Harvard Is Hoping Court Rules Trump Administration's $2.6b Research Cuts Were Illegal
'This case involves the Government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decision-making at Harvard,' the university said in its complaint. 'All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: Allow the Government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions.'
A second lawsuit over the cuts, filed by the American Association of University Professors and its Harvard faculty chapter, has been consolidated with the university's. Harvard's lawsuit accuses President Donald Trump's administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands in an April 11 letter from a federal antisemitism task force. The letter demanded sweeping changes related to campus protests, academics, and admissions. For example, the letter told Harvard to audit the viewpoints of students and faculty and admit more students or hire new professors if the campus was found to lack diverse points of view. The letter was meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment on campus.
Harvard President Alan Garber pledged to fight antisemitism but said no government should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue. The same day Harvard rejected the demands, Trump officials moved to freeze $2.2 billion in research grants. Education Secretary Linda McMahon declared in May that Harvard would no longer be eligible for new grants, and weeks later, the administration began canceling contracts with Harvard. As Harvard fought the funding freeze in court, individual agencies began sending letters announcing that the frozen research grants were being terminated. They cited a clause that allows grants to be scrapped if they no longer align with government policies. Harvard, which has the nation's largest endowment at $53 billion, has moved to self-fund some of its research but warned it can't absorb the full cost of the federal cuts.
In court filings, the school said the government fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism. The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the April demand letter was sent. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel contracts for policy reasons. 'It is the policy of the United States under the Trump Administration not to fund institutions that fail to adequately address antisemitism in their programs,' it said in court documents.
The research funding is only one front in Harvard's fight with the federal government. The Trump administration also has sought to prevent the school from hosting foreign students, and Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. Finally, last month, the Trump administration formally issued a finding that the school tolerated antisemitism – a step that eventually could jeopardize all of Harvard's federal funding, including federal student loans or grants. The penalty is typically referred to as a 'death sentence.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Us wants back millions in covid relief from local governments over missing reports
The US Treasury is seeking to recoup COVID-19 pandemic relief funds from hundreds of local governments that received millions of dollars but never complied with requirements to report how they used the money. The federal government distributed 350 billion to state, local, territorial, and tribal governments as part of the American Rescue Plan approved by Congress and President Joe Biden in 2021. More than 30,000 governments from the largest state to the tiniest town were to get a share. Governments had until the end of 2024 to obligate the money for specific projects and were supposed to file either quarterly or annual progress reports depending on their population and how much money they received. Most complied. But as of January, about 1,000 mostly smaller governments had failed to file any reports with the Treasury detailing how they used a total of 139 million, according to an analysis by the US Government Accountability Office. A GAO report released last week said the Treasury sent notices to the local governments seeking to recoup the money. As of June 24, a total of 740 local governments subsequently filed reports and will no longer be subject to repaying their funds, the Treasury said in a letter attached to the GAO report. Thirteen governments returned their funds to the Treasury. But that still left 235 local governments that had never filed a report nor returned their pandemic relief funds. The GAO told The Associated Press it does not have list of the specific governments that haven't complied with the reporting requirements. The Treasury has not responded to an AP request for a list of the 13 governments that returned their funds and those that still haven't reported how they used it. This is not the first time concerns have been raised about governments failing to disclose how they used their pandemic relief funds. The GAO reported in October 2023 that the Treasury had sent noncompliance notices to more than 3,500 local governments that hadn't filed progress reports on their pandemic relief funds. The Treasury at that time declined to provide the noncompliance letters to the AP. So the AP in January 2024 submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking copies of the noncompliance notices and related correspondence. The Treasury still has not fulfilled that request. In its most recent report, the GAO said the failure of local governments to file regular progress reports is limiting the Treasury's ability to determine whether they are spending the funds on allowable uses.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Schools and counties begin to see payment delays as pennsylvania's budget stalemate hits a month
Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro's administration says billions of dollars in aid to Pennsylvania's schools and human services will be delayed as he and the politically divided Legislature struggle to end what is now a month-long budget stalemate. State-supported universities, libraries, early-childhood education programs, and county health departments also will see delays in payments, Shapiro's administration said in letters sent Tuesday to providers. 'I recognize this information is concerning, and it is equally concerning to both me and the governor,' Budget Secretary Uri Monson said in the letters. 'Our administration continues to work diligently to find agreement between the House and Senate, and we will work to support you and your organization as you manage the current situation.' Budget stalemates are also playing out in Michigan and North Carolina, where Democratic governors are sharing power with Republican legislators. Pennsylvania school districts, which received more than 11 billion last year from the state for operations, will see delays on more than 2 billion in payments through August, Shapiro's administration said. District officials have said the poorest districts might have to borrow money if aid is delayed in August. Universities such as Penn State and state-run system schools will see delays on more than 200 million in aid, and counties will not get on-time payments of 390 million to child welfare agencies, it said. More than 100 million in payments to a range of other agencies, nonprofits, and programs will also be delayed, according to the administration's letters. It also said it cannot distribute money to early childhood education providers. Shapiro and top Republican lawmakers have said they are engaged in closed-door discussions to try to find a compromise. Neither the state House nor state Senate have scheduled a voting session for this week. Without the governor's signature on a new spending plan, the state lost some of its spending authority starting July 1.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Belgium asks ICC to look at war crimes claims against two Israelis
Belgium said Wednesday it would ask the International Criminal Court (ICC) to look into accusations of war crimes leveled against two Israelis who traveled to a Belgian music festival this month. The pair were briefly held for questioning by prosecutors upon attending the electronic dance music festival near Antwerp, following a complaint filed by pro-Palestinian groups who identified them as Israeli soldiers and accused them of violations in Gaza. Authorities initially said they took action after concluding that Belgian courts had extraterritorial jurisdiction over war crimes cases. But after analyzing the complaints the federal prosecutor's office said on Wednesday that the justice ministry would refer the cases to the ICC, which is already investigating possible violations of humanitarian law in the Palestinian Territories. 'This decision was taken in the interest of the proper administration of justice and in accordance with Belgium's international obligations,' the office said. The two Israelis, who have not been named, were held after traveling to Tomorrowland, one of the world's largest electronic dance music festivals. The Israeli foreign ministry described the pair as 'an Israeli citizen and an IDF soldier.' 'The ministry of foreign affairs and the IDF dealt with this issue and are in touch with the two,' it added in a statement. Both men were released after questioning by the Belgian authorities and their current whereabouts are unclear. The Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF), a Belgian pro-Palestinian organization which triggered the investigation, welcomed the referrals but argued Belgium 'should have gone further' and prosecuted the pair directly or extradited them to the ICC. 'We now urge the ICC to act without delay,' it said in a statement. The ICC opened an investigation in 2021 into possible war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Palestinian Territories, including in Gaza. In 2024, the court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the campaign against Hamas in Gaza. At the same time, the ICC issued arrest warrants against three senior Hamas leaders over the October 7, 2023 attack that sparked the war. All three have since died. The ICC collects potential evidence for many different sources and under its founding statute, anyone -- individuals, NGOs, institutions or governments -- can submit whatever they like. It is then up to the prosecutor to decide how credible the source and the information is and whether to use it in a potential case.
