Google agrees to curb power use for AI data centres to ease strain on U.S. grid when demand surges
Utilities in the country have been inundated with requests for electricity for Big Tech's AI data centres, with demand eclipsing total available power supplies in some areas.
That power crunch has led to concerns about spiking bills for everyday homes and business and blackouts.
It has also complicated the technology industry's expansion of AI, which requires massive amounts of electricity, fast.
Google's agreements with Indiana Michigan Power and Tennessee Power Authority would involve scaling back power use at the technology giant's data centres when called upon by the electric utilities to free up space on the grid.
They are the first formal agreements by Google in demand-response programmes with utilities to temporarily curtail its machine learning workloads, a subset of artificial intelligence.
"It allows large electricity loads like data centers to be interconnected more quickly, helps reduce the need to build new transmission and power plants, and helps grid operators more effectively and efficiently manage power grids," Google said in a blog post.
Demand-response programmes have typically been used by other energy-intensive industries like heavy manufacturing or cryptocurrency mining. In exchange, the businesses generally receive payments or reduced power bills.
The programmes involving AI activity in data centres is generally new, and details of the commercial arrangements between Google and the utilities were not clear.
While demand-response agreements apply only to a small portion of demand on the grid, the arrangements might become more common as U.S. electricity supply tightens.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trade Desk stock collapses 28% after Q2 shock — is this the beginning of the end for ad tech's golden run?
Synopsis Trade Desk stock took a massive 28% nosedive after the company's Q2 2025 earnings report left Wall Street stunned. While the ad tech giant posted solid revenue growth and beat on adjusted earnings, weak guidance for the upcoming quarter shook investor confidence. Even with strong customer retention and the growing impact of its AI-driven Kokai platform, the market reacted sharply to the lack of near-term optimism. Leadership changes and expanding ad tools weren't enough to stop the sell-off. This sharp drop has now raised serious questions about the future of digital advertising and the outlook for ad tech stocks overall. The Trade Desk (TTD) shocked investors after its Q2 2025 earnings release, sending the stock plunging 28% in after-hours trading. Despite strong revenue growth and high customer retention, weak guidance for the next quarter rattled Wall Street, raising fresh concerns about the future of the ad tech industry. The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD), a longtime favorite among digital advertising investors, sent shockwaves through Wall Street after reporting its Q2 2025 earnings. Despite showing revenue growth and consistent customer retention, the stock crashed 28% in after-hours trading, marking one of its steepest single-day declines in recent memory. Investors were initially hopeful, riding high on Trade Desk's growing adoption of its AI-powered Kokai platform and ongoing dominance in connected TV (CTV) advertising. But those hopes quickly unraveled after the company issued soft guidance for Q3, sparking widespread concern about the near-term health of the ad tech sector. For the second quarter of 2025, Trade Desk reported revenue of $694 million, a solid 19% year-over-year increase from $585 million in Q2 2024. The company also posted an adjusted EPS of $0.41, beating analyst expectations, and maintained an impressive 39% adjusted EBITDA margin. While these numbers appear strong on the surface, Wall Street had expected signs of stronger recovery in the second half of the year. Instead, Trade Desk's Q3 outlook came in below expectations, signaling continued macroeconomic pressures on the digital ad market and prompting heavy sell-offs. TTD's sharp drop wasn't about what it achieved—it was about what it failed to promise. The company's lackluster forward guidance and cautious tone during the earnings call spooked investors who had hoped for a rebound in ad spending. With no clear signal of an industry turnaround, especially in performance-driven ad categories, the market swiftly punished the stock. Analysts also pointed to mounting pressure from competitors and slower-than-expected growth in key areas like retail media and international expansion. Despite appointing Alex Kayyal as the new CFO (starting August 21) and welcoming AI expert Omar Tawakol to the board, the leadership shake-up wasn't enough to restore confidence. Investors had also pinned hopes on the continued rollout of Kokai, OpenPath, and UID2, but the company's inability to project stronger near-term performance raised red flags. TTD noted that Kokai adoption is growing, with about two-thirds of its customers now onboarded. The platform claims to deliver a 24% reduction in cost per conversion and 20% lower cost per acquisition, promising long-term efficiency gains. But in the short term, Wall Street is clearly looking for revenue acceleration, not just efficiency stories. The Trade Desk's Q2 report is now a wake-up call for the broader ad tech industry. If a company with Trade Desk's fundamentals and innovation pipeline can't deliver confident forward guidance, others in the space may face similar scrutiny. While the long-term picture for digital advertising remains promising, especially with the shift to CTV and AI-powered ad targeting, the immediate future looks uncertain. Investors should brace for potential volatility across other ad tech names and watch Q3 results closely. The Trade Desk's steep drop might turn out to be a buying opportunity—but only if the company can reestablish growth momentum and calm investor nerves in the quarters ahead. With strong fundamentals, industry-leading retention, and advanced tech tools like Kokai in play, there's still a path forward. But the message from Wall Street is clear: 'Show us growth, not just potential.' Q1. Why did Trade Desk stock crash after Q2 earnings? Because investors were disappointed by the company's weak guidance for the next quarter, despite good revenue growth. Q2. What does Trade Desk's Q2 2025 report mean for ad tech stocks? It signals uncertainty in the ad tech sector as even strong players like Trade Desk are facing market pressure.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trade Desk stock collapses 28% after Q2 shock — is this the beginning of the end for ad tech's golden run?
The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD), a longtime favorite among digital advertising investors, sent shockwaves through Wall Street after reporting its Q2 2025 earnings. Despite showing revenue growth and consistent customer retention, the stock crashed 28% in after-hours trading , marking one of its steepest single-day declines in recent memory. Investors were initially hopeful, riding high on Trade Desk's growing adoption of its AI-powered Kokai platform and ongoing dominance in connected TV (CTV) advertising. But those hopes quickly unraveled after the company issued soft guidance for Q3 , sparking widespread concern about the near-term health of the ad tech sector. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Revenue climbs 19%, but guidance leaves investors cold For the second quarter of 2025, Trade Desk reported revenue of $694 million , a solid 19% year-over-year increase from $585 million in Q2 2024. The company also posted an adjusted EPS of $0.41, beating analyst expectations, and maintained an impressive 39% adjusted EBITDA margin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo While these numbers appear strong on the surface, Wall Street had expected signs of stronger recovery in the second half of the year. Instead, Trade Desk's Q3 outlook came in below expectations, signaling continued macroeconomic pressures on the digital ad market and prompting heavy sell-offs. Wall Street reacts sharply to weak Q3 outlook TTD's sharp drop wasn't about what it achieved—it was about what it failed to promise. The company's lackluster forward guidance and cautious tone during the earnings call spooked investors who had hoped for a rebound in ad spending. Live Events With no clear signal of an industry turnaround, especially in performance-driven ad categories, the market swiftly punished the stock. Analysts also pointed to mounting pressure from competitors and slower-than-expected growth in key areas like retail media and international expansion . New leadership and AI-driven platform growth fail to reassure investors Despite appointing Alex Kayyal as the new CFO (starting August 21) and welcoming AI expert Omar Tawakol to the board, the leadership shake-up wasn't enough to restore confidence. Investors had also pinned hopes on the continued rollout of Kokai, OpenPath, and UID2, but the company's inability to project stronger near-term performance raised red flags. TTD noted that Kokai adoption is growing, with about two-thirds of its customers now onboarded. The platform claims to deliver a 24% reduction in cost per conversion and 20% lower cost per acquisition, promising long-term efficiency gains. But in the short term, Wall Street is clearly looking for revenue acceleration, not just efficiency stories. What does this mean for ad tech stocks moving forward? The Trade Desk's Q2 report is now a wake-up call for the broader ad tech industry. If a company with Trade Desk's fundamentals and innovation pipeline can't deliver confident forward guidance, others in the space may face similar scrutiny. While the long-term picture for digital advertising remains promising, especially with the shift to CTV and AI-powered ad targeting, the immediate future looks uncertain. Investors should brace for potential volatility across other ad tech names and watch Q3 results closely. Is this a temporary dip or a long-term reset? The Trade Desk's steep drop might turn out to be a buying opportunity —but only if the company can reestablish growth momentum and calm investor nerves in the quarters ahead. With strong fundamentals, industry-leading retention, and advanced tech tools like Kokai in play, there's still a path forward. But the message from Wall Street is clear: 'Show us growth, not just potential.' FAQs: Q1. Why did Trade Desk stock crash after Q2 earnings? Because investors were disappointed by the company's weak guidance for the next quarter, despite good revenue growth. Q2. What does Trade Desk's Q2 2025 report mean for ad tech stocks? It signals uncertainty in the ad tech sector as even strong players like Trade Desk are facing market pressure.
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
India Records Highest Average Cost of a Data Breach at INR 220 million in 2025: IBM Report
IBM today released its Cost of a Data Breach Report, which revealed the average total organizational cost of data breach in India reached an all-time high of INR 220 million in 2025 (13% higher than last year). The report also found that globally, AI adoption is greatly outpacing AI security and governance. While the overall number of organizations globally experiencing an AI-related breach is a small representation of the researched population, this is the first time security, governance and access controls for AI have been studied in this report, which suggests AI is already an easy, high value target. Only 37% of organizations reported having AI access controls in place in India Nearly 60% of organizations either don't have AI governance policies in place or are still developing them in India. This year's results show that organizations are bypassing security and governance for AI in favor of do-it-now AI adoption. Globally, ungoverned systems are more likely to be breached, and more costly when they are. 'India's accelerating AI adoption brings immense opportunity, but it's also exposing enterprises to new and complex cyber threats. The report revealed a gap, while AI is being rapidly embedded across business operations, security and governance are being left behind. The absence of access controls and AI governance tools are not just a technical oversight, it's a strategic vulnerability. CISOs must act decisively – embedding trust, transparency, and governance into AI systems by design,' said Viswanath Ramaswamy, Vice President, Technology, IBM India & South Asia. Key findings from the report for India are as follows: Breaches and the AI era AI Governance Policies: Nearly 60% of breached organizations either don't have an AI governance policy or are still developing a policy. Of the organizations that have AI governance policies in place, only 34% use AI governance technology. The Cost of Shadow AI (the use of AI tools and applications without oversight from the organization's IT department): Shadow AI was among the top 3 cost driver of a breach in India, added INR 17.9 million to the cost of a breach on average. Despite this, we found that only 42% have policies to manage AI or detect shadow AI. The Financial Cost of a Breach Data Breach Costs : In India, the average total organizational cost of data breach was INR 220 million in 2025, which is about 13% higher than 2024 (was INR 195 million). Phishing Remains the Top Attack Vector: In India, the top three initial cause/ attack vector for the data breaches were Phishing (18%), third party vendor and supply chain compromise (17%), and vulnerability exploitation (13%). India Breach Lifecycles Hit Record Low : The India average breach lifecycle (the mean time to identify and contain a breach, including restore services) dropped to 263 days, a 15-day reduction from 2024, as more studied organizations were able to speed identification. Research Breaches Become the Costliest : The research sector in India faced the highest impact from data breaches, with average cost reaching INR 289 million, closely followed by the transportation industry at INR 288 million and the industrial sector (which was the highest in 2024) at INR 264 million. Security AI Investments Still Lacking: Data showed that using AI and security automation less than halved the cost of a data breach. Yet despite the proven benefit, 73% of those surveyed reported limited or no use of AI and security automation. About the Cost of a Data Breach Report The Cost of a Data Breach Report has investigated nearly 6,500 data breaches over the past 20 years. Since the inaugural report in 2005, the nature of breaches has evolved dramatically. Back then, risk was largely physical. Today, the threat landscape is overwhelmingly digital and increasingly targeted, with breaches now driven by a spectrum of malicious activity. With the pace of enterprise AI adoption proliferating, for the first time, the Cost of a Data Breach research studied the state of security and governance for AI, the type of data targeted in security incidents involving AI, breach costs associated with AI-driven attacks, and the prevalence and risk profile of shadow AI (unregulated, unauthorized use of AI).
