Archaeologists Found 23,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn't Exist
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story:
Researchers determined that footprints in White Sands National Park in New Mexico are from the oldest migrants to North America.
The footprints first made headlines after a study published in 2021 claimed that they were thousands of years older than the Clovis people of New Mexico, who had long been thought to be the first North American culture.
Who these nomadic people were—or whether they stayed in New Mexico or moved on—is still unknown.
An endless ocean of white sprawling across New Mexico's Tularosa Basin, White Sands National Park glitters with dunes of gypsum sand. From those sands have surfaced footprints that would rewrite human history.
Found in ancient clay that had long since hardened to stone, the footprints were thought to be anywhere from 21,000 to 23,000 years old. Controversy surrounded the finding—if these tracks really were that ancient, it would mean that they were even older than the Clovis people from the late Pleistocene, whose name comes from a site in New Mexico that was thought to be the oldest known settlement in North America. Whether or not these tracks really did predate the Clovis culture would be debated for years until the investigation was reopened.
Archaeologist and geologist Vance Holliday—now a professor emeritus at the University of Arizona—started researching the geologic strata of White Sands in 2012. In 2019, researchers from Bournemouth University in the UK teamed up with the U.S. National Park Service for the excavation that resulted in the discovery of the footprints, and some of Vance's data on the ages of seeds and pollen in the area was used to date the prints for a study published in 2021. If the age of the footprints was correct, that would make them 10,000 years older than the Clovis people.
With doubts surrounding that study, Vance became determined to prove their age, and finally succeeded by dating the mud rock they were imprinted on.
'The issue of the arrival of the first Americans has long been contentious and the record from the White Sands locality generated considerable debate focused on the validity of the dating,' he said in a new study recently published in the journal Science Advances.
The age of the footprints coincides with the final phase of the Pleistocene epoch, otherwise known as the Last Glacial Maximum. Ice sheets that blocked the Bering Land Bridge between Asia and North America made human migration impossible. This could potentially mean that the first people to settle in North America crossed over before Earth plunged into a deep freeze—a time period which aligns with the age of the footprints, as confirmed by Vance.
What is now the Tularosa Basin was once the bottom of a paleolake called Lake Otero that formed after the snow and ice melted. Flows of melted snow brought dissolved gypsum to Lake Otero, which emerged as an expanse of white sand when the lake evaporated into a dry playa. Erosion may have erased some of this history forever, but beneath the sand, fossils of megafauna like mammoths and ground sloths were still preserved—alongside the controversial footprints.
Whoever made these prints traveled through marshlands before Lake Otero formed and walked through gley—mud that is too waterlogged for oxygen to penetrate. Organisms in the mud instead turn to iron and manganese compounds in this mud to survive, chemically breaking down these compounds and turning the mud shades of blue, green, or gray. The gley was radiocarbon dated to anywhere between 20,700 and 22,400 years old, supporting previous findings that came close to that range. Before this, Vance had relied on pollen remnants and the seeds of the aquatic plant Ruppia cirrhosa (also known as spiral tasselweed or ditchgrass) to date the impressions.
'At the time that the human tracks were created […] there was an extensive body of standing but shallow water or wetlands in proximity to the trackways throughout the period of human activity,' Vance said.
If this is proof of what could be the first humans who migrated to the Americas, then why did they only leave footprints? The absence of artifacts might be explained by nomadic life. Vance thinks that one of the trackways was easily walked over in only seconds, and hunter-gatherers might have only been passing through the basin while holding onto tools and supplies that were not easily replaced. Who these enigmatic people were remains a mystery burried in the sands of time.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
New, urgent warning about the ‘hidden risk' of e-cigarettes and vapes issued by scientists
E‑cigarettes were initially marketed as a sleek way to help people quit traditional cigarettes — but that promise has largely gone up in smoke. Research shows that most adult smokers who try vaping end up using both, while many teens who never smoked are getting hooked on nicotine through vaping. Roughly 11 million Americans vape regularly, and though vapes are still considered less harmful than cigarettes because they don't burn tobacco — the source of tar and many carcinogens — mounting evidence shows they're far from safe. A new study — published in the journal ACS Central Science — revealed that e-cigarettes release a shocking amount of toxic metals. Andrey Popov – A new study — published Wednesday in the journal ACS Central Science — revealed that e-cigarettes release a shocking amount of toxic metals, with some producing more lead in a day's use than nearly 20 packs of traditional cigarettes. 'Our study highlights the hidden risk of these new and popular disposable electronic cigarettes — with hazardous levels of neurotoxic lead and carcinogenic nickel and antimony — which stresses the need for urgency in enforcement,' senior author Brett Poulin, an assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Environmental Toxicology, said in a statement. 'These risks are not just worse than other e-cigarettes but worse in some cases than traditional cigarettes,' Poulin added. The research was led by Mark Salazar, a PhD candidate in Poulin's lab, who wanted to know more about what his friend — a vaper — was putting into his body. When he tested the disposable vape pod in the lab, he was stunned by the results. 'When I first saw the lead concentrations, they were so high I thought our instrument was broken,' Salazar said. 'That sparked us into looking further into these disposables.' 'When I first saw the lead concentrations, they were so high I thought our instrument was broken,' one researcher said. fotofabrika – Researchers took a good, hard look into seven types of disposable devices from three of the most popular brands — Esco Bar, Flum Pebble and ELF Bar. They discovered 'these disposable devices have toxins already present in the e-liquid, or they're leaching quite extensively from their components into e-liquids and ultimately transferred to the smoke,' Salazar said. Some of the devices contained nickel and antimony levels that could increase the risk of cancer, as well as lead and nickel emissions that could lead to brain and lung damage. Equally worrying is that the newer, disposable vapes seemed to emit more toxic metals than earlier, refillable vapes. The researchers urged more research and regulation around e-cigarettes, especially because the market is outpacing the science. While New York and the federal government restricted the sale of flavored e-cigarettes or vapes in 2020, the ban has not really been enforced — and new e-cigarette products are continuously emerging.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Daily dose of baby aspirin can halve your chances of getting colorectal cancer if you have this condition
Could a pill a day keep polyps at bay? A new study suggests that a daily dose of aspirin could help ward off colorectal cancer in people with a rare genetic disorder that increases their risk of developing the disease. Better yet, British researchers found that low doses of the over-the-counter drug offer the same protection as higher ones — with fewer side effects. Advertisement 4 Several studies have linked long-term aspirin use to a lower risk of colorectal cancer and polyps. Stefan – The study involved nearly 1,900 people with Lynch syndrome, a hereditary condition that significantly raises the risk of several cancers, especially colorectal and endometrial. Though it affects an estimated 1.1 million Americans, fewer than 5% know they carry the genetic mutation, according to the National Cancer Institute. Advertisement Previous research found that a daily 600 milligram aspirin dose could cut colorectal cancer risk in people with Lynch syndrome by half. However, high doses can cause side effects like stomach pain, ulcers and bleeding, which have made some patients reluctant to continue with the preventive treatment. 4 Aspirin can cause uncomfortable side effects when taken at high doses. Liubomir – This time, scientists at Newcastle University in the UK split participants with Lynch syndrome into three groups, each taking 100mg, 300mg or 600mg of aspirin daily for five years. Advertisement By the end of the study, there were fewer colorectal cancer cases in all three groups, but those taking the lowest dose got the same protection with fewer side effects. 'We now have really good evidence that aspirin can prevent bowel cancer in those at a high risk of the disease,' said Dr. David Crosby, head of prevention and early detection research at Cancer Research UK. 4 Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US. Jo Panuwat D – Advertisement The average American's lifetime risk of colorectal cancer is about 5%, but those with Lynch syndrome face a staggering 40% to 80% risk, according to MD Anderson Cancer Center. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that people with Lynch syndrome take aspirin daily to reduce their chances of developing cancer. However, studies show only about 34% follow this advice — often due to concerns about side effects. 'Too many people are missing out on a potentially life-changing opportunity to prevent cancer,' said Sir John Burn, professor of clinical genetics at Newcastle University and lead author of the study. 'We have a chance to give more people with Lynch syndrome protection, which would reduce their fear of bowel cancer in the future.' 4 Lynch syndrome is passed down through families via a gene mutation. Dana Farber Cancer Institute Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colorectal cancer in the US, with data showing that it accounts for about 3,800 cases each year. Advertisement Colon cancers tied to the genetic disorder tend to develop far faster than in the general population — often within one to two years versus about 10 years, according to the Cleveland Clinic. To make matters worse, those diagnosed with colorectal cancer linked to Lynch syndrome are more likely to face a relapse down the line. 'People with Lynch syndrome get regular colonoscopies and live with the anxiety that they are highly likely to develop bowel cancer in their lifetime,' Crosby said. 'Taking aspirin daily could cut this risk by at least half and alleviate their fears,' he added. Advertisement Once a disease that primarily affected older adults, colorectal cancer cases have surged among younger Americans in recent years. It's now the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer in the US, and the second leading cause of cancer death nationwide, according to the Colorectal Cancer Alliance.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Archaeologists Found 23,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Where They Shouldn't Exist
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Researchers determined that footprints in White Sands National Park in New Mexico are from the oldest migrants to North America. The footprints first made headlines after a study published in 2021 claimed that they were thousands of years older than the Clovis people of New Mexico, who had long been thought to be the first North American culture. Who these nomadic people were—or whether they stayed in New Mexico or moved on—is still unknown. An endless ocean of white sprawling across New Mexico's Tularosa Basin, White Sands National Park glitters with dunes of gypsum sand. From those sands have surfaced footprints that would rewrite human history. Found in ancient clay that had long since hardened to stone, the footprints were thought to be anywhere from 21,000 to 23,000 years old. Controversy surrounded the finding—if these tracks really were that ancient, it would mean that they were even older than the Clovis people from the late Pleistocene, whose name comes from a site in New Mexico that was thought to be the oldest known settlement in North America. Whether or not these tracks really did predate the Clovis culture would be debated for years until the investigation was reopened. Archaeologist and geologist Vance Holliday—now a professor emeritus at the University of Arizona—started researching the geologic strata of White Sands in 2012. In 2019, researchers from Bournemouth University in the UK teamed up with the U.S. National Park Service for the excavation that resulted in the discovery of the footprints, and some of Vance's data on the ages of seeds and pollen in the area was used to date the prints for a study published in 2021. If the age of the footprints was correct, that would make them 10,000 years older than the Clovis people. With doubts surrounding that study, Vance became determined to prove their age, and finally succeeded by dating the mud rock they were imprinted on. 'The issue of the arrival of the first Americans has long been contentious and the record from the White Sands locality generated considerable debate focused on the validity of the dating,' he said in a new study recently published in the journal Science Advances. The age of the footprints coincides with the final phase of the Pleistocene epoch, otherwise known as the Last Glacial Maximum. Ice sheets that blocked the Bering Land Bridge between Asia and North America made human migration impossible. This could potentially mean that the first people to settle in North America crossed over before Earth plunged into a deep freeze—a time period which aligns with the age of the footprints, as confirmed by Vance. What is now the Tularosa Basin was once the bottom of a paleolake called Lake Otero that formed after the snow and ice melted. Flows of melted snow brought dissolved gypsum to Lake Otero, which emerged as an expanse of white sand when the lake evaporated into a dry playa. Erosion may have erased some of this history forever, but beneath the sand, fossils of megafauna like mammoths and ground sloths were still preserved—alongside the controversial footprints. Whoever made these prints traveled through marshlands before Lake Otero formed and walked through gley—mud that is too waterlogged for oxygen to penetrate. Organisms in the mud instead turn to iron and manganese compounds in this mud to survive, chemically breaking down these compounds and turning the mud shades of blue, green, or gray. The gley was radiocarbon dated to anywhere between 20,700 and 22,400 years old, supporting previous findings that came close to that range. Before this, Vance had relied on pollen remnants and the seeds of the aquatic plant Ruppia cirrhosa (also known as spiral tasselweed or ditchgrass) to date the impressions. 'At the time that the human tracks were created […] there was an extensive body of standing but shallow water or wetlands in proximity to the trackways throughout the period of human activity,' Vance said. If this is proof of what could be the first humans who migrated to the Americas, then why did they only leave footprints? The absence of artifacts might be explained by nomadic life. Vance thinks that one of the trackways was easily walked over in only seconds, and hunter-gatherers might have only been passing through the basin while holding onto tools and supplies that were not easily replaced. Who these enigmatic people were remains a mystery burried in the sands of time. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
