logo
Two Female Oregon High Jumpers Refuse to Share Podium with Trans Athlete as They Leave High School Track and Field Championship

Two Female Oregon High Jumpers Refuse to Share Podium with Trans Athlete as They Leave High School Track and Field Championship

Two female high jump athletes refused to stand on the podium alongside a transgender competitor at this weekend's high school state championships in Oregon.
Reese Eckard from Sherwood High School and Alexa Anderson from Tigard High School have been widely praised on social media, with many calling them heroes, after they appeared to walk away from the medal ceremony in protest of the fifth-place athlete, who is reportedly transgender. Anderson finished third in the competition, while Eckard came in fourth. Video footage obtained by Fox News shows both athletes turning away from the audience instead of stepping onto the podium before an official escorted them away from the medal ceremony.
Setting an Example
"Two female athletes in Oregon refused to stand on the podium because a boy was awarded a place. Girls have had enough," conservative activist Riley Gaines wrote on X. "Girls have had enough."
Anderson spoke to Fox News about her decision in an interview over the weekend.
"We didn't refuse to stand on the podium out of hate,' she said. 'We did it because someone has to say this isn't right. In order to protect the integrity and fairness of girls sports we must stand up for what is right."
Oregon is among several states challenging President Donald Trump's executive order titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," which warns of cutting off federal funding to states that do not comply.
According to a recent AP-NORC poll, around 70 percent of U.S. adults believe that transgender women should not be allowed to compete in girls' or women's sports at the high school, college, or professional levels. That opinion is held by nearly 90 percent of Republicans and about 50 percent of Democrats.
The athletic federation announced a policy change following Trump's warning that California could lose federal funding unless it bans transgender female athletes from girls' teams. However, the federation claimed that its decision was made prior to the federal threat.
Going Against Trump's Orders
The U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would launch an investigation into the athletic federation and the school district that oversees Hernandez's high school to determine whether they violated federal laws prohibiting sex-based discrimination.
In California, state law allows transgender students to join sports teams that align with their gender identity, even if the teams are separated by sex.
While data on transgender athletes participating in female sports is limited, NCAA President Charlie Baker testified in December that fewer than 10 transgender athletes are currently competing out of the roughly 500,000 collegiate student-athletes nationwide.
Both the American Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association have affirmed that gender exists on a spectrum rather than being strictly male or female—a stance that contradicts the position taken by the White House in its January 20 executive order aimed at "defending women from gender ideology."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China really wants to attract talented scientists, Trump just helped
China really wants to attract talented scientists, Trump just helped

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

China really wants to attract talented scientists, Trump just helped

Last week, the Trump administration said it would work to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students in 'critical fields'. PHOTO: AFP China really wants to attract talented scientists, Trump just helped HANGZHOU – China was already scoring wins in its rivalry with the United States for scientific talent. It had drawn some of the world's best researchers to its campuses, people decorated with Nobel Prizes, MacArthur 'Genius' grants and seemingly every other academic laurel on offer. Now the Trump administration's policies might soon bolster China's efforts. Under President Donald Trump, the United States is slashing the research funding that helped establish its reputation as the global leader in science and technology. The president is also attacking the country's premier universities, and trying to limit the enrollment of international students. Scientists from China are under particular pressure, as US officials have said that they may pose a national security threat by funneling valuable knowledge to China. Chinese-born scientists have been investigated or even arrested. Last week, the Trump administration said it would work to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students in 'critical fields'. As a result, many scholars are looking elsewhere. And Chinese institutions have been quick to try to capitalise. Universities in Hong Kong and Xi'an said they would offer streamlined admission to transfer students from Harvard University. An ad from a group with links to the Chinese Academy of Sciences welcomed 'talents who have been dismissed by the US NIH,' or National Institutes of Health. 'The United States is shooting itself in the foot,' said anatomy expert Zhang Xiaoming, who in 2024 left the Baylor College of Medicine, in Texas, to lead the medical education program at Westlake University, a research university in the tech hub of Hangzhou. 'Since I went to the United States more than 30 years ago, so much of its research has been supported by foreigners, including many Chinese,' said Dr Zhang, who emphasised that he was speaking for himself, not his employer. 'Without foreigners, at least in the field of scientific research, they can't go on.' On its own, China had become more attractive to scientists in recent years because of the huge investments the country has made in research. Westlake is a prime example. Established in 2018 by several high-profile scientists who had returned to China from the West, Westlake's campus exudes technological advancement. A spaceshiplike tower looms over rows of research laboratories. Computing centers and animal testing facilities cluster around a central lawn, in a shape designed to evoke a biological cell. In its main academic building, portraits of dozens of professors are on display – all of whom were recruited from overseas. There is Dr Guan Kunliang, a biochemist who won a MacArthur 'Genius' grant while in Michigan; Dr Cheng Jianjun, a materials engineer honored multiple times by the National Science Foundation; Dr Yu Hongtao, a Harvard-educated cell biologist who received millions in funding from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Maryland. Recruitment notices advertise high compensation, in line with those at top foreign universities. Westlake has been perhaps the most successful Chinese university at recruiting overseas talent, but it is far from the only one. Between 2010 and 2021, nearly 12,500 scientists of Chinese descent left the United States for China, according to a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The rate of departure was accelerating: More than half of them left in just the five years between 2017 and 2021. The trend has only continued in the past few years, said Professor Yu Xie from Princeton University who co-authored the study. Nor is it only Chinese-born scientists who are jumping ship. Former Harvard chemist Charles Lieber, who was convicted in 2023 of failing to disclose payments from a Chinese university, recently joined Tsinghua University. Chinese scientists have long flocked to American universities, lured by the promise of a world-class education and resources that their home country could not provide. In the 1980s, Chinese scientists who visited the United States would collect disposable test tubes to reuse in China, said neurobiologist Rao Yi at Peking University in Beijing, who studied and worked in the United States for two decades. The admiration continued even as China's economy boomed. In 2020, nearly one-fifth of doctorates in science, technology, engineering and mathematics awarded in the United States went to students from China, according to data from the National Science Foundation. Historically, the vast majority of those doctorates stayed in the United States – 87 per cent between 2005 and 2015, the data showed. Many became US citizens, and they have helped the United States accumulate patents, publications and Nobel Prizes. In recent years, more scientists have been returning to China, drawn partly by government recruitment programs promising them millions of dollars in funding as well as housing subsidies and other perks. China's spending on research and development is now second only to the United States. And Chinese institutions such as Tsinghua and Zhejiang University now routinely rank among the best in the world for science and technology. The investment is part of a plan to turn China into a scientific superpower, especially in strategically important fields such as artificial intelligence, semiconductors and biotechnology. 'The scientific and technological revolution is intertwined with the game between superpowers,' China's leader Xi Jinping said in 2024. At the same time, the United States has been pushing scientists away for years, in particular by investigating their ties with China. Protein chemist Lu Wuyuan, formerly at the University of Maryland, was one of those targeted. He was investigated by the National Institutes of Health for allegedly failing to disclose research ties to China – ties he said Maryland knew about. After 20 years at the university, he quit in 2020. Most of the cases brought under the so-called China Initiative eventually collapsed. Many researchers criticised the campaign as racial profiling. Dr Lu, who now works at Fudan University in Shanghai, said that many of his friends mused about leaving the United States, but most chose to stay because they had settled there. The Trump administration's assault on research funding may change that. 'If they cut so much funding, I believe that may be the last straw for many people,' Dr Lu said. Still, China faces its own issues in poaching talent. It has become harder for Chinese universities to meet and woo overseas scientists, as Chinese scholars have had trouble securing visas to the United States to attend academic conferences. Researchers in America also face restrictions in visiting China; Texas, for example, prohibits employees of public universities from traveling to China for work. The scientists who have returned to China largely fall into a few categories: those who are early in their careers, or who are nearing retirement, or who felt pushed out by investigations. Established midcareer scholars are still reluctant to leave, multiple scientists said. Dr Rao at Peking University, who was also one of Westlake's co-founders, said that China's progress in recruiting international talent had also been hampered by cronyism and jealousy among domestic colleagues. 'While funding should increase, it is not the key factor at this stage,' Dr Rao said. 'Supporting scientists based on merit and their good science is the key.' Even at home, scientists are not spared political scrutiny. Chinese universities face limits on free expression, and China's Ministry of State Security has warned that scholars returning from overseas may be spies. Multiple Chinese-born scientists – both those who had returned to China, and those still in the United States – emphasised that they did not want to get entangled in politics. They were just trying to do good work. The simple fact was, many agreed, that it was increasingly easier to do so in China. 'It's hard to survive in America. And China is developing so fast,' said artificial intelligence researcher Fu Tianfan, 32, who left Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in December 2024 to join Nanjing University. 'Whether it was the best choice,' he said, 'it may take some time to say.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Asia: Stocks track Wall Street up after jobs data, Seoul surges on Lee win
Asia: Stocks track Wall Street up after jobs data, Seoul surges on Lee win

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

Asia: Stocks track Wall Street up after jobs data, Seoul surges on Lee win

[HONG KONG] Asian shares extended a global rise on Wednesday following data indicating the US economy remained resilient, with South Korean equities and the won standing out as the election of a new president ended months of political paralysis. Speculation that US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will speak this week stoked optimism for a soothing of trade tensions between Washington and Beijing. However, Trump's ramped-up tariffs on aluminium and steel imports - announced on Friday - are due to kick in later Wednesday, highlighting the uncertainty caused by the White House's off-the-cuff policies. Traders in Asia took the baton from a positive Wall Street, where all three main indexes were lifted by data showing US job openings unexpectedly rose in April, calming worries about the impact of Trump's tariff blitz on the world's number one economy. The reading came ahead of crucial non-farm payrolls figures on Friday, which are closely followed by the US Federal Reserve as it maps monetary policy in light of weak growth and fears of tariff-fuelled inflation. 'Growth is sputtering, the second half looks increasingly cloudy, and everyone knows the Fed's rate-cut cavalry will ride in eventually. It's already priced, already scripted - no one's shocked by the plot twist unless, of course, inflation proves stickier than expected,' said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'But what's genuinely keeping equities ticking higher is the soft hum of hope - that US-China tensions could thaw into something warmer than their current frosty detente,' Innes said. He added that the risk of tariffs, 'once a terrifying monster, now looks more like a toothless terrier's wag, comforting investors enough to hold their ground despite the global economy's chills'. Traders are awaiting further developments on the China-US front after White House officials said the two nations' leaders could talk this week, even after Trump accused Beijing of violating last month's detente that slashed tit-for-tat tariffs. News that eurozone inflation had eased in May to its lowest level in eight months - and slipped back below the European Central Bank's two-per cent target - added to the upbeat mood. Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Wellington, Taipei, Manila and Jakarta all rose. Seoul rallied more than two per cent - pushing into a bull market after rising more than 20 percent from its recent low - as Lee Jae Myung won South Korea's snap presidential election. The won gained around 0.3 per cent. The poll was called after the impeachment of predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol over his brief martial law attempt and ended six months of political turmoil in the country. It has also raised hopes that Lee will introduce fresh measures to boost the export-dependent economy, which faces a hefty hit from Trump's tariffs, particularly the huge levies on steel and aluminium. In his inauguration speech on Wednesday, the new president warned protectionism posed a threat to the country's 'survival'. On the campaign trail, Lee said Seoul needed to start tariff negotiations with Washington 'immediately' but also stressed there was no need to 'rush' a deal. AFP

White House calls South Korea election 'fair', expresses concern about Chinese influence, World News
White House calls South Korea election 'fair', expresses concern about Chinese influence, World News

AsiaOne

time3 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

White House calls South Korea election 'fair', expresses concern about Chinese influence, World News

WASHINGTON — The White House said on Tuesday (June 3) that South Korea's election, which saw liberal party candidate Lee Jae-myung win the presidency, was fair, but it expressed concern about Chinese interference. "The US-ROK Alliance remains ironclad. While South Korea had a free and fair election, the United States remains concerned and opposed to Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world," a White House official said in an emailed response to a Reuters request for comment made at an earlier White House briefing. "ROK" refers to the Republic of Korea. The official did not elaborate on the reference to alleged Chinese interference or connect it directly to the South Korean election. In recent days, however, right-wing allies of US President Donald Trump have taken aim at Lee, who has spoken of the need to balance Seoul's relations with China and the United States. Laura Loomer, a far-right activist who has jockeyed her way up from online agitator to self-appointed Trump adviser, posted "RIP South Korea" on X on Tuesday after Lee's victory became clear. "The communists have taken over Korea and won the Presidential election today," she wrote. "This is terrible," she added. Loomer has shown herself to be highly influential: Several high-ranking White House officials were fired this year after she presented Trump with a list of national security staffers she perceived to be disloyal. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement congratulating Lee, and like the White House spoke about the two countries' alliance, also calling it "ironclad". He made no mention of concerns about China. "The United States and the Republic of Korea share an ironclad commitment to the Alliance grounded in our Mutual Defence Treaty, shared values, and deep economic ties," Rubio said. "We are also modernising the Alliance to meet the demands of today's strategic environment and address new economic challenges." Rubio also said the United States would continue to deepen trilateral co-operation with South Korea and Japan, "to bolster regional security, enhance economic resilience, and defend our shared democratic principles". As South Korea's ousted former president, Yoon Suk-yeol, fought for his political life earlier this year, he raised unsubstantiated claims about possible fraud in South Korea's elections as one reason for his announcement of a martial law decree that had prompted his ouster. His backers adopted "Stop the Steal" slogans and expressed hopes that Trump would intervene to help, but that never came. Last week, without providing evidence, Trump ally Mike Flynn, a retired general who briefly served as the president's national security adviser during his first term, referred in a post on X to "signs of fraud" in the South Korea election, and said a fraudulent outcome would only benefit the Chinese Communist Party. Another Trump ally, Steve Bannon, explored a similar theme of Chinese election interference on his WarRoom channel last week. [[nid:718612]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store