logo
Google Canada claims pregnancy is not a protected ground under Ontario's human rights code in defence of lawsuit

Google Canada claims pregnancy is not a protected ground under Ontario's human rights code in defence of lawsuit

National Post31-07-2025
In defending a lawsuit by a former employee claiming Google Canada fired her within days of telling her bosses she was pregnant, the tech giant claims that pregnancy is not a protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code.
Article content
Sarah Lilleyman filed a statement of claim in Toronto's Superior Court of Justice last year claiming wrongful dismissal and a breach of the Ontario Human Rights Code because of 'pregnancy discrimination,' as previously reported by National Post.
Article content
Article content
Google Canada, headquartered in Toronto, filed a statement of defence in court as part of the legal process for adjudicating the claim. In it, Google, a leading provider of online search services and internet-related products, denies discrimination and wrongful dismissal.
Article content
Article content
Google says Lilleyman worked for the company from October 2021 'until her employment was terminated on March 22, 2024, as part of a workforce reduction.' She worked as an editor, responsible for user growth through writing, editing, and publishing content.
Article content
'In January 2024, due to changing business needs, Google Canada was forced to implement significant workforce reductions across various locations and divisions. Lilleyman's role was among those impacted by this workforce reduction in Canada.' She was given two months' notice.
Article content
'Google Canada denies it discriminated against Lilleyman in her employment or on termination on the basis of sex, gender, or any other protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code,' Google says in its statement of defence.
Article content
Article content
Lilleyman's job, 'along with many other positions,' was eliminated in a company-wide reduction and her pregnancy or leave were not factors.
Article content
Article content
The Google statement then continues: 'Moreover, Google Canada states that Lilleyman's allegations, even if true (which are expressly denied), do not amount to a violation of the Code…
Article content
'First, 'pregnancy' is not a protected ground under the Code.'
Article content
'The Code protects a woman because she is or was pregnant, may become pregnant, has just had a baby or other pregnancy-related situations. Pregnancy includes the process of having a baby from conception up to the period following childbirth. It also includes the post-delivery period and breastfeeding,' the tribunal says in an information package on the human rights code's application.
Article content
'It is contrary to the Code to fire you, demote you or lay you off (even with notice) because you are or may become pregnant. If you are or may become pregnant, you have the right to keep your job and not to be passed over for benefits and opportunities.'
Article content
Veronica Spada, a spokeswoman with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, a body that adjudicates discrimination complaints about the code, said she cannot comment on specific complaints but confirmed the province's human rights code prohibits discrimination and harassment on several grounds, among them sex, 'including sexual harassment and pregnancy.'
Article content
Google officials declined to discuss specifics of the case.
Article content
'We cannot comment on active litigation; our position is outlined in the documents filed with the court,' a spokesperson said.
Article content
Lilleyman's lawyer, Kathryn Marshall, said Google made the statement in their public court filing and have not recanted or amended it since.
Article content
'This is their legal position and they are standing behind it despite the fact that it is contrary to the human rights code,' Marshall said.
Article content
'I believe that Google is trying to import American law into Canada and is willfully ignoring Canadian human rights law that protects women from pregnancy discrimination.'
Article content
Daniel Del Gobbo, an assistant law professor and chair of the Law, Gender, and Sexual Justice program at the University of Windsor, said Google is wrong in its interpretation of the Ontario Human Rights Code.
Article content
'Pregnancy in the workplace is a fundamental issue of gender equality in Canada. Individuals should not suffer negative consequences because they were, are, or may become pregnant. And individuals should not suffer negative consequences because they plan to take or have taken maternity or parental leave. Human rights law is clear on these points,' Del Gobbo told National Post.
Article content
'An employer cannot consider the factor that the employee is pregnant and/or planning a maternity or parental leave when deciding whether to terminate the person's employment,' he said.
Article content
Lilleyman, of Trent Hills, between Kingston and Oshawa, moved to Google from a job at Shopify after a career in news media, including at the Winnipeg Free Press and as an editor at Toronto's Globe and Mail.
Article content
In her lawsuit, she asks for damages for lost compensation and benefits, as well as $250,000 in punitive damages and $150,000 for alleged breaches of the Ontario Human Rights Code. Google said she earned an annual base salary of $181,980 plus a discretionary 20-per-cent bonus, a benefits package, and Google stock eligibility.
Article content
'The Plaintiff was terminated by Google shortly after she disclosed her pregnancy and her intention to take an 18-month maternity leave and her need for medical accommodations. At the time that the Plaintiff was terminated, she was in the second trimester of her pregnancy,' her claim says.
Article content
She claims a Google human resources representative told her she 'should conceal her pregnancy when seeking new jobs during the working notice period,' the claim alleges.
Article content
Google denies that any Google human resources representative made such a statement and challenged Lilleyman to prove it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AbCellera to Participate at Upcoming Investor Conferences in September
AbCellera to Participate at Upcoming Investor Conferences in September

National Post

timea minute ago

  • National Post

AbCellera to Participate at Upcoming Investor Conferences in September

Article content VANCOUVER, British Columbia — AbCellera (Nasdaq: ABCL) today announced that the Company will participate in the following investor conferences: Article content Wells Fargo Healthcare Conference, September 3-5, 2025 Morgan Stanley Annual Global Healthcare Conference, September 8-10, 2025 Article content Article content Visit AbCellera's Investor Relations website for additional information. Article content . Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Inquiries Article content Article content Media: Tiffany Chiu; Article content media@ Article content Article content Partnering: Murray McCutcheon, Ph.D.; Article content Article content Article content

Toronto's renoviction bylaw a 'huge win' and already making an impact, advocates say
Toronto's renoviction bylaw a 'huge win' and already making an impact, advocates say

CBC

time2 minutes ago

  • CBC

Toronto's renoviction bylaw a 'huge win' and already making an impact, advocates say

A new bylaw aimed at reducing renovictions in Toronto is already having noticeable effects, according to tenant and anti-poverty advocates, though some say it's too early to tell if it will be well-enforced. The Rental Renovation Licence Bylaw was implemented on July 31 and is designed to protect tenants from "bad faith" evictions by their landlords under the guise of a renovation — an increasingly common tactic critics say is used by landlords to evade rent control and increase rent prices. Toronto landlords must now obtain a licence from the city before carrying out repairs or renovations that force tenants to move out, and must apply for this licence within seven days of giving a notice of ending tenancy — known as an N13 notice — to the renter. With the new bylaw in effect, some tenant advocates say they are already noticing a difference in landlords' actions. "We're seeing far fewer calls regarding renovictions leading up to the implementation date of July 31, so it's already had a positive impact in that sense," said Douglas Kwan, director of advocacy and legal services at the Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario. "We're going to monitor how that goes for the rest of the year, but we anticipate that we're going to see a gradual decline with the number of N13s or renoviction calls to our organization and others in Toronto," Kwan said. Renovictions have been on the rise in Toronto: advocate Renovictions have been on the rise in Toronto and the province for the past decade, and became a "massive" issue in the last five or so years, said Alejandra Ruiz Vargas, president of ACORN Canada. Since 2017, there has been a nearly 50 per cent increase in the number of N13 notices filed in Toronto, according to a 2024 renoviction report by ACORN. "I know a couple that has been renovicted three times last year," Ruiz Vargas said, adding that the bylaw's implementation is a "huge win" for renters. People in lower-cost rentals are commonly targeted by renovictions, and they face immense difficulties in finding places they can afford to move into after being evicted, anti-poverty advocates say. "The huge increase in evictions has fuelled a massive increase in homelessness in Ontario," said Jeff Schlemmer, executive director of Community Legal Clinic of York Region. "Thank goodness municipalities are stepping up." New West, B.C. 1st municipality to take action New Westminster, B.C., was the first municipality to adopt a renoviction bylaw in 2019, with several other municipalities in Ontario, such as Hamilton and London, following in its footsteps. These bylaws are beneficial not only for renters but the entire housing system in a city as they help preserve affordable housing stock and are a simpler and quicker solution than putting shovels into the ground to build more affordable housing, said Kwan. "It doesn't mean that legitimate landlords who have to renovate their units are prevented from doing so. It's really to capture situations or people who aren't even considering renovating their unit and it gives them pause," he said. There are several requirements under Toronto's new bylaw that make it especially strong, such as the need for a landlord to have an architect or engineer confirm that the unit must be empty for the renovation work, and the requirement for the landlord to make rent gap payments if the tenant has to move elsewhere and pay higher rent, said Kwan. "The rent gap payments ensure that a landlord mitigates the work. In other words, they don't sit on their hands," said Kwan. Though the bylaw does not apply retroactively to tenants who have already received N13 notices, advocates say it strengthens their fight as it puts the burden on landlords to prove their renovations require vacant units. Toronto to take 'education-first approach' to issue The City of Toronto says on their website that they will use an "education-first approach" to encourage compliance, with enforcement action to follow when appropriate. According to the bylaw, landlords could face fines of up to $100,000 if they force a tenant to leave and re-rent the unit to someone else for financial benefits, or if they fail to comply with other aspects of the new licensing requirements. "The fines are quite high and I think they might be sufficient disincentive for these corporate landlords from acting," Kwan said. "I think if there is a concern, it would be uneducated, smaller landlords who perhaps unknowingly or knowingly are just trying to take the risk of renovicting their tenant. That's probably the group of landlords that should be more of a concern than the larger corporate ones." Chiara Paravani, co-chair of York South-Weston Tenant Union, said she is aware of several landlords who are particularly "aggressive" in pursuing renovictions. The particularly relentless actors may be willing to take a financial hit, Paravani said. "Absorbing those fines is just part of the cost of doing business in terms of evicting people and replacing them with higher paying tenants, she said, adding that provincial fines were already in place and didn't do much to change landlords' actions. Province doubled fines for unlawful evictions 5 years ago The provincial government doubled maximum fine amounts for unlawful evictions in 2020, setting the fine rates at $50,000 for individuals and $250,000 for corporations. But the Ministry of Housing was "vastly overwhelmed" with requests to enforce the violations, said Schlemmer, from the community legal clinic. "You can make the penalty capital punishment, but if the person knows they're not gonna get caught, they're still gonna try it, which is what we have for renovictions," Schlemmer said, stressing the importance of enforcement. "I really hope that the City of Toronto does allocate meaningful resources to enforcement, because if they do, they could make a real dent in these unlawful evictions and significantly reduce the ongoing increase in homelessness."

Windsor getting $5.2 million to help build more homes
Windsor getting $5.2 million to help build more homes

CTV News

time15 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Windsor getting $5.2 million to help build more homes

The Ontario government is giving the City of Windsor $5.2 million towards more housing. It is through the second round of the Building Faster Fund, which provides funding to municipalities that achieve at least 80 per cent of their provincially designated housing targets. Windsor broke ground on 2,306 new homes in 2024, achieving 213 per cent of its 2024 housing target. The government said this funding will help Windsor build more homes and community infrastructure while advancing the province's plan to protect Ontario by investing in infrastructure to support economic growth. 'Mayor Dilkens and the City of Windsor have done an incredible job supporting new home construction and getting shovels in the ground,' said Premier Doug Ford. 'Today's investment is a reflection of that hard work and is just the latest step we are taking to protect workers and communities by supporting continued growth and keeping the dream of homeownership alive in Windsor and across Ontario.' Announced in August 2023, the Building Faster Fund is a three-year, $1.2 billion program that is designed to encourage municipalities to speed up municipal approval processes and get more homes built faster. The province is also providing funding to support housing-enabling infrastructure, including through the Housing-Enabling Water Systems Fund and the Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program. 'Windsor has been identified as one of the most important and fastest growing communities to watch in Ontario and Canada,' said Windsor mayor Drew Dilkens. 'As we continue to focus on investment, growth and sustainability, Windsor has been a leader in removing red tape, repurposing City-owned land to promote development and significantly exceeding our housing targets to support housing options and developments in our community.' Ford said the government is also helping to speed up the construction of new homes and infrastructure, including by streamlining development processes and reducing costs in close partnership with municipalities, through the Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store