Pope Leo XIV just took the top job in the Catholic Church—and the role comes with a $33,000-a-month paycheck
Pope Leo XIV has been elected as the leader of the Roman Catholic Church, and the job comes with a $33,000 monthly paycheck. That pay stacks up to the salaries of U.S. presidents and university chancellors—but the pontiff also gets unique perks like free meals all day, a Popemobile, his own private pharmacy and more.
Shortly after white smoke billowed out of the chimney of the Sistine Chapel, the Roman Catholic Church named its next pope: Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, the first American to take the job. Not only is it a huge honor and promotion—but it also comes with a sizable six-figure wage.
The pope is awarded a lavish salary of €30,000 (about $33,800) per month, or about $405,600 yearly, according to Daniel Rober, a professor of Catholic studies at Sacred Heart University.
However, becoming the pope is a much more spiritual endeavor than other high-flying leadership roles; the late Pope Francis even turned down the generous paycheck, opting to have the money donated to those in need instead.
'He's somebody who lived as a Jesuit for decades before becoming a bishop and continued to live in the style that he's been accustomed to as a religious throughout the rest of his life,' Rober told Fortune.
There's no telling if Pope Leo XIV will accept the salary—but if he does, he could be making as much as some of the world's most powerful leaders. Either way, he'll still be enjoying Vatican perks like the Popemobile and a cushy retirement.
The pope's nearly half-a-million paypacket is on par with the wages of U.S. presidents.
Government leaders receive a $400,000 baseline salary, with at least another $170,000 per year in additional allowances for official duties, travel, and entertainment. The president also has access to Air Force One, Marine One, and 24-hour Secret Service protection—saving them thousands per year in other expenditures.
Another institutional leadership job that pays in the ballpark of the pope is U.S. university chancellors. The presidents of America's elite schools can even earn a base pay of up to $1.5 million annually—far higher than the president or pope. But usually, the salary range for chancellors is between $250,000 to $372,000 yearly. The presidents of Northwestern University, University of Vermont, and Purdue University all reportedly rake in a base pay close to the pontiff at around $400,000.
But sometimes, the perks go beyond the pay for a high-profile position. Elon Musk has had a baseline salary of $0 for many years—but he gets billions in stock compensation for hitting milestones, and has a fleet of private jets and security paid for by his companies. Mark Zuckerberg's baseline wage has also been $1 annually since 2013 with no bonus, but his $211 billion empire has grown through Meta stock.
The pope is revered as the highest and most holiest leader of the Catholic Church, which has over a billion members. And the Vatican makes sure the pontiff can lead in style.
For one, the pope usually lives in the gilded Apostolic Palace—lavish living arrangements with all expenses covered by the Vatican. All of his meals and day-to-day necessities are also free of charge for the pope, with unfettered access to custom, hand-tailored regalia made by top religious outfitters.
Pope Leo XIV will also have access to the Popemobile, private cars, and a fleet of vehicles at the drop of a hat. The pontiff also doesn't have to worry about security, healthcare, or retirement anymore. He has free access to Vatican medical services and a private pharmacy to ensure a healthy, long reign.
And even after the pope chooses to retire, he would receive a monthly pension of €2,500 ($3,300). But there's more beyond a stacked savings account—the Vatican will cover the living expenses, provide a home inside the Vatican, pay for all daily necessities including food and housekeeping.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Want to Improve Employee Financial Health? Pay Them More Often
Spain and Portugal top the list of desired destinations for digital nomads and aspiring expats for more than a few good reasons. They have delicious food, temperate climates, fascinating art and architecture, and relatively low costs of living compared to much of the continent. Their worker-friendly employment policies include over a month of paid time off for vacation and public holidays, as well as four months of paid parental leave for both mothers and fathers. Particularly enticing may be the bonus paychecks for employees in both June and December to help families enjoy the summer and winter holidays. But that's not the only payroll quirk that makes these countries unique, and the other one might make some wannabe Madrileños or Lisboetas think twice. If you work for an employer based in either country, you will only be paid once every month. It's a legal requirement that's common not only throughout much of Europe, but also Central and South America. An angled view of a new $100 bill laying on a bed of cash. An angled view of a new $100 bill laying on a bed of cash. Getty Images For those of us accustomed to the more common biweekly pay cycle in the U.S., it's easy to imagine the challenges this may present for family budgets—especially for workers on the lower end of the income spectrum. But monthly pay is more common in the U.S. than you might think. Nearly 11 million American full-time workers still get paid this way, including many public sector employees. But whether you're in Porto or Pittsburgh, there's little reason for unnecessary delays in giving people money they've already earned. Academic research has shown how longer waiting periods for payment hurt workers and shorter ones help them. For example, one study found that retired couples who receive their individual monthly Social Security payments on staggered weeks fare better economically than those who get them at the same time. Another study found that higher pay frequency not only improves household financial liquidity, but it can even reduce credit card borrowing between pay days. There's little doubt that higher inflation, increased housing costs, and other economic factors have exacerbated these problems for many families. All this raises an important question: in an era in which transactions occur instantly, why should one's pay be different? Frankly, why should workers have to wait at all? We recently conducted survey research to better understand the current frequency of pay for full-time workers in the U.S., as well as how decreasing waiting periods between paychecks might help them and their families. We found that over three-quarters of people are paid only once or twice a month, and 8 percent of workers are still being paid monthly. There's a strong sense that this system isn't working for workers and their families. More than half would like to be paid at least once a week. Roughly 7-in-10 individuals in households making less than $75,000 said the same, as did a similar proportion of those in families enduring challenging financial circumstances. Half of workers under 30, and nearly two-thirds of Black and Latino workers, said that increasing their pay frequency would be very or extremely beneficial to their mental wellness. Broad cross-sections also felt that more frequent pay would help them better manage their bills and expenses. To anyone who has worked for a paycheck, none of these findings should be a shock. But what might surprise you is that it's quite easy for companies to pay their people more frequently. It's an outdated mindset, not technology, that keeps paychecks tied to antiquated pay cycles. For example, my company continuously calculates take-home pay, taxes, health care premiums, retirement contributions, and other withholdings for our customers and their employees, regardless of the duration between pay cycles. We also give our customers the ability to offer their employees in U.S., Canada, and the U.K. the option to get paid at the end of every day or shift worked. The argument that more frequent paychecks can help workers isn't new. In 1886, former Governor George Robinson signed the groundbreaking Massachusetts Wage Payment Act, which required employers to pay workers at least once a week. Today, there are pay frequency laws in every state except Florida and Alabama. This includes a requirement in Michigan, New York, and seven other states for workers in certain industries to be paid weekly. At a moment when workers face higher costs of living and other economic struggles are real and rising, it's time for a new paradigm shift. This is especially true for the 44 percent of workers in the U.S. who don't make a living wage. Increasing pay frequency can't solve every ill, but it is a fast and free way to give them greater agency, choice, and flexibility in managing their family's every day and unplanned expenses. It's their money, they've earned it, and they shouldn't have to wait. Jason Rahlan is the global head of sustainability and impact at Dayforce. He has previously held a number of roles in the public, nonprofit, and private sectors. This includes time at Chobani, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the U.S. Department of State, and the U.S. House of Representatives. He is currently a member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Sustainability Advisory Council as well as a board member for the Center for Family Support (CFS) Foundation. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Former President Biden defends autopen use amid Republican investigation and more top headlines
1. Former President Biden defends autopen use amid Republican investigation 2. Trump signs sweeping travel ban to US targeting several high-risk countries 3. Israel recovers bodies of elderly American couple taken during Hamas attack 'OUTRAGEOUS' – Elon Musk urges Americans to 'kill' Trump's big budget bill over debt concerns. Continue reading … PARADISE LOST – Americans tourists warned of increased threat in summer vacation hotspot. Continue reading … SECRET WEAPON – Chinese-made solar panels used on American farms put US power grid at risk. Continue reading … VANTAGE POINT – Karen Read defense gets boost as key witness's account raises questions. Continue reading … TAKING A STAND – Police escort NFL player from church after demanding answers on priest porn controversy. Continue reading … -- SWITCHING SIDES – Former GOP congressman launches Democratic bid to break 30-year GOP hold on Florida governorship. Continue reading … NO BENEFITS – DOJ files suit to block red state's tuition law for illegal immigrants. Continue reading … FULL COURT PRESS – Judge throws roadblock into Trump immigration crackdown in sweeping ruling. Continue reading … ON THE LINE – Trump reveals details of hour-long call with Putin after Ukraine strike. Continue reading … JAW-DROPPING – Biden-era White House reporters express disbelief on Karine Jean-Pierre's sudden party switch. Continue reading … 'SURPRISED ME' – Dave Chappelle recalls SNL writers' tearful reaction to Trump's election victory. Continue reading … 'OUT OF CONTROL' – Former Bush official warns Putin's desperation growing after Ukraine bridge attack. Continue reading … PAVING THEIR OWN PATH – Michelle Obama says daughters pushed away from famous family to make their own success. Continue reading … HUGH HEWITT – Morning Glory: Antisemitism is shameful and evil. None of us should ever be neutral on such hate. Continue reading … SEN. JOHN CORNYN – Congress must reimburse Texas for Biden's border security malpractice. Continue reading … -- UNFAIR ADVANTAGE – Parents voice frustration as transgender girl pitcher leads team to shutout win. Continue reading … REST RIGHT – Why the best sleep position might not be the same for everyone. Continue reading … AMERICAN CULTURE QUIZ – Test yourself on legendary landmarks and fruitful facts. Take the quiz here … POOL PRODIGY – Teen swimmer turns heads after breaking Olympic legend's time. Continue reading … BACKYARD PEST – Seven-foot alligator is dragged out of family's backyard pool. See video … LAWRENCE JONES – Courts are defending the very people who want to cause Americans harm. See video … ADAM CAROLLA – Democrats wonder how they can fool people into voting for them. See video … Tune in to the FOX NEWS RUNDOWN PODCAST for today's in-depth reporting on the news that impacts you. Check it out ... What's it looking like in your neighborhood? Continue reading… Thank you for making us your first choice in the morning! We'll see you in your inbox first thing Friday.


Axios
32 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Democrats vow to boycott popular D.C. restaurants
Dozens of House and Senate Democrats have signed a pledge to boycott some of Washington, D.C.'s hottest restaurants over labor disputes, Axios has learned. Why it matters: The list includes Le Diplomate and posh downtown venues that are popular spots for Democratic fundraisers, giving lawmakers a rare opportunity to throw around some serious weight on behalf of a union. Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told Axios: "We can have big policy debates, but we also have to show the American people some concrete examples." "If a bunch of workers are organizing across multiple restaurants here in D.C., it will get attention. Absolutely," Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) told Axios. Driving the news: More than 50 House and Senate Democrats have signed onto Unite Here Local 25's pledge to avoid six of D.C.'s buzziest restaurants. In addition to Le Diplomate, they include Osteria Mozza and The Occidental, all owned by prolific East Coast restaurateur and Democratic donor Stephen Starr. There's also Rasika, Modena and Bombay Club — classics of the power dining scene in Washington, founded by chef Ashok Bajaj of Knightsbridge Restaurant Group. Between the lines: Political groups and candidates have spent thousands of dollars at those spots over the past year, federal campaign records show. Former President Obama and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos made headlines when they dined at Osteria Mozza in January. Then-President Biden was a repeat customer at Le Diplomate during his presidency. State of play: Unite Here Local 25 says the boycott is necessary because "workers have endured months of union busting." Both restaurant groups deny those claims and accuse the union of being heavyhanded. Unite Here is continuing its organizing at all six establishments, though there are currently no unionization elections scheduled. "Workers are calling for D.C. customers to boycott these restaurants, asking the public not to eat, meet or drink at these locations," says a copy of the pledge provided to Axios. Zoom in: Among the signers are some of Democrats' top fundraisers and biggest names, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are also on the list. It isn't just progressives or safe-district Democrats either: Landsman and Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) both signed on despite being moderates in competitive seats, as did Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) What they're saying: "With these restaurants that are frequented so much by members of Congress, our boycott of fundraisers and visiting could have a real impact — could really help these workers," said Casar. He added: "This is our opportunity when we're here in Washington, D.C. to not just go vote in the Capitol but actually go out in the community and make a difference." Landsman said his advice to the restaurants is to "avoid the negative publicity, and sit down with them." "We can say that all members on the list are personally boycotting," Benjy Cannon, a spokesperson for the union, told Axios in a message. "Many of them have been meeting personally with STARR and Knightsbridge workers all year." The other side: "Local 25's call for a boycott is baseless," Starr restaurants said in a statement. "A boycott of any kind can result in lost hours, wages, and tips that hardworking employees rely upon." "It is unfortunate that an organization that claims to want to represent employees would call for an action that would harm them." "We respect our employees wishes," Bajaj said. "How many of these congress members even know themselves that they're signing?" Zoom out: Starr's restaurant group has accused Unite Here Local 25 of overly aggressive tactics. That includes union reps showing up with petitions outside employees' homes, leading one bartender to sign it even though she planned to vote against a union, as Eater reported in February. Francisco López, a Le Diplomate server of five years, told Axios some employees are holding counter protests to the union.