HS2 has suffered ‘significant cost' from legal challenges by public bodies
The Cabinet minister noted that in 'almost all cases', the courts have found in favour of the high-speed rail scheme between London and Birmingham.
HS2 Ltd was given the power to construct the railway when the High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Act received royal assent in February 2017.
The most recent of the nine legal challenges the project has faced from other public bodies since then was launched by North Warwickshire Borough Council in relation to the extension of the under-construction Bromford Tunnel.
In May, the High Court rejected the council's bid for a judicial review.
Since royal assent was obtained, there have also been 25 appeals relating to the HS2 planning regime.
In a six-monthly written update to Parliament on HS2, Ms Alexander acknowledged it is 'right there are checks and balances embedded in our legal and planning systems', but expressed concern these are being used to 'frustrate the delivery of consented projects'.
She wrote: 'The delivery of HS2 has continued during this period to be the subject of both legal and planning challenges, which have added significant cost, uncertainty and potential for delay.'
She added: 'The Government continues to monitor this issue closely and will consider further interventions where appropriate, alongside its wider work on planning reform.'
Ms Alexander also announced that she has lifted safeguarding on the majority of land protected for HS2's former Phase 2b eastern leg between Birmingham and Leeds, which was cancelled in November 2021.
Safeguarding is used to stop land from being developed in a way that would conflict with future schemes.
More than 550 properties were acquired by HS2 Ltd ahead of the planned construction of Phase 2b's eastern section.
Removing safeguarding means the process of selling them can begin.
Former owners of property within the safeguarding zone, which was acquired by HS2 Ltd will be given the opportunity to buy it back at the current market value.
HS2 has suffered repeated delays and soaring costs.
Ms Alexander announced last month there was 'no route' to meet the target date of having HS2 services running by 2033.
In her update to Parliament, the Secretary of State said her department is working with HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild to 'reset' the project, with the aim of providing an 'updated delivery baseline and funding envelope in 2026'.
She went on: 'Until this work is completed, this Government is not in a position to say with confidence how much HS2 will cost or when it will be delivered.
'That is a deeply unsatisfactory position, but it is necessary to complete the hard work we have embarked upon.'
HS2 was originally planned to run between London and Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs.
The first phase was initially scheduled to open by the end of 2026, but this was later pushed back to between 2029 and 2033.
In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham.
In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Britain is lowering the voting age to 16. It's getting a mixed reaction
LONDON (AP) — There has been a mixed reaction in Britain to the government's announcement that it will lower the voting age from 18 to 16 before the next national election. The Labour Party administration says it's part of a package of changes to strengthen British democracy and help restore trust in politics. The opposition says it's a power-grab by the left. Experts say it's complicated, with mixed evidence about how lowering the voting age affects democracy and election outcomes. The biggest change since the 1960s Britain's voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries, including the United States, followed suit within a few years. Now the government says it will lower the threshold to 16 by the time the next general election is held, likely in 2029. That will bring the whole country into line with Scotland and Wales, which have semiautonomous governments and already let 16- and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. A handful of other countries currently have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. A few European Union countries, including Belgium, Germany and Malta, allow 16-year-olds to vote in elections to the European Parliament. The case for votes at 16 Supporters argue that 16-year-olds in Britain can work and pay taxes, so should be allowed to vote. 'If you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. Pro-democracy organizations welcomed the lower age, and a move toward automatic voter registration, saying it would help increase voting rates. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7%, the lowest level in more than two decades. The age change is part of a package of electoral reforms that includes tightening campaign financing rules and broadening the range of documents that can be used as identification at polling stations. Supporters argue it will increase democratic participation by getting teenagers into the habit of voting at a time when most are still in school. 'Younger people who are in full-time education and often still live at home can make for better, more engaged first-time voters compared with 18- to 20-year-olds, who often experience their first election in a highly transitory phase of their lives,' Christine Huebner, a social scientist at the University of Sheffield who has studied youth voting, wrote in The Guardian. Critics call it a cynical move Opponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds should not be given the vote because in most ways they are not considered adults. 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?' Conservative lawmaker Paul Holmes asked Thursday in the House of Commons. Mark Goodwin, a senior lecturer in politics at Coventry University, agreed the move could seem paradoxical, because 'socially, if anything, we're moving in the opposite direction.' 'Increasingly the age of majority, the age at which you become a fully capable and responsible adult, is moving more towards 18,' he said. The government's political opponents on the right argue that Labour hopes to benefit from 1.5 million new potential young voters who generally lean to the left. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right party Reform UK, said Labour was trying to 'rig the system.' Conservative former foreign secretary James Cleverly said the government had cynically announced the change because it is 'tanking in the polls.' Labour can't take youth votes for granted Experts say enfranchising 16- and 17-year-olds is unlikely to dramatically change election results, because they are a relatively small group with diverse views. And it's far from clear that Labour will reap most of the benefits of a bigger youth vote. U.K. politics, long dominated by Labour and the Conservatives, is becoming increasingly fragmented. Polling suggests younger voters lean left, but they are split among several parties including Labour, the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. Farage's embrace of TikTok has built his brand with youth, and Reform has some support among young men. Goodwin said that in many parts of the world, 'young people are abandoning the center-left in droves. 'And in many cases, they're lending their support to parties of the populist right, or challenger parties, outsider parties, independents, more alternative parties,' he said. 'If it is a cynical ploy to get more Labour votes, there's certainly an element of risk about where those votes would ultimately be cast.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs are tipping Europe toward recession
Trump's tariff threats—potentially up to 30% on E.U. imports—may tip Europe into recession by late 2025, some analysts say. European exporters are heavily reliant on the U.S. market, especially in autos and pharmaceuticals. The U.S. is the largest trading market for both the E.U. and the U.K. Stock markets remain buoyant for now, seemingly on the assumption that deals will be struck lowering the rates. U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said yesterday that he thinks the Fed should cut interest rates at the end of July because he thinks the U.S. economy's 'momentum has slowed significantly,' and he's worried about unemployment rising. He's not alone. Oxford Economics' Ryan Sweet told clients this week that President Trump's tariffs will shave growth off the U.S. economy. 'The hit to US GDP growth is 0.1ppt this year and 0.3ppts next year,' he wrote in a note seen by Fortune. While the tariffs' effects on the Fed rate and the U.S. economy have generated most of the headlines recently, they are having a serious negative effect on the European economy too. Trump has threatened to impose a 30% tariff on that trade if the parties don't strike a better deal. Analysts are saying that if no deal is reached, the tariff barrier could push Europe into a recession. 'A 30% US tariff on EU exports would send the EZ economy into recession in the second half of 2025,' Pantheon Macroeconomics' Claus Vistesen said in a recent research note. 'Markets don't believe Mr. Trump's tariff threats, but a US-EU escalation cycle is still a big near-term risk. The ECB will hold fire [on retaliating] in July unless it is absolutely certain a 30% tariff is coming over the summer.' 'A sustained 30% US tariff … would pull down our 2025 and 2026 growth forecasts by 0.3pp and 0.5pp, respectively, to 0.7% and 0.8%,' he said. At Oxford Economics, Angel Talavera agrees: 'We estimate the US tariffs of 30% on imports from the EU threatened by President Trump could shave up to 0.3ppts off annual Eurozone growth over the next two years. This would push the Eurozone economy to the edge of recession, with growth stagnating over the coming quarters,' he wrote in a recent note. Unemployment in the U.K. is already on the rise—it ticked up to 4.7% over the last three months, the highest in four years. The problem is that the U.S. is Europe and Britain's largest export market. About 20% of EU exports go to the U.S. at a value of around €500 billion ($581 billion). Europe's trade doesn't immediately have anywhere else to go—at least not at that scale. 'The sheer size of the US economy means that it takes a large share of Europe's exports, particularly pharmaceuticals and autos. This will make it difficult for Europe to switch to other markets,' Oxford Economics' Matt Swannell said in a note this week. It's not just the size of Trump's tariff demand, it's the complexity. 'On top, there are sectoral tariffs of 25% on cars/parts, as well as 50% on aluminum and steel (up from 25% since June 4). Effective tariffs rates could remain at 12-17% (assuming a 10-20% universal tariff), which is significantly higher than the around 1% at the start of the year with automotives, steel and potentially pharma hit by sectoral tariffs,' Deutsche Bank's Marion Muehlberger and Ursula Walther told clients this week. Pharmaceuticals are one of the biggest export markets for Europe, and Trump has threatened to tax them at a rate of 200% on entry to the U.S. Finally, there's the ever-changing nature of Trump's demands. Until a few weeks ago, a 30% tariff wasn't even on the radar. 'In June, the ECB's baseline scenario assumed just a 10% tariff, and even the downside scenario only went up to 20%. A 30% tariff would be more damaging to the eurozone economy, even if European retaliation eventually pushed inflation higher,' ING's Carsten Brzeski said in a research note this week. European stock markets are whistling past this graveyard at the moment. The Stoxx Europe 600 and the UK's FTSE 100 are both at or near all-time highs. France's CAC 40 is up 6% YTD and Germany's DAX blue chip index is up a staggering 21.69% YTD, based largely on Germany's big fiscal military spending plan. Here's a snapshot of the action prior to the opening bell in New York: S&P 500 futures were flat this morning, premarket. The index closed up 0.54% yesterday. STOXX Europe 600 was up 0.4% in early trading. The UK's FTSE 100 was up 0.32% this morning, placing it above 9,000, which would be an all-time high if it holds. China's CSI 300 was up 0.6%. Japan's Nikkei 225 was down 0.21%. Bitcoin is still above $118K. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Private equity baron Hands eyes voyage with Boatfolk marinas
The private equity firm founded by Guy Hands is plotting a takeover of Boatfolk, one of the UK's biggest independent marina owners. Sky News has learnt that Terra Firma Capital Partners, the buyout shop now run by Mr Hands' son, Richard, is among the remaining suitors for Boatfolk, which has been exploring a sale for several months. The elder Mr Hands retired from his full-time roles at Terra Firma two years ago, having built it over several decades into one of Britain's most prominent private equity groups. Money latest: Among its investments - some of which turned out to be financially and reputationally notorious - were the music company EMI, the care homes operator Four Seasons Health Care and Annington Homes, the former owner of thousands of Ministry of Defence homes. More recently, it has focused on managing Mr Hands' family's money, although it does still have some external investors. Its interest in Boatfolk is unsurprising, given the company's underlying property portfolio. Owned by Mansford, a prolific investor in real estate assets, Boatfolk owns marinas at East Cowes on the Isle of Wight, Weymouth in Dorset and Royal Quays in North Shields. Its portfolio comprises 11 sites in total. The identities of other bidders for Boatfolk was unclear on Friday, although industry sources speculated that Crestline, an investment firm, could be among them. The Boatfolk auction is being handled by CBRE, the property agent. A spokesman for Terra Firma declined to comment.
