'I called the military in Minneapolis': Trump takes swipe at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz; calls him 'dumb and low-IQ individual'
US president Donald Trump and Minnestna Governor Tim Walz
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday took a swipe at Minnesota Governor Tim Walz over 2020 protests following the murder of George Floyd and called him "a low IQ individual and a dumb person.
"
While talking to reporters, Trump said, "I called in the military in Minneapolis, but it was seven days. I waited for this guy — the same guy who ran for vice president, who's a very dumb person. He's a low-IQ individual like many Democrats are."
He also said that he will never forget in Minnesota, and Minneapolis, which was burning down. "It was gonna burn to the ground, and he wouldn't call the guard. And I waited for a long time, and I called the guard, and I saved it.'
The president shared his experience over his visit to Fort Bragg and said that he was with the Generals and they're explaining the different maneuvers, and the love they have for the us Army and the military is beautiful.
Earlier, he went to Fort Bragg to mark the upcoming celebration of the US Army's birthday, and delivered a stern speech on military strength and immigration protests
'I want to say a few words about the situation in Los Angeles, California,' Trump said earlier, referring to the deployment of over 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to confront protesters following federal immigration raids.
'The police in LA, who are very good, but they weren't aggressive, like our soldiers. Our soldiers really were aggressive.'
Trump also launched attacks on political opponents, including California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, accusing them of failing to control unrest.
'They're incompetent, and they paid troublemakers, agitators and insurrectionists,' Trump claimed. 'They're engaged in this wilful attempt to nullify federal law and aid the occupation of the city by criminal invaders," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election results: Was U.S elections 2024 rigged? Ex-VP gets zero votes in a New York County
Kamala Harris 2024 election results are under scrutiny after she reportedly received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York, triggering a major lawsuit. Filed by SMART Legislation, the case demands a full hand recount of presidential and state senate ballots. Shocking data shows hundreds voted for Democrats like Kirsten Gillibrand, but allegedly not for Harris, raising red flags about vote counting accuracy. A New York judge has ordered the recount, citing the need for transparency. Experts call the results statistically 'highly unlikely.' This lawsuit could reshape public trust in the 2024 election results. Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of New York's Rockland County during the 2024 election, prompting a lawsuit and full recount order. Voting data irregularities spark questions about ballot counting and public confidence in U.S. election integrity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Kamala Harris get zero votes in parts of New York? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What triggered the lawsuit challenging the 2024 election? 'There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted.' Could the voting data be the result of a technical or reporting issue? What is the court's response to the election lawsuit? Was the 2024 U.S. presidential election rigged? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What happens next in the 2024 election case? Why this case matters for future elections FAQs: A surprising legal challenge to the 2024 election results has gained momentum after official data revealed that Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York. The lawsuit, now moving forward in court, is raising serious concerns about the accuracy and integrity of both the presidential and state senate election results in the case is being led by SMART Legislation, the action arm of the non-partisan group SMART Elections, which focuses on election security and voting rights. The group is demanding a full hand recount of all ballots cast in Rockland County during the 2024 election to determine whether there were irregularities in vote of the most shocking revelations in the lawsuit is that former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, reportedly received no votes in certain voting districts in Rockland County. This data raised immediate red flags among election observers, prompting calls for a deeper District 35, 331 people reportedly voted for Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet none of those voters appeared to select Harris for president — an unusual pattern given typical party-line voting trends. In District 55, 909 voters backed Gillibrand, but only two votes were recorded for discrepancies have led analysts to question the integrity of the vote counts, as such patterns are statistically unlikely without some form of error or lawsuit was filed by SMART Legislation after multiple voters signed sworn affidavits stating that they voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet her reported vote totals were lower than expected. These testimonies raised doubts about whether all ballots were properly Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, emphasized the gravity of the issue:She stressed the need for a public, transparent hand recount of all ballots to restore public confidence in the election say it's possible, but the numbers are hard to ignore. According to Max Bonamente, a physics and astronomy professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the data "would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation."Bonamente pointed out that four out of the five towns in Rockland County showed statistically improbable results when compared with historical voting data, particularly from the 2020 election. These discrepancies suggest that the current figures may not reflect actual voter Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court has ordered a full hand recount in Rockland County, marking a key development in the case. Her ruling signals that the concerns raised are being taken seriously by the court's decision sets the stage for a meticulous review of the presidential and state senate ballots, which could potentially alter the reported outcomes in the county — and possibly have broader implications depending on what the recount viral claims and social media speculation, there is no credible evidence that the 2024 election was rigged. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which monitors election security, confirmed that there were no signs of external tampering or hacking. Additionally, bipartisan audits, paper ballot verification, and local election board reviews have reaffirmed the election it's completely valid for the public to question irregularities, it's important to separate local voting patterns from national election integrity. The claim that Kamala Harris received zero votes in one New York precinct does not prove fraud; it simply reflects bloc voting behavior and the influence of hyper-local political the lawsuit progresses, all eyes are on the hand recount process in Rockland County. If the recount shows errors or manipulation in the vote tally, it could lead to further legal challenges in other parts of the state or even the case also raises wider questions about election transparency, vote counting accuracy, and public trust in electoral systems, especially in an era where voting technology is under increasing now, officials and observers await the results of the recount, which could shed light on whether this was an isolated incident or a sign of deeper systemic issues in the 2024 election lawsuit underscores the importance of election integrity and voter confidence. Even a single case of miscounted ballots can erode public trust in the system. Whether the issue in Rockland County turns out to be a clerical error, a software glitch, or something more concerning, the need for transparency and accountability is we look ahead to future elections, ensuring that every vote is counted accurately — and that any anomalies are addressed quickly and fairly — will be essential to upholding democracy in the United voting data triggered concerns over counting errors or reporting issues in Rockland challenges vote accuracy and demands a recount after irregular results in Kamala Harris's vote totals.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Walmart heiress sparks firestorm with No Kings ad - MAGA calls for nationwide boycott
Christy Walton , who is part of the Walmart family, paid for a big ad in The New York Times. She asked people to attend town hall meetings and talk about the country's future. The ad was for " No Kings Day ," which is on June 14, the same day as Trump's birthday, Flag Day, and the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. The ad didn't name Trump directly, but said, 'We honor our commitments and stand by our allies.' 'We defend against aggression by dictators.' 'We respect our neighbors and trading partners.' 'The honor, dignity, and integrity of our country are not for sale', as mentioned in the ad by The New York Times and reported by Newsweek. Many people, especially Trump supporters, saw this as a direct criticism of Trump's 'America First' policies and foreign policy ideas. This led to backlash online, with MAGA supporters calling for a boycott of Walmart. Kari Lake, who supports Trump, posted a photo of the ad on X and asked her followers, 'Do you shop at Walmart?' Tariffs and Boycotts A Walmart spokesperson said the company has nothing to do with the ad. Christy doesn't work for Walmart, is not on the board, and doesn't help make decisions. Christy Walton is worth $19.3 billion and became part of the Walmart family after marrying John Walton, son of founder Sam Walton, who died in 2005, as mentioned by Newsweek. Some Republicans, like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, reacted by saying the Walmart family is angry about China tariffs. The boycott trend isn't new, Walmart has already been targeted this year along with Amazon, Nestlé, and General Mills, as part of 'economic blackouts.' Live Events Trump himself slammed Walmart earlier for saying that his tariffs on China would make their products more expensive. He posted on Truth Social that Walmart should 'eat the tariffs' instead of passing the cost to customers, as stated by Newsweek. Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group, said people are upset because the ad doesn't match their political views, but it's still freedom of speech. Experts say the boycott may not last long, as Walmart remains the most affordable option for many. FAQs Q1. Why are Trump supporters angry with Walmart? They believe a Walmart heiress 's ad was against Trump, so they're calling for a boycott. Q2. Did Walmart support the No Kings ad? No, Walmart said it had nothing to do with the ad and the heiress doesn't work for them.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why a US education bill on antisemitism drew criticism and was vetoed
Governor Katie Hobbs. (Getty Images) Arizona antisemitism bill: A bill in the US state of Arizona aimed at banning the teaching or promotion of antisemitism in public K-12 schools, colleges, and universities has been vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs. The legislation would have introduced strict penalties for educators and institutions, but it drew national attention for what many saw as an attack on academic freedom and free speech. The measure passed Arizona's legislature with a 33-20 vote, including support from a few Democrats. However, Governor Hobbs, a Democrat, vetoed the bill, saying it posed serious risks to educators. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff,' she said, as quoted by the Associated Press. Educators risked lawsuits and penalties Under the proposal, teachers and administrators could be sued by students over 18 or by parents of younger students for creating a 'hostile education environment' related to antisemitism. Those found in violation would be denied immunity and made personally responsible for paying damages, with the state prohibited from covering any legal judgments. As reported by the Associated Press, public educators would have faced escalating penalties: a first offense would bring a reprimand, a second a certificate suspension, and a third offense would lead to certificate revocation. College staff faced similar consequences, including suspension without pay and eventual termination. The bill also blocked universities and colleges from recognizing student groups that host speakers accused of promoting antisemitism, calling for genocide, or encouraging others to engage in antisemitic acts. Opponents warned of vague definitions and censorship Opponents said the bill's language was overly broad and could be used to target discussions about the Holocaust or criticism of Israel. Lori Shepherd, executive director of the Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, said the bill could 'threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust,' as reported by the Associated Press. She warned that classroom conversations could be labeled antisemitic 'depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context.' Democratic lawmakers attempted to replace the term 'antisemitism' with 'unlawful discrimination' and remove the lawsuit clause, but those changes were rejected. Sponsor defends bill, calls veto disgraceful The bill's main sponsor, Republican Representative Michael Way of Queen Creek, called the veto 'disgraceful' and said it misrepresented the bill's purpose. He said it aimed to stop 'egregious and blatant antisemitic content' in schools, as quoted by the Associated Press. He added that claims the bill threatened educators' speech were 'disingenuous at best.' Part of a wider national trend The Arizona bill joins similar efforts across the US. In Louisiana, a resolution asks universities to adopt antisemitism policies and track reports. In Michigan, lawmakers want to add antisemitism to the state's civil rights law. Governor Hobbs acknowledged antisemitism is a serious issue in the US but said parents and students already have channels through the state Board of Education to report it, as reported by the Associated Press. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
