Kamala Harris says she will not run for California governor
Former Vice President Kamala Harris has confirmed she will not run for Governor of California.
This decision comes after widespread speculation about her potential entry into the 2026 gubernatorial race.
Harris recently lost the November presidential election and has not held elected office since 2004.
LOS ANGELES - Former Vice President Kamala Harris will not run for Governor of California, she confirmed exclusively to FOX 11's Elex Michaelson on Wednesday.
She issued a statement saying "In recent months, I have given serious thought to asking the people of California for the privilege to serve as their Governor. I love this state, its people, and its promise. It is my home. But after deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for Governor in this election."
"For now, my leadership—and public service—will not be in elected office. I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans," the statement read.
The backstory
Speculation over Harris' possible run for governor began earlier this year. Politico first reported the news, saying that Harris plans to decide by the end of the summer whether to enter the 2026 governor's race.
Harris lost in the November presidential election to President Donald Trump, after she was thrust into an unprecedented situation when President Joe Biden ended his reelection bid and endorsed her as his successor.
This is the first time since 2004, when she became San Francisco's district attorney, that she hasn't held an elected position.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Kamala Harris reportedly considering run for California governor
Speculation about her political future has grown, especially after she signed a deal with Creative Artists Agency and reports that she may write a book.
Harris made history as the first woman, Black person and person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Kamala Harris sees support for potential CA governor run in new poll
In Nov. 2024, a poll conducted by Berkeley IGS found that 1 in 3 voters surveyed said they would be very likely to support Harris if she ran for governor. Another 13% said they would be "somewhat likely" to support her.
If she had run, she would seek to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom, who will be term-limited.
Race for Governor
Several candidates have announced their run for governor.
Three Republicans, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, former Fox News host Steve Hilton, and businessman Leo Zacky, have already announced their campaign.
RELATED:CA Governor Race: Who is running to replace Newsom
A host of Democrats have also joined the race -- former congressman and U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, former Orange County Rep. Katie Porter, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, state schools chief Tony Thurmond, former Controller Betty Yee, former state Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins and entrepreneur Stephen Cloobeck.
The Source
Information for this story is from Fox News Digital and a report from Politico.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kennedy is gutting health advisory panels to weaken the Affordable Care Act
The famous thumbs-down by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in 2017 resulted in the notorious failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Subsequent legislative attempts also crashed and burned, teaching Republicans the importance of discretion in their efforts to sabotage that law. Consequently, both congressional Republicans and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have instead turned to subtler tactics to undermine the Affordable Care Act's impact. Mark Twain once quipped that history does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes. The U.S. once again finds itself in a period of health insurance rescission amid unified Republican control of government, though there are key differences from 2017. The Affordable Care Act now enjoys not only record enrollment of 24.3 million people in marketplace plans, but also record high approval of 66 percent, according to the June Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll. In light of this popularity, as well as political scientist David Mayhew's characterization of members of Congress as ' single-minded seekers of reelection,' it is hardly surprising that congressional Republicans' preferred strategy has transitioned to subverting the act's progress. They have done so by undercutting enhanced subsidies and dismantling the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Under the Affordable Care Act, the recommendations of both of these committees are required to be covered by private health insurance, as well as, in some cases, Medicaid and Medicare. As such, they are critical in safeguarding the nation's health. These are but two of the many ways that the second Trump administration is defined by full-frontal assaults on the American public health infrastructure. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is a federal advisory committee composed of medical and public health experts who formulate recommendations on vaccine availability and eligibility. Its recommendations carry a great deal of weight, guiding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's adult and childhood vaccination schedule, and ensuring that vaccines are available to children who are underinsured or uninsured through the Vaccines for Children Program. Vaccine For Children's origins in the 1993 measles epidemic, and the role of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in recommending vaccines to be covered by the program, bring into sharp relief why it is so critical in mitigating the damage of America's ongoing spread of measles cases. The prior outbreak resulted in 55,000 cases, more than 11,000 hospitalizations and 166 deaths. The culprit? Undervaccination, in no small part due the cost of vaccination. Today, the Affordable Care Act stipulates that insurers shall cover without cost-sharing all vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and so must Vaccines for Children. Nonetheless, online misinformation has initiated a precipitous decline in vaccine coverage, which may have contributed to the U.S. surpassing the most measles cases since the disease was declared to be eliminated in 2000. Kennedy is undermining the advisory committee's work by installing anti-vaccine members who were not properly vetted. His actions are a viable path toward eliminating insurance coverage for lifesaving vaccines such as measles, mumps and rubella, which costs around $200 without insurance. This, in turn, will result in more infectious disease outbreaks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a national panel of volunteer independent experts, examines which preventive services and medications insurers must cover under the Affordable Care Act with a broader lens. Their task includes the thorough assessment of preventive strategies ranging from cancer screenings to medications that prevent HIV transmission. The Affordable Care Act's preventive services mandate recently came under scrutiny in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management. In June, the Affordable Care Act emerged unscathed again in a 6-3 holding that it could constitutionally compel private insurers and Medicaid expansion programs to cover the preventive services recommended by the Preventive Services Task Force. Unfortunately, the decision also gave Kennedy complete control over the makeup of the task force, leading to his plans to dismiss all of the current serving members. These no-cost preventive services identified by the Preventive Services Task Force panel are accessed by approximately 100 million people each year. But according to Kennedy, their recommendations are too ' woke,' and warrant termination of all members. Kennedy provided no scientific, policy or economic justification for this action, nor did he bother to define the meaning of too woke, leaving us to guess what might be problematic for him. Perhaps he objects to Preventive Services Task Force-guided insurance coverage for such critical services as screening for anxiety disorders in adults, including those who are pregnant and postpartum. Or perhaps it's biennial mammography for women between the ages of 40 and 74, screening for HIV in adolescents and adults between the ages of 15 and 65 or screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in adults between the ages of 35 and 70 who are overweight or obese. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations span a broad range of common health conditions with significant health and financial burden for the United States and beyond. They also help to reduce evidence gaps and promote the delivery of accessible, evidence-based medicine. For all the administration's expressed concerns about the cost of medical care, they may not have heard the adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. And while Preventive Services Task Force recommendations have the added bonus of promoting health equity due to the lack of patient financial responsibility for the identified health services, its approach is rooted in science, not ideological agendas. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force are critical in ensuring equitable access to care for preventive services for both infectious and chronic disease management. But despite their immense impact, they operate less in the public eye and elicit fewer protests and phone calls from Americans who benefit from their guidance than did explicit repeal efforts. Given Republicans' repeated failures to undermine the Affordable Care Act through legislative action or litigation, these stealth attempts constitute an effective, though dangerous pathway for Republicans to evade substantial scrutiny when undercutting critical access to affordable medical care for large swaths of the population. Not all Americans will understand why they can no longer access live-saving healthcare, but they will know they are not being made healthy again. Miranda Yaver is a political scientist and an assistant professor of Health Policy and Management at the University of Pittsburgh. Elizabeth Jacobs is an epidemiologist and professor emerita at the University of Arizona, and a founding member of the advocacy group Defend Public Health.
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Comer: Bill Clinton ‘prime suspect' in Epstein investigation
House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) on Monday said former President Clinton's alleged ties to the late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein should be uncovered during his testimony before members of Congress. 'Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island and we've all heard reports that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor there, so he's a prime suspect to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee,' Comer said Monday during an interview on Newsmax. 'So hopefully we'll win that court battle with that subpoena and see President Clinton in October,' he added. Comer subpoenaed Clinton and his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on Aug. 5 to give testimony in the House GOP's probe of matters surrounding Epstein, a convicted sex offender. Democrats have joined Republicans' in backing the request. 'I've never lost a subpoena battle, I've been chairman of that committee for a year and a half, this is the most challenging subpoena I've ever issued, but what makes this subpoena different is that the Democrats voted with Republicans,' Comer told Rob Finnerty. The Kentucky Republican added that he believes the subpoena will hold 'a lot of weight in court.' Clinton could refuse to testify but would then be subject to repercussions from Attorney General Pam Bondi. 'If someone doesn't comply with a subpoena — we've seen it happen in the past, in both my committee, as well as on the Jan. 6 committee, when the Democrats had the majority — and you can hold them in contempt of Congress,' Comer said during an appearance on NewsNation's ' The Hill ' last week. 'And with a Republican attorney general, that's something that I think that the Clinton legal team is going to think long and hard about.' Former Attorneys General Bill Barr, who served under Trump's first administration, and Merrick Garland, who served under the Biden administration, have also been summoned to testify.
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump touts ‘great' nominees for ‘Kennedy Center Awards,' teases name change
President Trump is touting the 'great nominees' who are poised to be announced for what he's dubbing the 'Kennedy Center Awards,' teasing that his name could possibly replace that of the 35th president on the historic institution. 'GREAT Nominees for the TRUMP/KENNEDY CENTER, whoops, I mean, KENNEDY CENTER, AWARDS,' Trump wrote in a Tuesday post on Truth Social. 'They will be announced Wednesday,' Trump said. The message from the president came months after Trump, in an unprecedented move that drew criticism, overhauled the Kennedy Center's board and named himself its chair. Calling it an 'American jewel,' Trump had accused the performing arts space — created in honor of Kennedy in 1971 — of being too 'woke.' It was unclear in Trump's Truth Social post if he was referring to nominees for the Kennedy Center's Honors, or if that hallmark event — which recognizes lifetime artistic achievements — was being renamed or reimagined as the 'Kennedy Center Awards.' A Kennedy Center representative did not immediately return ITK's request for comment. In past years, the Kennedy Center Honors recipients have been announced in the summer ahead of a traditional December ceremony. Throughout his first term in office, Trump bucked tradition and declined to attend the annual Kennedy Center Honors after several of the awards recipients criticized him. 'Tremendous work is being done, and money being spent, on bringing it back to the absolute TOP LEVEL of luxury, glamour, and entertainment,' Trump said in his social media post. 'It had fallen on hard times, physically, BUT WILL SOON BE MAKING A MAJOR COMEBACK!!!' he said. In June, the president attended the Kennedy Center's opening night performance of 'Les Misérables,' which was one of the first major productions to premiere following Trump's takeover. Last month, Rep. Bob Onder (R-Mo.) introduced a bill that would replace Kennedy's name with Trump's at the Washington arts hub. The bill would 'designate the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts as the 'Donald J. Trump Center for the Performing Arts.''
