
Lovesong writer Abi Morgan: ‘I feel incredibly grateful to be here. It's nearly seven years since Jacob collapsed'
Like the bond between the couple at its heart,
Abi Morgan's
Lovesong has endured over the years. 'Weirdly, the older I get, the more I see in it,' she says of the play, which opens shortly at the
Gate Theatre
in
Dublin
.
'It is one of those things that keeps giving with plays: they come back to haunt you in a really lovely way,' says the
Emmy
and
Bafta
winner, who wrote Lovesong when she was in her early 40s, almost 15 years ago.
'Perhaps because I am down the ageing process a little bit more – I am now in my mid-50s – and I'm in a long relationship, I understand the context of how you run a long journey with someone.'
First performed in 2011, the play centres on Billy and Maggie, who have been married for more than 40 years when her health begins to deteriorate. This elicits memories of their younger selves, who we see moving through the same suburban house and garden in an earlier timeline.
READ MORE
Produced many times around the world since, Lovesong offers a tender portrait of what it means for love to survive the passage of time. It is lightly metaphysical in the sense that time is presented as fluid – Billy imagines life 'wired like a filmstrip' – and we see the older versions of the characters interact with their younger counterparts.
'It is a play that has that kind of fluidity, but it's also about a long marriage, and I guess I have reflected on that and all of the things that it brings up, which are to do with illness and mortality, and the domestic ebb and flow of your day and the way that starts to form your relationship and become the backbone of your relationship,' Morgan says.
'That is absolutely the core of Lovesong, so it is a play that I feel more and more warm towards as the years go on.'
Although one of its themes is assisted dying, the rising political profile of this issue in many countries, including Ireland and Britain, isn't the key reason for its lasting relevance and appeal, Morgan believes.
'I think most theatre companies around the world are looking for small plays that have big ideas within them, and then, I guess, at the heart of it, it's a love story, and love stories are always compelling,' she says.
Abi Morgan: 'I feel incredibly grateful to be here and standing and alive.' Photograph: Lorna Milburn
While there are some sadnesses in the couple's marriage – the play also touches on childlessness and the temptation to be unfaithful – it is not about late-life regret.
'There are key moments between the younger William and Margaret where you see they are really wrestling with what they expected their life to be and what it is actually going to be,' Morgan says.
In one scene they share a 'very painful moment' as they overhear a child's birthday party on their street.
'There's a sense of regret in that moment. But once they carry through life, the older Billy and Maggie feel a huge sense of pride, relief and nourishment in the fact that they have managed to survive and stay together,' Morgan says.
'I don't think it's a play that deals with regret. I think it's a play that acknowledges that life is painful and complicated and you don't always get what you want, but perhaps you get what you need.'
Originally built in the workshops of the innovative London-based company
Frantic Assembly
, Lovesong was always designed as a piece that would have 'a very strong sense of movement' in its staging, so there is logic to the fact that in Dublin it will be directed by
David Bolger
, artistic director of
CoisCéim Dance Theatre
.
'It was great to find a director who has such a strong background in choreography,' Morgan says. 'I also think it is quite lyrical, and there's something in it that will really benefit from having Irish actors playing those roles.'
The cast is
Nick Dunning
and
Ingrid Craigie
, both of whom have worked on Morgan projects before, as the older Billy and Maggie, with Naoise Dunbar and
Zara Devlin
as the younger version of the couple, identified in the script as William and Margaret.
Zara Devlin and Naoise Dunbar as Margaret and William and Ingrid Craigie and Nick Dunning as Maggie and Billy (background). Photograph: Kate Bowe
The Welsh writer, who lives in London, wouldn't usually come to see one of her plays after its first run, she says, but Morgan is so 'intrigued' by the Gate's production that she hasn't been able to resist it this time.
'I feel a little bit like an interloper coming over to have a look. I'm a tourist on it,' she says.
Morgan was born in Cardiff in 1968 to an actor mother, Pat England, and director father, the late Gareth Morgan. (They divorced when she was 13.) She went to seven schools during a peripatetic childhood as her mother chased theatre work, then studied English and drama at Exeter University before pursuing a career as a writer.
Best known as a versatile and prolific screenwriter, Morgan has a CV that is neither shy of hits nor lacking in critical acclaim. Her film credits include
The Iron Lady
,
Suffragette
and
Shame
(which she wrote with its director,
Steve McQueen
); on television, she earned a Bafta for the grim but essential Channel 4 one-off Sex Traffic, in 2005, and – to her surprise – an Emmy for The Hour, the BBC's 1950s-set TV news drama, in 2013.
More recently she created and wrote The Split, a lively BBC drama series (
available
on RTÉ Player) about a family of divorce lawyers and the clients they represent, and is now executive-producing The Split Up. This spin-off about a British-Asian family law firm, written by the 'tremendous' Irish-Indian screenwriter
Ursula Rani Sarma
, will go into production later in 2025.
Morgan has also just delivered the script for a spy feature with her most regular collaborator, the producer Jane Featherstone, of
Sister Pictures
, and is developing a new show for
Netflix
after her stunning series
Eric
debuted on the platform last May; like Eric, it will explore 'a really dark world'.
Then, in the new year, she hopes to work on an adaptation – likely for television – of her extraordinary book This Is Not a Pity Memoir, an honest and gripping account, from 2022, of the collapse of her partner (now husband), the actor Jacob Krichefski, with a brain inflammation called anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.
Krichefski, whose condition was caused by the drug he had been taking for his multiple sclerosis, was in a coma for six months. When he emerged he was suffering from a delusional misidentification disorder called Capgras syndrome. He was convinced that she was an impostor, not the real Abi Morgan. The real Abi had gone away somewhere.
In the middle of this heartbreak and distress – relayed in the book with droll skill – she was diagnosed with
breast cancer
.
How is Jacob now, and how is she now?
'I'm great. I feel incredibly grateful to be here and standing and alive, and it's actually been nearly seven years since Jacob collapsed, but he's fantastic, you know, much improved,' she says.
'The book was really a beautiful way to share the experience with the world. People have responded so warmly. It has been an incredible way to connect with other people who have experienced the kind of rare form of encephalitis that Jacob had, but also any kind of acquired brain injury or traumatic brain injury.'
Morgan feels that she's 'on the other side of it now', and says that they're both thankful to be able to move on with their lives, with their two children, Jesse and Mabel, 'now cooked and off and out in the world'.
Abi Morgan with her husband, Jacob Krichefski, and their children, Mabel and Jesse. Photograph: Lorna Milburn
The time feels right to return to the crisis. Even as it was all unfolding, as she writes in the memoir, she couldn't help experiencing 'every new punch and blow with a kind of masochistic fascination', knowing that for a writer 'everything is material'.
When catastrophe hit she was working on the second series of The Split; she felt 'very lucky' to have a show up and running throughout her own illness and treatment. The show's third series went on to focus on mortality and grief.
'That definitely came out of my experience, but it was also testament to the amount of love and support I got, not just from the creative team but also from the audience who kept following it, and then also, on a personal level, from my own family and friends,' she says.
Morgan also feels lucky to be getting paid for writing in 2025, given the 'really difficult time' the screen industry is going through amid a pullback from the global surge in production spending.
'It'll be okay,' she says. 'It'll come back in some form, but it's definitely having a bit of a reconfiguration and a reassessment right now, and commissioners on both networks and streamers are nervous about what they commission and how they sell work.'
Among the projects she hopes will go ahead soon is a film of Jennifer Egan's novel
Manhattan Beach
, which revolves around a female diver and a gangster in 1940s New York. Her adaptation marks an extension of her fascination with the city, which also permeates the enthralling 1980s-set Eric, in which Benedict Cumberbatch stars as a television puppeteer whose son goes missing.
[
Manhattan Beach review: A luminous New York story
Opens in new window
]
The six-parter – about 'the darker parts of ourselves, but also how that is reflected in the city' – was influenced by a spell she spent in New York in the mid-1980s, when a stint looking after a child made her think about how easy it would be to get lost there.
It is exceptionally evocative, with Morgan and the production team using the 'incredible footage' available from television, music videos and stills photography to bring the period back to life.
'Putting a show like that on a global streamer was interesting, because it just really travelled in a way that it wouldn't have done if it had been on the BBC, for example,' she says.
'Working in the vernacular of America and New York', as she had also done with McQueen on Shame, from 2011, was a 'really intriguing' opportunity, though she adds that it is always 'sort of part of the job' as a writer to be the outsider who stands back and observes.
Morgan recently started writing a new play – her most recent one opened in 2017 – and is 'finding it hard', she says. 'I don't know whether that's just because with screenwriting you have to sell your idea so much more before you even get the commission. You have to have a very realised idea to get something greenlit.'
But it felt important to return to writing for the stage.
'Theatre was the place where I found my voice and I really found my authorship, and that is something that I've carried through to today. I think part of going back to that now is to reinvigorate my voice again, because with screenwriting you are part of a huge collective of everybody from script editors through to producers through to commissioners.
'And the thing I love about it is that it is collaborative, but the thing that is sometimes hard about it is holding on to your voice within it.'
In the meantime, Morgan hopes that her voice, as expressed through Lovesong, will find an appreciative audience at the Gate.
Although Billy is 'raging at the loss of Maggie', the play is not consumed by mortality. It is about the intimacy and security of our closest relationships and the imprints we leave on one another – a reassuring theme in mixed-up times.
'You know, they found each other, so I hope it's an uplifting play, ultimately,' she says. 'One of the gifts you have with life is that you have to squeeze out every inch of it.'
Lovesong opens at the
Gate Theatre
, Dublin, on Wednesday, May 14th, with previews from Friday, May 9th; it runs until Sunday, June 15th

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
I made a fake Tinder account to catch my boyfriend cheating – my revenge will give him self-esteem issues for eternity
A YOUNG woman has shared how she got the ultimate revenge on her cheating boyfriend. Emmy Stove was praised for giving the 3 Emmy stove caught her boyfriend cheating so she decided to get revenge Credit: tiktok/@emstove22 3 She decided to catfish her boyfriend on the dating app Credit: Free for editorial use Taking to social media, she revealed she had a feeling her boyfriend was Instead of asking him outright, she decided to create an account on the dating app Tinder, the same one he was using to meet other women. Emmy used different pictures in her profile so he wouldn't know it was her and began to message him. Not long after, she revealed they planned to go on a date. READ MORE ON RELATIONSHIPS She said: "(I) told him to meet 'me.'" While he did turn up for the date, Emmy obviously didn't but he did send him a savage message from her new persona. "When he did, I texted and said I saw him but left because I thought he was too ugly," she said. But her revenge plot didn't end there. Most read in Fabulous Later, when he came home to Emmy with his tail tucked between his legs, she decided to give him the same treatment. She broke up with him then and there, telling him she didn't find him attractive anymore. 3 Women are praising her for getting her own back Credit: tiktok/@emstove22 How my 'perfect' beauty regime exposed my ex as a cheating rat - what his other woman did is totally unforgivable But the clever woman didn't let him know she knew he was cheating or that she was one of the 'girls' he cheated with to make him feel even worse about being called unattractive twice in one day. "Hope he has self-esteem issues for eternity," she captioned the post. The clip was shared on her TikTok account @ People were quick to praise her revenge tactic with some claiming she should do it again. Four red flags your partner is cheating Private Investigator Aaron Bond from BondRees revealed four warning signs your partner might be cheating. They start to take their phone everywhere with them In close relationships, it's normal to know each other's passwords and use each other's phones, if their phone habits change then they may be hiding something. "You should also look at how they place their phone down when not in use. If they face the phone with the screen facing down, then they could be hiding something." They start telling you less about their day When partners cheat they can start to avoid you, this could be down to them feeling guilty or because it makes it easier for them to lie to you. "If you feel like your partner has suddenly begun to avoid you and they don't want to do things with you any more or they stop telling you about their day then this is another red flag." "Partners often avoid their spouses or tell them less about their day because cheating can be tough, remembering all of your lies is impossible and it's an easy way to get caught out," says Aaron. Their libido changes Your partner's libido can change for a range of reasons so it may not be a sure sign of cheating but it can be a red flag according to Aaron. Aaron says: "Cheaters often have less sex at home because they are cheating, but on occasions, they may also have more sex at home, this is because they feel guilty and use this increase in sex to hide their cheating. You may also find that your partner will start to introduce new things into your sex life that weren't there before." They become negative towards you Cheaters know that cheating is wrong and to them, it will feel good, this can cause tension and anxiety within themselves which they will need to justify. "To get rid of the tension they feel inside they will try to convince themselves that you are the problem and they will become critical of you out of nowhere. Maybe you haven't walked the dog that day, put the dishes away or read a book to your children before bedtime. A small problem like this can now feel like a big deal and if you experience this your partner could be cheating," warns Aaron. One person wrote: "Big fan of your work." Another commented: 'Him losing twice the same night is gold." "Ma'am you are a psychological genius," penned a third. "He's still thinking about that to this day. In fact his new girlfirend has to remind him he's beautiful once a week." Meanwhile a fourth said: "He was trying to play checkers but BABYYY you were playing CHESS ." "Not gonna lie that's a pretty solid way of handling that,' claimed a fifth. Someone else added: 'Girl, if you don't catfish him every year like it's a nationally observed holiday, what are you doing with your life? Get him again."


RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
A fox by design, a hedgehog by nature: the tension at the heart of Brian Friel's enduring appeal
As the Gate Theatre's acclaimed revival of Brian Friel's play Dancing At Lughnasa returns to Dublin's 3Olympia this July, Thomas Conway explores the enduring appeal of the Donegal playwright's work. 'a fox knows many things but a hedgehog knows one big thing' - Archilochus Brian Friel may have aspired to the condition of the fox, always experimenting, always pitching in new directions, always breaking the rules. But he seemed equally inclined towards that of the hedgehog, circling the same obsessions around memory and imagination, around what is perceived and what is actual, around the treacheries involved in shoring up our identities on images of the past that are so little to be trusted. His remarkable output of twenty-four original plays and eight adaptations are distinguished for their stylistic variety and restless innovation, and yet they are also unified by recurring obsessions and motifs. In what does Friel's signature abide? Noting his attention to language as the vehicle for drama gets us some of the way there. We hear Friel testify to this absolute commitment to language at the darkest moment of his struggle with the composition of Translations, as recorded in his journal: '…the play has to do with language and only language. …if it becomes overwhelmed by the political element it is lost.' The redundancy of language seduces Friel too, to judge by so many of his plays, Dancing at Lughnasa among them, that go beyond language in their final moments: 'Dancing as if language no longer existed because words were no longer necessary.' Also with Friel, the musical and rhythmical aspects matter more in the structuring than more expected qualities such as plot. As such, while he takes on political themes and public issues, he exercises a primary concern with qualities of language and style, with musical shape, with expressing the inner ebb and flow of thought and emotion. Friel's obsessive return to the fraught boundaries between memory and imagination, between remembering things as they were and as we wish them to have been, between recording the past and making things up, is exemplified in his reliance on the allegorical setting of Ballybeg for many of his most enduring dramas. Ballybeg is itself recognisably a place in history and a realm of the imagination. How do we reckon with the fact that fourteen of Friel's plays have Ballybeg (or Baile Beag, as he called it in Irish) as a setting or key point of reference? We need only dig a little deeper to see correspondences between his two most enduring plays set in Ballybeg for evidence of Friel's wider obsessions: Philadelphia, Here I Come! and Dancing at Lughnasa, plays written twenty-five years apart, yet seemingly built on a shared bedrock of memory and myth. Why else does Friel insist on a day's outing in a little blue rowing boat on a remote uplands lake near Ballybeg for both plays? Gar remembers fishing with his father from such a boat in Philadelphia, Here I Come! Rose gives an account of a tryst with Danny Bradley in a boat of the same description in Dancing at Lughnasa. Why else does Friel give Gar (from the earlier play) and Michael (from the later play) four childless Mundy aunts? Why does he retain the names of Agnes and Rose for two of those aunts? Memory's betrayals can only be explored, it seems, by means of such a common stock of images and their correspondences; here we see Friel delve into aspects of his own family history and its mythologies. The Mundy sisters, we are told, are modelled on his aunts, and the tensions between fathers and sons explored across so many of the plays reflects aspects of a strained relationship between Friel and his own headmaster father. What partly distinguishes Friel's work, then, is the attention to the deeply personal that ultimately yields a view on the wholly universal: Friel works from his own particular historical co-ordinates and perspectives with such linguistic dexterity and scrupulous honesty that it resonates with everyone's experience. This quest to state things precisely on his own terms also explains one of Friel's more idiosyncratic features. Friel's plays are distinguished by the softening he exerts on their edges only to draw an audience into the hardest of human truths. (For many Irish playwrights, the trajectory is so often the reverse, a spiky exterior hides a sentimental core.) Friel seems to work in a whimsical register initially, only to ensnare us with a devastating consequence, one that knocks us off balance and leaves us re-evaluating the pattern we thought was unfolding. Such moments not only reveal character in a new light; the actions leading up to the reversal need to be rethought. These elusive endings invite us not merely to contemplate the future but to question everything that has gone before. The plays thus begin again in the mind of the audience the moment the curtain descends on the stage. (This may owe something to Friel's experience as a teacher: as the best teachers do, he leads us by simple steps steadily and stealthily to ever more complex perspectives on a shared dilemma. By the time the audience gains a purchase on the complexity at the heart of the action it feels itself hovering in mid-air, where language is both self-sufficient and no longer serves; it is caught in a moment of suspension that precedes a fall from innocence into experience.) Friel's risk-taking is never more apparent than in the theatrical conceits with which he launches the action—the theatrical sleights of hand that sets the language itself in motion. In Philadelphia, Here I Come! a central character is shadowed by an alter ego; the audience are privileged to hear what Gar alone hears from that private self; the audience also, however, looks Gar's alter ego in the eye, something that Gar never manages to do. In Translations a community speaks Irish but the audience hears English; this community can neither comprehend nor be comprehended by the colonists who seek to govern their lives, but they can by the discerning audience. In Dancing at Lughnasa, a child is addressed by his aunts but this child is never embodied by a child-actor—rather, the child's dialogue is spoken by the adult narrator without conceding in any way to a child's vocal mannerisms. This attention to language is matched by Friel's scrupulous tracking of psychological movements in the characters. These conceits are Friel's self-imposed challenges that he meets head-on in the act of composition; the playing out of the logic of these conceits oftentimes gives the plays their dynamism and shape. They are Friel's stylistic responses to the one constant in the worlds he depicts: the reticence and social constraints on language to which the plays bear witness. Nobody in Friel's world is able to speak her or his mind to another character; however, somehow, by these sleights of hand, the audience are vouchsafed these confidences. What a shock it is, then, to discover that Gar's father as likely has his own alter ego shouting into his ear, keeping him awake, shaking his resolve, and his own bank of memories in which he once had a loving connection with his son. Who would have guessed that 'old Screwballs' has his own inner voice goading him to speak and sabotaging his feeble attempts? The actions are invariably positioned within seismic societal change—where one way of life is being overtaken by another. It is here the plays find their characteristic tone or atmosphere. The central characters are seldom defiant or resigned, but wistful and conflicted about finding themselves unable to take sides. They neither oppose change nor promote it outright; they neither defend themselves against change nor look to guide it or others through it. In Translations, Hugh concedes to teach Maire English only to reveal the quisling he has proven to be. In Dancing at Lughnasa Michael tells us that he finds his missing aunts when it is too late to intervene on their behalf. In Philadelphia, Here I Come! Gar fails to decide why he is leaving, but he knows he must leave. These proxies for Friel often presume to cast a backward glance at changes that may yet still be in train. They look to language as a means to get above these changes and to survey them whole, even as they are part of the flux; they discover in language an inadequacy that never quite gets these changes into proper focus. These characters find in language both their single best resource and something that fails them. Dramatic form, as Friel would reveal, is better than all other literary forms for speaking not only through but around language, to its strengths and its incapacities; drama needs words, the very best words, but it also abandons them. Friel achieves a near impossible balancing act between these two conditions in ways that testify to the utmost care he brought to the labour of writing. This attention to language is matched by Friel's scrupulous tracking of psychological movements in the characters. Here we frequently see a pattern whereby a character's taciturnity and brooding silences are broken by sudden outbursts of zeal and articulacy that are then of no consequence and resolve again into brooding silence. These outbursts are absorbed into some greater historical movement and disappear. The march of history is given a location and a form precisely in Friel's mapping of the failures of the individual to make any distinctive mark against it. How is it that Friel should achieve a vantage point where he can see from above whilst being in the midst of the change himself? It seems that whatever the style the fox in him chooses to exploit, the hedgehog in him re-encounters the tidal force of history pulling him into its current. The fox's freedom and the hedgehog's servitude are always at odds, always held in tension, always yielding to new forms developing around obsessive constants. Even in that journal he wrote during the composition of Translations we hear the conflict play out in neither's favour. The fox pulls him in one direction: 'The play must concern itself only with the dark and private places of individual souls.' The hedgehog pulls him in the other: 'But it is a political play—how can that be avoided?' Maybe it is the abundance of forms and styles within something so recognisably Friel's that accounts for the exhilaration we experience in each encounter with his plays. However uneasy and provisional is each balancing act, some measure of what we all need to survive in the face of change is somehow to be found in, and indeed, around these plays.


The Irish Sun
13 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Two award winning Brit actors announced for new Harry Potter TV show as Rivals and Ripley stars join cast
THREE award-winning Brit actors have been announced for the new Harry Potter TV show. From HBO, the upcoming series will adapt JK Rowling's novels for a new generation. 7 BAFTA winner Katherine Parkinson will play Molly Weasley in the Harry Potter TV show Credit: Getty 7 Fellow BAFTA winner Daniel Rigby is set as Uncle Vernon Credit: Getty 7 Bel Powley has also joined the show's cast Credit: AP 7 Johnny Fynn has been cast in a major role Credit: AP Several new cast members have now been officially confirmed to join the Wizarding World. Among them is The actress, 47, is a BAFTA winner for her role as Jen in hit sitcom The IT Crowd. Viewers may have more recently seen Katherine as Lizzie Vereker in raunchy Disney+ series Rivals. Read more on Harry Potter Fellow BAFTA winner Daniel Rigby, 42, is set to play Harry's Muggle uncle Vernon Dursley, He won a BAFTA for playing Eric Morecambe in 2011 BBC film Eric and Ernie. Also joining the cast is Bel Powley in the role of Harry's biological aunt, Petunia Dursley. Her past credits include a main role on The Morning Show, opposite Jennifer Aniston and Most read in News TV Lox Pratt, star of the BBC 's upcoming Lord of the Flies, will be playing Harry's school rival Draco Malfoy. Meanwhile, actor Johnny Flynn, 42, will take on the role of Draco's father, Lucius Malfoy. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) Official Trailer He has played real-life figures such as David Bowie and a young Nicholas Winton. Johnny also worked with predecessor Jason Isaacs in 2021 film Operation Mincemeat. Three of Harry's classmates have also been cast - Leo Earley as Seamus Finnigan, Alessia Leoni as Parvati Patil, and Sienna Moosah as Lavender Brown. Rounding out these announcements Last month, the three screen newcomers playing Harry, Ron and Hermione Dominic McLaughlin is set to star as Harry, with Alastair Stout as Ron and Arabella Stanton as Hermione. Harry Potter author JK, 59 - who will also serve as executive producer of the TV series - had her say on the young trio. Writing on social media after the news broke, she said: 'All three are wonderful. I couldn't be happier.' Several major adult roles were already confirmed, including John Lithgow as Albus Dumbledore. How to spot a rare Harry Potter book AS JK Rowling's popularity has rocketed, so has the value of the first edition of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. If you think you might have one, then first look to see if Bloomsbury is listed as the publisher on the title page at the bottom. The copy should be a first edition - which will be noted within the first few pages. The latest date listed in the copyright information must by 1997. It should be credited to "Joanne Rowling" and not "J.K Rowling" and carry a print line that reads " 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1" on the copyright page. There is a mistake on page 53 where '1 wand' appears twice in the list of school supplies Harry receives from Hogwarts, which was corrected in later print runs. For the other titles in the Harry Potter series, it is only the first hardback editions with the dust jacket that have any collectable value. The show will also feature Janet McTeer as McGonagall, Speaking at the time, showrunner Francesca Gardiner said: "We are happy to announce the casting of John Lithgow, Janet McTeer, Paapa Essiedu, Nick Frost , Luke Thallon and Paul Whitehouse to play Dumbledore, McGonagall, Snape, Hagrid, Quirrell and Filch." Mark Mylod, who will executive produce and direct multiple episodes of the series for HBO , added: 'We're delighted to have such extraordinary talent onboard, and we can't wait to see them bring these beloved characters to new life.' The series is also executive produced by JK Rowling , Neil Blair, and Ruth Kenley-Letts of Brontë Film and TV, and David Heyman of Heyday Films. 7 Bertie Carvel is the new Cornelius Fudge Credit: PA 7 The show's three young leads were confirmed last month Credit: AP 7 Author JK Rowling will serve as an executive producer Credit: Getty