logo
Will Trump get played by Putin? Europe is worried

Will Trump get played by Putin? Europe is worried

The Hill10 hours ago
President Trump's sharp criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday is sending chills across Europe, where leaders are working to guard against the worst-case scenario: Trump aligning with Russian President Vladimir Putin to force a bad deal on Kyiv.
Trump blew past a deadline last week to impose punishing sanctions on Russia and its primary trading partners in exchange for the face-to-face meeting with Putin, set for Friday in Alaska.
And while the president has expressed increased frustration with Putin and Russia's attacks on Ukraine, he this week reverted to criticisms that Zelelsky is to blame for stating the war.
'[Trump] is very unpredictable,' Lesia Zaburanna, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament in Zelensky's Servant of the People party and the deputy chair of the budget committee, said in a call with The Hill.
'We highly appreciate all American support, and we highly appreciate all military, financial support. But if we talk about the situation with Trump's negotiation, we are not sure what we will have on Friday.'
The worst case scenario, Zaburanna said, would be if Trump reached an agreement with Putin on territorial concessions without Ukraine, and a fatal blow for Kyiv would be if Trump withdrew U.S. support, particularly intelligence sharing on the battlefield and military support.
Zaburanna described living in Kyiv now as similar to the first days of the full-scale invasion – nightly air raid alarms, massive explosions, menacing drones attacks, destruction of civilian buildings and mounting casualties.
Trump has provided few details on his goals for the meeting, telling reporters on Monday he's using the summit as an opportunity to 'feel out' Putin, who has so far rebuffed all his calls for a ceasefire and increased the pace of attacks on Ukraine.
But Zelensky told reporters this week that Ukraine could be asked to withdraw from the Donbas region to attain a ceasefire. Zelensky said he'd received these indications from Steve Witkoff, Trump's envoy to the region.
'Witkoff said that there should be territorial concessions from both sides – that's how it sounded,' Zelenskyy told NewsNation's Robert Sherman and other reporters in Ukraine. 'And that, most likely, Putin wants us to withdraw from Donbas. In other words, it didn't sound like it was America wanting us to withdraw. After we held two more NSA meetings, it became clear what Putin wants. This is not a proposal from Trump or Witkoff.'
'During the call, I said that I am not ready to discuss Ukraine's territories, as this is solely a matter of our Constitution,' Zelenskyy added.
While Trump has called Putin's ongoing attacks on Ukraine 'cold,' he also offered criticism this week of Zelensky.
'I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying, 'I have to get constitutional approval,' he has approval to do a war and kill everybody but he needs approval for land swapping?' Trump told reporters on Monday.
Marko Mihkelson, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Estonian Parliament, described it as 'quite crazy' that Trump was putting pressure on Zelensky instead of calling out Putin for launching the war.
'We don't have any high hopes on what's going to happen in Alaska,' he said in a phone call with The Hill.
Mihkelson, along with 26 chairs of European foreign affairs committees, published a letter Tuesday saying that any outcome of the Alaska talks 'must firmly uphold Ukraine's sovereignty, territorial integrity, constitution and the principles of the United Nations Charter.'
The letter matched a joint statement from European Union foreign ministers on Tuesday and a Saturday statement from the leaders of France, Italy, Poland, Finland, the United Kingdom and European Union.
Mihkelson said the best-case scenario would be for the Alaska summit to be cancelled. He warned of repeating the mistakes of the 1938 Munich Conference – when European leaders agreed to allow Hitler to annex territory in then-Czechoslovakia, and that served as a prelude to the Nazi invasion of Europe.
'Can Alaska become a second Munich, or not?… We should not repeat mistakes from the past,' Mihkelson said. 'And obviously nothing can be decided about Ukraine without Ukraine, and nothing can be decided about Europe, without Europe.'
Trump said he will call Zelensky and European leaders almost immediately after meeting with Putin, saying that he gets along great with European leaders and NATO members. The White House said Tuesday that Trump's meeting with Putin is exclusively focused on ending the war in Ukraine, and not about bilateral issues, or opportunities between Moscow and Washington.
Zelensky warned that Putin is preparing the ground for more war, and is re-deploying troops and forces in what Ukraine assesses is a renewed military offensive.
'If someone is preparing for peace, this is not what he does. We continue to keep our partners informed about the real situation on the battlefield, in diplomacy, and in Russia's planning of further actions,' Zelensky said in his nightly address to the country.
Zelensky told NewsNation on Tuesday that Ukraine is supportive of a trilateral track of negotiations, to get a ceasefire, an 'all-for-all exchange' [prisoners of war] and the return of Ukrainian children taken by Russia.
'Some period of time is set for the ceasefire – any period. Let America choose, let the Russians choose. This is to prepare a plan, so that we can find some compromises for ending the war,' Zelensky said.
He also warned that compromises leading to peace cannot be found if Russia issues ultimatums.
'Putin always speaks in ultimatums. But I believe he does not have enough leverage against Trump to speak to him in ultimatums,' Zelensky said.
Russian officials signal the Kremlin's demands will include the same it had when it launched its war: demanding Ukraine's demilitarization, Ukraine's commitment to neutrality and a commitment to never joining NATO, according to an analysis by the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank.
It also believes Putin will angle for Ukrainian elections that could give Russia influence over their results.
David Kramer, executive director of the George W. Bush Institute and an expert on Russia and Ukraine, said there are still ways for Trump to gain the upper hand in Alaska.
'We can ramp up the sanctions, we can invite Zelenskyy to the meeting, I mean, it's Tuesday now, there's time for Zelensky to travel… I think there are a number of things that the president can do to turn this opportunity into a meeting where he makes clear that Russia is the guilty party here… and any attempts to blame Zelensky, I think, are misguided,' he said.
There will be scrutiny on the choreography surrounding Trump and Putin's greeting.
In July 2022, President Biden fist-bumped Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to avoid a handshake after calling him a killer. In 2009, former President Clinton appeared straight-faced, no smile, alongside then-North Korean leader Kim Jung-Il.
'I hope he has the discipline,' Kramer said of Trump.
'I hope he goes into this meeting with the awareness that Putin has the blood of thousands of Ukrainians on his hands, but thousands and thousands of Ukrainians would still be alive if Putin did not decide on February 24, 2022 to launch this unjustified, unprovoked, full scale invasion that has included war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Human rights ‘worsened' in UK over the past year, says US
Human rights ‘worsened' in UK over the past year, says US

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Human rights ‘worsened' in UK over the past year, says US

A Trump administration report has accused the UK of backsliding on human rights over the past year, citing increased antisemitic violence and growing restrictions on free speech. The annual US State Department assessment, which analyses human rights conditions worldwide, flagged what it described as 'serious restrictions' on freedom of expression in the UK. 'The government sometimes took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, but prosecution and punishment for such abuses was inconsistent,' the report read. The report specifically said laws limiting speech around abortion clinics, pointing to 'safe access zones' curbed expression, including silent protests and prayer. 'These restrictions on freedom of speech could include prohibitions on efforts to influence others when inside a restricted area, even through prayer or silent protests,' the report read. In the wake of the 2024 Southport attack, the report said government officials 'repeatedly intervened to chill speech'. Criticism over the handling of free speech was also directed at the governments of Germany and France. A UK government spokesperson told the BBC: 'Free speech is vital for democracy around the world, including here in the UK and we are proud to uphold freedoms whilst keeping our citizens safe.' Sentiments echoed those previously made by vice president JD Vance. In February, Mr Vance criticised the UK over a legal case in which a former serviceman who silently prayed outside an abortion clinic was convicted of breaching the safe zone around the centre. In a wider attack on what he suggested is a shift away from democratic values across Europe, Mr Vance claimed the 'basic liberties of religious Britons, in particular' are under threat. He referred to the conviction of Adam Smith-Connor, 51, who had denied doing so but was found guilty last year of failing to comply with a public space protection order at the centre in Bournemouth in November 2022. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Mr Vance said that the US' 'very dear friends the United Kingdom' appeared to have seen a 'backslide in conscience rights'. 'A little over two years ago, the British government charged Adam Smith-Connor, a 51-year-old physiotherapist and an Army veteran, with the heinous crime of standing 50 metres from an abortion clinic and silently praying for three minutes, not obstructing anyone, not interacting with anyone, just silently praying on his own,' he said. The report also said the Government 'effectively' enforced laws around freedom of association and the rights of workers. The UK Government has been contacted for comment.

‘They created this impasse': Lula, Trump at a standstill on tariffs
‘They created this impasse': Lula, Trump at a standstill on tariffs

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

‘They created this impasse': Lula, Trump at a standstill on tariffs

Trump has tied tariffs so large they are effectively sanctions to an issue Lula's government has made clear it won't negotiate on. President Donald Trump and then-Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro approach the podiums for a joint news conference at the White House on March 19, 2019 in Washington, D.C. |By Megan Messerly 08/12/2025 05:55 AM EDT President Donald Trump has used tariffs to pressure world leaders on a host of non-trade issues. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is one of the few who isn't budging. The left-wing South American president has taken a forceful response to the 50 percent tariffs Trump announced in July, last week calling on India, China and other emerging economies to unite against the U.S. levies. Lula, as Brazil's president is known, called the tariffs 'unacceptable blackmail' and filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization, after Trump tied the levies in part to the prosecution of former Brazilian president and far-right Trump acolyte Jair Bolsonaro. Unlike countries that have caved to Trump's demands on digital services taxes or defense spending, Trump has tied tariffs so large they are effectively sanctions to an issue Lula's government has made clear it won't negotiate on.

When Trump meets Putin, anything could happen
When Trump meets Putin, anything could happen

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

When Trump meets Putin, anything could happen

Top Republicans were horrified. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called it a 'disgraceful performance.' Trump's own national security adviser at the time, John Bolton, would later write that 'Putin had to be laughing uproariously at what he had gotten away with in Helsinki.' Trump plans to see Putin on Friday in Alaska for the first time since his return to the White House to discuss the U.S. president's goal of ending the war between Russia and Ukraine. With Putin pressing peace proposals that heavily favor Russia, many analysts and former Trump officials worry that he will once again turn a meeting with Trump to his advantage. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up During Trump's first term, he and Putin met six times in person and had several more phone conversations. (His successor, Joe Biden, met Putin only once, in June 2021, before the Russian invasion of Ukraine.) Advertisement Those interactions alarmed many of Trump's senior aides, who watched as the U.S. president disregarded their advice, excluded them from meetings with the Russian leader and proposed impractical ideas that appeared to have been planted by Putin, like creating a U.S.-Russia 'impenetrable Cyber Security unit.' The idea was dropped as soon as Trump got back to Washington. Advertisement The relationship has grown more complicated in Trump's second term. In recent months Trump, eager to fulfill his promises of settling the war between Russia and Ukraine, has grown irritated by Putin's unwillingness to de-escalate the conflict. Putin will land in Alaska determined to rewind Trump's view of the war to February, when he berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a contentious White House meeting for not showing more gratitude for U.S. support, while speaking warmly about Putin. 'Since the blowup between Trump and Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, Europeans, Ukrainians and Ukraine's supporters inside the administration have cobbled together a policy of helping Ukraine stay in the fight and preventing the lurch by Trump to embrace Russia's view of the conflict,' said Andrew Weiss, vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'The real test on Friday will be how much of that policy survives the first in-person contact between Trump and Putin in his second term,' Weiss added. The White House portrays the meeting as an example of Trump's dedication to stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine and defends his unconventional style as a needed break from slow-moving diplomatic customs. But critics worry that the hastily planned conversation will play into the hands of Putin, a former KGB agent known as a master manipulator. 'I think he believes he should reel Trump back in, and believes his KGB skills will do that,' Bolton said in an interview with NewsNation last week. The Russian leader may also benefit from the fact that Trump, in contrast to his first term, has few advisers pushing back against Putin's worldview. For his trip to Helsinki, for instance, Trump was surrounded by such Russia hawks as Bolton, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Advertisement Today, Secretary of State Marco Rubio is the lone member of Trump's inner circle with a clear record of criticizing Putin. But even Rubio, who also serves as Trump's national security adviser, has softened his tone since joining Trump's Cabinet. The Alaska meeting was set after Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, met with Putin in Moscow last week. Witkoff, a friend of Trump and a fellow real estate mogul, had no diplomatic experience before joining government. He has been criticized for meeting with Putin without other U.S. officials and for echoing his talking points afterward. To be sure, the Russia hawks around Trump in his first term often had little success. When Trump called Putin after the Russian president was reelected in a March 2018 vote widely seen as illegitimate, Trump's aides placed a clear instruction in his briefing papers: 'DO NOT CONGRATULATE.' Trump did so anyway. Not even a federal investigation into 2016 Russian election interference was enough to restrain Trump. When the two leaders last met in person, on the sidelines of a 2019 Group of 20 gathering in Osaka, Japan, Trump joked with Putin about the subject. 'Don't meddle in the election!' Trump said, with a smirk and a finger wag. Putin grinned in delight. The investigation, and the presence of Putin critics at high levels of his administration, may have led Trump to conduct his conversations with unusual secrecy, however. When the men first sat down together, at a G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany, in 2017, Trump was joined only by his secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, and an interpreter. After the meeting, Trump took the interpreter's notes and ordered him not to disclose what he heard. Advertisement That evening, Trump and Putin had an impromptu conversation, initiated by Trump, at a group dinner. No other Americans were present, and the White House confirmed the meeting only after surprised witnesses spoke to reporters. Asked by reporters what he had told Trump in Hamburg about the 2016 election, Putin replied, 'I got the impression that my answers satisfied him.' For his part, Trump called a New York Times reporter in Hamburg just as he was departing from the summit and said Putin had told him that Russia could not have been involved in the 2016 election because its operations were so sophisticated they never would have been detected. Trump said he was 'very impressed' by that argument, a case he went on to make in public. Analysts said they have low expectations for the sort of breakthrough on Ukraine that Trump is hoping to achieve in Alaska. Putin has shown every sign that he believes he can gain more on the battlefield than in negotiations -- at least on the terms Trump has so far required. Maria Snegovaya, a senior fellow for Russia and Eurasia with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, noted that in his first term Trump tried to strike major deals with the authoritarian leaders of such nations as China and North Korea, with limited results. 'In general, Trump's history of meetings with strong men from Xi Jinping to Kim Jong Un does not lead to a successful deal that follows,' she said. Advertisement Fiona Hill, who was senior director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council in the first Trump White House, agreed that any breakthrough appeared unlikely. Putin and his aides have been frustrated at a lack of diplomatic progress with the Trump administration, and Hill said she sees little fresh ground for a deal, even one favorable to Putin. The Russians 'always want something they can take to the bank, an agreement they can hold the U.S. to,' she said. 'They were excited by Witkoff at first, since he's a direct channel to Trump, but they're frustrated there's no structure around it.' While Putin might welcome a leader-to-leader meeting, she said, 'he wants the details to be worked out later. And Trump isn't a details guy.' This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store