German coalition crisis as top judge vote postponed over plagiarism claims
Other parties, including his Social Democrat coalition partners, charged the Christian Democrats with bringing Germany's highest court into disrepute and using spurious plagiarism allegations as a pretext for shelving a vote the coalition would not have won.
The conservatives had initially sought to postpone a vote only on appointing Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, a law professor and the Social Democrats' nominee, who was opposed by many conservatives because of her support for abortion rights.
'I never imagined we'd see debates in our country reminiscent of those on appointing justices to the United States Supreme Court,' the SPD's Dirk Wiese told parliament.
'The kind of witch hunt we've seen against a distinguished law professor this week should make us fear for the state of democracy in our country,' he added.
The failure to muster a majority is an embarrassment for Merz and for his ally Jens Spahn, the conservatives' parliamentary leader, whose job it is to ensure his legislators toe the coalition line - something he had been confident of achieving as recently as Monday.
The conservatives blamed their volte-face on allegations published on Thursday evening by Stefan Weber, a self-proclaimed 'plagiarism hunter' who has claimed a string of politicians' scalps despite widespread doubts over his methods.
Brosius-Gersdorf did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for a comment on Weber's allegations, which appeared to accuse her of plagiarising footnotes in her thesis from one published after her own.
'This man brings plagiarism charges against half the republic,' said the Green's Britta Hasselmann, calling the conservatives' decision a disaster that would harm the court's reputation.
Weber later backtracked, telling the Sueddeutsche Zeitung that he had merely flagged 'possible unethical authorship' and had not accused Brosius-Gersdorf of plagiarism.
The Constitutional Court is one of Germany's most respected and powerful institutions. Its decision to overturn a budget helped trigger the collapse of the last government.
While judges often have open party affiliations, public disagreements over topical cultural issues are rare. Its members speak with pride about its political neutrality, frequently comparing it favourably with the U.S. Supreme Court. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
S. Korean court orders Yoon to compensate 105 claimants for distress caused by martial law crisis
SEOUL: The Seoul Central District Court on July 25 ruled that former president Yoon Suk-yeol (pic) has to pay a total of 10.5 million won (US$7,500) combined to 105 citizens for causing them to suffer emotional distress due to the imposition of martial law. The ruling in the civil case was in favour of 105 citizens who filed a suit against Yoon, demanding that the former president pay 100,000 won in compensation per person. 'It is clear that the plaintiffs, who are members of the public, suffered pain expressed through fear, anxiety, despair and humiliation,' said the court on Friday (July 25). The court fully accepted the plaintiffs' claims that the causes of their emotional distress are closely related with the martial law declaration, and Yoon's subsequent measures after the martial law imposition can be judged as 'intentional torts to person' as defined in Article 750 of the Civil Act. 'The defendant must compensate the plaintiffs for the psychological damage and an amount of 100,000 won per person is reasonably justified,' said the court, adding that Yoon would also be responsible for all legal expenses. It was not the first time that citizens had sought compensation over a political crisis caused by a former president. A case concerning former president Park Geun-hye's abuse of power scandal in 2017 was dismissed by the top court in 2020. Lawyers in this case argued that their suit was different from the 2020 case, as the former president Yoon committed an unconstitutional act of insurrection. 'The abuse of power under Park Geun-hye was a matter of personal misconduct. But former president Yoon's illegal actions went beyond mere illegality. 'They were unconstitutional and he was even impeached by the Constitutional Court. That's why this case must be viewed differently,' said the legal representatives after a pre-trial hearing on June 27. The Supreme Court of Korea previously ruled that the state was liable to compensate victims who had been arrested, punished or detained under the former president Park Chung-hee's emergency decree in 1975. - The Korea Herald/ANN
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Cambodia clash heaps pressure on embattled Thai PM, boosts army
BANGKOK: Thailand's military conflict with Cambodia is inflaming nationalist tensions at home and threatening embattled leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra (pic), who had already been suspended as prime minister for her handling of the border dispute. Hours after Thai fighter jets struck Cambodian military positions and Phnom Penh hit civilian areas in the deadliest clashes in over a decade, Thai nationalist groups announced plans for an anti-government rally in Bangkok on Sunday (July 27). Tweets supporting the Thai army and air force are trending on X and Facebook in Thailand. Paetongtarn is already in a precarious position over her handling of the border issue, thanks to the leak of a June 15 call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen in which the 38-year-old was sympathetic to her neighbour and critical of the powerful Thai military. That led to complaints to the Constitutional Court, which suspended her as prime minister. "Heightened military tensions reaffirm expectations that the Constitutional Court will likely rule that Paetongtarn be removed from office,' said Peter Mumford, South-East Asia Practice Head at Eurasia Group. "If snap elections take place in Thailand later this year or next year, conservative parties will hope to ride a wave of nationalist sentiment, with populist Pheu Thai on the backfoot.' Thailand's Pheu Thai-led coalition has been on the brink after the defection of a key party last month left it with a slender majority. Paetongtarn herself only took power after a court removed her predecessor, while her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, was ousted in a 2006 coup. "The continuation of this government has gravely undermined and endangered the country's security in all dimensions - including national honour, national interests, and public assets - and has resulted in a complete loss of trust and public order,' protest leader Pichit Chaimongkol said at a briefing on Thursday. Thai-Cambodian tensions have been running high since a May exchange of fire that killed a Cambodian soldier, and the countries have disputed their roughly 800 kilometre border for decades. The Thai army asked people to stay away from border areas on Friday, saying fighting continues. In 2003, the Thai embassy in Phnom Penh was destroyed in riots by Cambodians angered by a Thai celebrity who suggested that the iconic Angkor Wat temple complex was Thai, while clashes from 2008 to 2011 killed more than two dozen people on both sides of the border. Much of the argument stems from different maps based on the text of Franco-Siamese treaties of the early 1900s that laid out boundaries between Thailand and Cambodia, which was then part of French Indochina. The latest crisis comes at a challenging time for both countries, with the US threatening to impose stiff tariffs from Aug. 1. While neighbouring Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam have secured trade agreements with the Trump administration, export-dependent Thailand does not yet have a deal. Thursday's fighting killed at least 14 people and injured dozens in Thailand, which launched airstrikes against at least three Cambodian military bases. The Thai army has been allowed a relatively free hand in conducting its operations. The government's actions on the Cambodia issue risk lending more legitimacy to the military and boosting its popularity in Thai politics, said Titipol Phakdeewanich, a political science lecturer at Ubon Ratchathani University. "Pheu Thai's inability to lead the government effectively is leading to popularity for the military,' Titipol said. Thai politics has been dominated by a longstanding power struggle between populist, pro-democracy forces and a pro-military establishment made up of wealthy elites and royalist bureaucrats. Since the end of absolute monarchy in 1932, the nation has seen roughly a dozen coups and about 20 constitutions. At least four governments backed by the influential Shinawatra clan have been dismissed either through coups or court orders. Paetongtarn and Thaksin, who's the de facto leader of Pheu Thai, have both expressed support for the Thai military. Still, during his long, post-coup exile from Thailand, Thaksin was named an economic adviser to then-Cambodian prime minister Hun Sen, angering the military-backed authorities in Bangkok at the time. Their relationship has since deteriorated, with Thaksin taking to X to criticise the former Cambodian leader, whose son is the current prime minister. While countries have offered to mediate in the conflict, "we probably need to let the Thai military do its job and teach Hun Sen a lesson about his cunning ways first,' Thaksin said. "I am not surprised by Thaksin's attitude toward me,' Hun Sen tweeted in turn, criticising his "warlike' tone and accusing him of multiple betrayals. He also mentioned a mass killing of Thai Muslims that occurred during Thaksin's premiership in 2004, which was widely condemned by human rights groups. Paetongtarn, who attends cabinet as the culture minister, is facing a Thai Constitutional Court probe of alleged ethical violations in her handling of the border dispute. She has until July 31 to submit her defence. "The border skirmish will strengthen conservatives and there will be speculation that, alongside domestic political developments, it could trigger a military coup - though this does not currently seem on the cards,' Mumford said. "The odds of a coup will rise if the security and political environment worsens further.' - Bloomberg ALSO READ:
The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
Phumtham confident Paetongtarn will survive Constitutional Court case
BANGKOK: Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai (pic) on Wednesday (July 23) voiced confidence that suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra will overcome her legal battle in the Constitutional Court and return to lead the government. Phumtham, who also serves as Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, made the remarks at the Interior Ministry in response to reporters' questions about a dinner gathering of coalition leaders on Tuesday evening. Paetongtarn and her father, former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, were both in attendance. When asked whether Paetongtarn was confident she could return to work as prime minister, Phumtham said: 'The prime minister didn't think she did anything wrong. She has explained it clearly to the public. She has repeatedly said she simply wanted to find a way to persuade Hun Sen to join us in resolving the tensions.' Paetongtarn has been suspended from her duties pending a judicial review by the Constitutional Court following a petition filed by 36 senators. The complaint accuses her of dishonesty and violating ethical standards. The case centres on a leaked audio recording of a phone conversation between Paetongtarn and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen on June 15, 2025. In the call—intended to ease border tensions — Paetongtarn allegedly referred to Hun Sen as "uncle" and called the commander of Thailand's Second Army Area 'the other side.' Phumtham, who was present during the call, clarified that it was informal and initiated by Hun Sen, not Paetongtarn. Asked whether he was concerned about a separate lawsuit filed against him by a group of senators, Phumtham said he was not worried and believed the case was a distraction from a larger issue involving alleged voting collusion by the same senators. The senators accused Phumtham of abusing his authority to influence the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) into accepting the collusion case as a special investigation. Phumtham rejected the claim, explaining that he did not interfere with the DSI's operations. As the ex-officio chairman of the special cases committee, he chaired the meeting that day and merely exercised his duty to consider which cases warranted special status under DSI jurisdiction. - The Nation/ANN
