Trump hosts the Kennedy Center board as he seeks to remake arts and culture in America
Advertisement
Trump has called the center's past programing 'woke' and 'terrible,' while more broadly seeking to slash federal funding for the arts — complaining that too much programing promotes leftist ideology and political correctness.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In the view of the Republican president and top leaders in his administration, molding the Kennedy Center to his own liking can go a long way toward creating a new arts and social culture nationwide.
The center has announced it is abandoning a week's worth of July events celebrating LGBTQ+ rights as part of this summer's World Pride festival in Washington.
The White House has further moved to cancel millions in previously awarded federal humanities grants awarded to arts and culture groups. And Trump's budget framework has proposed eliminating the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities altogether.
Advertisement
Trump visited the Kennedy Center in March to preside over a meeting of its board, and complained then of 'tremendous disrepair' to the building while adding that the center 'represents a very important part of D.C., and actually our country.'
The president has also expressed displeasure with a recent expansion of the complex, known as 'The Reach,' which features studios, rehearsal spaces and meeting facilities, and he suggest he would move to close up the spaces because they lack windows.
In an aesthetic touch for the Trump era, meanwhile, the center's exterior lighting has been changed to permanently display red, white, and blue.
The president's changes drew pushback from a variety of artists.
The musical Hamilton responded to Trump's hands-on approach by canceling performances it had planned in March and April. Other performers — including actress and producer Issa Rae and musician Rhiannon Giddens — have similarly scrapped planned appearances.
And with Trump planning to attend a performance of Les Miserables at the Kennedy Center on June 11, the show announced that many understudies may be performing then due to boycotts by cast members.
The political tension is a departure for the Kennedy Center, which opened in 1971 and for decades was seen as an apolitical celebration of the arts.
'What had once been a nonpartisan institution dedicated to the arts is now under the direct control of a president eager to impose his ideological vision, dictating artistic priorities at one of the nation's most esteemed cultural landmarks,' Nevada Democratic Rep. Dina Titus wrote in a recent op-ed.
Presidents typically nominate members of the Kennedy Center's board in consultation with members of Congress. After that, they often don't have a lot of contact with the center's leadership, except to attend the annual Kennedy Center Honors.
Advertisement
'You're one of America's most renowned living playwrights, and you're still writing strong,' Republican President Ronald Reagan said in 1984, addressing Author Miller, who was among that year's Kennedy Center honorees. It was an example of a Cold War commander in chief praising a writer who had well-known associations with communist-aligned groups.
In 2019, the center hosted an exhibit of former Republican President George W. Bush's paintings.
Trump, who calls 'Citizen Kane' one of his favorite movie and said he once considered studying film at the University of Southern California, mostly ignored the center during his first term. He became the first president to routinely skip attending the honors ceremony. But he didn't didn't retaliate when one honoree, producer Norman Lear, threatened not to attend if the president did.
In his second term, Trump has been far more aggressive and proactive — as he has on many policy and political fronts. He cited some drag show performances at the center as a reason to transform it entirely.
'Come here and watch it, and you'll see, over a period of time, it'll improve very greatly physically,' Trump said during his Kennedy Center visit in March. 'And we're going to get some very good shows.'
Associated Press writer Hillel Italie contributed from New York.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Budget negotiations between Gov. Evers, Republican leaders at an end for now
Negotiations on the state budget between Gov. Tony Evers and Republican lawmakers broke down on Wednesday. Evers delivers his 2025 state budget address. (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) Republican lawmakers are planning to move forward on writing the two-year state budget without input from across the aisle after negotiations with Gov. Tony Evers broke down on Wednesday. Senate and Assembly leaders and Evers each released statements on Wednesday in the early evening saying that while negotiations have been in good faith, they are ending for now after meetings late on Tuesday evening and on Wednesday morning. Evers said Republicans were walking away from the talks after being unwilling to compromise, while Republicans said Evers' requests weren't reasonable. 'Both sides of these negotiations worked to find compromise and do what is best for the state of Wisconsin,' Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-Oostburg) and Joint Finance Committee co-chair Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) said in a statement. 'However, we have reached a point where Governor Evers' spending priorities have extended beyond what taxpayers can afford.' Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) and Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) left the possibility of future negotiations open in a separate statement. 'Assembly Republicans remain open to discussions with Governor Evers in hopes of finding areas of agreement, however after meeting until late last night and again this morning, it appears the two sides remain far apart,' the lawmakers said. Vos and Born said JFC will continue 'using our long-established practices to craft a state budget that contains meaningful tax relief and responsible spending levels with the goal of finishing on time.' In previous sessions this has meant that the Republican committee throws out all of Evers' proposals, writes the budget itself, passes it with minimal Democratic support and sends the bill to Evers — who has often signed it with many (sometimes controversial) partial vetoes. LeMahieu and Marklein noted that the Republican-led committee has created budgets in the last three legislative sessions that Evers has signed and they are 'confident' lawmakers will pass a 'responsible budget' this session that Evers will sign. Lawmakers have less than a month before the state's June 30 budget deadline. If a new budget isn't approved and signed into law by then, the state will continue to operate under the current budget. Evers said in a statement that he is disappointed Republicans are deciding to write the budget without Democratic support. 'The concept of compromise is simple — everyone gets something they want, and no one gets everything they want,' Evers said. He added that he told lawmakers that he would support their half of priorities, including their top tax cut proposals, even though they were similar to ones he previously vetoed, but he wanted agreements from them as well. 'Unfortunately, Republicans couldn't agree to support the top priorities in my half of the deal, which included meaningful investments for K-12 schools, to continue Child Care Counts to help lower the cost of child care for working families and to prevent further campus closures and layoffs at our UW System,' Evers said. 'We've spent months trying to have real, productive conversations with Republican lawmakers in hopes of finding compromise and passing a state budget that everyone could support — and that, most importantly, delivers for the people of Wisconsin. I am admittedly disappointed that Republican lawmakers aren't willing to reach consensus and common ground and have decided to move forward without bipartisan support instead.' Democratic leaders said that Republicans are refusing to make investments in the areas that Wisconsinites want. Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer (D-Racine) and Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein (D-Middleton) said in a joint statement that it's disappointing Republicans are walking away from negotiations. 'The people of Wisconsin have a reasonable expectation that their elected leaders will work together to produce a state budget that prioritizes what matters most: lowering costs for families and investing in public education,' the lawmakers said. 'This decision creates yet more uncertainty in a difficult time. Democrats will continue to stand up for all Wisconsinites and work to move Wisconsin forward through the budget process.' Democrats on the budget committee accused Republicans of giving in to the 'extremist wing of their party' by walking away from the negotiations and not committing to 'fully funding our public schools, preventing the closure of child care centers, or meeting the healthcare needs of Wisconsinites.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reuters: Ukraine struck fewer Russian bombers during Operation Spiderweb than estimated, US officials claim
Two U.S. officials told Reuters on June 4 that Ukraine struck as many as 20 Russian military aircraft during Operation Spiderweb, destroying around 10 of them. The claims stands in contrast with estimates made by Ukraine's security service (SBU) which claimed more than 40 aircraft were hit in the June 1 attack. A source in the SBU told the Kyiv Independent on June 1 that Ukrainian first-person-view (FPV) drones smuggled deep inside Russian and hidden inside trucks has hit 41 Russian heavy bombers at four airfields across the country. The attacks rendered a significant number of aircraft irreparable, with others expected to take years to restore. The strikes targeted four key airfields—Olenya, Ivanovo, Dyagilevo, and Belaya—used by Russian strategic aviation involved in bombing Ukrainian cities. The SBU claimed the operation caused approximately $7 billion in damage and disabled one third of Russia's cruise missile bombers. The Kyiv Independent cannot independently verify the claims made by Ukrainian or U.S. officials. The SBU on June 4 released new footage from its Operation Spiderweb, showing targeted strikes on Russian strategic aircraft across multiple airfields. From the footage, it is not immediately clear as to how many aircraft were destroyed. Kyiv did not inform U.S. President Donald Trump about the operation ahead of its execution, and President Volodymyr Zelensky said on June 4 that Ukraine would not have carried out its drone strikes on Russian strategic bombers if Russia had agreed to a ceasefire. Trump held an hour and 15 minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 4, which Trump described as a "good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace." "President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields," Trump added, without making further comments regarding the "response" and did not say whether the U.S. had urged restraint. Trump's Special Envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, warned that the attack could lead to escalations in the full-scale war. "I'm telling you the risk levels are going way up," Kellogg told Fox News on June 3. "When you attack an opponent's part of their national survival system, which is their nuclear triad, that means your risk level goes up because you don't know what the other side's going to do." Ukraine's drone strike followed several days of Russian escalation as Moscow launched some of the heaviest aerial attacks in the full-scale war over a span of three nights. Operation Spiderweb targeted some of the very bombers that rained destruction on Ukrainian cities and civilian targets. Read also: Putin 'will have to respond' to Ukraine's attack on Russian bombers, Trump says after call with Kremlin chief We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Germany's straight-talking new leader is meeting with Trump for the first time. Here's why it matters
Friedrich Merz, the newly inaugurated German chancellor, will take a seat in the Oval Office on Thursday for his first in-person meeting with US President Donald Trump. The meeting comes as a series of high-stakes international issues once again come to the fore. Trump has issued another round of warnings to the European Union on tariffs; the war in Ukraine appears no closer to ending; and pressure is mounting on Israel over the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza. Since taking office, Merz has been on a tour of European capitals, meeting with France's Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Keiier Starmer and Poland's Donald Tusk – before they all appeared in Kyiv alongside Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky in a show of European unity. The one major omission has been a meeting with Trump. While there have been phone calls between the two, the handshake accompanied by the frantic clicks of camera shutters will mark the start of the new German-US relationship. Germany's status as the economic powerhouse of Europe and Merz's repositioning of the country as a leader in European security – which includes a commitment to beef up its military and fall in line with Trump's demands for NATO members to increase defense spending – underscore the importance of a successful encounter. There is also the chance of an explosive diplomatic broadside, as seen with President Zelensky and, more recently, South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa. Both Vice President, JD Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have recently criticized Germany's decision to classify the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) political party, as 'certainly right-wing extremists', and therefore expanding surveillance on the party. Both took to X, to express their anger at what they called the German 'establishment' for the designation. Secretary Rubio said, 'that's not democracy – it's tyranny in disguise'. Vance followed up by saying Germany is trying to redivide the country, 'the West tore down the Berlin Wall together. And it has been rebuilt — not by the Soviets or the Russians, but by the German establishment.' The German Foreign Ministry, for its part, said on X, the decision was democratic, 'the result of a thorough & independent investigation to protect our Constitution & the rule of law.' Merz, a few days later, also rejected the statements, saying 'Germany was liberated from tyranny by the US; Germany is stable, liberal, and democratic today. We don't need a remedial lesson in democracy.' The expectation though, is that this will be a cordial meeting. Wolfgang Ischinger, a former German ambassador to the United States, told CNN that Merz is 'totally ready' for the meeting and said the chancellor's personality and manner of communicating would help him win over the president. 'He doesn't mince his words… That's not Friedrich Merz's style. He says what he thinks. He's transparent. He's direct. And I would imagine that that is something which Donald Trump will hopefully learn to appreciate.' That directness, particularly as regards Europe's relationship with the US, has already raised eyebrows in some quarters. In the minutes after Merz's center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its sister party won the largest share of the vote on February 23, making him the likely next chancellor, he said, 'the utmost priority is strengthening Europe as quickly as possible, so that we achieve independence from the US step-by-step.' He added that the Trump administration 'doesn't care much about the fate of Europe.' Merz also had a few other choice words for the US in the days following the election. And only last week, he delivered a riposte to comments made earlier this year by Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference in which he accused European allies of backsliding on freedom of expression – a speech which at the time Merz described as having disturbed him. Vance posed a question to which we 'have the strongest and best answer imaginable,' Merz said in Berlin on Thursday, 'namely, the conviction that freedom and democracy are worth standing up for resolutely and, if necessary, fighting to preserve them.' These comments notwithstanding, Claudia Mayor, senior vice president at the German Marshall Fund, a think tank focused on US-German relations, assessed that since the election 'the tone has been turned down' by Merz. She noted that on May 8, Merz held a phone call with Trump in which he said, 'the United States remains an indispensable friend and partner of Germany.' At a business summit a few days later, Merz revealed that he had invited Trump to Germany. As part of that trip, he would accompany the US president to the rural town of Bad Dürkheim, the childhood home of Trump's paternal grandfather. And recently there has been Germany's alignment with the US on NATO defense spending. Merz and his government have indicated that they are ready to comply with, and push others to agree to, the long-stated Trump demand that members of the alliance increase spending on defense to 5% of GDP. Building up a positive working relationship, though, is likely to be Germany's major ambition for the White House meeting. And Merz's previous roles and experience could play a big part in bringing that about. Formerly the head of 'Atlantik Brucke,' or Atlantic Bridge, a think tank that promotes German-US ties, Merz is known in Germany as being an ardent proponent of the transatlantic relationship. He was a huge advocate for a US-EU trade agreement while at Atlantic Bridge and has spoken openly about his admiration for former US President Ronald Reagan. He also understands the corporate world, having served on numerous boards, including that of US global investment firm BlackRock. Ischinger, now the chairman of the board of trustees of the Munich Security Conference, said: 'If Donald Trump feels that he can trust Friedrich Merz, that's very important, and vice versa… because, these are dangerous times, and there must not be any misunderstanding.' Mayor, too, says much is at stake. She told CNN that although she believes the German government understands it needs to keep a good relationship with the White House, 'deep inside, they are totally, deeply, utterly worried' about the Trump administration and its commitment to the defense of NATO allies in Europe, particularly given the threats posed by an increasingly bellicose Russia. The conundrum, she said, is that Germany 'can't afford the Americans leaving,' because despite European commitments to increase spending on security, building up those capabilities takes years. 'At the same time, we don't want them to leave, because we think we are better off together,' she added. She points to the German coalition agreement, (essentially a contract between the two coalition parties, the CDU and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), on how they will govern Germany) and a major change in the constitution that could unlock half a trillion dollars of spending on the military, as indicators of the conflicting sentiment. The revision of Germany's constitutional debt brake, pushed through by Merz in March before he even formally became chancellor, was a 'revolutionary change by German standards,' Mayor said. But it was forced through because 'international relations have changed so much' that it appeared essential, she said. At the same time, she said, the coalition pact reads as if everything about the transatlantic relationship is in fine working order. 'If you're such great partners, why did we need a constitutional change?' Major asked. A Western diplomat, who was not authorized to speak ahead of the meeting, told CNN that Merz's recent words have been 'both tactical and strategic.' The source said Merz sees Germany as '(needing) to grow up and take care of (itself),' adding that the chancellor does not see that as possible 'in the next three years,' and thus it is still in Germany's interest to have a good relationship with the US and find a way to work together. Ischinger, too, sees pragmatism at play, suggesting that Merz could seek to replicate the personal relationship built by Macron with Trump. The German chancellor will want to ensure that 'Donald Trump understands that if Friedrich Merz is a committed European, that does not mean that Friedrich Merz is going to make the Atlantic wider,' he said.
