logo
US Spies Denied Iran Was Building Nuclear Weapon. "Don't Care," Said Trump

US Spies Denied Iran Was Building Nuclear Weapon. "Don't Care," Said Trump

NDTV5 hours ago

Washington:
Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran's nuclear program earlier this year.
The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels.
But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of US spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.
"I don't care what she said," Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was "very close" to having a nuclear bomb.
Trump's statement aligned him more closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump met with national security officials, including Gabbard, in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps.
Administration officials downplayed the inconsistency between Trump and Gabbard, saying that enriching uranium can put Iran on track to having a nuclear weapon.
Gabbard blamed the media for misconstruing her earlier testimony, asserting that "President Trump was saying the same thing that I said."
"We are on the same page," she told CNN. Asked for comment, Gabbard's office referred to those remarks.
In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community "continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."
She also said the US was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's "enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons."
Gen. Erik Kurilla, who leads US forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb.
A senior intelligence official said Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues.
Trump's contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with US spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a "deep state" that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was "extremely strong and powerful in his denial."
The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations.
Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump in last year's election, testified Tuesday before the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee in a closed session that had been previously scheduled about the budget.
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, who is the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee but isn't on the budget panel, said he's unaware of any new information that would change the assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities.
"Director Gabbard stated publicly in March that the Iranians were not actively pursuing a bomb," Warner said. "I've seen nothing in recent intelligence that contradicts what Director Gabbard said."
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs if it wants to. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful.
An earlier intelligence report, compiled in November under then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, also said Iran "is not building a nuclear weapon."
However, it said the country has "undertaken activities that better position it to produce one, if it so chooses," such as increasing stockpiles of enriched uranium and operating more advanced centrifuges. The report did not include any estimates for a timeline for how quickly a bomb could be built.
Trump's immigration agenda is another place where he's split with intelligence assessments. He cited the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants, which he justified by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang was coordinating with the Venezuelan government. However, an intelligence assessment in April found no evidence of that.
Gabbard fired the two veteran intelligence officers who led the panel that created the assessment, saying they were terminated because of their opposition to Trump.
In response to those reports, the White House released a statement from Gabbard supporting the president.
"President Trump took necessary and historic action to safeguard our nation when he deported these violent Tren de Aragua terrorists," the statement said. "Now that America is safer without these terrorists in our cities, deep state actors have resorted to using their propaganda arm to attack the President's successful policies."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mahashtra introduces Hindi as 3rd language in schools, move sparks backlash
Mahashtra introduces Hindi as 3rd language in schools, move sparks backlash

Hindustan Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Mahashtra introduces Hindi as 3rd language in schools, move sparks backlash

Hindi will now be taught as the third language in English and Marathi medium schools in Maharashtra from classes 1 to 5, the state government said on Tuesday. According to the government order, Hindi has not been mandatory and will 'generally' be the third language. However, if at least 20 students per grade want to study any language other than Hindi as a third, the schools have an option to opt out. The move, which aligns with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, drew sharp criticism from not just the Opposition but also Marathi language advocates, who accused the government of giving a 'backdoor' entry to the policy after initially backtracking, reported PTI. Congress, which is in opposition in the state, accused Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis of "stabbing" the Marathi people in the chest. The order gives an option to schools to opt out of teaching Hindi if 20 students from each standard wish to learn some other language. "Those who wish to learn any other language as an option to Hindi, should meet the expectation of 20 students from each standard in a school. In such a situation, a teacher for that particular language will be made available or the language will be taught online," the order read. If a demand of teaching any other language arises, either a teacher will be appointed or the language will be taught online, the order added. For schools that follow other mediums of instruction, the three-language formula must include the medium language, Marathi and English, the order said. The fresh move by the Maharashtra education department comes in contrast to what the state's education minister said earlier. When the Maharashtra government tried to bring the three language policy earlier this year by introducing Hindi from class 1, it was met with severe backlash. Following this, state's School Education Minister Dada Bhuse on April 22 said that Hindi will not be compulsory. 'The decision to introduce Hindi from class 1 as a third language was taken earlier. However, many parents have suggested it be introduced from class 3 instead. We will consider these suggestions before taking any further decision," Bhuse said at an event in Pune last month. He added that the three-language formula was 'on hold' and that the schools will operate under the current two-language system for now. However, the fresh move by the state government contradicts Bhuse's statements. Deepak Pawar of the Mumbai-based Marathi Bhasha Abhyas Kendra called the action 'nothing but the backdoor imposition of Hindi'. "The government has betrayed the Marathi people. If we remain silent now, it will pave the way for dismantling the federal structure and the legacy of the Samyukta Maharashtra movement," he said in a social media post According to Vasant Kalpande, former chairman of the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, it will be difficult for the students at such a young age to understand the nuances and differences between Marathi and Hindi scripts and that it is not likely to find 20 students in a class who want to study some other language than Hindi. "The provision to make teacher available online is also an attempt to discourage opting for any other language than Hindi," he said. He also pointed out that in Gujarat and Assam, which are also BJP-ruled states, Hindi is not a mandatory third language in schools. Maharashtra Congress president Harshwardhan Sapkal slammed chief minister Devendra Fadnavis and said he has 'once again stabbed a dagger into the heart of Maharashtra'. He called the option of opting out of Hindi 'a pretense of choice while a deliberate conspiracy to impose Hindi!' 'This is nothing but BJP's anti-Maharashtra agenda, a plot to destroy the Marathi language, Marathi identity, and the Marathi people. It is clear from this that the loyalty of Fadnavis, Shinde, and Ajit Pawar lies not with Maharashtra or the Marathi people but with the rulers in Delhi,' Sapkal said in a post on X. 'The Shinde faction, which repeatedly invokes Balasaheb Thackeray's name, controls the education department, yet they have stabbed a dagger in the back of Shiv Sena, just as they have taken a contract to murder Marathi.' 'Ajit Pawar is so desperate for power that he cares little whether Maharashtra, the Marathi language, or the Marathi people live or die. His only policy is to secure the finance department for himself,' he added. With PTI inputs.

Hindi spoken largely in public life, learning it will benefit students: Maharashtra minister
Hindi spoken largely in public life, learning it will benefit students: Maharashtra minister

New Indian Express

time36 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Hindi spoken largely in public life, learning it will benefit students: Maharashtra minister

MUMBAI: Maharashtra minister Dada Bhuse on Wednesday defended the government's decision of Hindi to be taught as the third language in schools, saying it is widely used in daily communication and will help Class 12 students in higher education. The school education minister also warned of strict action against schools not teaching Marathi, as per the curriculum. The Maharashtra government on Tuesday issued an order saying Hindi will "generally" be taught as the third language to students in Marathi and English medium schools in the state from classes 1 to 5. The amended government resolution (GR) said Hindi will "generally" be the third language, instead of being mandatory, and gave an option to opt out if 20 students per grade in a school express the desire to study any Indian language other than Hindi. Some pro-Marathi outfits accused the government of reintroducing the policy through the "backdoor" after initially backtracking, and the opposition Congress accused the Devendra Fadnavis-led government of "stabbing" the Marathi people in the chest.

3 big takeaways from PM Modi declining Trump's stopover request
3 big takeaways from PM Modi declining Trump's stopover request

First Post

time38 minutes ago

  • First Post

3 big takeaways from PM Modi declining Trump's stopover request

PM Modi was scheduled to meet Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada, but the meeting could not take place as the president had to leave for the US earlier than scheduled to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict read more US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, February 13, 2025. File Image/Reuters Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday held a 35-minute-long phone call with US President Donald Trump and clarified that Washington did not mediate between India and Pakistan, destroying the American leader's repeated claims that he played a role in halting the conflict. In a call that was requested by Trump , PM Modi gave a detailed briefing to the president about Operation Sindoor. This was the first direct conversation between the two leaders since the Pahalgam attack of April 22. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD PM Modi was scheduled to meet Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada, but the meeting could not take place as the president had to leave for the US earlier than scheduled to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict. The US president, however. tried to reschedule his meeting with PM Modi. Here's how the events unfolded during their phone call: PM Modi is on his way to Croatia after concluding his trip to Canada, where he attended the G7 Summit. Trump reportedly asked PM Modi to stopover in the US before heading to the European nation. This request was denied as PM Modi said he honours Croatia and is the first prime minister ever to visit the country Meanwhile, Trump is slated to meet Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir today (Wednesday) over lunch, where they are likely to discuss the India-Pakistan conflict. So, if Trump's request for a US stopover had been accepted, he would have met PM Modi on the same day as he is scheduled to meet Munir During the phone call, PM Modi directly addressed Trump's repeated claims of mediation through trade to bring an end to the India-Pakistan conflict. Indian government officials have been reiterating that the prime minister never spoke to the US president during or after the launch of Operation Sindoor. In the phone call today, PM Modi told Trump that he had only talked to US Vice President JD Vance, who had called him to warn that Pakistan might launch a retaliatory attack

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store