
Why are thousands of Americans at the risk of losing their homes? Explained
Tens of thousands of Americans are at the risk of losing their critical
rental assistance
under the federal
Emergency Housing Vouchers
(EHV) programmes, reported news agency AP. EHV programmes are running out of money quickly and the funding is expected to come to an end by 2025 unless Congress intervenes.
The
US Department of Housing and Development
(HUD) in a letter warned that no additional funding is likely forthcoming. That would leave tens of thousands across the country scrambling to pay their rent.
Mass eviction of nearly 60,000 families
Analysts have raised alarm it would be among the largest one-time losses of rental assistance in the United States. This could lead to mass eviction of nearly 60,000 families and individuals, many of whom have escaped homelessness, domestic abuse, or human trafficking.
ALSO READ:
Why is Pete Hegseth's wife Jennifer Rauchet under fire for Signal chat leak controversy?
"To have it stop would completely upend all the progress that they've made," said Sonya Acosta, policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which researches housing assistance. "And then you multiply that by 59,000 households," she said.
Live Events
Launched by former President Joe Biden in 2021, the program, as part of the pandemic-era American Rescue Plan Act, was allocated $5 billion to help pull people out of homelessness, domestic violence and human trafficking.
The EHV programme supported individuals across the country — from children and seniors to veterans — with the expectation that the funds would last through the decade. But rising rents have accelerated the programme's depletion.
'To have it stop would completely upend all the progress that they've made,' said Sonya Acosta, policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'And then you multiply that by 59,000 households.'
Democratic Representative Maxine Waters is pushing for an $8 billion funding extension, though its chances appear slim as Republican-led efforts to cut the federal budget continue. 'We've been told it's going to be an uphill battle,' said Kim Johnson of the National Low Income Housing Coalition. So far, four key Republican lawmakers involved in the negotiations have not issued any public statements.
ALSO READ:
How Pete Hegseth invited multiple controversies for himself in less than a month? 10 points
For individuals like Daniris Espinal, the issue hits close to home. Escaping domestic violence and the threat of homelessness, she was able to find stability through an Emergency Housing Voucher, securing a three-bedroom apartment in Brooklyn for herself and her daughters — a home that would typically cost more than $3,000 per month.
'I regained my sense of self-worth and peace. I was able to rebuild my identity,' Espinal said. But now, she's worried it could all be taken away. 'That's my fear — losing everything I've worked so hard to rebuild.'
Espinal and her two daughters, aged 4 and 19, are currently living in a three-bedroom Brooklyn apartment with a monthly rent exceeding $3,000 — a cost that would be unmanageable without the support of a housing voucher.
Just four years ago, Espinal escaped a controlling marriage where her husband dictated nearly every aspect of her life — from whom she could see, to whether she could leave the apartment. When she tried to assert herself, he dismissed her as wrong, unreasonable, or even crazy. Struggling with postpartum depression and isolated from her support system, Espinal began to lose her sense of self. 'Every day, little by little, I started to feel not like myself,' she recalled. 'It felt like my mind wasn't mine.'
In March 2021, she was blindsided by notices demanding $12,000 in unpaid rent. At her husband's insistence, she had quit her job, trusting him to manage the household finances — a promise he failed to keep. Police reports of his explosive outbursts helped Espinal secure custody of their daughter in 2022. But she was left on uncertain ground: alone, in debt, and without an income to support her two daughters.
ALSO READ:
'Very perilous time in America...': 'Shame' chants echo across US as thousands protest Trump, over 700 events held
Pandemic-era financial aid provided a lifeline, covering her back rent and sparing her family from homelessness. But that support was temporary. Around the same time, the Emergency Housing Vouchers program launched, specifically aimed at individuals in situations like hers. 'A leading cause of family homelessness is domestic violence,' said Gina Cappuccitti, director of housing access and stability services at New Destiny Housing, a nonprofit that has helped 700 domestic violence survivors access these vouchers — Espinal among them.
In 2023, she moved into her current apartment. But the stability brought more than just a roof over her head. 'I gained my worth, my sense of peace, and I was able to rebuild my identity,' she said. Today, she's saving money, preparing for any future uncertainty. 'That's my fear,' she admitted, 'losing control of everything that I've worked so hard for.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Federal immigration raid at Omaha food production plant sparks protests
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Immigration authorities raided at least one Omaha food production plant Tuesday morning, inspiring some small protests, but details about how many workers were affected weren't immediately clear. Omaha police and the Douglas County sheriff said immigration officials had warned them about their plans, and their departments helped block off traffic around the neighborhood where many food production plants are located while U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers worked. ICE officials didn't immediately respond to questions. Meatpacking plants rely heavily on immigrant workers who are willing to do the physically demanding work. The industry has not yet been the focus of President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement efforts, but the administration has been intensifying its efforts in recent weeks. Trump called out the National Guard this week to respond to ongoing protests in Los Angeles over his immigration policies. In Omaha, a small group of people came out to protest the raids, and some of them even jumped on the front bumper of a vehicle to try to stop officers. Glenn Valley Foods officials didn't immediately respond to an inquiry from The Associated Press, but WOWT reported that CEO and owner Gary Rohwer said he wasn't made aware of the operation ahead of time and that there was no warrant. 'Of course not. It's a raid,' said Rohwer, whose company makes the Gary's QuickSteak brand of ready-to-grill steak. Federal agents entered the plant around 9 a.m. Tuesday with a list of 97 people they wanted to screen, Rohwer said. He said the company regularly checks the immigration status of employees with the federal E-Verify database. The raids prompted one Douglas County Commissioner to walk out in the middle of a meeting Tuesday to head down to the area he represents in southeast Omaha where the plants are located. Commissioner Roger Garcia and City Councilman Ron Hug both expressed concern about the impact of the raids on families. 'These actions are deeply harmful to the South Omaha community,' Hug said in a statement. 'Not only are they unjust and disruptive, but they also directly undermine the economic stability and growth of District 4 and the broader community.' Douglas County Sheriff Aaron Hanson said his agency is 'not privy to the exact nature of the ICE operation' but that his agency is there to assist with assuring 'peace and safety' of everyone in the area. Asked when he learned of the operation, he said his department received 'respectful and ample notification.' He says he got the notification about a week ago.


The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The difficult task of keeping everyone happy
The recent Cabinet expansion in Telangana reflects the Congress's promised commitment to social justice. By inducting three Ministers — Gaddam Vivek and Adluri Laxman from the Scheduled Caste (SC) group and Vakiti Srihari from the Backward Classes (BC) group — as well as leaders from socially and economically backward communities for various posts, the party has attempted to realign its power structure to better represent historically marginalised groups. However, this has not come without friction, particularly from the dominant Reddy community, which feels ignored despite its numerical and political clout in the Assembly. Of the seven BC MLAs in the Congress, three have been given Cabinet posts and two have been appointed as chief whip and whip. Among Ministers, Ponnam Prabhakar is from the Goud community, Konda Surekha belongs to the Padmashali community (with her husband hailing from the Munnuru Kapu community), and Vakiti Srihari comes from the Mudiraj caste. Pradesh Congress Committee chief A. Mahesh Kumar Goud is a Goud from the BC community. BCs enjoy more representation not just in the Cabinet, but also in key political roles. Additionally, with the inclusion of Mr. Vivek and Mr. Laxman, the number of SC leaders in the Cabinet has increased to four. They are split equally between the Mala and Madiga sub-groups. This balance is critical in a State where internal divisions within SC communities have influenced political equations, particularly the Madiga Reservation Porata Samiti. Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka, a Mala, holds the Finance portfolio, while former Deputy Chief Minister Damodar Raja Narsimha holds the Health portfolio. Despite this progressive outlook, Congress has triggered dissatisfaction within its largest and historically most influential support base, the Reddy community. In the 119-member Assembly, 43 MLAs are from the Reddy community. Within the Congress, 26 of the 64 MLAs are from the Reddy community. Those who have been left out include strong aspirants such as Komatireddy Rajgopal Reddy, P. Sudarshan Reddy, T. Rammohan Reddy, and Malreddy Ranga Reddy. Mr. Rajgopal Reddy, who played a key role in boosting the Congress's prospects by jumping ship from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) before the elections, feels particularly aggrieved, especially since his political ally, Vivek Venkatswamy, was inducted into the Cabinet. Both leaders were promised a berth. When Mr. Rajgopal Reddy, Mr. Venkatswamy, and Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy from the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) entered the Congress at around the same time, it created the perception that the BJP was losing ground and that the Congress was the only alternative to the BRS. No one can deny impact of these leaders on the overall performance of the party even though Revanth Reddy, who was then PCC chief, strongly built an anti-BRS narrative. The BJP, which was looking strong, lost steam when Mr. Rajgopal Reddy and Mr. Venkatswamy exited the party at a crucial juncture. Mr. Rajgopal Reddy's brother, Komatireddy Venkata Reddy, is a Minister and hails from Nalgonda — a Reddy bastion. While being progressive in its politics, the Congress would also do well in ensuring that its traditional support base, the Reddy community, is kept happy. While the Congress's caste arithmetic may have worked, the representation of regional and minority members leaves much to be desired. Key districts such as Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, and Nizamabad have gone not represented in the Cabinet. Muslims, and Lambadas among the tribal communities, have also been left out. There is no Muslim MLA in the Congress fold. The party has only one Muslim MLC, Amer Ali Khan. To bridge this gap, Congress is considering fielding a Muslim candidate from Jubilee Hills in the coming by-election. The names of Mohd Azharuddin, a cricketer, and Faheem Qureshi, a confidante of the Chief Minister, are being floated. To compensate for the absence of the Lambada community, the Chief Minister nominated Ram Chander Naik, an MLA from Dornakal, as Deputy Speaker. This complements the appointment of Gaddam Prasad Kumar, a Dalit, as Speaker. As a result, Telangana is perhaps the only State where both the presiding officers of the Assembly belong to the SC and ST communities, respectively.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
$134 million and counting: Pentagon details the whopping cost of sending troops to quell L.A. riots
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was grilled by Congress on why troops were sent to Los Angeles and how much it cost. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) told Hegseth that his time as Defense Secretary has been full of 'endless chaos.' as per Associated Press report. The hearing got heated, with lawmakers and Hegseth yelling over each other at times. After lots of pressure, Pentagon's acting controller, Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell, said sending troops to LA would cost $134 million. Hegseth defended the decision, saying the troops are there to protect federal agents during their work. He said under Trump, the use of troops inside the U.S. would probably increase to better protect the homeland. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Do You Remember Him? You Better Sit Down Before You See Him Today Reportingly Undo Troops for help This was Hegseth's first time answering tough questions in front of Congress since becoming Defense Secretary. The hearing was the first of three Hegseth will face this week. Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) challenged Hegseth over sending 700 active Marines along with 4,100 National Guard members to guard federal buildings in L.A. during immigration raid protests. Hegseth avoided direct answers but then let MacDonnell explain that the $134 million would cover travel, housing, and food. Live Events Hegseth justified the 60-day deployment by saying they're there to stop 'rioters, looters and thugs' from attacking the police. The Posse Comitatus Act says U.S. troops can't police citizens, unless the Insurrection Act is used, which is super rare. It's unclear if Trump plans to use the Insurrection Act. Marine Corps Gen. Eric Smith told lawmakers the Marines in L.A. haven't had to act yet. He said they can't make arrests, they are only there to protect federal buildings and workers. When asked if Marines might use deadly force, Smith said he isn't worried, he trusts his troops to follow the law. FAQs Q1. Why were U.S. troops sent to Los Angeles? They were sent to protect federal buildings during protest-related unrest. Q2. How much did the L.A. troop deployment cost? The Pentagon said it cost around $134 million for 60 days.