Toronto police board to formalize how and when it says ‘sorry'
The Toronto Police Services Board is considering adopting a new policy that would set out how the police force offers formal apologies — who approves them, how they're delivered, and how victims are consulted.
The policy is set to go before a board meeting on Thursday, If approved, it will apply to any formal apologies issued by Toronto's police chief or the board itself. Staff say that the policy is intended to 'build trust between the Service and the communities of Toronto.' But, the proposed policy also stipulates that no apology should be seen as an admission of legal liability.
The move follows several high-profile apologies from the Toronto Police Service in recent years.
In 2022, then-Chief James Ramer issued an 'unreserved' apology after race-based data showed that Black residents were significantly more likely to face police enforcement and use-of-force incidents.
However, critics like University of Toronto professor Beverly Bain rejected the apology as lacking substance.
A year earlier, Ramer also apologized for failings in missing persons investigations tied to serial killer Bruce McArthur. A report by retired judge Gloria Epstein found the disappearances of LGBTQ2S+ men in the Village were not taken seriously enough. Ramer called the findings 'inexcusable.'
'We recognize that there is more work ahead on many fronts,' Chief Myron Demkiw, wrote in a letter accompanying the proposed apology policy. 'We must continue to strengthen our relationships with various partners and communities across the city to build a solid safety network.'
What's proposed in the new rules?
Under the proposed policy, when apologies are made to communities over systemic or historical wrongs, police leadership will be required to strike an advisory group composed of key community representatives.
That group will provide advice, cultural significance, and information to construct a formal apology, the staff report said.
Apologies to individuals will require officials to consult with the impacted individual or their family prior to any formal apology.
The board has not said when the final vote on the policy will take place. If approved, the guidelines would become a standard operating framework for all formal apologies moving forward.
With files from CP24's Joanna Lavoie...
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
26 minutes ago
- National Post
Jesse Kline: Air Canada strike brought to you by the Liberal government
For years, the Liberals have worked to increase the power of Canada's labour unions, and the monster they created is now coming back to bite them as Air Canada's flight attendants walk off the job, grounding hundreds of flights. But Ottawa can start to fix the mess it created by opening the airline market to more competition, thus lessening the impact that strikes have on consumers. Article content Article content It's no coincidence that the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which represents more than 10,000 Air Canada employees, chose this moment to go on strike and throw the country's air transportation network into chaos. Article content Article content Article content The contract between the airline and its flight attendants ended in March, but the union waited until the height of the summer travel season to walk off the job, in a move that has so far affected around 500,000 travellers. Article content Thanks to legislation passed last year that banned the use of replacement workers in federally regulated industries, including air travel, the union knew the airline would have little recourse if its members hit the picket line. And given the Liberals' penchant for intervening in labour disputes, CUPE could also be fairly certain the government would try to order the striking flight attendants back to work, after doing so in disputes involving Canada's major railways and postal service last year. Article content And so it was that after Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to force the flight attendants back to work and send the parties to binding arbitration on Saturday, Mark Hancock, CUPE's national president, tore up the back-to-work order and vowed to challenge it. Article content Article content On Monday morning, the CIRB declared the strike 'unlawful' and ordered workers back on the job 'immediately.' As of this writing, it's unclear whether the union intends to continue to defy the mandate. Article content Article content The situation highlights the catch-22 the Liberals now find themselves in: their interventionist, pro-labour policies have reduced the incentive for unions to settle disputes at the bargaining table, forcing Ottawa to step in to alleviate the resulting political headache caused by major disruptions in markets that are dominated by a few large players. Article content It's a classic case of the state stepping in with Big Government policies to fix problems caused by other interventionist measures. But it's also an opportunity for the Liberals to read the room and enact reforms that will attract foreign investment, make the country more competitive and reduce prices for consumers. Article content To do that, the government should follow the advice of its own Competition Bureau, which released a report in the spring advocating for more competition in Canada's airline market. Article content To be sure, there have been some noticeable improvements in recent years. According to the competition watchdog, thanks to upstart airlines like Porter and Flair, market concentration dropped by 10 per cent between 2019 and 2023. Article content But Air Canada and WestJet still account for between 56 and 78 per cent of all domestic passenger traffic departing from Canada's major airports. This is a direct result of government policies that favour incumbent carriers, increase costs and limit foreign ownership and competition. Article content One of the major barriers faced by new airlines, according to the Competition Bureau, is the high cost of government taxes and fees that are tacked onto ticket prices. Article content Some of them are designed to ensure the cost of running Canada's air transportation network is paid by travellers, which makes perfect sense. But ticket prices are also affected by fuel taxes and high airport fees, which Ottawa simply treats as a cash cow. Article content This assertion is backed up by research released Monday by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), which found that the exorbitant rents the federal government charges airport authorities is significantly driving up the cost of air travel. Article content Article content According to MEI, airports sent Ottawa close to $500 million in rental fees last year, which is up 68 per cent since 2014. Article content All told, the think tank found that the average airport improvement fee paid in Canada is four times higher than in the United States. Airport security charges and fuel taxes are also far higher in Canada than in peer countries, such as the U.S. and Australia. Article content These costs make it harder for discount carriers to compete based on price. The Competition Bureau says that taxes and fees constitute 30 per cent of the ticket price on major carriers, but that those 'costs take up an even higher share of what passengers pay for flights on ultra-low-cost carriers,' which makes them less profitable. Article content New carriers are also constrained by airport procedures, which often favour incumbents. Smaller, secondary airports in major cities can provide consumers and airlines with more options, but are hamstrung by the size of their runways and legal restrictions that only allow one international airport in certain regions. Article content Article content A good example is Toronto's Billy Bishop Airport, which is often cheaper and more convenient than Pearson Airport, but was prevented from hosting long-haul flights when the Liberals kiboshed plans to extend its runway to accommodate passenger jets in 2015. Article content Yet the biggest impediments to airline competition are the government's restrictions on foreign ownership and its prohibition on foreign carriers flying domestic routes. Article content In 2018, Ottawa increased the share of Canadian airlines that foreigners are allowed to own, but the Competition Bureau doesn't think it went far enough. Article content It recommends the rules be changed so that a single foreign investor can own up to 49 per cent of a Canadian carrier, and that the government create a new class of airline that can only serve domestic routes but can be fully owned by non-Canadians. Article content The competition watchdog also suggests Ottawa start allowing 'airlines from partner countries to fly domestic service within Canada.'
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Lawyers for alleged B.C. hijacker get more time to prepare bail application
Shaheer Cassim makes an appearance by video in Richmond provincial court in this sketch. RICHMOND — The man accused of hijacking a plane and triggering a security scare at Vancouver International Airport last month appeared briefly at a provincial court in Richmond, B.C., where his lawyers were granted an adjournment. Shaheer Cassim attended the court virtually from Surrey Pretrial Centre wearing an orange sweatsuit. He acknowledged he could see and hear the judge, and sat with his hands on his knees throughout the short video appearance, which lasted less than five minutes. An articling student representing Cassim's defence lawyer, Kevin Westell, asked the court for a two-week adjournment as they continue to prepare a bail application. The agent confirmed Cassim had agreed to remain in custody until his next appearance, which the judge scheduled for Sept. 2. Cassim is a former commercial pilot who faces charges for allegedly taking a small aircraft from Victoria's airport on July 15 and flying it over the Vancouver airport before he was arrested upon landing. The 39-year-old has been in custody at the pretrial facility in Surrey since his arrest and his court files have been placed under publication bans. He's been charged with hijacking, which is an offence constituting terrorism, and with damaging or interfering with a navigation system. This report by Brieanna Charlebois, The Canadian Press, was first published Aug. 18, 2025
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
London man charged in hate-motivated assault investigation
A London police cruiser is seen in this undated image. (Source: London Police Service) London police have charged a man in connection to a hate-motivated assault investigation. On Sunday around 3:15 p.m., a man was standing near Queens Avenue and Clarence Street when police said an unknown man approached him and began speaking to him. According to the London Police Service, the suspect uttered racially motivated comments and allegedly assaulted the victim. Property was reportedly taken and thrown into the road before the victim was assaulted a second time. The suspect left the area and police were called. The victim's property was damaged. Before police arrived, officers said the suspect came back to the area, saying additional comments to the man before leaving again. No physical injuries were sustained by the victim. The suspect was found and arrested around an hour later. A 44-year-old man of London is now facing charges for assault, assault by suffocation, mischief under $5,000, and breach of probation. 'The LPS acknowledges that hate-motivated incidents can generate concern and unrest within the community,' said Det. Sgt. Adam Steele. 'We are committed to thorough investigations and ensuring the safety of all Londoners.'
