Delegates should survey members before voting - GPA chief Tom Parsons
GPA CHIEF EXECUTIVE Tom Parsons says one of the lesson from the skorts controversy is that delegates 'make decisions at Congress' and they 'should be surveying their members' before voting.
Parsons added: 'And what was different this time was, they did that, and a raft of counties publicly stated the results of their consultation.'
Camogie players are now allowed to wear shorts in matches after a motion passed at Special Congress last night at Croke Park.
The motion — which needed a two-thirds majority in order to be passed — succeeded after receiving an overwhelming 98% of the votes from delegates.
A motion before the 2024 Camogie Congress to allow players to wear shorts fell well short of the 66% support required to pass as just 45% voted in favour.
'In Congress, every decision is a blind vote,' said Parsons. 'And over the years, these very important motions have come up. And, you know, players don't know how their county voted. They don't publicly say how they voted. And is it good enough that delegates might make a decision on preference, or might not have had the time to consult and might make a decision on the day?
'I really do think we need transparency on how counties vote because it will keep them accountable to their members, their delegates.'
Parsons acknowledged the efforts from delegates to be present for the vote last night, and praised them for taking on board players' wishes.
Advertisement
'The delegates had to drive all over the country yesterday, to press a button and vote,' he said. 'That was a big sacrifice on the delegates who had to do that. Thank you to them for actually listening to the players.'
The GPA CEO said certain policy, though, should not be left for Congress.
'There's decisions that should be made in rule. And then there's decisions that's about human rights and athletes' rights. If there's any decisions that, or any elements of the game that impact player welfare, for example, and there's policy that says this is the duty of care for players to provide this level of care, that shouldn't come down to a rule or a constitution.
'That should be an obligation on the governing body to protect the rights of players. We've got this very ancient Constitution and Congress and Central Councils. It's great to protect tradition but we have to move with the times and not everything should be a vote.
'Not everything should have to wait for Congress to be voted on. When we put out that report (on skorts) and we actually put research behind how players are feeling mentally, the anxiety it causes, it was like a rocket.'
Parsons added: 'Fair play to camogie players for standing tall. For taking this fight on. And this is really all on them. The GPA are just proud. And I'm proud just to have their backs really, in all of it. They put themselves in a very vulnerable position.
'You know, there's enough pressures on very young women to be playing at this level, and then to be under the public eye as such to make change.
'We have players who have ultimately sacrificed a Munster Championship which will hopefully be replayed.'
Media pundit and four-time All-Ireland winner with Wexford, Ursula Jacob, said the result shows the delegates canvassed players this time.
'98% last night versus 45% last year just shows that when delegates went back to clubs and asked the players, the result speaks for itself,' Jacob said.
She said the result comes with 'a huge sense of relief'.
Ursula Jacob. Tom Maher / INPHO Tom Maher / INPHO / INPHO
Jacob added: 'Really proud of the players for standing strong the last number of weeks. It hasn't been easy and it's been far from ideal with preparation for championship. But I think in the long run, it's been really worth it.
'The players' voice was the driving force behind it all. It was fantastic to see such a resounding result last night. It was an accurate reflection of how the players have been feeling.
'It'll have a huge impact on the modern game but also for future players coming into the game. It's just removing that barrier or the reason why certain girls decided to give up. Anything to remove barriers is a positive.'
Jacob said some players will likely continue to wear skorts. 'If they feel good about wearing the skorts, they shouldn't be criticised for that either.'
Jacob hopes the sport will make headlines for more positive reasons in the coming weeks, and that the public who have followed this debate will consider attending games as the season moves up a gear.
'It's a frustration that the camogie has been thrown into such a negative light in the last number of weeks,' she said.
'I just hope now we can move on and move forward and talk about the game for all the right reasons. We have a fantastic championship to look forward to and now more than ever, we need to get the support for those girls out on the pitch.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
8 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Fergus Finlay: Let's restore people's dignity by going back to the Constitution
What are my fundamental obligations as a citizen of Ireland? The Constitution spells out two, in Article 9, and it uses the word fundamental to describe them. I must be faithful to the nation and loyal to the State. In addition, if I am a parent, I have some additional duties in relation to the welfare and education of my children. None of that seems unreasonable to me. I'm proud of being Irish, never wanted to live anywhere else, always wanted to ensure that my children and their children had the same sense of pride as I have. But I've always wondered why the drafters of our Constitution never thought that the country might have the occasional duty to its citizens and all the people who live here. This is exclusive subscriber content. Already a subscriber? Sign in Subscribe to access all of the Irish Examiner. Annual €120€60 Best value Monthly €10€4 / month Unlimited access. Subscriber content. Daily ePaper. Additional benefits.


RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Why having a massive public row with your boss rarely ends well
Analysis: The spat between Donald Trump and Elon Musk is a vivid example of how a massive blowup with your boss can be destructive and dangerous The increasingly bitter spat between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has dominated the news cycle of late. Until a few days ago, they presented the appearance of being best buddies, but Musk's criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill" that Trump is trying to get through Congress (which would enact tax cuts, cuts social funding, increase defense spending and lead to a substantial increase in America's already massive deficit) led to a serious breach between these two self-styled titans. Trump and Musk are now trading insults on their respective social media platforms (X and Truth Social), with Musk claiming that Trump would not have won the election without his help and Trump musing that it might be time to cancel Musk's many contracts with the US government. This has quickly degenerated into the type of brawl usually seen in the schoolyard, and pundits are having a field day. From RTE Radio 1's Brendan O'Connor Show, former journalist Mark Little on why he's backing Elon Musk in his schoolyard brawl with Donald Trump Beneath the childishness of their feud, there are serious issues. It is certainly an expensive fight for Trump and Musk, with Tesla stock losing over $150 billion and the Trump crypto coin $Trump losing over $100 million in value over the last few days. It is also a vivid example of one of the most destructive and dangerous events that can happen in an organisation: a massive blowup at your boss. These rarely turn out well. There are usually two scenarios that lead to this blowup with your boss. First is the case where you are completely in the wrong and probably in very hot water. For example, you make a mistake, your boss appropriately calls you out and you tell your boss to go soak his or her head (or something considerably more colorful). There is little to do here but hope that your boss is generous and forgiving. From RTÉ Brainstorm, my boss is a psychopath: why bad people get good jobs The second, and much more difficult situation, is where a blowup with your boss is the result of his or her unreasonable behavior. In a paper in Harvard Business Review, Annie McKee notes that many bosses lack the emotional stability to monitor and control their behavior. These bosses can be abusive, and they can make their subordinates' lives miserable by yelling, displaying hostility toward their subordinates, insulting and denigrating them or simply sabotaging their work by withholding information resources needed to perform their jobs. These are the bosses who are most likely to provoke a blowup - and also the bosses least likely to forgive and forget. Blowing up at an abusive boss can be dangerous in many ways. McKee suggests that the most important thing to do in this case is to protect yourself. If your boss is so abusive that you often feel on the verge or blowing up at him or her, it is a good bet that the culture of the business tolerates abuse, in part because the organisation is strictly hierarchical. This means that the presumption will often be that the boss is always right, and that no matter what the boss does, subordinates have no right to challenge it. From RTE Radio 1's Brendan O'Connor Show, how to deal with a toxic boss In this case, protecting yourself might start with developing a strategy for dealing with the fallout of a blowup. Do you have powerful allies? Do you have a realistic exit strategy? If the answer to both these questions is no, you must do whatever you can to avoid a blowup. A strategy for dealing with the physical and emotional toll of an abusive boss is every bit as important as developing an exit strategy. The targets of abusive supervision experience a range of negative effects, including elevated blood pressure, depressed immune systems, anxiety and depression. Unfortunately, many employees respond to abusive supervision by suffering in silence or by retaliation, and neither of these is a very effective response. Suffer in silence and it is likely that the physical and psychological effects of stress will accumulate. Retaliate by blowing up at your boss and you will probably be out on the street in short order. From RTÉ Radio 1's The Business, is being bold a good thing for the workplace? There are productive ways of dealing with an absuive boss than hitting them over the head with something heavy. You should document the situation and events, manage the way you perform your job to minimise contact with and conflicts with the abusive supervisor and diagnose the likely causes of abusive supervision. McKee suggests that you start with self-awareness and situational awareness. Are there things that you do or situations in the organization that contribute to your boss's behavior? Even if you cannot make large changes in the organization, having a better understanding of why your boss acts the way he or she does can help in managing the stress of dealing with an abusive boss. Reacting to a bad boss is always difficult (even if it is sometimes hard to tell who is the bad boss as in the Trump-Musk feud), but there is one thing we know with confidence from the research on abusive supervision. The thing that might be most satisfying at the moment – blowing up at your boss – is a very bad idea.


RTÉ News
3 days ago
- RTÉ News
Musk deletes post alleging Trump link to Epstein files
Elon Musk has deleted his post on X alleging US President Donald Trump was "in the Epstein files". Mr Musk made the unverified accusation on Thursday as the two men clashed over Mr Trump's proposed spending bill. The accusation was among a number posts deleted by Mr Musk. It comes after US President Donald Trump said yesterday that Elon Musk had "lost his mind" but insisted he wanted to move on from the fiery split with his billionaire former ally. Mr Trump had scrapped the idea of a call with Mr Musk and was even thinking of ditching the red Tesla he bought at the height of their bromance, White House officials said. "Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk, I just wish him well," Mr Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to his New Jersey golf club yesterday evening. Mr Trump told US broadcasters that he now wanted to focus instead on passing his "big, beautiful" mega-bill before Congress. Mr Musk's harsh criticism of the bill had sparked their bust-up. But the 78-year-old Republican could not stop himself from taking aim at his South African-born friend-turned-enemy. "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" Mr Trump said in a call with ABC when asked about Mr Musk, adding that he was "not particularly" interested in talking to the tycoon. Mr Trump later told Fox News that Mr Musk had "lost it". Just a week ago Mr Trump gave Mr Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after four months working there. While there had been reports of tensions, the sheer speed at which their relationship imploded stunned onlookers. After Mr Musk called Mr Trump's spending bill an "abomination" on Tuesday, Mr Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe on Thursday in which he said he was "very disappointed" by the entrepreneur. Mr Trump's spending bill faces a difficult path through Congress as it will raise the US deficit, while critics say it will cut health care for millions of the poorest Americans. The row then went nuclear, with Mr Musk slinging insults at Mr Trump and accusing him without evidence, in a since deleted post on X, of being in government files on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.