Nearly one-third of Pacific nation Tuvalu seeks Australian climate visa
SYDNEY: Nearly one-third of citizens in Pacific nation Tuvalu are seeking a landmark climate visa to live in Australia as rising seas threaten their palm-fringed shores, official figures obtained by AFP show.
Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as "the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world".
More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian programme, almost a full third of the nation's population.
One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, scientists fear Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years.
Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves.
"Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security, and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region," Australia's foreign affairs department told AFP.
Australia and Tuvalu inked the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China's expanding reach in the region.
Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu.
Already, there are signs the programme will be hugely oversubscribed.
Official data on the programme shows 3,125 Tuvaluans entered the random ballot within four days of it opening last week.
"This is the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen," a spokesperson for Australia's foreign affairs department said.
Tuvalu is home to 10,643 people, according to census figures collected in 2022.
Registration costs A$25 (US$16), with the ballot closing on Jul 18.
NOT "MUCH OF A FUTURE"
The visa programme has been hailed as a landmark response to the looming challenge of climate-forced migration.
"At the same time, it will provide Tuvaluans the choice to live, study and work in Australia," Australia's foreign affairs department said.
But they have also fanned fears that nations like Tuvalu could be rapidly drained of skilled professionals and young talent.
University of Sydney geographer John Connell warned that a long-term exodus of workers could imperil Tuvalu's future.
"Small states do not have many jobs and some activities don't need that many people," he told AFP.
"Atolls don't offer much of a future: agriculture is hard, fisheries offer wonderful potential but it doesn't generate employment," he added.
The Falepili pact commits Australia to defending Tuvalu in the face of natural disasters, health pandemics and "military aggression".
"For the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to come to the aid of Tuvalu, upon request, when Tuvalu encounters a major natural disaster, a health pandemic or military aggression," Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo said at the time.
"Again, for the first time there is a country that has committed legally to recognise the future statehood and sovereignty of Tuvalu despite the detrimental impact of climate changed-induced sea level rise."
The agreement also offers Australia a say in any other defence pacts Tuvalu signs with other countries, raising concerns at the time that the Pacific nation was handing over its sovereignty.
Tuvalu is one of just 12 states that still have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing.
Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last year his country shared a vision for a "peaceful, stable, prosperous and unified region".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
12 hours ago
- Straits Times
Pacific Islands delay security plan that could open door to China
SYDNEY - Leaders of the four biggest Pacific Islands nations have delayed adopting a joint security strategy that could provide an opening for Beijing, against a backdrop of increasing rivalry between China, Australia and the United States in the Pacific Ocean. The Melanesian Spearhead Group, which includes Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu and Fiji, had been negotiating its first joint security framework, focused on maritime security. A meeting of the group's leaders on June 23 in Fiji delayed a decision, with Papua New Guinea's Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko telling Reuters the security strategy was yet to be agreed on. Discussions over Taiwan, among other matters, and how to accommodate the different positions of members was challenging, he said on June 26. The inter-government group, courted by Beijing which funded its headquarters in Vanuatu, has previously said it would consider China as a security partner. The Pacific's bigger diplomatic bloc, the 18-member Pacific Islands Forum, has rejected China security ties and said instead the Pacific should provide its own security. Among the Melanesian Spearhead Group nations, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu are seen as the closest to Beijing with policing ties, while Papua New Guinea has security deals with the United States and Australia, and Fiji has a defence partnership with Australia. Australia said on June 26 it would assist the Pacific Islands to counter illegal fishing by doubling funding to A$477 million (S$397.46 million) for aerial maritime surveillance across millions of kilometres of the Pacific, using civilian planes and drones. China, which operates the biggest fishing fleets, demonstrated its coast guard capabilities to 10 Pacific Islands ministers in May, prompting concern from some regional officials it may start patrolling the South Pacific, where the United States Coast Guard has increased activity. Largest trading partner Australia's Pacific Minister Pat Conroy attended the Melanesian Spearhead Group meeting for the first time, sitting across the room from China's ambassador Zhou Jian at the Fiji discussions. China's embassy in Fiji said in a statement that the group was a "crucial platform for promoting regional peace and stability". In the meeting, Mr Conroy highlighted that Australia is the largest trading partner of every member of the group. Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele said in a statement that progress was made on the security strategy, with "a firm commitment to collaborate with member countries and associate partners to enhance stability and peace throughout the region". He did not specific which partners. In the Solomon Islands on June 26, Mr Conroy said Australia will provide 60 police vehicles, cybersecurity support and road upgrades for Honiara to host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September. "The Pacific is best served by Pacific-led institutions and processes," he said in a statement. Solomon Islands is yet to formally respond to Australia's offer in December of A$100 million to expand its police force, Mr Conroy said in a television interview. "I made it clear that I don't think that China should be involved in policing in the Pacific," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Solomon Islands said it would fill any security gaps by seeking assistance from Melanesian countries, he added. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
14 hours ago
- CNA
Nearly one-third of Pacific nation Tuvalu seeks Australian climate visa
SYDNEY: Nearly one-third of citizens in Pacific nation Tuvalu are seeking a landmark climate visa to live in Australia as rising seas threaten their palm-fringed shores, official figures obtained by AFP show. Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as "the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world". More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian programme, almost a full third of the nation's population. One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, scientists fear Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years. Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves. "Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security, and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region," Australia's foreign affairs department told AFP. Australia and Tuvalu inked the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China's expanding reach in the region. Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu. Already, there are signs the programme will be hugely oversubscribed. Official data on the programme shows 3,125 Tuvaluans entered the random ballot within four days of it opening last week. "This is the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen," a spokesperson for Australia's foreign affairs department said. Tuvalu is home to 10,643 people, according to census figures collected in 2022. Registration costs A$25 (US$16), with the ballot closing on Jul 18. NOT "MUCH OF A FUTURE" The visa programme has been hailed as a landmark response to the looming challenge of climate-forced migration. "At the same time, it will provide Tuvaluans the choice to live, study and work in Australia," Australia's foreign affairs department said. But they have also fanned fears that nations like Tuvalu could be rapidly drained of skilled professionals and young talent. University of Sydney geographer John Connell warned that a long-term exodus of workers could imperil Tuvalu's future. "Small states do not have many jobs and some activities don't need that many people," he told AFP. "Atolls don't offer much of a future: agriculture is hard, fisheries offer wonderful potential but it doesn't generate employment," he added. The Falepili pact commits Australia to defending Tuvalu in the face of natural disasters, health pandemics and "military aggression". "For the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to come to the aid of Tuvalu, upon request, when Tuvalu encounters a major natural disaster, a health pandemic or military aggression," Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo said at the time. "Again, for the first time there is a country that has committed legally to recognise the future statehood and sovereignty of Tuvalu despite the detrimental impact of climate changed-induced sea level rise." The agreement also offers Australia a say in any other defence pacts Tuvalu signs with other countries, raising concerns at the time that the Pacific nation was handing over its sovereignty. Tuvalu is one of just 12 states that still have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last year his country shared a vision for a "peaceful, stable, prosperous and unified region".
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Commentary: Social media regulation should protect users, not push them out
SINGAPORE: Across the Asia Pacific, governments are tightening the rules around who gets to use social media. In Vietnam, users must now verify their accounts with a national ID or local phone number under Decree 147. Malaysia in January began requiring social media platforms to obtain operating licences. Indonesia is considering a minimum age of 18, while Australia has already banned children under 16. These aren't just rules about what you can post. They are rules about who gets to participate. The shift is subtle but significant, going from regulating content to regulating access. Whether you can participate now is increasingly about fitting into the right category – by age, by location, by documentation – not just about how you behave online. In this climate, it does not take much for caution to harden into restriction. And when that happens, platforms might stop being open spaces. They start becoming exclusionary systems that pre-emptively screen users out before anything even happens. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE OVERPROTECT Blanket restrictions look decisive, but they often miss the mark. Blocking the young, the anonymous or the vulnerable does not always lead to safety. It often results in exclusion, silence or migration to platforms with weaker rules and safeguards. Australia's under-16 ban has drawn global attention. But it's still too early to know whether it's working as intended. Will it protect children, or merely push them towards less regulated corners of the internet? These are questions we need to ask before more countries follow suit. Sonia Livingstone, a UK scholar of digital literacy and youth technology use, has long warned against protection that turns into exclusion. Young people have a right to be in digital spaces – safely, yes, but meaningfully too. And that principle applies more broadly: Exclusion by legislation doesn't just affect teens. It cuts off anyone who won't – or can't – verify their identity on demand. The truth is, anonymity poses challenges but it's not the only issue. Accountability is another. At SG Her Empowerment, we've supported victims whose intimate images were shared by both anonymous users and known individuals. In both cases, the ecosystem struggled to respond to prevent or mitigate harm. When perpetrators can slip between accounts or disappear altogether, it becomes harder to trace, report and stop the abuse. Anonymity can make that harder. But the deeper issue is whether our systems are built to hold anyone – visible or not – to account. VISIBILITY IS NOT VIRTUE We are drifting towards a global system that increasingly treats visibility as virtue and invisibility as risk. That is a misconception. Whistleblowers, survivors and marginalised communities often need anonymity to speak freely and safely. And it's not just about safety. Anonymity also nurtures creativity, experimentation and candid self-expression – ways of thinking, expressing or deliberating that are not always possible when every action is tied back to a name, job or family. Not everyone posting is trying to hide nefarious deeds. Some are just trying to grow – without the cost of getting it wrong in public. A healthy digital space must ensure room for that too. The countries in the region seem to be edging towards digital systems that assume users should be screened before they can participate. In these jurisdictions, ID, location and traceability are fast becoming the price of entry to online social spaces. That might make enforcement easier, but it narrows the space for meaningful interaction. PRECISION SAFETY When safety is enforced at the door, the burden shifts away from where it matters most: how systems respond when things go wrong. To be clear, a safer internet is not just one with fewer bad actors. It's one where harm is taken seriously, where victims are supported and where platforms are held accountable. That requires more than just gatekeeping – it requires a redesign of social media systems to ensure they can respond to failures and hold up under pressure. Singapore's model has been lauded as frontrunning but is nonetheless still evolving. While early legislation like the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (better known as POFMA) raised concerns about its scope and ministerial discretion, it was designed to issue correction directions for falsehoods post-publication, not to impose blanket restrictions to social media platforms or services. The Online Safety (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2022 expanded regulatory powers further to direct platforms to remove or block access to egregious content such as child sexual exploitation, suicide promotion and incitement to violence. Still, it left room for ambiguity – especially around harms that fall outside these categories, including non-consensual distribution of sexual content, targeted harassment, or content promoting dangerous behaviours. The next step is the Online Safety (Relief and Accountability) Bill. Once passed, it will establish a dedicated Online Safety Commission in 2026. It will also give regulators the authority to request user identity information – but only when serious harm has occurred and legally defined thresholds are met. In this case, identity disclosure is not the starting point. Instead, the focus is on harm-based disclosure: targeted, post-incident and justified. REGULATING USERS IS ONLY PART OF THE PICTURE Governments are leaning on what they know: identity checks, age gates, device and user verification. These are easy to understand and relatively easier to enact. They show immediate action and are often framed as part of a broader effort to protect minors and rein in perpetrators who exploit anonymity to evade detection or accountability. But they don't get to the root of the problem. Why do social media algorithms keep pushing content that distress, provoke or trigger users? Why are reporting avenues and mechanisms buried under three layers of menus? Why are some platforms better at responding to harm than others, even with the same risks? Real trust does not come from mere gatekeeping, but by ensuring platforms behave predictably when things go wrong. That means robust reporting tools, responsive moderation and interface designs that prioritise user safety and well-being. Right now, most of that isn't happening. On many social media platforms, algorithms still reward emotional extremes. Autoplay and endless scroll are still the default. Reporting tools are scattered, inconsistent and underpowered. GETTING IT RIGHT BEFORE IT CLOSES IN Regulation is necessary. But it has to be targeted, not sweeping; responsive to real harm, not preoccupied with suspicion. Safeguards must aim to protect users of social media from potential dangers, not to protect social media platforms from users. Will the current surge of regulation eventually make social media unusable? Perhaps not – but it will certainly make it overwhelmingly more conditional. The question we must ask ourselves is: Conditional on what? Identity? Risk profiles? If we get this wrong, we won't just be regulating platforms – we'll be deciding who gets to belong in the digital world we're building next. That's a decision worth getting right.
