Latest news with #SMARTLegislation
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election results: Was U.S elections 2024 rigged? Ex-VP gets zero votes in a New York County
Kamala Harris 2024 election results are under scrutiny after she reportedly received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York, triggering a major lawsuit. Filed by SMART Legislation, the case demands a full hand recount of presidential and state senate ballots. Shocking data shows hundreds voted for Democrats like Kirsten Gillibrand, but allegedly not for Harris, raising red flags about vote counting accuracy. A New York judge has ordered the recount, citing the need for transparency. Experts call the results statistically 'highly unlikely.' This lawsuit could reshape public trust in the 2024 election results. Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of New York's Rockland County during the 2024 election, prompting a lawsuit and full recount order. Voting data irregularities spark questions about ballot counting and public confidence in U.S. election integrity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Kamala Harris get zero votes in parts of New York? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What triggered the lawsuit challenging the 2024 election? 'There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted.' Could the voting data be the result of a technical or reporting issue? What is the court's response to the election lawsuit? Was the 2024 U.S. presidential election rigged? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What happens next in the 2024 election case? Why this case matters for future elections FAQs: A surprising legal challenge to the 2024 election results has gained momentum after official data revealed that Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York. The lawsuit, now moving forward in court, is raising serious concerns about the accuracy and integrity of both the presidential and state senate election results in the case is being led by SMART Legislation, the action arm of the non-partisan group SMART Elections, which focuses on election security and voting rights. The group is demanding a full hand recount of all ballots cast in Rockland County during the 2024 election to determine whether there were irregularities in vote of the most shocking revelations in the lawsuit is that former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, reportedly received no votes in certain voting districts in Rockland County. This data raised immediate red flags among election observers, prompting calls for a deeper District 35, 331 people reportedly voted for Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet none of those voters appeared to select Harris for president — an unusual pattern given typical party-line voting trends. In District 55, 909 voters backed Gillibrand, but only two votes were recorded for discrepancies have led analysts to question the integrity of the vote counts, as such patterns are statistically unlikely without some form of error or lawsuit was filed by SMART Legislation after multiple voters signed sworn affidavits stating that they voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet her reported vote totals were lower than expected. These testimonies raised doubts about whether all ballots were properly Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, emphasized the gravity of the issue:She stressed the need for a public, transparent hand recount of all ballots to restore public confidence in the election say it's possible, but the numbers are hard to ignore. According to Max Bonamente, a physics and astronomy professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the data "would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation."Bonamente pointed out that four out of the five towns in Rockland County showed statistically improbable results when compared with historical voting data, particularly from the 2020 election. These discrepancies suggest that the current figures may not reflect actual voter Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court has ordered a full hand recount in Rockland County, marking a key development in the case. Her ruling signals that the concerns raised are being taken seriously by the court's decision sets the stage for a meticulous review of the presidential and state senate ballots, which could potentially alter the reported outcomes in the county — and possibly have broader implications depending on what the recount viral claims and social media speculation, there is no credible evidence that the 2024 election was rigged. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which monitors election security, confirmed that there were no signs of external tampering or hacking. Additionally, bipartisan audits, paper ballot verification, and local election board reviews have reaffirmed the election it's completely valid for the public to question irregularities, it's important to separate local voting patterns from national election integrity. The claim that Kamala Harris received zero votes in one New York precinct does not prove fraud; it simply reflects bloc voting behavior and the influence of hyper-local political the lawsuit progresses, all eyes are on the hand recount process in Rockland County. If the recount shows errors or manipulation in the vote tally, it could lead to further legal challenges in other parts of the state or even the case also raises wider questions about election transparency, vote counting accuracy, and public trust in electoral systems, especially in an era where voting technology is under increasing now, officials and observers await the results of the recount, which could shed light on whether this was an isolated incident or a sign of deeper systemic issues in the 2024 election lawsuit underscores the importance of election integrity and voter confidence. Even a single case of miscounted ballots can erode public trust in the system. Whether the issue in Rockland County turns out to be a clerical error, a software glitch, or something more concerning, the need for transparency and accountability is we look ahead to future elections, ensuring that every vote is counted accurately — and that any anomalies are addressed quickly and fairly — will be essential to upholding democracy in the United voting data triggered concerns over counting errors or reporting issues in Rockland challenges vote accuracy and demands a recount after irregular results in Kamala Harris's vote totals.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Kamala Harris vote dispute: Trump's 2024 election win is under lens. Will it overturn his presidency?
A lawsuit challenging the results of the 2024 presidential election in the United States has moved forward after it was revealed that hundreds of votes for former Vice President Kamala Harris were not counted by the voting machines. The lawsuit has been filed over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York and has stirred fresh debate over the integrity of the 2024 US presidential election. This is seen as a fresh twist to America's fiercely contested electoral saga and has put Donald Trump's win under the radar. Even though Trump's victory remains untouched, the lawsuit could lead to a full hand recount and potentially ignite changes in how US elections are run. Here are ten things you need to know: -Fresh doubts have emerged about the 2024 presidential elections in the US after a lawsuit filed by legal advocacy group SMART Legislation , the case alleges that votes cast for Kamala Harris were mysteriously uncounted due to alleged malfunctioning voting machines. -While Donald Trump's second term is already underway and his win formally certified, this legal battle is scheduled for hearing on September 22, 2025. The lawsuit has attracted national attention, not for the possibility of overturning results, but for raising serious questions on voter trust and electronic voting vulnerabilities. ALSO READ: Amid California unrest, anti-Trump protesters to hold 'No Kings' protests at 2,000 locations in US: 10 points Live Events -The lawsuit claims that five voting machines in the town of Ramapo recorded zero votes for the President, while simultaneously counting ballots for Senate and Congressional races. Multiple affidavits from voters and polling staff affirm that ballots marked in favour of Kamala Harris failed to reflect in the final count — a statistical anomaly raising eyebrows across the board. -The group behind the case, SMART Legislation (linked to election watchdog SMART Elections), argues that this is not a clerical error but a systemic failure that undermines voter trust. -Moreover, the lawsuit also alleges that machines updated weeks before the election using software vetted privately by Pro V&V. Pro V&V is a vendor whose update records have not been made public and it is a violation, transparency advocates argue, of election integrity protocols. ALSO READ: Air India plane crash: What is Mayday call that pilot issued before fatal tragedy in Ahmedabad -While experts assert that this lawsuit won't affect Trump's presidency, the larger implications could be profound. If voting discrepancies are proven, the case might serve as a wake-up call for electoral reforms. -Some of the electoral reforms such as mandatory statewide audits, tighter federal regulation of voting machine software and reassessment of electronic-only ballot usage in favour of paper backups might be introduced if the claims of the lawsuit gets proved in the court of law. -'This isn't about changing who sits in the White House,' noted election analyst Susan Greenhalgh, 'It's about understanding whether the systems we trust can fail — and what we're doing to prevent that.' Greenhalgh further highlighted that ballots showing blank presidential choices while registering down-ballot votes are 'virtually unheard of', suggesting possible misconfiguration or technical fault. ALSO READ: 2024 US Presidential election is under scrutiny as lawsuit claims discrepancies in Rockland County, New York -The plaintiffs are seeking a complete hand recount of the ballots cast using the disputed machines. The court has granted full discovery, allowing them to subpoena machine logs, obtain internal communications, and compel election officials to testify under oath. -Legal analysts say that while the outcome won't overturn Trump's presidency, it could shed light on election system vulnerabilities and set precedent for future legal challenges. -The lawsuit won't change the 2024 US election results. Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 election has been officially certified. While there were reports of hundreds of votes for Harris potentially being overlooked in Rockland County, the margin is not large enough to affect the national outcome. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Politics
- Int'l Business Times
Lawsuit Challenging 2024 Election Results Moves Forward After Kamala Harris Received Zero Votes in a New York County
A lawsuit disputing the results of the 2024 election has moved forward after it was revealed that former Vice President Kamala Harris received no votes a New York state district. A seminal case calling the results of the presidential race as well as state senate races into question has advanced. The case refers to the results of the election in Rockland County, New York, with Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruling that a full hand recount must occur following the discovery. The case's lead plaintiff is SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a non-partisan group that advocates for voting security and voter rights. "There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely," Lulu Friesdat, founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." The complaint outlined how a number of voters relayed under sworn testimony that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet the Rockland County Board of Elections recorded fewer votes for Sare than should have been reported. In addition to this, 331 voters in Rockland County NY district 35 reportedly chose Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand during the 2024 elections, but allegedly none of them continued to vote for Harris in the presidential election. A similar incident occurred in Rockland County NY district 55, where 909 voters opted for Gillibrand but only two cast their votes for Harris. Comparing the results of the 2024 election to the results collected in 2020, a statistician stated that the alleged results of the election in four out of the five towns making up Rockland County are "highly unlikely". "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity," said Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Originally published on Latin Times
Time of India
a day ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Rockland county rigged for Trump? 2024 US election results under scrutiny; NY lawsuit moves forward
A legal challenge questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election results in Rockland County, New York, is moving forward, according to a report by Newsweek. The lawsuit, filed by SMART Legislation, the legal advocacy arm of nonpartisan watchdog SMART Elections, raises concerns about vote counts and statistical anomalies in both the presidential and US Senate races. In May, New York Supreme Court Judge Rachel Tanguay ruled in open court that the allegations were serious enough to proceed to the discovery phase, where evidence will be formally gathered and reviewed. While the lawsuit is unlikely to affect the overall outcome—Congress has already certified President Donald Trump's victory—it could reignite debate over election integrity. The complaint includes affidavits from voters who claim they voted for independent US Senate candidate Diane Sare, but their votes were not reflected in the certified count by the Rockland County Board of Elections. Additionally, Newsweek reports that the suit cites multiple voting districts where hundreds of voters selected Democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand but allegedly cast no votes for Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee. These patterns raised red flags for analysts. Max Bonamente, a physics and statistics professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, said the results in four out of five Rockland County towns were 'statistically highly unlikely' compared to the 2020 election. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo 'These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity,' he wrote. Lulu Friesdat, SMART Legislation's founder, said, 'There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount.' Costas Panagopoulos, a political science professor at Northeastern University, told Newsweek that such statistical irregularities deserve investigation, though they may stem from non-malicious sources like error or miscalculation. He emphasised that the discrepancies were not significant enough to alter the outcome but said reviewing them could strengthen trust in the electoral process. A hearing in the case is scheduled for September 22. The plaintiffs are demanding a full hand recount of the presidential and Senate ballots cast in Rockland County.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election dispute joins a long list of controversial US presidential results from Thomas Jefferson to George W Bush Jr
Historical parallels to Kamala Harris election dispute As questions surrounding the Kamala Harris election result continue to unfold in court, the controversy draws on a long history of disputed US presidential elections. From the earliest years of the republic to the modern era, contested outcomes, allegations of fraud, and constitutional ambiguity have repeatedly tested the resilience of American democracy. The latest case, allowed to proceed in New York's Rockland County, challenges the validity of several voting machines used in the 2024 election. Filed by SMART Legislation, the lawsuit alleges that votes for Kamala Harris were undercounted or missing entirely from machines in towns like Ramapo. Affidavits from poll workers and voters suggest ballots showed zero votes for president while including votes for other contests, raising concerns about possible machine malfunctions or tampering. Also read: Kamala Harris election result: Trump's victory under scrutiny as lawsuit filed - here's what could happen next by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Rates Undo This case, while unlikely to affect Donald Trump's presidency, brings renewed focus on electoral transparency and echoes the legacy of past presidential contests that reshaped US election law and public trust. From Jefferson to Bush: six disputed presidential elections In 1800, the Electoral College delivered a tie between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, both receiving 73 votes. The House of Representatives required 36 ballots to award the presidency to Jefferson. The deadlock prompted the Twelfth Amendment, which separated presidential and vice-presidential votes to avoid future stalemates. Live Events A similar issue surfaced in 1824 when Andrew Jackson secured the most popular and electoral votes but lacked a majority. The House chose John Quincy Adams instead, triggering Jackson's accusations of a 'corrupt bargain.' His eventual win in 1828 led to reforms demanding greater voter participation and scrutiny of elite political deals. Abraham Lincoln's 1860 victory with only 40 per cent of the popular vote triggered Southern secession. His win, reflecting a deeply divided electorate over slavery, came despite his absence from ballots in several Southern states. The dispute ultimately cascaded into the Civil War, underscoring how electoral fractures can deepen national crises. Also read: Kamala Harris voters 'erased' in Rockland? New York lawsuit to probe vanishing ballots: What we know so far In 1876, Democrat Samuel Tilden won the popular vote and led in the Electoral College, but 20 electoral votes from four states were contested. A bipartisan commission awarded them to Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. In return, Hayes agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South, a deal known as the Compromise of 1877. This political resolution ended Reconstruction and enabled state-level disenfranchisement of Black voters. Fast forward to 1960, John F. Kennedy's razor-thin win over Richard Nixon raised concerns over vote manipulation in Illinois and Texas. Allegations pointed to organized political machinery in Chicago and strategic ballot management in Texas. Nixon declined to challenge the result, citing national unity, though doubts persisted. In 2000, George W. Bush and Al Gore's battle hinged on Florida's 25 electoral votes. Machine errors like 'hanging chads' and inconsistent ballot designs such as the 'butterfly ballot' caused major confusion. The US Supreme Court halted recounts in Bush v. Gore , awarding Florida, and the presidency, to Bush by a margin of just 537 votes. Rockland County lawsuit: new scrutiny on voting machines The Kamala Harris election result lawsuit centers on irregularities in Rockland County, where five voting machines in Ramapo reportedly recorded zero presidential votes despite ballots including selections for down-ballot races. Voters and poll workers submitted affidavits confirming they cast votes for president. Also read: Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024 Election integrity advocate Susan Greenhalgh cited the rarity of such discrepancies, questioning whether software updates made before the election contributed to machine errors. The updates were made by Pro V&V, a private firm, with minimal public disclosure. Judge Rachel Tanguay's decision to allow full discovery will enable attorneys to access internal machine logs and request sworn testimony. The case's next hearing is scheduled for September 22, 2025. What the Kamala Harris election result case could mean While the lawsuit is unlikely to affect the 2024 presidential outcome, it may influence broader election reforms. Legal experts say a full hand recount could expose vote-counting inconsistencies and spark legislative changes on machine certification, ballot design, and voter access laws. Also read: 2024 US Presidential election is under scrutiny as lawsuit claims discrepancies in Rockland County, New York The case also offers an opportunity for officials to improve voter confidence by ensuring transparent and verifiable election systems. As with previous disputed elections, the outcome may shape how future contests are administered and perceived, especially in an era of intense partisanship and evolving technology.
