Trump's Greenland threats spark Iceland jitters

The Sun

15-05-2025

REYKJAVIK: US President Donald Trump's threats to take over Greenland have neighbouring Iceland rethinking its long-term defence, currently provided by the United States and NATO as the volcanic island has no military of its own.
Around 74 percent of Icelanders think Trump's interest in Greenland, and in the Arctic in general, pose a threat to their country, according to a recent poll by public broadcaster RUV.
'We can easily put ourselves in Greenlanders' shoes,' an Icelandic member of parliament for the governing Social Democrats, Dagur Eggertsson, told AFP.
The White House under Trump has not so far voiced any plans for Iceland, a subarctic island in the North Atlantic between the UK and Greenland and home to 390,000 people.
Trump 'is threatening Greenland every day but doesn't say a thing about Iceland', said Valur Ingimundarson, a professor of contemporary history at the University of Iceland.
He noted that while Iceland shares Greenland's geostrategic location, it does not possess the mineral riches believed to be hidden under Greenland's soil.
And like Greenland, Iceland has close military ties with the United States.
Washington has guaranteed Iceland's defence since 1951 following an agreement between the two NATO members.
During World War II, the Keflavik military base was a key US hub and it remained important to the alliance during the Cold War.
The 1951 agreement enables the United States to maintain troops on the island but allows Iceland to set limits on the number of soldiers and to unilaterally cancel the agreement with 18 months' notice.
Subsea infrastructure
Although the United States officially closed the Keflavik base in 2006, it returned following Russia's 2014 invasion of Crimea.
'The US military base has not formally been reopened in Iceland, but American troops are here the whole year round, if on a rotational basis,' Ingimundarson said.
At stake are underwater telecoms and energy infrastructure, at risk of potential Chinese or Russian sabotage.
Beijing and Moscow have been increasingly active in the Arctic as climate change opens up sea routes.
As a result, no one in Iceland has officially questioned the US presence or Reykjavik's military dependence on Washington.
'Iceland and the US have a longstanding and close relationship on security and defence matters, based on shared interest in the North Atlantic and the Arctic,' the foreign ministry told AFP.
'There is no reason to assume that this will change.'
Establishing an Icelandic army has always been a taboo subject.
'If the government would put it on the agenda, it would result in a divisive public debate, with those opposing the idea most likely having the upper hand,' Ingimundarson said.
Yet the tide appears to be gradually turning, said Eggertsson, the MP.
'We are in a time of transformation, where the clear vision from the post-World War years that Europe should not re-arm, but be provided defence under the NATO-US umbrella, is giving way,' he said.
Plan B
Advocating a multilateral approach to security, Iceland is now shifting its gaze toward Europe as Trump casts US defence ties with NATO allies into doubt.
Given the unpredictability of the Trump administration, 'we should have as a plan B (to) try to establish a close relationship with the EU,' Ingimundarson said.
The foreign ministry has already made it clear that partnerships with the EU 'are expected to deepen further in the coming years'.
'Iceland would definitely support a European NATO if the United States would withdraw from the alliance,' Ingimundarson said.
That would be an 'easier option' than transferring European defence to the EU -- of which Iceland is not a member.
'It wouldn't necessitate Iceland becoming an EU member, if it would seek to disentangle itself from the US,' he said.
Iceland launched EU membership negotiations in 2009 following its 2008 economic collapse. The talks were suspended in 2013, but a referendum on their resumption is due in 2027.
EU membership would not just be about safeguarding the island's security.
'It is also about economic prosperity, low tariffs with our biggest trading partners, fisheries and more,' Eggertsson said.
Fisheries policy would be the biggest stumbling block, with Iceland keen to retain total control over its lucrative fishing zones, a crucial pillar of its economy.