
'Lilo & Stitch' (2025) Review — An Underwhelming Live Action Remake
Every time I watch a remake that involves science fiction technology—in this case, characters in the live-action Lilo & Stitch (2025) using a gun that portals people through walls—I wonder why they can't just teleport back to a place and time to rediscover the magic of the original. Clearly, this version lacks that kind of imagination. The only thing these laser shooters can do is open up walls to walk through instead of, you know, opening a door or a window.
Now, don't get me wrong—the new Lilo & Stitch is cute enough. The young actress who plays Lilo is downright adorable and has the added charm of never acting beyond her age. The frenzied animation of Stitch, voiced once again by Chris Sanders, has moments of genuine levity. However, something feels off throughout the entire film. In the third act, I waited for a moment to tie the story together—a moment that never comes. It leaves you wondering why they couldn't use a damn portal to tug at our hearts and make it better. Chris Sanders and Maia Kealoha in Lilo & Stitch (2025) | Image via Walt Disney Pictures
The story follows two sisters. Nani (Sydney Elizebeth) is an ambitious, athletic, straight-A student who has put her life on hold to become the legal guardian of her younger sister, Lilo (Maia Kealoha). Their parents died just months earlier, and the Pelekai siblings are struggling. Lilo is acting out at school—during a native Hawaiian dance recital, she pushes a classmate, likely projecting her feelings about Nani not showing up to watch her perform.
Nani is doing her best to raise Lilo while juggling household responsibilities and trying to hold a job. Assigned to their case is Mrs. Kekoa, a patient and empathetic social worker ( Wayne's World's Tia Carrere, who originally voiced Nani in the 2002 animated film—a nice touch). Mrs. Kekoa gives Nani a one-week deadline to keep her job, pay off the growing stack of bills, and secure health insurance for both of them, or else she'll be forced to place Lilo in foster care.
However, things are about to be turned even more upside down when the sisters are visited by an alien (voiced by The Wild Robot's Chris Sanders) who looks and acts like a rabid blue koala. In reality, he is known as 'Experiment 626,' though Lilo affectionately names him 'Stitch' after he cuts up the seats in Nani's truck. Stitch came to Earth after being banished by the Grand Councilwoman ( Ted Lasso's Hannah Waddingham) of the United Galactic Federation. Chris Sanders and Maia Kealoha in Lilo & Stitch (2025) | Image via Walt Disney Pictures
Believing he would perish in water, Stitch instead crash-lands on solid ground. The Grand Councilwoman then sends Dr. Jookiba (Zach Galifianakis) and Agent Pleakley (Billy Magnussen) to retrieve him. The pairing of these two characters—and their performers—highlights how uneven the film can be. Magnussen excels at physical comedy, delivering most laughs outside the animated titular character. Meanwhile, veteran comedian Galifianakis' take on the 'hairy potatoes' scientist feels wooden and stiffer than a well-crafted papa he'e nalu.
Sanders stepped aside, wrote, and co-directed the original with Dean DeBlois to let Dean Fleischer Camp take the lead. The lack of emotional connection is utterly shocking. Especially knowing that Camp is the genius behind one of the most remarkable feats of animation cinema of the 21st century , Marcel the Shell with Shoes On . A film that knows poignant themes of loneliness, connections, grief, and letting go.
It feels as if Camp watered down a script from Chris Kekaniokalani Bright, who wrote Moana, of the Hawaiian community, the only one that deals with a single line of never leaving someone behind. It's as if they were watching Black Hawk Down? Chris Sanders voices Stitch in Lilo & Stitch (2025) | Image via Walt Disney Pictures
Lilo & Stitch is a G-rated live-action remake that never recaptures the original's wonderment and unique point of view. Even the main characters feel thinly drawn and lack real dimensionality—take Courtney B. Vance's undercover government agent, for example, whose belief that protecting the country outweighs saving a little girl comes off as underdeveloped and one-note. The film's themes feel hollow, as if it's trying to teach children moral lessons without actually earning them.
And when it finally reaches its big emotional moment near the end, it misses the opportunity to use those portal guns to deliver meaningful closure. Instead, it settles for a boring, safe ending that falls flat. When it comes to missing the big moment, Lilo & Stitch forget the unspoken interconnection life brings that makes moments like these matter the most.
You can watch the live-action remake of Lilo & Stitch only in theaters May 23rd!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary
Podcaster Joe Rogan claimed Tuesday that two unnamed former presidents were involved in the protest against his skeptical discussions about COVID-19. Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan, one of its biggest stars, to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. Musician Neil Young famously removed his content from Spotify in protest over Rogan's rhetoric, saying he no longer wanted to share a platform with him. "And then all of a sudden, I hear that Neil Young wants me removed from Spotify. I was like, 'What the f--- is going on? This is crazy,'" Rogan said Tuesday. "Spotify got calls from two former presidents," he added. Then-Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki commented on the controversy directly. After Spotify announced it would flag podcasts that cover COVID-19, Psaki responded, "So this disclaimer, it's a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out misinformation while also uplifting accurate information." "Our hope is that all major tech platforms — and all major news sources for that matter — be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19," she added. But Rogan said that instead of being censored or deplatformed, "I grew by 2 million subscribers in a month." "People started listening," he said, despite how his critics attacked his reputation. "And they started listening, like, 'Oh, he's really reasonable and pretty humble about all this stuff and just asking questions.'" Rogan also condemned how media outlets attacked his use of Ivermectin to treat his COVID-19 by referring to it as a horse dewormer. "I'm, like, 'Why aren't you guys concentrating on the fact that a 55-year-old man is fine three days later during the worst strain?' It was during the Delta where everybody's freaking out. 'This one's going to kill us all.' And I was fine in three days," he said. Rogan described the whole experience as a "wake-up call" that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. "It's so dirty. It's such a dirty business," Rogan said. "God, I used to have massive respect for journalists. If I had never done this podcast, I would be your regular schmo out there with, you know, just spitting out all the company lines and all the blast all over the news." "I kind of liked it better then," he said with a laugh. "I didn't think the world is filled with demons, money-hungry demons that are willing to sacrifice human lives in the pursuit of revenue." Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek addressed the pushback against hosting Rogan during the company's earnings call in February 2022. "I think the important part here is that we don't change our policies based on one creator, nor do we change it based on any media cycle," the chief executive said at the time. "Our policies have been carefully written with the input from numbers of internal and external experts in this space – and I do believe they're right for our platform." Fox News Digital reached out to Spotify for comment and did not receive an immediate reply.


New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
How the Beach Boys' ‘Pet Sounds' Entered the Pop Music Pantheon. (Eventually.)
Making a list of the best rock albums ever is easy: Something old (the Beatles), something new or newer (perhaps Radiohead), something borrowed (the Rolling Stones' blues or disco pastiches) and Joni Mitchell's 'Blue.' And, of course, bursting into the top 10 — and often higher — of any respectable list: 'Pet Sounds.' The overwhelming brainchild of Brian Wilson, the Beach Boys' chief songwriter whose death at 82 was announced on Wednesday, 'Pet Sounds' is beautiful — with gorgeous vocal harmonies, haunting timbres and wistful lyrics of adolescent longing and estrangement. It was a landmark in studio experimentation that changed the idea of how albums could be made. But one thing that stands out about the Beach Boys' masterpiece is how gradually it came to be widely celebrated, compared with many of its peers. 'When it was released in the United States,' said Jan Butler, a senior lecturer in popular music at Oxford Brookes University in the United Kingdom, 'it did pretty well, but for the Beach Boys, it was considered a flop.' Released in the spring of 1966, 'Pet Sounds' represented a break from the catchy tunes about surfing, cars and girls that the group had consistently rode to the top of the charts. The opening track is called 'Wouldn't It Be Nice,' but previous Beach Boys songs had described how nice it was. The album peaked at No. 10 — low for one of the most popular acts at the time — and was the first Beach Boys album in three years not to reach gold status, Butler wrote in a chapter of an academic book. The Beach Boys' record company, Capitol, rushed out a greatest-hits that outsold the album of original music. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Blue Moon is getting into the lip balm business
In an unusual pairing, beer maker Blue Moon and personal care product company eos have teamed up to create a new orange-flavored lip balm. The Valencia Orange Lip Balm debuted Tuesday and is available exclusively on Blue Moon and eos' websites. It comes in a round shell typical of eos' style but with a twist: A small Blue Moon label is printed on the orange casing. In the online description of the product, the companies say the lip balm was designed to enhance the flavor of Blue Moon beer, a Belgian-style wheat beer known for its citrusy flavor. "This limited-edition balm doesn't just resemble a Valencia orange, it delivers the same refreshing, juicy taste," Blue Moon and eos said in a statement. While the product does not contain any alcohol, the companies say it is intended for an audience 21 and older. The balm retails for $4.99 and is available while supplies last, according to the companies' statement. Blue Moon is owned by Molson Coors Beverage Company, whose beer brands include Coors, Coors Light, Miller High Life and Miller Lite. "Through this unexpected partnership with eos, we're giving fans a whole new way to enjoy that iconic citrus taste," Courtney Benedict, vice president of marketing at the Molson Coors, said in a statement.