logo
Labour is waging an open war on businesses

Labour is waging an open war on businesses

Yahoo14-03-2025

Whenever I speak to small business owners in Fareham and Waterlooville – or anywhere across the country, for that matter – the conversation quickly turns to how they are coping under the new Labour Government.
From cafés and pubs to dry cleaners and hairdressers, the story is the same: they are struggling. And not in a vague 'times are tough' sort of way. It is much worse than that. They are struggling in the 'we may not survive this' way.
The first hammer blow comes in the form of Labour's changes to employer National Insurance contributions (NICs). From April 1st, the rate rises from 13.8 per cent to 15 per cent, while the threshold for contributions drops from £9,100 to £5,000.
The British Chambers of Commerce estimates that nearly a million businesses – overwhelmingly SMEs – will be forced to make difficult choices as a result. Some will cut back hiring. Others will slash wages or working hours. Many will simply close.
Take the case of one local restaurateur I spoke with. He is a man who has spent 20 years building up his business. He told me he will have to entirely shut one of his three branches. The others, meanwhile, will have to cut their opening hours simply to cope with the sheer weight of staffing costs.
For employers in sectors like retail and hospitality – where payroll is a huge proportion of overheads – this will be devastating. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that these changes alone will add nearly 2 per cent to payroll costs. For an employee on a £50,000 salary, that's an extra £1,106 per year in tax for the employer.
This will lead to a slower economy, a weaker labour market, and fewer opportunities – particularly for those on low wages. Labour claims to be the party of workers. In fact it is actively sabotaging the very businesses that employ them.
And if the NIC hike was a kick in the stomach, Labour's Employment Rights Bill is a strangulation. It is a trade unionist's dream; it is written in the language of 1980s class warfare.
Listening to Labour MPs in Parliament this week, you could be forgiven for thinking that Arthur Scargill was about to triumphantly march through the chamber. Their worldview remains binary: bosses bad, workers good. And this Bill is a revenge fantasy that punishes employers for a variety of imagined sins.
The measures are staggering in their economic illiteracy. Day-one unfair dismissal rights for employees – once a safeguard earned after two years of service – will now be automatic. This means small business owners, already facing punishing tax hikes, will also find it harder to dismiss underperforming staff. They will think twice before hiring anyone at all.
For those using zero-hours contracts – a lifeline in sectors like hospitality – Labour has also decided to interfere. SMEs will be forced to guarantee hours after just 12 weeks of work. At the same time they will be hit with compensation costs for last-minute shift changes. The reality of this will be fewer flexible jobs and fewer work opportunities for young people.
The Government's own impact assessment is damning: £5 billion in new costs for businesses over the next decade. The Regulatory Policy Committee rated the Bill as 'not fit for purpose.'
And then there is the naked power grab for the unions. Labour is handing them everything they have ever wanted. The minimum notice period for strikes is being cut from 14 to 10 days; this makes it even harder for businesses to plan ahead.
Strike mandates will now last for a year instead of 6 months – effectively ensuring prolonged disruption. Union officials will also be given greater access to workplaces. This gives them free rein to organise and agitate.
The results will be predictable: more strikes, less productivity, greater costs for business. At a time when Britain needs to be leaner, more competitive and more flexible, Labour is doing the opposite – dragging us back to the sclerotic economic model of the past.
And yet, when challenged on this, Angela Rayner couldn't name a single business that supports the Bill. Not one. The silence was deafening. That's not because businesses are shy about their view – it is because Labour has waged open war on them.
The consequences of these policies will be severe. Hiring freezes, closures, job losses, inflationary pressures – Labour is setting up Britain for economic ruin. Will they realise before it's too late? Or will they continue their crusade against the very businesses that keep this country running?
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jobless rate surges to highest since 2021 while pay growth eases sharply
Jobless rate surges to highest since 2021 while pay growth eases sharply

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jobless rate surges to highest since 2021 while pay growth eases sharply

Britain jobless rate surged to its highest level for nearly four years and pay growth for UK workers eased by more than expected as employers faced surging staff costs, official figures have shown. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said average regular earnings, excluding bonuses, fell sharply to 5.2% in the three months to April, from 5.5% in the previous three months and the lowest since the third quarter of last year. While this is still outstripping inflation, up by 2.1% with Consumer Prices Index inflation taken into account, it was lower than predicted, with most experts pencilling in a fall to 5.3%. The rate of unemployment also jumped to 4.6% in the three months to April, up from 4.5% in the three months to March and the highest level since the three months to July 2021. The figures also showed vacancies tumbled by 63,000 to 736,000 in the three months to May, while payroll data revealed the biggest drop for five years last month, down 109,000 to 30.2 million. It coincided with firms facing a hike in national insurance contributions in April, which had been announced in October's budget. Liz McKeown, ONS director of economic statistics, said: 'There continues to be weakening in the labour market, with the number of people on payroll falling notably. 'Feedback from our vacancies survey suggests some firms may be holding back from recruiting new workers or replacing people when they move on.'

Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say
Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say

The UK has one of the "worst statutory leave offers for fathers and other parents in the developed world", the chairwoman of the Women and Equalities Committee has warned. Sarah Owen said the UK's parental leave system was in "urgent need of an overhaul to fit with the reality of working parents' lives". "The UK's parental leave system has fallen far behind most comparable countries," she added. Her comments come as a new report by her House of Commons committee found that a maximum of two weeks' paternity leave is "completely out of step with how most couples want to share their parenting responsibilities" and "entrenches outdated gender stereotypes about caring". Explainer: The UK's rate of parental pay is "completely out of kilter with the cost of living, has not kept pace with inflation and is far below rates in most comparable countries", the report states. The Women and Equalities Committee has urged the government to consider raising paternity pay to the level of maternity pay during the first six weeks, which equals 90% of someone's average earnings. It also called on the government to either amend the Employment Rights Bill to legislate for a day one right to paid leave or commit to "considering this vital change within its review" in consultation with employers. The report stated that working parents "will be let down by a review that leads only to tinkering around the edges of the system". In its report, the committee also recommended a phased introduction of increases to statutory pay across the system to improve the rates for all working parents up to 80% or more of average earnings or the real living wage. Read more from Sky News:Analysis: Problems with U-turn on winter fuel paymentsGovt commits £14.2bn to new nuclear power station Additionally, it urged the government to consider options for providing statutory paid leave for all self-employed working fathers as part of its review of the parental leave system, as the lack of provision for self-employed fathers was "deeply unfair". The report suggests considering the introduction of a paternity allowance for self-employed fathers and other parents, similar to the maternity allowance. The upcoming review into the parental leave system must examine the function and necessity of eligibility rules, with a view to "simplifying or removing the employment status, time in service and earnings criteria", the committee added.

Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut

Labour backbenchers have called for a Government U-turn on planned disability benefit cuts, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves restored winter fuel payments to a majority of pensioners. Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store