Kevin Yu odds to win the 2025 Texas Children's Houston Open
Texas Children's Houston Open details and info
Date: March 27-30, 2025
March 27-30, 2025 Course: Memorial Park Golf Course
Memorial Park Golf Course Location: Houston, TX
Houston, TX Previous Winner: Stephan Jaeger
How to watch the Texas Children's Houston Open
Thursday: Golf Channel
Golf Channel Friday: Golf Channel
Golf Channel Saturday: Golf Channel, NBC
Golf Channel, NBC Sunday: Golf Channel, NBC
Watch golf on Fubo!
Yu odds to win the Texas Children's Houston Open
PGA odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Wednesday at 8:57 PM ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.
Yu odds to finish in the top 5 at the Texas Children's Houston Open
Yu odds to finish in the top 10 at the Texas Children's Houston Open
Other betting markets for Yu at the Texas Children's Houston Open
Yu recent performances
Yu is still looking for his first top-10 finish this season (he has taken part in nine tournaments). Yu has finished in the top 20 in two of his past four tournaments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
How to watch John Cena, more in WWE Summerslam 2025 Night 2: Time, streaming
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. It's time for the second half of the WWE biggest event of the summer. After a first night full of shocking surprises, Night 2 is here with six matches on the card, all of which have a title on the line. Of course, the main event is a street fight for the Undisputed WWE Champion belt between Cody Rhodes and current champion John Cena, who will retire from professional wrestling at the end of the year. The Women's World Championship is also up for grabs, with current champion Naomi taking on Iyo Sky and Rhea Ripley in a triple threat match. There will also be a steel cage match and a six-team TLC match. summerslam 2025: what to know When: Aug. 3, 6 p.m. ET Aug. 3, Where: MetLife Stadium (East Rutherford, New Jersey) MetLife Stadium (East Rutherford, New Jersey) Streaming: Peacock Night 1's main event was a battle for the World Heavyweight Championship between Gunther and CM Punk. Punk defeated Gunther, but his time with the belt was short-lived. Roman Reigns, who held the Money in the Bag briefcase, returned from what was believed to be a major injury to cash-in and defeated Punk easily to become the new World Heavyweight Champion. Here's everything you need to know to tune in to night one of this supersized SummerSlam. WWE SummerSlam 2025 start time: Night two of SummerSlam 2025 will begin at 6 p.m. ET. tonight, Aug. 3. Peacock will broadcast pre-show coverage beginning at 3 p.m. ET. How to watch SummerSlam 2025 WWE SummerSlam is exclusive to Peacock in the United States, so you'll need a subscription to watch it. Peacock currently costs $10.99/month with ads and $16.99/month ad-free. The streamer also offers discounted annual plans, which are either $109.99 with ads or $169.99 ad-free. Unfortunately, Peacock does not have a free trial, so a paid subscription is the only way to stream SummerSlam. WWE SummerSlam 2025 card (Night 2 – Sunday, Aug. 3): Tables, ladders and chairs match for WWE Tag Team Championship: The Wyatt Sicks (Dexter Lumis and Joe Gacy) (c) vs. #DIY (Johnny Gargano and Tommaso Ciampa) vs. The Street Profits (Montez Ford and Angelo Dawkins) vs. Motor City Machine Guns (Alex Shelley and Chris Saban) vs. Fraxiom (Nathan Frazer and Axiom) vs. Andrade and Rey Fenix The Wyatt Sicks (Dexter Lumis and Joe Gacy) (c) vs. #DIY (Johnny Gargano and Tommaso Ciampa) vs. The Street Profits (Montez Ford and Angelo Dawkins) vs. Motor City Machine Guns (Alex Shelley and Chris Saban) vs. Fraxiom (Nathan Frazer and Axiom) vs. Andrade and Rey Fenix Steel cage match for United States Championship: Solo Sikoa (c) vs. Jacob Fatu Solo Sikoa (c) vs. Jacob Fatu No disqualification, no countout match for Women's Intercontinental Championship: Becky Lynch (c) vs. Lyra Valkyria Becky Lynch (c) vs. Lyra Valkyria Intercontinental Championship match: Dominik Mysterio (c) vs. AJ Styles Dominik Mysterio (c) vs. AJ Styles Women's World Championship match: Naomi (c) vs. Iyo Sky vs. Rhea Ripley Naomi (c) vs. Iyo Sky vs. Rhea Ripley Street fight for the Undisputed WWE Championship: John Cena (c) vs. Cody Rhodes WWE SummerSlam Night 1 results: Roman Reigns and Jey Uso vs. Bron Breakker and Bronson Reed vs. Bron Breakker and Bronson Reed WWE Women's Tag Team Championship match: Raquel Rodriguez and Roxanne Perez (c) vs. Charlotte Flair and Alexa Bliss Sami Zayn vs. Karrion Kross vs. Karrion Kross WWE Women's Championship match: Tiffany Stratton (c) vs. Jade Cargill vs. Jade Cargill Randy Orton and Jelly Roll vs. Drew McIntyre and Logan Paul World Heavyweight Championship match: Gunther (c) vs. CM Punk World Heavyweight Championship match: CM Punk (c) vs. Roman Reigns (this was Reigns' Money in the Bag cash-in match) Why Trust Post Wanted by the New York Post This article was written by Angela Tricarico, Commerce Streaming Reporter for Post Wanted Shopping, Page Six, and New York Post's streaming property, Decider. Angela keeps readers up to date with cord-cutter-friendly deals, and information on how to watch your favorite sports teams, TV shows, and movies on every streaming service. Not only does Angela test and compare the streaming services she writes about to ensure readers are getting the best prices, but she's also a superfan specializing in the intersection of shopping, tech, sports, and pop culture. Prior to joining Decider and The New York Post in 2023, she wrote about streaming and consumer tech at Insider Reviews
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kalshi Loss in Maryland Could Pave the Way for Supreme Court Review
A federal judge in Maryland on Friday ruled against the prediction market operator Kalshi on whether states can use sports betting laws to regulate the company's sports-based event contracts. The decision conflicts with interpretations by federal judges in Nevada and New Jersey. Kalshi immediately appealed U.S. District Judge Adam B. Abelson's denial of the company's motion for a preliminary injunction against Maryland's lottery and gaming control agency and commission to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The move sets in motion the possibility of an eventual review by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court would decide which federal court has correctly interpreted the disputed interplay between federal and state laws in the context of sports wagering and sports-event contracts. More from Ex-Stanford Coach Taylor Sues ESPN for Defamation After Firing Deflated Balls Artist Sues Pelicans Over Instagram Posts Quintenz's CFTC Nomination Paused by White House Intervention As Sportico detailed in April, Kalshi scored victories before federal judges in Nevada and New Jersey that prevented those states gaming' commissions from requiring Kalshi to obtain licenses. The Maryland decision capped a challenging week for Kalshi, which also saw board member Brian Quintenz's bid to lead the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) paused by the White House. Meanwhile, chief rival Polymarket recently signaled its intent to return to the U.S. with the pricey acquisition of a CFTC-registered exchange, a development that could limit Kalshi's growth ceiling regardless of outcomes in the courtroom. Before Abelson rejected Kalshi's arguments, U.S. District Judge Andrew P. Gordon and U.S. District Judge Edward S. Kiel, respectively, had agreed with the company that federal law appears to preempt states from regulating sports-event contracts. That is true even if sports-event contracts bear similarity to sports bets. Prediction markets such as Kalshi, which have gone live in all 50 states this year, enable users to place 'yes' or 'no' trades on subjects such as whether an MLB team will become the 'Pro Baseball Champion.' Prices for those contracts vary by team and are set by the market in a way that many states and tribal groups contend resembles odds-making. Kalshi insists that it is a distinct product from gambling because odds aren't being set in the same fashion as sportsbooks, though it has at times appeared to undermine its argument here through its marketing materials. At preliminary stages in the litigations, Gordon and Kiel agreed with Kalshi that its legal arguments are enhanced by the CFTC. The CFTC is an independent federal agency created by the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 (CEA), a statute that has been amended several times. The CFTC enjoys exclusive jurisdiction to regulate commodities and futures on designated exchanges, is intended to craft uniform and national set of regulations for futures markets and has cleared Kalshi to offer prediction contracts under new leadership this year. While Nevada and New Jersey insisted that CEA's exclusive jurisdiction doesn't extend to sports-event contracts, the judges concluded that CEA doesn't explicitly say that, and that CFTC has implicitly allowed Kalshi to offer sports-event contracts. But Abelson, the Maryland judge, offered a contrasting viewpoint of Kalshi's activities. He highlighted that while Congress envisioned a substantial role for the CFTC, it also 'expressed a concern that some event contracts' would be 'contrary to the public interest.' Abelson further noted that while Kalshi self-certified (which the CEA authorizes) its sports-event contracts earlier this year, it could have instead 'requested pre-approval from the Commission regarding whether Kalshi could lawfully conduct sports betting on its platform.' During President Joe Biden's term, the CFTC contested Kalshi over its range of event contracts, which also include the ability for users to put money on elections. The agency's outlook on Kalshi changed with President Donald Trump taking office and Caroline Pham, a Republican, becoming the agency's interim chair. In May, the CFTC voluntarily dismissed an appeal of a 2024 court decision that allowed Kalshi to offer contracts on the 2024 election. As Maryland's gaming enforcers see it, 'event contracts based on the outcome of sporting events' are simply a form of sports wagering. In Maryland, sports wagering is a regulated activity that, under a state statute, is defined as 'the business of accepting wagers on any sporting event by any system or method of wagering, including single-game bets, teaser bets, parlays, over-under, moneyline, pools, exchange wagering, in-game wagering, in-play bets, proposition bets, and straight bets.' Kalshi maintains Maryland law doesn't apply to sports-event contracts because state law is preempted by the CEA. Maryland disagrees, asserting that sports-event contracts don't fall within the meaning of the CEA, and that even if they do, the CEA doesn't preempt Maryland's sports betting laws. Central to the debate is the Supremacy Clause found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The Clause establishes that the Constitution and laws of the U.S. 'shall be the supreme Law of the Land.' The Supremacy Clause allows the federal government to preempt states on certain types of legal questions. On the other hand, as Abelson detailed, Congress has also 'long recognized states' authority to regulate gambling conducted within their borders' because gambling can be 'vice activity' that imposes 'social costs' on states. This tension underscores much of the legal debate surrounding Kalshi's sports-event contracts. Abelson concluded that while CEA generally preempts state regulation of prediction markets, he wasn't persuaded that Congress 'clearly and manifestly intended to strip states' of the ability to regulate a company 'offering . . . wagering opportunities' and in turn require that company to gain state approval via a license. In that same vein, Abelson distinguished CEA having 'some' preemptive effect from a more expansive preemption of 'state gambling laws and specifically sports wagering laws.' He cited other cases for the precedent that courts must avoid 'interpreting the scope of the preempted field too broadly.' Abelson was also moved by the potential repercussions of siding with Kalshi on other industry actors. To that point, a group of tribes and gaming associations filed an amicus brief urging Abelson to side with Maryland. As the tribes see it, federal, state and tribal gaming laws apply to sports event contracts. Striking a supportive position of the tribes and gaming associations' concern, Abelson worried that an interpretation of the CEA as preempting state gambling laws for Kalshi contracts 'would necessarily mean that the CEA impliedly (albeit partially) overrides the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.' This act, better known as IGRA, is central to a lawsuit brought last month by three tribal groups from California against Kalshi. IGRA established a system for reservations to launch, oversee and retain revenue from gaming—including sports betting—on their lands. Federal courts in different circuits reaching conflicting interpretations of law has problematic implications that sometimes attract the attention, and willingness, of the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. The primary worry with circuit splits is that legal rights and obligations for people, businesses and government agencies vary based on which circuit they reside and where a legal dispute is litigated in the U.S. Here, the question of whether Kalshi's offerings ought to count as sports bets is the headline. However, the meat of the dispute is how a court should interpret a federal law that, through clearly contested language, preempts states from regulating an activity. Best of College Athletes as Employees: Answering 25 Key Questions
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
How to watch Man United vs. Everton in Premier League Summer Series
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. The Premier League Summer Series is coming to an end with one final match between Manchester United and Everton. Man United is undefeated through the first two matches, and has a good chance at taking home the Summer Series trophy. To slip out of the top spot, they'll have to lose to Everton (who haven't notched a win yet) in blowout fashion after the earlier Bournemouth-West Ham match ends in a one-sided victory. In simpler terms, if Man United wins this game, it's likely they'll win the title, too. Advertisement Man United vs. Bournemouth: what to know When: Aug, 3, 5 p.m. ET Aug, 3, Where: Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta, Georgia) Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta, Georgia) Channel: Not on TV Not on TV Streaming: Peacock Here's everything you need to know to tune in to tonight's Summer Series finale. What time is the Manchester United vs. Everton match? The Man United vs. Everton Summer Series match begins at 9:30 p.m. ET today, July 30. How to watch Man Utd. vs. Everton live Advertisement In the United States, the Man United vs. Everton match is exclusive to NBC's Peacock streaming service. Peacock currently offers two subscription types with live sports: Premium with ads and Premium Plus ad-free. Peacock Premium costs $10.99/month, while Premium Plus costs $16.99/month. You can save a bit by subscribing to one of Peacock's annual plans, which give you 12 months for the price of 10. These cost either $109.99 with ads or $169.99 without ads. 2025 Premier League Summer Series schedule Sunday, August 3 – Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta Advertisement Bournemouth vs. West Ham, 2 p.m. ET Manchester United vs. Everton, 5 p.m. ET Why Trust Post Wanted by the New York Post This article was written by Angela Tricarico, Commerce Streaming Reporter for Post Wanted Shopping, Page Six, and New York Post's streaming property, Decider. Angela keeps readers up to date with cord-cutter-friendly deals, and information on how to watch your favorite sports teams, TV shows, and movies on every streaming service. Not only does Angela test and compare the streaming services she writes about to ensure readers are getting the best prices, but she's also a superfan specializing in the intersection of shopping, tech, sports, and pop culture. Prior to joining Decider and The New York Post in 2023, she wrote about streaming and consumer tech at Insider Reviews
