Latest news with #SMARTElections
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election results: Was U.S elections 2024 rigged? Ex-VP gets zero votes in a New York County
Kamala Harris 2024 election results are under scrutiny after she reportedly received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York, triggering a major lawsuit. Filed by SMART Legislation, the case demands a full hand recount of presidential and state senate ballots. Shocking data shows hundreds voted for Democrats like Kirsten Gillibrand, but allegedly not for Harris, raising red flags about vote counting accuracy. A New York judge has ordered the recount, citing the need for transparency. Experts call the results statistically 'highly unlikely.' This lawsuit could reshape public trust in the 2024 election results. Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of New York's Rockland County during the 2024 election, prompting a lawsuit and full recount order. Voting data irregularities spark questions about ballot counting and public confidence in U.S. election integrity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Kamala Harris get zero votes in parts of New York? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What triggered the lawsuit challenging the 2024 election? 'There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted.' Could the voting data be the result of a technical or reporting issue? What is the court's response to the election lawsuit? Was the 2024 U.S. presidential election rigged? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What happens next in the 2024 election case? Why this case matters for future elections FAQs: A surprising legal challenge to the 2024 election results has gained momentum after official data revealed that Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York. The lawsuit, now moving forward in court, is raising serious concerns about the accuracy and integrity of both the presidential and state senate election results in the case is being led by SMART Legislation, the action arm of the non-partisan group SMART Elections, which focuses on election security and voting rights. The group is demanding a full hand recount of all ballots cast in Rockland County during the 2024 election to determine whether there were irregularities in vote of the most shocking revelations in the lawsuit is that former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, reportedly received no votes in certain voting districts in Rockland County. This data raised immediate red flags among election observers, prompting calls for a deeper District 35, 331 people reportedly voted for Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet none of those voters appeared to select Harris for president — an unusual pattern given typical party-line voting trends. In District 55, 909 voters backed Gillibrand, but only two votes were recorded for discrepancies have led analysts to question the integrity of the vote counts, as such patterns are statistically unlikely without some form of error or lawsuit was filed by SMART Legislation after multiple voters signed sworn affidavits stating that they voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet her reported vote totals were lower than expected. These testimonies raised doubts about whether all ballots were properly Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, emphasized the gravity of the issue:She stressed the need for a public, transparent hand recount of all ballots to restore public confidence in the election say it's possible, but the numbers are hard to ignore. According to Max Bonamente, a physics and astronomy professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the data "would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation."Bonamente pointed out that four out of the five towns in Rockland County showed statistically improbable results when compared with historical voting data, particularly from the 2020 election. These discrepancies suggest that the current figures may not reflect actual voter Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court has ordered a full hand recount in Rockland County, marking a key development in the case. Her ruling signals that the concerns raised are being taken seriously by the court's decision sets the stage for a meticulous review of the presidential and state senate ballots, which could potentially alter the reported outcomes in the county — and possibly have broader implications depending on what the recount viral claims and social media speculation, there is no credible evidence that the 2024 election was rigged. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which monitors election security, confirmed that there were no signs of external tampering or hacking. Additionally, bipartisan audits, paper ballot verification, and local election board reviews have reaffirmed the election it's completely valid for the public to question irregularities, it's important to separate local voting patterns from national election integrity. The claim that Kamala Harris received zero votes in one New York precinct does not prove fraud; it simply reflects bloc voting behavior and the influence of hyper-local political the lawsuit progresses, all eyes are on the hand recount process in Rockland County. If the recount shows errors or manipulation in the vote tally, it could lead to further legal challenges in other parts of the state or even the case also raises wider questions about election transparency, vote counting accuracy, and public trust in electoral systems, especially in an era where voting technology is under increasing now, officials and observers await the results of the recount, which could shed light on whether this was an isolated incident or a sign of deeper systemic issues in the 2024 election lawsuit underscores the importance of election integrity and voter confidence. Even a single case of miscounted ballots can erode public trust in the system. Whether the issue in Rockland County turns out to be a clerical error, a software glitch, or something more concerning, the need for transparency and accountability is we look ahead to future elections, ensuring that every vote is counted accurately — and that any anomalies are addressed quickly and fairly — will be essential to upholding democracy in the United voting data triggered concerns over counting errors or reporting issues in Rockland challenges vote accuracy and demands a recount after irregular results in Kamala Harris's vote totals.
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Politics
- Int'l Business Times
Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Received Zero Votes in a New York County
A lawsuit disputing the results of the 2024 election has moved forward after it was revealed that former Vice President Kamala Harris received no votes a New York state district. A seminal case calling the results of the presidential race as well as state senate races into question has advanced. The case refers to the results of the election in Rockland County, New York, with Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruling that a full hand recount must occur following the discovery. The case's lead plaintiff is SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a non-partisan group that advocates for voting security and voter rights. "There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely," Lulu Friesdat, founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." The complaint outlined how a number of voters relayed under sworn testimony that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet the Rockland County Board of Elections recorded fewer votes for Sare than should have been reported. In addition to this, 331 voters in Rockland County NY district 35 reportedly chose Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand during the 2024 elections, but allegedly none of them continued to vote for Harris in the presidential election. A similar incident occurred in Rockland County NY district 55, where 909 voters opted for Gillibrand but only two cast their votes for Harris. Comparing the results of the 2024 election to the results collected in 2020, a statistician stated that the alleged results of the election in four out of the five towns making up Rockland County are "highly unlikely". "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity," said Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Originally published on Latin Times
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Politics
- Newsweek
2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election is moving forward. The lawsuit, brought by SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, filed the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in open court in May that the allegations were serious enough for discovery to proceed. Newsweek has contacted SMART Elections for comment via email. People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images Why It Matters The lawsuit could renew debate about the 2024 election, though it won't change the outcome since Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner. It comes amid unconfirmed reports that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were cast in November's election. The federally accredited testing lab, Pro V&V, that signed off on "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines—which are used in over 40 percent of U.S. counties—"vanished from public view" after the election, according to the Dissent in Bloom Substack. What To Know According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results. They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president. Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results. What People Are Saying Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." Max Bonamente said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity." Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen. "In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing. "In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions." What's Next The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
