
Why does Rhode Island hate its governors so much?
. To subscribe,
.
TODAY'S STARTING POINT
Radio host Jim Braude isn't necessarily an expert on Rhode Island politics, but he can read a poll as well as anyone. So in discussing Governor Dan McKee's recent dismal job approval numbers on Boston Public Radio last week,
'It would seem to me, based on the polling that I've seen, that if ... Vladimir Putin ran for governor of Rhode Island, he would beat Governor McKee,' Braude said during a conversation with Providence Mayor Brett Smiley. 'Governor McKee has the lowest approval rating I've ever seen for an incumbent politician ... in my whole life.'
Indeed, with recent job approval ratings ranging between 19 percent and 25 percent, McKee appears to be one of the
Advertisement
A
Advertisement
But while McKee's numbers are exceptionally low among New England's governors, his predicament is hardly unique by Rhode Island standards. You'd be hard pressed to find a governor in recent history who enjoyed prolonged popularity in the state.
Of the state's last seven governors, two (Republican Ed DiPrete and Democrat Bruce Sundlun) suffered lopsided losses in their reelection bids, and one (independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee) was so unpopular that he didn't bother to seek reelection. Republicans Lincoln Almond and Don Carcieri did enjoy high approval ratings during parts of their tenures, but they left office deeply unpopular.
Gina Raimondo, McKee's predecessor, recently told political consultant David Axelrod that Rhode Island has '
So what gives?
Darrell West, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who spent years leading political polling at Brown University, said Rhode Island has long had 'difficulty getting its act together, and that often leads to poor poll numbers for sitting governors.'
'As a small state, it is hard for Rhode Island to control its own fate,' West said. 'It typically is dependent on the national economy, congressional largesse, and defense dollars. When any of those things turn negative, voters blame governors even if they are not responsible for what happens elsewhere.'
Advertisement
West also pointed out the obvious: Rhode Island has a long history of political corruption that has sapped the confidence of residents. DiPrete, who died last week at the age of 91, once allegedly dove through a dumpster outside a fast food restaurant searching for a $10,000 bribe that he had received but misplaced. He served a year in prison after leaving office.
Rhode Island's most famous modern-day politician was Buddy Cianci, the cartoonishly corrupt former mayor of Providence who landed in federal prison. Unlike the governors, the uber-charismatic Cianci enjoyed high approval ratings throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. But his lasting legacy is contributing to the perception among Rhode Islanders that many politicians are on the take — he was just the one who got caught.
Which brings us back to McKee, the current governor.
To be fair, McKee, who's been in office since 2021, has some accomplishments to his name, including creating a statewide strategy to address chronic absenteeism in schools
He hasn't faced widespread corruption allegations and largely benefited from free-flowing federal dollars following the pandemic. But he is dogged by competence questions, in part because of his handling of the 2023 closure of the westbound side of the Washington Bridge, which is the most common route you'd take from Providence to Cape Cod.
McKee isn't responsible for years of deferred maintenance on the bridge, but he repeatedly gave inaccurate repair timelines and cost estimates in the months following the closure. He was also dismissive of complaints from drivers and small business owners about traffic delays.
The bridge is now scheduled to be rebuilt by 2028 at a cost of more than $400 million, but it's become the latest symbol of government dysfunction in Rhode Island. The unhappiness of voters who face unusually long traffic delays as a result of the bridge closure is no doubt contributing to McKee's low approval rating, and that's before any of his potential opponents have spent a dollar on TV ads pouring gasoline on the fire of residents' frustrations.
Advertisement
McKee's only path to reelection may be to run a relentlessly negative campaign attacking Foulkes and whomever else jumps in the race, which won't exactly endear any of them to jaundiced voters. Otherwise, he may very well suffer the same fate as so many before him: The wrath of Rhode Islanders.
🧩
2 Down:
90°
POINTS OF INTEREST
A dock in Harpswell, Maine, near where a shark killed a woman in 2020.
Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff
Haverhill death:
The family of Francis Gigliotti, a Haverhill man who died after police officers restrained him last Friday,
Under the influence:
State Representative John Lawn, a Watertown Democrat, faces charges after police
Shark sighting:
Officials in Harpswell, a Maine town where a great white shark killed a woman in 2020, warned swimmers yesterday
AI therapy:
This Rhode Island woman says ChatGPT saved her life. Psychologists say relying on it for advice
Advertisement
Jeffrey Epstein:
Trump blasted Republicans who want him to release documents related to the wealthy sex offender as 'weaklings' falling for a 'scam,' even though Trump has
More cuts:
Senate Republicans approved $9 billion in funding cuts to public radio and foreign aid that the White House had requested, but preserved a global program that fights HIV/AIDS. The bill now heads to the House. (
Big beautiful bill:
Low-income Americans fear that Trump's new tax law, which cuts SNAP and Medicaid, will leave them
Policy change:
A special designation used to put some young undocumented immigrants on the path to a green card.
Climate resilience:
Massachusetts and other states
Israel vs. Syria:
Deadly Israeli airstrikes damaged Syria's defense ministry and an area near the presidential palace. Israel said the strikes were meant to protect a Syrian minority that has clashed with the government. (
BESIDE THE POINT
By Teresa Hanafin
❤️🩹
Heart health:
The American Heart Association has come up with a 'Life's Simple 7″ plan to lower your risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer. (
🦖
Capturing kitsch:
A TV journalist in New York devotes his time to documenting
Advertisement
🪨
Pricey rock:
An anonymous buyer purchased the biggest meteorite from Mars ever found on Earth — it weighs more than 54 pounds — for $4.3 million at a Sotheby's auction. The rock was discovered in the Sahara Desert in Niger in November, 2023. (
🏠
Unique home remakes:
A small, energy-efficient home in Lexington with
😡
Don't be that Angry Dad:
For a lot of fathers, feeling overwhelmed with the kids can lead to anger. Here are some tips on how to regulate that rage. (
🪈
Flute Central:
Metro Boston is home to several of
👉
Weird Stuff on the Web:
This site will find a photo of someone pointing at your cursor, no matter where on the screen you stop. Don't blame me if you're still playing with this in an hour. (
CORRECTION:
Yesterday's newsletter used the wrong pronouns for Andrea Gibson, a spoken-word artist who died this week and used they/them pronouns. We regret the error.
Thanks for reading Starting Point.
This newsletter was edited by
❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at
✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can
📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.
Dan McGowan can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's exactly how much you'll save on your 2026 taxes, by income bracket: Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill benefits
Now that President Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' is the law, you're probably wondering how much you'll save on your taxes when you file next year. The Tax Policy Center (TPC), a nonpartisan think tank staffed by the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, has crunched the numbers. Here's a rundown. Southwest Airlines' open seating is ending: Here's what the new 8-group boarding process will look like Here's exactly how much you'll save on your 2026 taxes, by income bracket: Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill benefits The Trump administration is pushing to open new coal mines that will likely never turn a profit What does the new tax bill do? Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) offers Americans a number of tax benefits by extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), making many of the changes permanent, plus adding some new short- and long-term tax rules. Those changes include certain business and international tax rules, and revenue-raising provisions—including the repeal of various energy tax incentives, according to the TPC. What is the average 2026 tax savings from Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? An analysis from the TPC shows the new law would reduce taxes for Americans by about $2,900 on average in 2026, with some 85% of households receiving a tax cut in 2026. That figure will drop to just 70% in 2030, after some provisions are phased out. But notably, almost 60% of the tax benefits would go to those in the top quintile, or one-fifth of earners, with incomes of $217,000 or more. It's fair to say that higher-income Americans are more likely to see larger tax benefits than lower-income Americans. Overall, about 4% of households would see their taxes go up in 2026; that percentage would increase to about 10% in 2030. How much will each income bracket save on their 2026 taxes? According to the data compiled by the Tax Policy Center, here's how much the average 2026 tax savings will be for each of the five quintiles of income, as well as the top 1% and 0.1%: Bottom 20% ($0 to $34,600 income range):Second quintile ($34,601 to $66,800):Third quintile ($66,801 to $119,200):Fourth quintile ($119,201 to $217,100):Top 20% ($217,101 and higher):Top 1% ($1,149,000 and higher):Top 0.1% ($5,184,900 and higher):What are some specific tax benefits included in the new bill? There are a number of new tax write-offs and credits, including: the 'No Tax on Tips' provision (which allows eligible tipped workers to deduct a portion of their income from tips on their federal income taxes), a car loan deduction, a deduction for charitable donations, and a child credit. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump escalates attacks on Obama and Clinton as questions swirl about Epstein
'Obama was trying to lead a coup,' Trump said. 'And it was with Hillary Clinton.' Trump's extended digression, which came during a visit with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of the Philippines, was a stark example of his campaign of retribution against an ever-growing list of enemies that has little analogue in American history. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It even prompted a rare response from Obama's office. Advertisement 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' said Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' After Trump's attack on Obama, reports continued to surface about his relationship with Epstein. CNN published photos of Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples, the president's second wife. Gabbard's report, which claimed there was a 'treasonous conspiracy' by top Obama officials, contradicted a lengthy study by the Senate Intelligence Committee that was signed by all Republican members of the committee, including Marco Rubio, now the secretary of state. Advertisement The Obama administration never contended that the Russians had manipulated votes; instead, the administration, and the Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee, concluded that Russia mounted a major effort to influence voters. Still, in his remarks Tuesday, Trump claimed that he could have sent Clinton, the former secretary of state and another of his political rivals, to prison but chose not to. He said he would show no such leniency to Obama. 'I let her off the hook, and I'm very happy I did, but it's time to start after what they did to me,' Trump said. 'Whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly.' The president then listed even more enemies he wanted his Justice Department to target, including his former FBI director, James Comey and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, and former President Joe Biden. 'It would be President Obama,' Trump said. 'He started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper, the whole group was there.' 'He's guilty,' he said of Obama. 'This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' Trump's campaign to exact revenge against his perceived enemies has taken many forms. Over the past six months, he has pulled protective details from former colleagues facing death threats from Iran. He has revoked or threatened to revoke the security clearances of Biden, members of his administration and dozens of others. His administration has taken steps to target members of the media seen as unfriendly, taken the hatchet to entire agencies perceived as too liberal, and fired or investigated government workers deemed disloyal. Advertisement The re-examination of the intelligence around the 2016 election began with John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, ordering a review of the agency's tradecraft that went into the intelligence community assessment in December of that year. The review was deeply critical of the Obama administration and the former CIA director, John Brennan. CIA analysts took issue with the speed of the assessment and accused Brennan of allowing an unverified dossier prepared by a former British intelligence officer to influence the assessment. But Brennan has long denied that the so-called Steele dossier had any impact on the assessment, and other former officials said that the analysts working on the report paid no attention to it, maintaining that it was unverifiable rumor. Ratcliffe wrote on social media that the review had shown that the process was corrupt, and then he made a criminal referral to the FBI. Last week, Gabbard issued another report that criticized the findings of the intelligence assessment even more directly. Gabbard's report suggested that in the winter of 2016, intelligence officials under pressure from the White House changed their assessment from one that Russia had failed to mount a significant effort to hack election infrastructure to one that the Kremlin was trying to boost Trump and denigrate Clinton, the Democratic nominee. But Gabbard's report conflated two different intelligence findings. Intelligence officials had concluded that Russia had not engaged in any major effort to hack election systems and change votes. But they also believed that Russia had tried to influence the election in various ways by releasing hacked documents to harm Clinton and sow dissent. Advertisement Gabbard has also called for several Obama officials to face criminal investigation, without naming them. This article originally appeared in


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Omar calls GOP ‘pedophile protection party' for dodging Epstein votes
Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar (D) on Tuesday slammed the GOP for dodging a vote that would call for the release of files related to deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Republican leaders this week scrapped their legislative plans and headed early into a long summer recess — all to avoid votes on the Epstein saga. However, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has insisted the move was not intended to shield Republicans from tough Epstein votes — or protect Trump from potentially embarrassing disclosures — but to end the Democrats' 'political games.' 'The pedophile protection party is shutting down Congress just to avoid voting on the release of the Epstein files,' Omar wrote in a post on X in response to the move. Last week, GOP lawmakers killed a vote backed by Democrats attempting to force the release of Epstein's files. It failed 211-210 along party lines. 'The American people are best served by putting an end to Democrats' side shows. That's what we're doing by not allowing the Rules Committee to continue with that nonsense this week,' Johnson said during a Tuesday press conference. 'We're done being lectured on transparency,' he said. However, some Republicans have refused to completely abandon the public's desire for more information related to Epstein's international illegal dealings. The House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee voted Tuesday to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, longtime associate to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, to appear for a deposition. Some are hoping the measure will unveil new details about the list of people involved with the human trafficking ring. 'This is progress. We will not stop fighting until the Epstein Files are released. Trump and Bondi must stop blocking the American people from the truth,' House Oversight Democrats wrote on the social platform X after the vote. On Tuesday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche also said in a statement that he has communicated with Maxwell's counsel 'to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department.' 'I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days,' Blanche said. 'Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now.'