Journalists Being Forgotten On The Frontline, Warns Injured War Reporter
'I believe in nothing right now. Our press vests are turning us into targets and it's becoming a death sentence for us,' Christina Assi told UN News.
On 13 October 2023, Ms. Assi - who was working as a photojournalist for Agence France Presse (AFP) - lost her right leg after two Israeli air strikes targeted the exposed hillside where she and other colleagues were observing the ongoing conflict between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants.
This year's commemoration of World Press Freedom Day on 3 May provided a moment to reflect on the fact that more journalists were killed in 2024 than in any other year since the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) began collecting data more than three decades ago.
At least 124 journalists and media workers were killed last year, nearly two-thirds of them Palestinians killed by Israel, the CPJ data shows.
Ms. Assi stands among the few survivors, and she never imagined that she would be targeted simply for doing her job.
The day of the attack
She recounted the harrowing events of that day – one of her first major assignments, which quickly became the most traumatic experience of her life.
'It was starting to get dark and that's when we were about to leave and then suddenly, out of nowhere, we were targeted,' she said.
'The first time I was on the ground, I couldn't really understand what was happening, and I was screaming for help. So, my colleague Dylan rushed to help me and put a tourniquet on me. But then, like 40 to 47 seconds later, we were targeted again.'
After the second strike, Ms. Assi found herself alone beside a burning car. Bleeding and gravely injured, she had no choice but to crawl away to save her life.
'My press vest was too heavy, and the camera belt was suffocating,' she recalled. In that moment, she began to lose faith in international laws and conventions. 'As journalists, we are left alone," she insisted.
The silence of the international community
For Ms. Assi, the international community's response to the attack - including condemnations and UN calls for investigation - has been utterly ineffective.
'I do believe that we need more than words. We need concrete action and something to happen where that should lead to justice in one way or another. If it's not now, then later,' she said.
She strongly condemns the impunity with which attacks on journalists continue. 'Our cases are being dismissed as collateral damage when, in fact, they are not. These are war crimes, and there should be a real investigation.'
The forgotten journalists of Gaza
Ms. Assi also emphasized that the same impunity applies to Palestinian journalists in Gaza, who have been documenting the war there since day one.
'They've been silenced, targeted in every possible way. It's all over social media and in the news—and yet nothing has been done. No action has been taken to protect these journalists,' she said.
She pointed out that the lack of international presence hasn't stopped the violence. 'It's clear how horrific everything is. But the world hasn't reacted the way it should have. No one has even tried to stop it.'
Carrying the flame
Nearly a year after losing her leg, Ms. Assi carried the Olympic torch in the French city of Vincennes, ahead of the Paris Games in July 2024.
It was more than a symbolic gesture but a powerful opportunity to pay tribute to her colleague, Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah, who was killed in the same attack.
'It was a great opportunity for us to honour all the fallen journalists and let the world and the international community and the Europeans and all those who didn't know about what happened to us, let them know about what happened,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
The wilful blindness of much of Israeli society about Gaza must be discarded
The attitude is projected from the top. 'There is no starvation in Gaza,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has declared. In a news conference this week he blamed Hamas and the international media for perpetuating a 'global campaign of lies'. He added that 'the only ones being deliberately starved' are the Israeli hostages in Gaza. This sentiment is widely shared in Israel. A poll in late July found that almost 80% of Jewish Israelis believe that Israel is making an effort to avoid causing suffering to Gazans. The same percentage — though primarily on the right and centre — said they are not troubled by reports of famine. While indications are growing that the tragedy is starting to register among Israelis, the wilful blindness of much of Israeli society must be discarded for Israel to begin pulling itself out of the quagmire in Gaza and repairing its own tattered image. The first step to resolving a problem is admitting there is one. When it comes to Gaza, Israelis live in an echo chamber, relying largely on local media, which often enacts self-censorship regarding Israeli wrongdoing and Palestinian suffering in Gaza. But it is also important to understand the powerful underlying emotions that have led many Israelis to close their eyes and ears to the suffering of Gazans and accept a different version of reality. Many feel fury at the humanitarians and international organisations that, while criticising Israel's every move, seemed to minimise Hamas's horrendous crimes on October 7, 2023, when about 1200 people in Israel were murdered and some 250 taken hostage. Fifty are still captive, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. There is a profound sense of unfairness over demands that Israel allow large transfers of aid to Gaza when many returning hostages describe being starved and abused even when there seemed to be enough food for their captors. Recent history also lingers bitterly in Israeli memory. It includes the 2005 disengagement of Israel from Gaza, followed by Hamas's 2007 takeover, and nearly two decades of cyclical attempts to deter and contain the organisation with limited military operations and economic carrots, like permits for Gazans to work in Israel. All seem to have amounted to nothing in the face of Hamas's futile and bloody drive to destroy Israel. The barbarity displayed on October 7, combined with the cheering chorus from enemies and the silence from many friends, hardened the conflict for many Israelis to the fundamental, zero-sum and inherently violent struggle for land and sovereignty that so many of the kibbutzniks murdered in their homes that day had sought to overcome with their peaceful intentions. Videos from Gaza circulate on Israeli social media, showing markets with food on display, open restaurants, gunmen looting aid. They might be real, but they are often old or fail to present a full picture across the strip. Nonetheless, these videos help Israelis to construct an alternative narrative: There is enough food going into Gaza, but the United Nations is failing to distribute it properly; Hamas and gangs are stealing it, while Israel is doing what it can. The warnings of famine have drawn more rational scepticism. Despite repeated alarms raised by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification — the definitive international source for declaring a famine — there is still no clear indication that their predictions have come to pass at scale, leading the Israeli public to believe that the warnings are just another part of the global anti-Israel propaganda machine. Israelis also lay blame with the UN, which despite objective difficulties has seemingly opted for a principled approach over pragmatism. Nearly 90% of UN food aid has been seized by armed actors or hungry crowds since May 19. Palestinians collect humanitarian aid that was dropped by parachute from planes flying over Gaza City. Photo / Saher Alghorra, The New York Times Still, although the UN adopted Security Council Resolution 2720 in December 2023 to accelerate and monitor the delivery of aid to the people of Gaza, it was not until May that the UN added an online dashboard to monitor that aid. In addition, the UN prioritises the privacy of its local workers in Gaza, failing in Israeli eyes to register legitimate concerns regarding terrorists penetrating aid agencies. For Israelis, the reality is this: Israel, a flawed but real and vital country, is fighting an evil terrorist group that has the power to stop the horror at any time, but hates Israel enough to persist and does not care enough for its own people to stop. Yet what is happening in Gaza speaks for itself. People are starving, and as in any other crisis, the most vulnerable in society — the elderly, newborns, people with pre-existing conditions — are harmed first. Even after almost two years of war, Israel lacks a coherent humanitarian strategy for Gaza, switching aid on and off based on the calculations of Netanyahu, who is trying to balance keeping the political support of his right-wing coalition partners, who want the war to continue, and international pressure to stop it. After several hundred thousand tonnes of food aid entered Gaza during the second ceasefire, according to Israel — enough for several months, by World Food Programme projections — Israel's decision to cut off all aid in March pushed the strip into the dire crisis it faces today. Israel said that it hoped the blockade would disrupt Hamas's ability to profit from the goods coming in, weaken the group's governance and pressure it to capitulate in ceasefire negotiations. This was not just a morally wrong choice — humanitarian aid should not be a political issue — but a strategically foolish one that misread both Hamas and the international community. A humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza was never going to force Hamas's hand. The group needs very few resources to operate: just enough to continue to hold the hostages, carry out guerrilla attacks and continue making statements to influence public opinion. In May, Israel sought to sidestep the UN assistance system, which it relentlessly criticised as ineffectual and compromised by Hamas with the poorly planned and even more poorly implemented system run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. But after months of no aid, stocks in Gaza had run down and prices had soared; the foundation's four distribution sites were almost immediately overwhelmed and exploited by profiteers, not to mention dangerous to access, with numerous casualties reported in lines for aid. The lack of aid has led to the death of more than 210 people by malnutrition since the start of the war, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health. The Israeli-American plan to quadruple the foundation's distribution centres will hardly address the grave situation. Even today the foundation faces logistical challenges, and the boxes they issue, both in terms of food quantity and diversity, don't translate easily to nutritious meals. The humanitarian disaster in Gaza is far broader than starvation. The vast majority of the population has been displaced at least once and lacks shelter. There is limited water and sanitation. Healthcare is devastated. Yet even though Israel now theoretically places no limits on aid to Gaza, it continues to refuse work visas to staff members of the UN and international aid groups. It restricts humanitarian operations to a small number of organisations that manage to successfully manoeuvre through an opaque registration. These conditions all seem likely to continue. Despite Netanyahu's statement last week that Israel would expand the war, beginning with the takeover of Gaza City, the Israel Defence Forces is loath to assume a civilian governance role. Glimmers of recognition of all this suffering have emerged in recent weeks. Despite denials of the extent of the grim reality in Gaza, Israel established fixed humanitarian corridors, conducted and facilitated airdrops and allowed in small amounts of commercial traffic and daytime pauses in operations in some areas to allow for aid delivery. The IDF chief of staff, Lieutenant-General Eyal Zamir, reportedly protested against the plan to take over Gaza City mainly for Israeli security reasons, but he also mentioned the lack of plans for a proper humanitarian response for the million people who will be displaced. In addition, he cited the absence of civilian infrastructure in Gaza and called for building hospitals there. Mainstream media, including Channels 12 and 13 and the popular newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, have begun stating the obvious: that there is hunger in Gaza, and that the current aid system is not working. The intellectual and cultural elite has also become more vocal, with a petition signed by some 1000 prominent Israeli artists titled 'Stop the Horror in Gaza' and a demand by heads of universities to address the humanitarian situation. People at vigils in Tel Aviv hold posters showing pictures of dead children in Gaza. Israel has played a leading role in creating this crisis, and continuing wilful blindness to that fact will only worsen the damage in Gaza, radicalise Palestinians for generations to come, and further isolate Israel regionally and internationally. Israel's legal and moral obligations do not change because of the evil of the enemy it is fighting. Israel cannot ignore, deflect, or wish away the crisis in Gaza. It is now making the right strategic and moral choice to increase aid into the territory, but absent a holistic strategy, it will be too little, too late. Israelis must look beyond their own prism of pain and trauma, ignore the double standards at play and recognise the harsh reality in Gaza and Israel's responsibility for it. Israel needs the courage to see what it sees. Then it must act. - Shira Efron is a senior fellow and research director at Israel Policy Forum. She previously led the Israel programme at the Rand Corporation and was a consultant with the United Nations in Jerusalem on Gaza access. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Shira Efron Photographs by: Saher Alghorra ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
One MP, One Pint: Being a Survivor ‘super fan' and getting deported with Simon Court
Act MP Simon Court only has one political regret: providing menstrual advice. It's been a tense week in parliament, as the government spends the next month mulling over whether Aotearoa should recognise Palestinian statehood. The conflict in Gaza is a topic that Simon Court is particularly passionate about, with his pro-Israel stance informed by experiences with Jewish-New Zealander friends and the belief that there's not much difference between that small nation and ours. That position has become increasingly hard to defend (according to most of our allies and the rest of the world) but we are here for only one pint so I've left that particular huge argument to the House. There is something very different that Court and I agree on right away: west is best. Sure, he's not a native West Aucklander, but after spending summers in Piha as a teenager and field trips through the Waitākere ranges as a civil engineering student at Unitec, he's never looked back. Also, I once lived in New Lynn for four months and have had four boyfriends who lived along the 195 bus line, so I can vouch for the place being the best part of Auckland, too. What I like about Court right away is that he shouts our round. I've got a Parrotdog, Court's got a Panhead, and he's telling me about his favourite parts of the west, like the Sugar Grill and Delicious Café in Te Atatū, but he also reckons there's a way it could be made better. Court has a member's bill currently sitting in the biscuit tin, which would abolish the liquor monopoly held by the Waitākere Licensing Trust (as well as those in Invercargill and Mataura) – not the Trust itself, but its restrictions on the sale and supply of alcohol within a community, so that Westies could have the option of buying a bottle of wine from the supermarket, or establishing a few local venues to serve the area's creatives. 'We've got a lot of musicians in West Auckland – there's lots of bands and producers, and people like King Kapisi and Fur Patrol are all Westies – yet there's nowhere for them to play locally, where they can set up and we can go have a beer and watch the band,' Court says. 'The barrier, as I see it, is the liquor licensing monopoly … We can keep the Trust, we just want them to perform better and deliver back to their community.' And if there were more bars out West, there could be more opportunities for people to hear Court's best pub yarn: that time he got deported from Fiji. Court had been working in Suva as an engineer for MWH Global, managing Chinese government contractors the Fijian government had hired to build the largest island's roads. After discovering reinforced steel poking out of newly built bridges and soil dumped down hills (creating landslide risks), Court reported the shoddy works to the Fijian government, but 'it turns out that that was a bit embarrassing, a bit uncomfortable for everyone involved, [and] it's much easier to get rid of the Kiwi engineers [than] have a difficult conversation'. And voilà, deportation time. You'd probably expect someone with a background in environmental engineering to be sitting in the opposition benches, rather than with Act (and Court's pretty sure his wife, a former Forest and Bird employee who has worked on Green Party campaigns, has switched her vote too). But, Court sees himself as more of an 'engineered solutions' guy rather than a 'zero waste' guy, plus, there's a lot of value in having an open mind – like the fact that while Court would rather listen to the drum and bass beats by Liquid, he can still accept that David Seymour is a 'massive fan' of Dire Straits ('you know, the thing we never wanted to hear again in the 80s and 90s'). Truly, nobody is perfect, which is why Court is totally unabashed when it comes to talking about his greatest love: reality television. Or, more specifically, Survivor. As a 'super fan' of the Australian spinoff of the series, Court has taken his family on trips through Samoa to revisit former filming locations, like the campsite and those poles that the contestants cling to in those challenges sometimes (which you'd remember if you were a true super fan). And even though he's absolutely fizzing about the show, he doesn't reckon he has what it takes to win Survivor – 'I'll go to the gym for half an hour and that's enough'. 'Maybe I should start with Celebrity Treasure Island,' Court reckons. THE SPINOFF PUB Q+A How much should a pint cost? Whatever the market dictates. Do you have a karaoke go-to? The last time I was doing karaoke it was 'Bad Romance' by Lady Gaga … But if I'm at home singing in front of the TV with my boys, it'd be Faith No More's 'Easy'. Favourite place to get a drink in Aotearoa? Probably Dr Rudi's, down at the viaduct in Auckland. Which three MPs would be on your pub quiz team? [Act's] David Seymour, because he's exceptionally smart. [National's] Chris Bishop, because he's my mate now and he knows everything about New Zealand music and sport, and [Labour's] Dr Deborah Russell, because she keeps telling me she has three degrees, and I reckon she'd be really helpful in a pub quiz. Which MP from across the aisle would you most like to share a drink with? [Greens'] Steve Abel — I've heard he really likes craft beer, and I'd like to ask him how he kept his beers cold for the 240 days he spent in a tree in Avondale holding up a housing development. What's a policy area we've been nursing without finishing the glass? Well, I did read about a Vic Uni student's proposal to farm weka. I was thinking that maybe if we really wanted to think about our indigenous biodiversity from a market point of view, maybe we should think about farming some of our threatened species, because there's nothing that's farmed [currently] that's threatened. Cows aren't at risk of going extinct, so maybe if we farmed weka… of course, we could eat some of them, there'd be lots. What qualities make a good drinking partner? Somebody who's prepared to push the boundaries of a story one step further than reality. Somebody who's got this quality of embellishment, and they'll take you with them past [the point] where it's believable. You're along for the ride, you're second guessing, but you want to believe. Have you ever had a Schnapp's election moment where you regretted your political instinct? Well, quite a few – coming into politics after being in civil engineering and having to play it straight for 25 years, you always get the sense that, well, I could open my mouth and say something that could end my political career. But that didn't stop me. Maybe providing suggestions for women's health and the use of appropriate, cost-effective period products. As my partner pointed out to me, most women would love to know that a man cared about their needs – [but] that's not what they were saying in the emails.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Al Jazeera corrects journalist death toll in Israeli strike to four
Al Jazeera has corrected the number of its journalists killed in a recent Israeli strike to four, saying that one of the five dead it initially reported killed was a freelancer.
