Russia says ready to assist Iran amid Middle East escalation
ISTANBUL: Russia is ready to assist Iran in various ways amid the ongoing escalation in the Middle East, depending on Tehran's needs, the Kremlin said on Monday.
According to Anadolu Agency, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia had offered mediation, but it would depend on what Iran required.
"We have stated our position; this is also a very important manifestation — a form of support for the Iranian side," he said.
Israel and Iran have been engaged in aerial combat since June 13, when Tel Aviv launched a surprise attack on several sites across Iran, including military and nuclear facilities, prompting retaliatory strikes from Tehran.
Meanwhile, the United States struck three main Iranian nuclear sites early Sunday, with US President Donald Trump claiming severe damage to the facilities and their "obliteration."
Commenting on the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow, Peskov said the talks would allow both sides to exchange views and give Tehran an opportunity to convey its proposals and position on the current situation.
Peskov added that the growing number of actors involved in the conflict was deeply regrettable and condemned by Russia.
"Iran was repeatedly discussed between Putin and Trump during their recent conversations, but the Russian president was not informed of Sunday's strikes.
"We believe that the fate of a country's leadership should be decided by its own people — not by third countries or their leaders," he said, in response to a question about Trump's remarks regarding regime change in Iran.
He added that the US strikes would not affect dialogue between Moscow and Washington, as these were "independent processes".
"It remains to be seen what happened to these nuclear facilities, and whether there is a radiation hazard. Although the IAEA has said there are currently no signs of radiation contamination, these developments are, of course, cause for legitimate concern," Peskov said. — BERNAMA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Will Iran give US a 'political grenade'?
THE United States' strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday raised two major questions: how effective were they and what will Iran do next? US President Donald Trump said the air raids "totally obliterated" the main nuclear sites, calling them a "spectacular military success". So far, Teheran has given little away about its response, although Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US had "crossed a very big red line". The US targeted Iran's three main nuclear sites, including Fordow, a uranium enrichment facility buried 90m underground. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the strikes "devastated the Iranian nuclear programme". The extent of the damage has not been confirmed, but there is speculation nuclear material had already been moved away. Heloise Fayet, a nuclear expert at the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales, said satellite images showing activity around Fordow "suggests enriched uranium stock may therefore have been transferred to sites not monitored by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)". "We previously had knowledge, albeit imperfect, of the programme thanks to the agency's inspections; now no inspections are possible," she said. "As for Iran's technical expertise, it cannot be destroyed, knowing that thousands of people have participated in Iran's nuclear programme." Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King's College London, called the US action a "high-risk operation that delivers unpredictable outcomes", given the facility was deep underground. "Trump has been using OSINT (open-source intelligence) accounts to say Fordow is gone while the Iranians claim there is only surface-level destruction." Ali Vaez, Iran project director for the International Crisis Group, said destroying Fordow "won't necessarily end Iran's nuclear programme". "Teheran has produced hundreds of advanced centrifuges in the past few years that are stored in unknown locations," he said. According to Krieg, Iran will seek a "calibrated response — loud enough to resonate, but measured enough to contain". Michael A. Horowitz, a geopolitics and security analyst, said its options included attacking US assets, closing the Strait of Hormuz — a vital conduit for the world oil trade — or even attacking energy facilities in the Gulf, which hosts several US military bases. "None of those are good options that achieve anything — this is mostly about saving face," he posted on X. "The risks, on the other hand, are great." However, Horowitz said there were other ways to respond, including a limited retaliation against the US before returning to strikes against Israel and finally negotiating a settlement. The Iranian government now realised its very existence was at stake, said Renad Mansour, senior research fellow at the Chatham House think tank, casting it back to the days of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. "It's survival mode," he said, predicting "more violence" in the short term with the prospect of a "managed de-escalation" and eventual negotiations. Hamidreza Azizi, visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said Iran might allow Trump a "symbolic win" and retaliate against Israeli targets instead. "This keeps Washington out of the war while intensifying pressure on Tel Aviv. The risk of drawing the US further in would now rest on Trump's next move," he posted on X. "If Trump continues to strike Iran without new provocation, it looks more like going to war on Israel's behalf. That's politically costly, given domestic opposition to war with Iran." Meanwhile, Iran could deny knowledge of what happened to its enriched uranium, avoiding IAEA inspections, and later leave the Nuclear Non-Profiferation Treaty. "Trump may have scored a tactical win but if Iran plays this smart, they hand him a political grenade, all while shifting the nuclear game into murkier, more dangerous territory," wrote Hamidreza.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: US attack on Iran
ON Sunday, the United States, a nuclear-armed state, went on an unprovoked war with Iran at the behest of another nuclear-armed state led by alleged war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu. US President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three nuclear sites in Iran is a grave mistake, with even graver consequences for the rest of the world. One such unintended outcome is the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. The message of the two unprovoked wars is this: if you do not have nuclear weapons, we will attack you. North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un must be wanting to tell Iran's President Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, "I told you so". Iran signed a nuclear deal with the US and five other countries in 2015, but Trump shredded it. Iran was in the midst of negotiating another with the US when, on June 12, the bloodthirsty Netanyahu attacked Iran. There is an irony here: he doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons when Israel is having 90 warheads — some say 400. Why is it that a genocidal Zionist regime can have nuclear weapons and others can't? Now Trump, echoing the words of Netanyahu, is telling Iran to sign on the dotted lines at bomb-point. Is this how sovereign nations are required to negotiate international treaties from now on? We have to say this: the US, by joining Israel in its project of annihilation in the Middle East, is undermining the very foundation of international law, which it had a hand in crafting. Welcome to the New World Disorder, where the powerful dictate the rules to the less powerful. Where "might is right" thrives, justice lies interred with its bones. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is right in saying that Washington's involvement in the conflict that Israel started is worsening the situation. Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran is illegal and so is the US attack on Iran. What the US should have done is to stop Israel's attack on Iran, but instead it is joining the rogue state in clear breach of everything the United Nations stands for. The response from the leaders of the international community, especially from Europe, is pathetic: "Israel has the right to defend itself", they echoed each other like they were reading an ad copy crafted by Tel Aviv. Now who attacked whom? Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, which has, historically, much to do with the annihilation perpetrated by Israel since its stealthy creation 77 years ago, responded, like the European leaders silenced by the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv, thus: we support the US strike on Iran. This is an unmistakable sign of nuclear-armed European nations lining up with the US and Israel to attack Iran, a non-nuclear sovereign country. Just like the unprovoked invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, many against one. The architects of these two invasions are strutting the Earth like the hubristic Pharaoh of old. The International Criminal Court is neither allowed to investigate their alleged war crimes nor prosecute the modern-day Pharaohs for committing them. We do not know how Iran will respond, but as it says, the attacks will have "everlasting consequences". A bungling few have made the rest pick up the tab.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Anwar: 13MP success hinges on unity and coordination across ministries
KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has stressed that the success of the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) hinges on proper coordination and preparedness across all government ministries and agencies. Anwar, who is also the Finance Minister, said every administrative machinery must act in unison as one national team to implement policies grounded in reality and designed to meet future challenges. "The 13MP was drafted following continuous discussions among ministries, central agencies and state governments over the past few months," said Anwar, who chaired the Special Cabinet Meeting today to review the framework and key initiatives of the plan. He said the 13MP — a key document that will shape the country's development over the next five years — is scheduled to be tabled in the Dewan Rakyat at the end of next month. During the meeting, Anwar also gave ministers and senior officials the opportunity to contribute ideas and suggestions to sharpen the plan's implementation. "The 13MP is a continuation of the reforms driven by the MADANI Government over the past two years, based on the aspirations of the MADANI Economy — to restructure the economic framework, elevate the status, dignity and well-being of the people, and build a more just, sustainable and resilient nation," he said. — BERNAMA
