putin, have done little to slow the fighting on the battlefield. Ukraine hopes to identify each of the 6,000 bodies it has received from Russia under a deal reached in Istanbul — which also included a prisoner exchange — and return the soldiers' remains to loved ones. The bodies are just a fraction of the more than 70,000 people in Ukraine, both military personnel and civilians, who have been listed as 'missing under special circumstances,' the legal designation for those who have disappeared during more than three years of war. The first remains arrived in Ukraine in June. A conveyor-belt-like process at a railway station in the Odesa region in southern Ukraine is intended to speed up identification, bypassing traditional autopsies in morgues, which are already overloaded. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.