logo
'Glastonbury is a middle-class hate crime - time to put it out of its misery'

'Glastonbury is a middle-class hate crime - time to put it out of its misery'

Daily Mirror30-06-2025
Is this the way the future's meant to feel? Twenty thousand people in a field, calling for the death of conscripts, comfortable in the knowledge that if war ever comes for them they can afford to buy their way off the front line.
A lady in a sunflower hat. A man proudly wearing the badge of the CND. A sea of people, all able to find £400 a head and the time off work to head to Somerset, all of whom have benefited from state-funded education, and not one expecting a terrorist to paraglide in and open up with an Uzi, as they danced and partied without a care in the world.
They seemed not to notice the racial hatred, even when it poured from their lips. In fact, they'd probably be very offended at the suggestion, and point out they were echoing the words of a black man, and talking about the wrongs of a genocide, so it couldn't possibly be racist and don't you know how nice everyone is at music festivals?
But when a pretty poor punk duo called Bob Vylan, whose sledgehammer wit is so perfectly displayed in their name, invited - or is it incited? The police will know - them to shout "Death to the IDF" it was a signal that everything that was once jolly lovely about 'Glasto' is as dead and buried as the 378 people slaughtered at the Nova Music Festival in Israel on October 7, 2023.
Had Somerset turned into the same sort of killing field, to provoke a government by the murder of its innocents into an era-defining conflict, the survivors may well have signed up to fight back on the spot, sunflower hats and all. Whether the UK armed forces would have considered them any damned use is a different matter.
But of course it did not happen in Britain, because Britain has no terrorist enemies, has never had a war within, and has always fought on the side of the angels. Except when it hasn't. And certainly, no-one has ever called for the death of the people who keep us safe, except for the Irish, the Northern Irish, the Iranians, ISIS, the Taliban, the Welsh, the Scottish, the Americans, the French, the Germans, the Italians, oh and quite a lot of everyone else.
Part of the reason for the 40ft high metal fences that surround the Glastonbury site is not just to protect the wealthy people within from having to share sound with people who can only afford a download. It's also to keep them safe from the many sorts of terrorist who would quite enjoy walking into a field full of entitled white prats and blowing as many of them as possible sky-high.
But people who float through life in fashionable wellies, who can afford to buy a tent for fun rather than fashion one out of sacks in a refugee camp, and who think it's a lark to be muddy for a couple of days because they know they won't have to wash in a puddle for the next year, did not feel empathy for a single second with the festival-goers who made the mistake of partying while living next door to someone who wanted them dead. They just called for the death of millions of Jews, because someone suggested they do so, and didn't think twice about whose company they were keeping.
They didn't think that the Israeli Defence Force gets its troops via conscription, with little chance to excuse themselves. That everyone is a reservist until they're 40. They didn't think that may mean the IDF is not very professional, they don't all want to be there, and maybe aren't very good at shooting things, or indeed at not shooting things. They didn't question as to why Israelis still have conscription, and whether it might be linked to the fact people are trying to kill civilians ALL THE TIME. And they especially didn't do the maths about Palestinian people and Israeli people, who both suffer warmongering leaders, and if wanting your own country is fine for one of them, then it's fine for both.
Nor did they recall that their own government - this nice, Labour, cosy, British government - is talking about bringing back conscription. While the soft-bellied Glasto-goers, with an average age approaching 44, could escape it, their children may not. How'd it feel if someone shouted "Death to little Crispin and Charlotte"? Not so socially-acceptable, then.
But Glastonbury has long been the place where common sense went to die. From an indie, hippie festival in a field it's become an industry of its own, with established, mainstream acts vying with smaller ones purely to cash in. But when it's got to the point that Rod Stewart and Lulu are on the main stage, it needs more cops and cleaners than a recently-discovered mass grave, and genuine hippies can't scrape together the entrance fee, it's no longer serving any purpose beyond pure, naked capitalism.
Vylan have put on a load of new followers, who will no doubt get tapped up to crowdfund the legal fees if they face any sort of police action for inciting the murder of an entire nation's youth. And they seem to have downgraded their status from being "violent punks" to being concerned about school dinners, and toned down calling for death to calling for peaceful protest marches. Good luck, as a criminal defence lawyer might say, with that.
But Glastonbury's rather tainted star has fallen even further into the mire. It's surely time for this middle-class, middle-of-the-road, money-making, maggot-attracting hate crime to take its final bow, and leave music festivals to people who still know that they're supposed to involve some peace and love.
Otherwise next year they'll try to go one better, and we'll see Ayatollah Khameini in the 'legends' slot, and bomb-making classes in a tepee.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK needs fundamental constitutional change, not merely ‘reform'
UK needs fundamental constitutional change, not merely ‘reform'

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

UK needs fundamental constitutional change, not merely ‘reform'

Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage have at least three things in common. Each one of them tacitly (if not openly and enthusiastically) supports the Israeli government's ongoing ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank. Each one of them shuns support of the democratic right of the people of Scotland to exercise their sovereign right to self-determination via their elected parliament. Each one of them supports an archaic electoral system that sustains privilege and the self-serving influence (if not corrupt influence) of the wealthy British establishment while seeking to condemn (as 'illegal immigrants') those desperately seeking asylum (many doing so as a consequence of UK Government imperialistic decisions). READ MORE: John Swinney addresses Scottish absence at Israel 'collective action' conference This self-righteous political and moral hypocrisy is reflected in the slanted decision-making of our self-proclaimed 'impartial' broadcaster, the BBC. While confessing to the 'atrocious failure' to declare that a young boy providing a perspective on current life in Gaza for the Palestinians was the son of a Hamas government official, the BBC continues to platform fanatical Israeli government officials (including a Prime Minister indicted for war crimes) as well as representatives of the IDF, which has been responsible for horrendous devastation including the truly atrocious massacre of more than 50,000 civilians. While foreign journalists are banned from reporting from Palestine, it is seemingly acceptable for BBC journalists to report from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, effectively providing unbalanced coverage of the hostilities. While the BBC is always careful to label Hamas as a 'terrorist organisation', it is content to repeat the bias inherent in words such as 'war', not 'slaughter'; 'detainees' or 'prisoners', not 'hostages'; 'the right to defend itself', not 'genocide'. Britain's sad demise, including the despicably widening wealth gap, will continue whoever is Prime Minister at Westminster. The UK does not need reform, it needs fundamental constitutional change. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian THE BBC's admission that it breached editorial guidelines by failing to disclose the parentage of the child narrator in Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone has been leapt upon by critics as if it invalidates the entire documentary. In reality, the boy's narration was scripted, so his role was that of a voice actor, not an editorial contributor. While the omission of his father's Hamas affiliation warrants correction for transparency, the scale of the reaction is revealing. This level of forensic scrutiny is not applied evenly. When Israeli officials deny allegations of war crimes or genocide – even when such denials are contradicted by independent investigations – the BBC and UK Government frequently accept these statements at face value, or present them uncritically alongside claims from human rights groups as though they carry equal weight. That's not balance, it's complicity in the laundering of impunity. READ MORE: 'Call it genocide': MSF paediatrician on UK's Gaza inaction It is deeply troubling that a documentary giving voice – even a scripted one – to Palestinian children in a war zone is treated as more suspect than repeated denials of atrocity from a heavily armed state power. If the BBC were as fastidious about vetting official Israeli claims as they are about the family ties of a 13-year-old narrator, we might get closer to genuine impartiality. As it stands, this episode has become a politically distracting piece of nitpicking deployed to undermine testimony from the ground and defend the indefensible. If editorial integrity matters, it must be applied consistently. Otherwise, it becomes just another tool for silencing the oppressed while shielding those with the power to destroy. In the interests of editorial transparency, I should add that although these are my own words, they were typed by a friend whose DNA matched on with a guy whose uncle was head of crop rotation for the Baader-Meinhof Gang. (That's not true – but you see what I did there?!) Ron Lumiere via email THE documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone was pulled by that 'impartial' bastion of political correctness commonly known as the BBC. There has been more hoo-ha about the MasterChef host who acted in a misogynist way towards females on the cooking programme than about the war crimes carried out by the psychopathic society in Israel. Children queuing up for water in a hot country, where they are in the process of being exterminated, BOMBED, with their wee bodies cut into pieces and bloody body parts scattered so their parents don't have a whole body to bury. READ MORE: BBC breached editorial guidelines in Gaza documentary, review finds Yet, on the contrary, I, wearing a Palestine Action T-shirt, will get arrested, like the demonstrators in London (and elsewhere) when I turn up this coming Saturday to protest at the war crimes being carried out by the UK Government. We no longer have democracy anywhere in Britain. It is time the domination of the UK Government, and the USA government, by a foreign state comes to an end. I did not vote for Labour Friends of Israel, Scottish Friends of Israel or Glasgow Friends of Israel. Or, for that matter, Benjamin Netanyahu. And now a former Israeli Prime Minister actually admits that what the Israeli government is planning to do: confine all the inhabitants of Gaza, is confining them to a CONCENTRATION CAMP. Ehud Ormak's words, not mine. STOP NOW THIS DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR BY ISRAEL. Margaret Forbes Blanefield

Trump Organisation 'hold talks' to discuss Turnberry hosting The Open
Trump Organisation 'hold talks' to discuss Turnberry hosting The Open

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Trump Organisation 'hold talks' to discuss Turnberry hosting The Open

The venue on Scotland's west coast has not hosted the major since its fourth visit in 2009 when Stewart Cink denied a then 59-year-old Tom Watson a fairytale sixth Claret Jug. Donald Trump's company bought the resort in 2014 but, despite concerns about the circus which could surround the event should it host again while he was a sitting United States president, Darbon insists the lack of a return has more to do with infrastructure. 'I think we've been extremely clear on our position in respect of Turnberry. We love the golf course, but we've got some big logistical challenges there,' The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews (R&A) chief executive Mark Darbon said. READ MORE: Scottish Tories in 'jobs for the boys' row as THIRD ex-spin doctor gets taxpayer cash 'We've got some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry. 'We've explicitly not taken it out of our pool of venues, but we'd need to address those logistical challenges should we return, so we've had good conversations with the ownership and the venue like we do with all of our venues. 'I met a couple of months ago with Eric Trump (executive vice-president of his father's Trump Organisation) and some of the leadership from the Trump golf organisation and from Turnberry. 'We had a really good discussion. I think they understand clearly where we're coming from. 'We talked through some of the challenges that we have, so we've got a good dialogue with them.' There were reports Trump, who is scheduled to make a state visit to the UK in September, had been petitioning the Government to step in to influence a decision on Turnberry's return to the Open rotation, but Darbon said the R&A remained sole arbiters. 'We've spoken to them specifically about Turnberry and I think they've made it clear that the decision around where we take our championship rests with us,' added Darbon. 'I would find it difficult to predict whether there will be any discussion on The Open if the President is making a visit here.' Muirfield, another Scottish links which has not hosted in 12 years, faces similar logistical issues since overturning a vote not to admit women in 2017. 'We're in a discussion with the venue right now. There's some things that we need to evolve at Muirfield and there's some work we need to do with the venue to facilitate some of the infrastructure that we require,' said Darbon. With the next two Opens scheduled for St Andrews and Royal Birkdale, the next available slot is 2028. Another course which has moved further up the reckoning for an Open debut is the highly-rated Portmarnock in Ireland. READ MORE: 'Call it genocide': MSF doctor urges UK to halt arms sales to Israel 'Yes, we are thinking about Portmarnock. We think it's a wonderful links golf course,' said Darbon. 'We've been really encouraged by the support that we've had in principle from the Irish Government to work with us to understand whether we could stage an Open Championship there in the future. 'We're knee deep in feasibility work to help us answer that question fully and we expect to have a clearer picture by the back end of this year.' Darbon also confirmed Saturday's tee times for this week's Open at Royal Portrush would have a 'slight tweak' of about 15 minutes to ensure play finishes before a loyalist march in the town, but he declined to comment on reports the R&A had offered £20,000 for organisers to cancel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store