
Oakland voters to choose new mayor, decide on controversial sales tax hike
On Tuesday, Oakland voters will head to the polls to elect a
new mayor
following a recent recall — but the high-stakes mayoral race isn't the only item on the special election ballot.
Voters will also decide the fate of Measure A, a proposed half-cent sales tax increase that city officials said is essential to address a financial crisis. If approved, the city's sales tax would rise from 10.25% to 10.75%, making it the highest in the state — a level already matched by neighboring cities like Alameda, Hayward, and San Leandro.
City leaders estimate the tax hike would generate approximately $30 million annually for Oakland's general fund, helping to close a projected $140 million budget deficit for the next fiscal year.
Given the city's dire financial outlook, some residents feel they have little choice but to vote in favor of the tax.
"We have 20 people in the store right now. It's great," said Henry Wimmer, owner of Open Mind Music in the Rockridge District.
However, Wimmer also expressed concern that a higher sales tax could negatively impact his business.
"I think that can have some weight. And that can mean maybe a customer doesn't come back as frequently or maybe they don't buy as much or as often," he said.
Longtime Oakland resident Al Flor already cast his vote in favor of Measure A, driven by personal experience with slow emergency response times.
"I voted yes because I think that we need more money to pay for valuable services here in town," said Flor, who recalled waiting nearly 40 minutes to reach a 911 dispatcher during a burglary in progress. "I feel like we need to do it. No one likes to do it. No one likes to pay more in sales taxes. But the alternative is pretty bleak."
But not everyone agrees. Critics argued that Oakland already imposes some of the highest taxes in the region, yet fails to provide consistent basic services. They said the city should focus on improving how it manages the money it already has.
"I'm going to vote no. I believe the sales tax is way too high as it is," said voter Sarah Marth.
She worried the increase would disproportionately impact low-income residents and could drive shoppers elsewhere.
"When I want to buy a car or a larger purchase, I would avoid having [to do so] in this higher tax climate," she added.
Back at Open Mind Music, Wimmer remained focused on the broader impact on small businesses and the local economy. He said he understands the city's financial needs and is ready to adapt based on the outcome of Tuesday's vote.
"We need more success, and hopefully, the arrow points up through these difficult times. Hopefully, we can all come together," Wimmer said.
If passed, Measure A would remain in effect for 10 years, with proceeds intended to support essential city services amid continued budgetary shortfalls.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
5 days ago
- CBS News
San Mateo Co. supervisors to decide on starting removal process for Sheriff Christina Corpus
San Mateo County Sheriff fights for her job by releasing new report on independent investigation San Mateo County Sheriff fights for her job by releasing new report on independent investigation San Mateo County Sheriff fights for her job by releasing new report on independent investigation The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors has scheduled a special meeting Thursday afternoon in which they are expected to decide on initiating the process to remove embattled Sheriff Christina Corpus from office. Supervisors gained the power to remove the sheriff after 84% of voters approved Measure A in a special election in March. The measure temporarily amended the County Charter to remove a sheriff from office for cause. Corpus has been facing months of scrutiny following a scathing independent report released last November by retired judge LaDoris Cordell into allegations of abuse of power at the sheriff's office. Cordell's report made multiple accusations against the sheriff, including intimidation, retaliation, the use of racial and homophobic slurs and conflicts of interest. Corpus is also accused of having a personal relationship with Victor Aenelle, her chief of staff. The report concluded that "Sheriff Corpus step down and that Victor Aenlle's employment by the sheriff's office be terminated immediately. Nothing short of new leadership can save this organization." The sheriff has repeatedly denied the allegations and has refused multiple calls to resign from local leaders and Deputy Sheriff's Association, which led to supervisors calling for the special election. In April, Corpus released her own report rebuttting Cordell's investigation. Corpus has also filed a $10 million lawsuit against the county, alleging discrimination and harassment. Under Measure A, removal of Corpus requires a four-fifths majority vote by the board of supervisors and Corpus will have an opportunity to defend her case. The board's authority to remove the sheriff expires at the end of 2028. Corpus, the county's first Latina sheriff, was elected in 2022. Thursday's board meeting is scheduled take place at the Board Chambers in Redwood City at 1 p.m.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Fresno County DA, sheriff get an extra two years in battle over election schedule
Two of Fresno County's top law enforcement officials just got extensions on their services, despite their own reservations and a voter-backed initiative that would have seen them up for re-election in 2026. On Monday, a state court judge ruled to invalidate Fresno County's Measure A, the 2024 ballot initiative that aligned District Attorney and Sheriff elections with the gubernatorial election cycle. The ruling pushes Fresno County District Attorney Lisa Smittcamp and Sheriff John Zanoni into six-year terms, with their re-elections now set for 2028. Measure A passed in 2024's March primary election with 55% of the vote and immediately put Fresno County at odds with AB 179, a 2022 state law that mandated such elections be synced to the presidential cycle. In July, California's Attorney General and Secretary of State challenged the measure in court, claiming it was preempted by the state law. In a 19-page ruling released Monday, Superior Court Judge Tyler Tharpe agreed. While the county has 'authority to set the terms of its elected officials,' he wrote, 'it is not authorized under the California Constitution to set the dates on which the elections of local officials will be held.' Judge Tharpe acknowledged the change as 'a fairly minor intrusion on the County's power to set the terms of its officials.' It is a one-time extension. 'Any district attorney and sheriff elected from 2028 onward will serve four-year terms as specified by the county's charter.' In a joint statement, Smittcamp and Zanoni said they are prepared to serve the six-year terms and 'remain committed to fulfilling our responsibilities with integrity and dedication for the full duration,' even as the county Board of Supervisors meets to discuss potential next steps, which it will do in closed session June 10. But they also expressed concerns about the legislative process that led to the enactment of AB 759 in the first place. 'After sitting in the Senate Appropriations Committee's suspense file for over a year, the bill advanced rapidly in the final weeks of the legislative session,' they wrote. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill into law in September 2022 'with little to no opportunity for public review,' Smittcamp and Zanoni said in their statement. 'As a result, local governments and voters were excluded from a policy decision that directly affects the terms of their elected officials.' For his part, Attorney General Rob Bonta claimed Monday's ruling as a win for voters. 'There is nothing more fundamental to American democracy than the right to vote and make your voice heard,' Bonta said in a statement. 'With Measure A, Fresno County threatened to undermine that fundamental right, intentionally seeking to move elections for sheriff and district attorney to off years, when voters are far less likely to show up and cast a ballot,' he wrote. 'Our democracy works best when everyone can participate.'

Miami Herald
31-05-2025
- Miami Herald
Forget tariffs, here's why CEOs worry about a looming recession
Tariffs are on the tip of many Americans' tongues, thanks to the multifaceted trade war in which U.S. President Donald Trump has used foreign taxes as a key negotiating tactic against foreign economic rivals. While Trump says he loves everything about tariffs, including the word itself, the rest of the world's business leaders don't share his affinity. Global stock markets certainly hate the trade war. Every time a new tariff is announced, foreign and domestic markets fall. Every time Trump announces a deal has been reached, markets rise, even if no concrete deals are ever made. Related: Tariff repeal couldn't come at a better time for US businesses Even moreso than investors, Trump's tariffs place business leaders in a most awkward position. Businesses love predictability. Knowing what to expect and when to expect it allows them to plan for the future and forecast expectations. However, Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs have had the opposite effect, casting doubt on what businesses will have to pay their suppliers quarterly, monthly, or even weekly. This environment has, understandably, had an adverse effect on CEO confidence, as reflected in the latest survey data from The Conference Board. Image source: Nikhinson - Pool/Getty Images Every quarter, The Conference Board releases its Measure of CEO Confidence in collaboration wth The Business Council. Over 130 CEOs participated in the Q2 survey between May 5 and May 19, and the results are concerning. A reading below 50 indicates a negative outlook. The confidence index fell by 26 points to 34, the lowest level recorded since Q4 2022. "All components of the Measure weakened into pessimism territory," said Conference Board's Senior Economist of Global Indicators Stephanie Guichard. Related: New car prices are rising; here's where to get the best deal "Expectations for the future also plummeted, with more than half of CEOs now expecting conditions to worsen over the next six months, both for the economy overall and in their own industries." The overwhelming majority of CEOs (83%) said they expect a recession in the next 12 to 18 months, nearly matching the rate reached in late 2022 and early 2023. While tariffs and trade issues were near the top of the list of concerns, geopolitical concerns were the number one concern. Geopolitical instability surpassed cybersecurity, "which dominated CEOs' concerns over the past two years," but dropped to fourth this year. However, the forecast from the top 1% isn't all doom and gloom. Most CEOs anticipate no change in the size of their workforce over the next 12 months. So while they expect hiring to be stagnant, they aren't anticipating any layoffs. The share of CEOs expecting to expand their workforce fell slightly to 28% from 32% in Q1. The share of CEOs planning to reduce their workforce rose 1% to 28%. "Still, consistent with more pessimism about the outlook in their own industries, the share of CEOs expecting to revise down investment plans doubled in Q2 to 26%, while the share expecting to upgrade investment plans dropped 14 ppts to 19%," said Business Council Vice Chairman Roger W. Ferguson. Part of the reason employers are confident in the labor market is that they currently aren't having trouble finding qualified candidates. Since there's less competition, the share of CEOs planning to raise wages by 3% or more over the next year dropped to 5% from 71% in Q1. While the future is murky for many CEOs, the present is almost equally disorienting. The percentage of CEOs who say that economic conditions are worse now than they were six months ago jumped 11% to 82% in Q2. Only 2% of respondents felt economic conditions were better. This change in sentiment is also reflected in the 69% of CEOs who said conditions in their own industries were worse than six months ago, a dramatic increase from 22% in Q1. Only 7% said conditions improved in their industries, and there was also a significant drop from 37% in Q1. Related: Wall Street's TACO trade gains momentum amid stock market rally The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.