CLAT UG 2025: SC ‘anguished' over NLU consortium's ‘casual manner' of framing questions
The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed anguish over the 'casual manner' in which the Consortium of National Law Universities was framing questions for the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT).
A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih, which pointed out mistakes related to some of the questions in the CLAT UG-2025, was hearing a plea filed by an aspirant challenging the Delhi High Court's April 23 verdict.
The high court had previously directed the consortium to revise the marksheets and republish the final list of selected candidates of CLAT UG-2025 within four weeks.
'At the outset, we must express our anguish at the casual manner in which the respondent number one (consortium) has been framing the questions for the CLAT examination which involves the career aspirations of lakhs of students in the country,' the top court said.
The CLAT 2025 for admissions to five-year law (LLB) courses in national law universities was held on December 1 last year and the results were declared on December 7.
The petitioner claimed being aggrieved by the high court verdict directing revision of marksheets.
The top court said in matters of academia, court was always 'very slow' in interfering as it did not possess the expertise in such issues.
'When academicians themselves err in such a manner which affects the careers of lakhs of students, the court is left with no other option,' it added.
The bench said it was clear from the high court's verdict that several questions were found not suitable and, therefore, the high court passed an order in relation to the several questions.
The apex court dealt with six questions in the matter.
On one of the questions over environmental issues, the bench referred to the answer key which said the fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources was only upon the state.
'It is totally wrong,' the bench said, 'time and again, the apex court has emphasised the duty of the state as well as the citizens to preserve and protect the natural resources'.
It directed the consortium to give a positive marking to all such candidates who chose option C and D in the answer key.
The bench said those who chose option A and B, would be marked negatively.
The apex court further set aside the high court's direction for deleting another question and ordered the consortium to give marks to those who chose option B in the answer key.
The bench was in agreement with the high court on another question and said C was the correct option.
On two more questions, the bench observed the consortium on its own deleted one of them.
The top court found 'not much difference between the two' and ordered deletion of the other.
Two more questions–one entailing a detailed mathematical analysis–were ordered to be deleted.
The bench referred to its June 2018 order in another case highlighting improper conduct of CLAT 2018.
In the judgement, it said, the top court directed the Centre to appoint a committee to look into the issue and take remedial measures including penal action, if any, against the body entrusted with the task.
Though the judgement came in June 2018, it noted, the Centre took no steps.
The bench then issued a notice to the Centre for its response and posted the matter on May 16.
During the hearing, the bench asked why a permanent mechanism for conducting CLAT did not exist.
On April 30, the apex court stayed the high court verdict directing the consortium to revise the marksheets and republish the final list of selected candidates of CLAT UG-2025 within four weeks.
Multiple pleas were filed in different high courts, alleging errors in the questions but on February 6, the Supreme Court transferred all cases to the Delhi High Court for a 'consistent adjudication' after the Consortium of National Law Universities filed transfer petitions.
On December 20, 2024, a Delhi High Court single judge bench directed the consortium to revise the result of CLAT-2025 over the errors in the answer key and then following a challenge the court's division bench on April 23 accepted certain objections of the candidates while rejecting some of them.
The high court is yet to hear pleas challenging the questions of CLAT PG-2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Govt to deploy AI officers in all departments
Bhubaneswar: The state govt has mandated the appointment of dedicated Artificial Intelligence (AI) officers across all departments to drive digital governance following the state cabinet's approval of the Odisha AI Policy–2025 on May 28. As per the plan, each AI officer will lead a two or three-member team, including assistant section officers (ASOs) or section officers (SOs), focusing on implementing AI-driven solutions in their respective departments. "The AI officers will be selected based on their technological expertise. The ASOs or SOs, too, should have basic knowledge of technology and AI," a senior govt official said. AI officers are expected to drive digital transformation in govt by identifying areas for AI-led efficiency, developing strategies, integrating technologies into daily operations, and coordinating adoption across departments. "In the recent NITI Aayog governing council meeting, the role of AI in governance was discussed. We are planning to constitute a committee under the executive director of the Centre for Modernizing Government Initiative (CMGI) to prepare a roadmap for the future. CMGI will engage six personnel with AI knowledge to promote AI in governance," the senior govt official said. In April, the state govt mandated AI training for all its officers. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Chief secretary Manoj Ahuja also issued a directive highlighting the requirement of online AI courses for officers. The govt stated that this AI learning programme aligns with its broader objective of developing a digitally competent and future-ready administrative workforce. The state AI policy's framework rests on four key pillars — AI infrastructure, skills development, energy sustainability, and regulatory mechanisms. It aims to accelerate the state's digital transformation while promoting responsible AI adoption across sectors.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Phone tapping: Prime accused Prabhakar Rao lands in Hyderabad, expected to appear for questioning today
Former Special Investigation Bureau (SIB) chief T. Prabhakar Rao, who is prime accused in the phone tapping case, anded in Hyderabad from the USA on Sunday night, and he is expected to appear before the West Zone police in Hyderabad on Monday for questioning. An official close to the investigation confirmed that Mr Rao landed in Hyderabad after the Supreme Court granted him protection from arrest, ordering the accused to appear before the investigating officer within three days of receiving the passport/travel documents. This comes after Mr Rao's passport was revoked by the Indian authorities and a Red Corner Notice was issued against him due to his prolonged absence for interrogation in the phone tapping case. Mr Rao has been citing ill health to stay in the US after the case was registered by Punjagutta police of Telangana more than a year ago. The phone tapping scandal surfaced after former Special Intelligence Branch (SIB) DSP Praneeth Rao was arrested on March 13, 2024. Panjagutta police detained him from his residence in Rajanna-Sircilla district, following a complaint by his superior, Additional SP D. Ramesh, who alleged that Rao had unlawfully intercepted the phone calls of several high-profile political leaders and officials.
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Telangana phone tapping case: Former SIB chief returns from US
Telangana's former Special Intelligence Bureau (SIB) chief T. Prabhakar Rao, a key accused in the phone tapping case, returned from the United States on Sunday. He is likely to appear before the Special Investigation Team (SIT) on Monday as per the undertaking given to the Supreme Court. The retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officer, who has been in the United States for 14 months, returned to India as directed recently by the apex court. He recently gave an undertaking to the Supreme Court that he will return to India soon after receiving emergency travel documents and cooperate with the investigation. The SIT hopes to make progress in the case relating to the alleged tapping of phones of politicians, businessmen, journalists and even judges under the previous government of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS). The Supreme Court on May 29 ordered the authorities to return the passport to Prabhakar Rao to enable him to return to India. The apex court had also directed Prabhakar Rao to give an affidavit of undertaking that, within three days of the receipt of the passport/travel document, he will return to India. A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma had passed the order on a petition by Prabhakar Rao, challenging the Telangana High Court order dismissing his petition for anticipatory bail. The bench also barred police from taking any coercive step against him till further orders. Prabhakar Rao's counsel had submitted to the court that he had to apply for special permission to return to India. The court was told that he had gone to the US when the First Information Report (FIR) was registered against him. The retired IPS officer was subsequently declared an absconder, and his passport was also revoked. Stating that Prabhakar Rao has been hounded by the present government in Telangana, the lawyer also brought to the court's notice that a red-corner notice has been issued against him. The Nampally criminal court in Hyderabad last month issued proclamation orders against Prabhakar Rao for evading proceedings for over a year. Prabhakar Rao, who was heading the SIB when the BRS was in power, was declared an absconder by the SIT probing the case. He had allegedly constituted a team within SIB with his trusted aides, including Praneeth Rao, for surveillance of rival political leaders, their families and dissidents within the ruling party, businessmen, journalists and even judges. The allegations under the previous government of the BRS came to light in March last year with the arrest of Deputy Superintendent of Police Praneeth Rao following a complaint from his superior, Additional SP D. Ramesh, with the SIB. The police have so far named six accused in the case - Praneeth Rao, Additional SPs Thirupathanna and Bhujanga Rao and former DCP P. Radha Kishan Rao.
