Trust no one: The Pentagon needs to come clean about UFO lies
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, a tiny DOD crew tasked with investigating UFO sightings, found that the Pentagon itself planted the rumor that Area 51 was swarming with aliens.
In the 1980s, an Air Force colonel (no word if he was perpetually shrouded in cigarette smoke) gave fake photos of flying saucers near the base to a local bar owner: The idea was to cover for the development of the F-117 Nighthawk; any locals who caught a glimpse of the stealth fighter on a test flight would be predisposed to think it was extraterrestrial tech — and so get laughed off.
Advertisement
In another episode of disinfo-spreading linked to the DOD, in 1996 a radio host received a piece of metal with a note claiming it came off an alien spaceship.
This wasn't wartime deception aimed at America's enemies, but peacetime disinformation fed to US citizens: Not what your taxes are supposed to pay for.
Nor were civilians the only victims of out-of-this-world military tall tales.
Advertisement
The AARO also discovered a longstanding Air Force practice in which hundreds of new commanders of highly classified programs were reportedly given photos of a 'flying saucer,' told that they would be working on reverse-engineering the tech and sworn to secrecy.
Many of these men were never clued into the ruse, and so lived their lives with the belief that aliens were real, the government knew about it, and they could never tell anyone — not even their spouses.
That practice continued all the way up until 2023, and AARO investigators still don't know why the Air Force was psychologically tormenting its own officers. (One theory is that it was some idiot's idea of loyalty test.)
And these lies were far from harmless: As the Journal notes, the 'paranoid mythology the U.S. military helped spread now has a hold over a growing number of its own senior officials who count themselves as believers.'
Advertisement
As well as the likes of former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who forced the Defense Department to burn millions on ghost hunters and psychics seeking to contact the little green men.
And the Pentagon was still being shady last year, when it reported that the AARO's exhaustive search of the records had never found a shred of evidence of space aliens visiting earth . . . but omitted any mention of the military's own role in pushing disinformation.
Even now, the Defense Department owes the public a lot more: Come clean on every lie told in these deceptions, with the names of who made the calls to give Americans sham 'information.'
Advertisement
Was this the work of a few rogue officers? Or a strategy approved by top brass over the decades?
However this got started, the Pentagon's duty now is to ensure that the full truth gets . . . out there.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
As Trump targets cities post-D.C. takeover, he's only looking for ‘blue' crime
President Donald Trump's take-over of the Washington, D.C., police and the deployment of the National Guard there are political power moves that he made clear on Monday he will not hesitate to use on other cities. Let's be clear — probably on other democratic-leaning cities. Because Trump doesn't see plain old crime; he sees blue crime, only. Part of this excessive action is Trump needing to generate a distraction, to turn the focus away from his negative approval ratings, voters' dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy, his political base's rebellion over the Jeffrey Epstein case, stubborn inflation and unpopular cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. What's better than scaring Americans about rampant crime one moment, then purportedly solving it the next? Certainly, crime has long been an issue in D.C., and the city, in response to large street brawls, has even instituted a teenage curfew. There's no excuse for the horrendous recent beating of a former federal staffer in an attempted carjacking (two 15-year-old suspects have been arrested in connection with it). But crime rates in D.C., as in most of the U.S., have been trending down since the pandemic, including for violent crimes, which have reached their lowest point in 30 years, the Miami Herald reported. The crime situation in the nation's capital looks complex, not easily explainable by Trump's hyperbole and fearmongering. While saying the city is suffering from 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' Trump hasn't presented any evidence that federal intervention is needed. And he won't do that the next time he sends the National Guard to another blue city. 'We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C.,' Trump said at a Monday press conference at the White House. Trump didn't offer any metrics on what will prompt him to intervene in another city's policing, the Herald reported. But he suggested what his political calculations will be. On Monday, he focused his ire on blue bastions that didn't vote for him — New York, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Oakland and Chicago — while ignoring the crime rate in red cities like St. Louis and New Orleans. Perhaps luckily for South Florida, our largest law-enforcement agency, the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office, is run by a Republican endorsed by Trump, and the county has done well managing crime. But who's to say Trump, egged on by Gov. Ron DeSantis, could not find a reason to intervene in some of the region's Democratic areas, such as Broward County? Trump's point isn't to lend a hand to a local police department to address crime. If it were, he would look for cooperation with local law enforcement, which the D.C. police chief said Monday is nothing new. This move furthers Trump's narrative that everything is terrible, crime is awful and he's the only one who can save us. It tramples on home rule, and it keeps making the federal government bigger, not smaller, the opposite of what Republicans and DOGE claim to be doing, with power more concentrated in his hands. Trump knows that looking tough on crime is good for his brand and bad for Democrats still trying to find their messaging strategy ahead of the 2026 midterms. By constantly shifting the narrative and creating a new controversy almost daily, Trump forces his opponents to keep up. But they would be fools to take the bait each time. A large section of the American public, meanwhile, feels overwhelmed with the barrage of presidential actions coming from the White House, many choosing to disengage from the political process. All they probably hear are the sound bites and social media headlines that Trump is saving the nation's capital from 'thugs.' And that's exactly what Trump probably wants: not to properly solve issues, but to show Americans he's the new sheriff in town.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
President Trump says other US cities could be next as he deploys National Guard to DC
"We're not going to lose our cities over this," Trump said as he mentioned plans to potentially expand his crackdown on crime to New York, Chicago, Baltimore and other cities. "This will go further." WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said he might expand his crackdown on crime in the nation's capital to other major U.S. cities as he announced plans to send 800 National Guard troops into Washington, D.C. Trump singled out New York City, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Chicago and Oakland, California during a Monday, Aug. 11, news conference as potential future targets in what would be a drastic escalation of federal presence on the streets of American cities. "We're not going to lose our cities over this. This will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C., and we're going to clean it up real quick," Trump said. Trump did not elaborate on his plans for other cities. But one of the two executive actions he signed Aug. 11 directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to coordinate with governors of states and "authorize the orders of any additional members of the National Guard to active service, as he deems necessary and appropriate, to augment this mission." "We're going to take back our capital," Trump said. "And then we'll look at other cities also. But other cities are studying what we're doing." Trump warns cities to 'learn their lesson' Each of the cities that Trump mentioned are led by Democratic mayors in states with Democratic governors, who could be less likely to request the Trump administration's intervention than Republican governors who are political allies of the president. "Other cities are hopefully watching this.... And maybe they'll self-clean up," Trump said, adding they could be targeted if "they don't learn their lesson" and study his administration's moves in Washington. He said he plans to look at New York City next "and if we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago." In a separate executive order, Trump invoked authority under Section 740 of the Home Rule Act to take control of Washington's police department. The move, authorized by federal law as part of the District of Columbia's unique status as a federal enclave, is not an option for Trump elsewhere. Secretary of Army Daniel Driscoll is set to lead the National Guard's operation in Washington. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon is also prepared to bring in additional National Guard units and other specialized units if needed. "They will be strong. They will be tough. And they will stand with their law enforcement partners," Hegseth said. "This is nothing new for DOD," he added, pointing to Trump's deployment of military troops at the United States-Mexico border to crack down on illegal immigration. Trump's authority to direct National Guard troops was challenged earlier this year after he tapped the California National Guard to quell protests over widespread deportations from increased immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area. After Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom challenged Trump's control over the troops, a judge ruled in favor of Trump. Trump reeled off a list of recent violent crimes in Washington, D.C. to justify his actions. Yet, volent crimes so far in 2025 are down 26% compared to last year, and homicides are down 12%, according to statistics compiled by the Metropolitian Police Department. Similarly, homicides in New York City are down in 2025 compared to the same time last year. Mayors push back at Trump's threat An FBI report released Aug. 5 found violent crime in 2024 dropped by 4.5% in the United States compared to 2023, with murder and non-negligent manslaughter decreasing by nearly 15%. The U.S. Conference of Mayors, which represents about 1,400 mayors, responded to Trump's actions and threats by touting a "nationwide success story" of plummeting crime rates. "Ultimately, the best public safety outcomes are delivered by local police departments and local officials, who know the communities," Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt, president of the mayors' conference, said in a statement. "America's mayors never see takeovers by other levels of government as a tactic that has any track record of producing results." Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, in response to Trump singling out his city, said "Baltimore is the safest it's been in over 50 years," adding that homicides are down about 28% in 2025. "We still have real work to do to build on this progress," Scott said in a statement, "but that work starts and ends here in Baltimore, with the local, state, and federal partners who have gotten us this far." Contributing: Cybele Mayes-Osterman of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
This Isn't About Crime
Donald Trump is famously reluctant to commit troops abroad, but salivates at the prospect of using them against Americans at home. That is the context in which one must understand his takeover of the Washington, D.C., police force; his deployment of the National Guard; and his threats to occupy other cities. Trump claims that he is acting to quell a spike in violent crime. And although he might very well feel sincere concern about crime, this does not explain his actions any more than concern about fentanyl smuggling (which he no doubt also genuinely opposes) motivates his trade restrictions against Canada. The most obvious reason for skepticism about Trump's desire to fight crime is that he is the most pro-criminal president in American history. He has treated laws as suggestions throughout his career, beginning with his defiance of Justice Department orders that he and his father stop discriminating against Black prospective tenants. Trump is a felon who has surrounded himself with criminals and promiscuously extended clemency to criminals who support him. When Trump talks about 'criminals,' he doesn't mean people who violate the law, or even people who violate the narrower and more serious set of laws against violence. (One of the first acts of his second term was a blanket pardon of violent criminals convicted of assaulting police officers on January 6, 2021. He even appointed to the Justice Department one of the instigators of the violence.) Trump's idea of criminality excludes himself and his supporters; includes noncriminal states of being, such as homelessness; and focuses heavily on categories of street crime that he seems to associate with Black people. Even by this skewed definition of crime, however, Trump's D.C. takeover makes little sense. His executive order announcing a state of emergency claims that crime is 'rising' and 'out of control,' but in reality, it has been falling since its post-pandemic spike two years ago. His defenders might correctly respond that crime remains too high. But imagine if Trump were declaring an emergency on the slightly more honest basis that crime in Washington was not falling quickly enough for his tastes. What would be left of the concept of an emergency? Serious policy experts, some of them conservative, have proposed solutions to bring down crime levels in Washington. The most straightforward remedy is to fill vacancies in the city's courts to speed up the processing of criminal cases. At Trump's press conference, the Fox News host turned (God help us) U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro denounced the District of Columbia's laws restricting sentencing for juvenile offenders. That's a reasonable complaint, but one that could be addressed by legislation, not by putting troops on the streets. Gilad Edelman: Just don't call her unqualified Trump's plan bears little resemblance to any of these remedies. His big idea is to flood the streets with troops. Yet the president himself does not appear committed to the belief that this will solve crime. In his press conference, Trump said that, by his reckoning, Washington already has more than enough police officers (3,500) to deter criminals. If that's true, why would adding more bodies—specifically, members of the military who lack training in law enforcement—improve the situation? Nothing about this proposal makes sense. The fact that Trump has proposed something illogical does not automatically imply that he is concealing a hidden motive. Anonymous White House sources assured Politico that the president is acting out of revulsion at scenes of crime and disorder that he has spotted while driving around town, and that might be true. But the obvious reality is that Trump has consistently and openly displayed a lust to use the power of the state against his political enemies. During his first term, he constantly described protesters as an unruly mob. He did this well before the George Floyd demonstrations, which did include pockets of vandalism and violence. He raged at the leaders of the military for failing to carry out his orders to have troops shoot protesters. More recently, before staging his birthday parade in June, he warned, 'If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' making no distinction between violent and peaceful protests. At the press conference, Trump appeared with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, both of whom have followed the second-term Trump mandate to place personal loyalty to the president above all other considerations. Hegseth's worldview, judging by his written output, is predicated on erasing the difference between foreign enemies and domestic critics. The Justice Department has lately been leaking splashy investigations of various Trump critics who obviously did nothing illegal. Activists on the post-liberal right, who yearn for Trump to use state power to crush their opponents, have barely disguised their glee. 'Trump has the opportunity to do a Bukele-style crackdown on DC crime,' Chris Rufo, a conservative activist who has influenced the administration, wrote on X. 'Big test: Can he reduce crime faster than the Left advances a counternarrative about 'authoritarianism'? If yes, he wins. Speed matters.' Note that Rufo is putting authoritarianism in scare quotes while holding up as a model Nayib Bukele, the thuggish president of El Salvador whose gulag-style prison employs torture, and who just recently smashed a constitutional term limit that represented one of the few remaining checks on his power. Bukele no doubt dislikes crime. But he has also used crime as a wedge to delegitimize all opposition. Rufo's invocation of him as an aspirational archetype is revealing. This morning, Trump depicted the Washington deployment as essential to secure the nation's capital, which hosts important foreign and domestic visitors. (He did not even claim to care about the needs of the city's residents.) He proceeded to mention, almost casually, that he would like to follow the occupation of Washington with similar action in a host of other cities. It should be abundantly clear that his stated motives do not align with his actual ones. His plans for Washington, D.C., are a warning to us all.
