Kamala Harris election results: Was U.S elections 2024 rigged? Ex-VP gets zero votes in a New York County
Kamala Harris 2024 election results are under scrutiny after she reportedly received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York, triggering a major lawsuit. Filed by SMART Legislation, the case demands a full hand recount of presidential and state senate ballots. Shocking data shows hundreds voted for Democrats like Kirsten Gillibrand, but allegedly not for Harris, raising red flags about vote counting accuracy. A New York judge has ordered the recount, citing the need for transparency. Experts call the results statistically 'highly unlikely.' This lawsuit could reshape public trust in the 2024 election results.
Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of New York's Rockland County during the 2024 election, prompting a lawsuit and full recount order. Voting data irregularities spark questions about ballot counting and public confidence in U.S. election integrity.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why did Kamala Harris get zero votes in parts of New York?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What triggered the lawsuit challenging the 2024 election?
'There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted.'
Could the voting data be the result of a technical or reporting issue?
What is the court's response to the election lawsuit?
Was the 2024 U.S. presidential election rigged?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What happens next in the 2024 election case?
Why this case matters for future elections
FAQs:
A surprising legal challenge to the 2024 election results has gained momentum after official data revealed that Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York. The lawsuit, now moving forward in court, is raising serious concerns about the accuracy and integrity of both the presidential and state senate election results in the area.The case is being led by SMART Legislation, the action arm of the non-partisan group SMART Elections, which focuses on election security and voting rights. The group is demanding a full hand recount of all ballots cast in Rockland County during the 2024 election to determine whether there were irregularities in vote reporting.One of the most shocking revelations in the lawsuit is that former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, reportedly received no votes in certain voting districts in Rockland County. This data raised immediate red flags among election observers, prompting calls for a deeper investigation.In District 35, 331 people reportedly voted for Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet none of those voters appeared to select Harris for president — an unusual pattern given typical party-line voting trends. In District 55, 909 voters backed Gillibrand, but only two votes were recorded for Harris.These discrepancies have led analysts to question the integrity of the vote counts, as such patterns are statistically unlikely without some form of error or interference.The lawsuit was filed by SMART Legislation after multiple voters signed sworn affidavits stating that they voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet her reported vote totals were lower than expected. These testimonies raised doubts about whether all ballots were properly counted.Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, emphasized the gravity of the issue:She stressed the need for a public, transparent hand recount of all ballots to restore public confidence in the election outcome.Experts say it's possible, but the numbers are hard to ignore. According to Max Bonamente, a physics and astronomy professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the data "would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation."Bonamente pointed out that four out of the five towns in Rockland County showed statistically improbable results when compared with historical voting data, particularly from the 2020 election. These discrepancies suggest that the current figures may not reflect actual voter intent.Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court has ordered a full hand recount in Rockland County, marking a key development in the case. Her ruling signals that the concerns raised are being taken seriously by the judiciary.The court's decision sets the stage for a meticulous review of the presidential and state senate ballots, which could potentially alter the reported outcomes in the county — and possibly have broader implications depending on what the recount reveals.Despite viral claims and social media speculation, there is no credible evidence that the 2024 election was rigged. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which monitors election security, confirmed that there were no signs of external tampering or hacking. Additionally, bipartisan audits, paper ballot verification, and local election board reviews have reaffirmed the election results.While it's completely valid for the public to question irregularities, it's important to separate local voting patterns from national election integrity. The claim that Kamala Harris received zero votes in one New York precinct does not prove fraud; it simply reflects bloc voting behavior and the influence of hyper-local political dynamics.As the lawsuit progresses, all eyes are on the hand recount process in Rockland County. If the recount shows errors or manipulation in the vote tally, it could lead to further legal challenges in other parts of the state or even the country.The case also raises wider questions about election transparency, vote counting accuracy, and public trust in electoral systems, especially in an era where voting technology is under increasing scrutiny.For now, officials and observers await the results of the recount, which could shed light on whether this was an isolated incident or a sign of deeper systemic issues in the 2024 election process.This lawsuit underscores the importance of election integrity and voter confidence. Even a single case of miscounted ballots can erode public trust in the system. Whether the issue in Rockland County turns out to be a clerical error, a software glitch, or something more concerning, the need for transparency and accountability is critical.As we look ahead to future elections, ensuring that every vote is counted accurately — and that any anomalies are addressed quickly and fairly — will be essential to upholding democracy in the United States.Unusual voting data triggered concerns over counting errors or reporting issues in Rockland County.It challenges vote accuracy and demands a recount after irregular results in Kamala Harris's vote totals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why a California senator was handcuffed and forcibly removed from a govt briefing
Law enforcement officials removed California's Democratic Senator Alex Padilla from an official briefing on Thursday (June 12), amid the escalating row between the state and the US federal government over immigration raids and protests in Los Angeles. Padilla, 52, was seen at a briefing by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristie Noem, attempting to ask questions. 'Sir! Sir! Hands off!' he said, as a few officers dragged him out of the room. 'I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have a question for the secretary,' he said. Padilla was then made to kneel in an adjoining corridor and then pinned to the ground with his hands behind his back. Noem claimed in a post on X that the senator had 'interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem'. Padilla later addressed the press, saying he was 'almost immediately forcibly removed from the room' after he asked a question, and that he was forced to the ground and handcuffed. He said he was not arrested or detained. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question… You can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day labourers out in the Los Angeles community… we will hold this administration accountable,' he said. Here is what to know. Padilla is one of the two senators from the border state of California (each US state sends two representatives to the Senate), which has traditionally been a Democratic stronghold. He is a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the son of Mexican immigrants, and a Los Angeles native. Padilla has frequently cited his background while talking about immigration-related issues, which have taken centre stage in US politics in recent years. His official website states, 'After graduating from MIT, Alex returned home eager to begin his career. However, a rising tide of anti-immigrant sentiment in California at the time drew Alex towards politics. He knew he had to take a stand against cynical rhetoric demonizing people like his parents, friends, and neighbors.' How does this incident figure among the recent protests? At the federal building in Los Angeles, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said she would continue the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Since last Friday (June 6), the federal immigration agency US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested people and carried out raids across multiple cities with the stated aim of acting against illegal immigrants with criminal records. Many of these cities have significant Latino populations, and in response to the raids, several collectives and individuals have protested against ICE. A few instances of looting and violence have been reported, which has led to Republicans accusing Democrats of shielding those involved. Many Democrats, including Padilla, have attempted to distinguish between the majority of peaceful protestors with those engaging in vandalism. US President Donald Trump has commented on the situation and described California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom as 'incompetent'. He ordered the National Guard and the US Marines into the state and did not take Newsom's consent, something the governor flagged as an overreach. The state of California has now sued the federal government over the deployment of the National Guard. Soon after Noem's comments, US District Judge Charles Breyer temporarily restrained the deployment, saying it was illegal and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. According to the AFP, Breyer said the violence fell 'far short' of the 'rebellion' Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen. There was 'no evidence of organized, as apart from sporadic or impromptu, violence' during the protests, he said. However, an appeals court paused the order just two and a half hours later, as the White House launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. (With inputs from Associated Press)
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump signs measure blocking California's ban on new sales of gas-powered cars
President Donald Trump signed a resolution on Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. The move is expected to become the state's latest legal challenge with the federal government. The resolution was approved by Congress last month and aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. Trump also signed measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. Trump called California's regulations "crazy" at a White House ceremony where he signed the resolutions. "It's been a disaster for this country," he said. It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over issues including tariffs, the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. The three resolutions Trump signed will block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and end the sale of new ones by 2035. They will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. In his remarks at the White House, Trump expressed doubts about the performance and reliability of electric vehicles, though he had some notably positive comments about the company owned by Elon Musk, despite their fractured relationship. "I like Tesla," Trump said. In remarks that often meandered away from the subject at hand, Trump used the East Room ceremony to also muse on windmills, which he claimed "are killing our country," the prospect of getting electrocuted by an electric-powered boat if it sank and whether he'd risk a shark attack by jumping as the boat went down. "I'll take electrocution every single day," the president said. When it comes to cars, Trump said he likes combustion engines but for those that prefer otherwise, "If you want to buy electric, you can buy electric." "What this does is it gives us freedom," said Bill Kent, the owner of Kent Kwik convenience stores. Kent, speaking at the White House, said that the California rules would have forced him to install "infrastructure that frankly, is extremely expensive and doesn't give you any return." The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents major car makers, applauded Trump's action. "Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic," John Bozzella, the group's president and CEO, said in a statement. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. "If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California," Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villasenor said in an email ahead of Trump's signing. "We're fighting back." California's attorney general is expected to speak at a news conference Thursday morning. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move follows other steps the Trump administration has taken to roll back rules that aim to protect air and water and reduce emissions that cause climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Dan Becker with the Center for Biological Diversity, said the signing of the resolutions was "Trump's latest betrayal of democracy." "Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets," Becker said in a statement. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but Democratic President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. ___ Austin reported from Sacramento, Calif.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Get The Hell Out': Carbajal YELLS At Hegseth At Tense Hearing; Watch Pentagon Chief's Reaction
/ Jun 13, 2025, 04:00PM IST In a fiery moment during a House Armed Services Committee hearing, Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) lashed out at Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, telling him to "get the hell out" of the Department of Defense. The explosive exchange underscored growing tensions between Democratic lawmakers and the Pentagon amid ongoing controversies. Carbajal's outburst came during a heated debate over defense policy, drawing gasps in the chamber. Watch to know more.
