
Why climbing the stairs can be good for your body and brain
While it is tempting to take the lift or escalator rather than use the stairs, even scaling just a few flights a day could give your health and mind a boost.
As expeditions go, it was a gruelling one. In just under 23 hours on 3 September 2021, Sean Greasley climbed and descended 8,849 m (29,032ft) – a distance that would have taken him to the top of the highest mountain on Earth. By the end, he was dripping in sweat and could barely walk. And he did it all in the relative comfort of his own home.
Greasley holds the world record for the fastest time to ascend and descend the same height as Mount Everest on stairs, achieving it in 22 hours, 57 minutes and two seconds.
While Greasley achieved this on the staircase at his home in Las Vegas, there are others who take stair climbing to other extremes. Tower running, for example, involves racing up enormous flights of stairs inside iconic buildings and skyscrapers. There is even a Tower Running Association and an official tower running global ranking for the elite athletes dedicated to this unusual sport.
Most of us are unlikely to achieve such giddy heights, yet even climbing a few flights of stairs in our daily lives might be something to aspire to. According to research, climbing stairs can have surprising benefits for both your physical health and your brain without needing to hurtle up two steps at a time or break records.
Climbing stairs has been found to improve balance and reduce the risk of falling for older people and improve their lower body strength. Other studies also find that climbing a couple of flights of stairs can positively affect our cognitive abilities such as problem-solving, memory, and potentially creative thinking.
As a "low impact" form of exercise, even short bursts of stair climbing can help improve cardiorespiratory fitness and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. The improvements in aerobic fitness from climbing stairs at home can even be equivalent to those gained using stair machines at the gym.
It's this everyday simplicity that is stair-climbing's greatest strength. Stairs are everywhere – we encounter them at home, at work and in public. Choosing to take the stairs instead of hopping on an escalator or riding in a lift provides us with an incidental form of exercise that can have an outsized impact on our health.
"It's an exercise that nearly everybody can perform because they have access, and they do it on the daily basis," says Alexis Marcotte-Chenard, a postdoctoral research fellow in heart, lung and vascular health at the University of British Columbia in Kelowna, Canada.
Marcotte-Chenard has been researching how to use exercise and nutrition to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, including the effects of "exercise snacks" – brief, spaced-out periods of vigorous activity lasting one minute or less that are performed throughout the day. Stair climbing, he says, is a promising exercise snack as it can be easily adjusted in difficulty by varying pace and requires no complex equipment or cost.
"When you do exercise snacks, you don't need any fancy equipment, you can just use your own body, you can use stairs," says Marcotte-Chenard. "And if you're doing physical activity throughout the day, you don't have to dedicate an hour for your workout."
Research into exercise snacks, also nicknamed "snacktivity," or "VILPA" (vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity), is on the rise as researchers search for the best exercise solution to combat sedentary habits and physical inactivity which currently puts approximately 1.8 billion adults worldwide at risk of disease.
But what makes stairs such an effective physical workout?
First, climbing stairs is an easy way to elevate your heart rate – an important part of getting physiological benefits. But there are unique benefits of stair-climbing compared to other forms of exercise.
"It increases your heart rate and your oxygen consumption more than if you do fast walking just because it's harder to go against gravity," says Marcotte-Chenard, "And then, if you talk about the muscle, it's mostly the lower body, and we know that lower body strength is a good indicator of overall health and longevity."
Climbing stairs can increase thigh muscle size and strength, and also requires use of the abdominal muscles for stabilisation going upwards.
You may not even have to sprint up the staircase to get the benefits. Whilst taking two steps at a time can be more difficult, requiring greater work by the muscles around your ankle and knee, the research is split about whether you actually burn more calories going up one step at a time.
And there is another reason to choose the staircase over the stair machine at the gym – going downstairs.
The muscles at the front of your thighs contract in two different ways: when walking upstairs they will shorten, known as concentric contraction, and when walking downstairs they lengthen, known as eccentric contraction. Although concentric contractions require more oxygen, burn more calories during the exercise itself and are considered more difficult, repeating eccentric contractions is more likely to result in bigger and stronger muscle growth. This is because eccentric contractions cause greater muscle damage during exercise and so more calories are burnt long-term during repair and recovery.
The benefits don't end with muscular thighs either. Researchers have found that stair-climbing results in surprising improvements in cognitive ability.
More like this:
Andreas Stenling is an associate professor psychology at Umeå University, Sweden, who primarily researches the longer-term relationships between physical activity and health. He and his colleagues studied the immediate effects of stair-climbing on different cognitive abilities in young adults.
"Inhibition and switching were the two main cognitive functions we focused on here," says Stenling, "Cognitive switching, sometimes called mental flexibility, is how easy we're able to switch between cognitive tasks," he says. "So, going from one task to the other without having to reset your cognition, so to speak. Inhibition is about blocking out irrelevant information while you're engaged in the task." Stenling explains that we know that these cognitive functions are important for learning, cognitive word tasks, abstract thinking, and being able to keep your thoughts on one thing.
Stenling and colleagues found that their stair-climbing exercise significantly improved participants' "switching" abilities, which is also considered the most difficult of the cognitive tasks tested for. They also tested for changes in mood, finding that participants felt happier and more energetic after stair-climbing.
Another study published by researchers at the Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine in Japan also found that people who climbed two flights of stairs displayed more focused problem solving than those who took the elevator. Intriguingly, there weren't any improvements in problem solving when they climbed five or eight flights of stairs, suggesting the effect is not dependent upon the number of stairs. Another study by the same group also found that walking downstairs led to an increase in creative thinking, generating 61% more original ideas than those who travelled using a lift. So if you are looking for a burst of inspiration on a problem you are trying to solve, a quick jaunt up to the next floor and back may be all you need.
There is much interest in the mechanisms which link exercise to cognitive benefits, but little conclusive research. Stenling suggests, however, that the improvements could be linked to the cardiovascular system and the increase in blood flow to the brain, as well as growth hormones such as Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), which seem to be impacted quickly by exercise in general.
Researchers including Stenling are also keen to explore whether there may be any delayed effects from stair climbing. Most studies focus on the cognitive effects immediately after climbing some stairs. One recent study found, however, that there were some improvements in memory from stair-climbing that carry over to the next day when paired with good sleep quality.
But while the concept of taking 10,000 steps a day is ingrained in the public mind as the benchmark for daily exercise, is there a similar target we should be aiming for when it comes to stairs?
Before we answer that, it is perhaps worth noting that the 10,000 step count number doesn't have a terribly strong basis in scientific research itself and some studies suggest the benefits tend to plateau after around 7,500 steps. The better known figure actually originates from an advertising campaign coinciding with the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, which took off because the number 10,000 in Japanese (万) resembles a person walking.
The research is similarly sparse when it comes to putting a target on stair climbing. But the studies that do exist suggest that climbing more than five flights of stairs daily (equivalent to 50 steps) is associated with a lower risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which is the build-up of plaque in the arteries.
Marcotte-Chenard and his colleagues are optimistic that exercise snacks, specifically stair-climbing, could provide a good solution to breaking sedimentary habits at work. In a study assessing the psychological responses of office employees undertaking stair-climbing in the workplace, Marcotte-Chenard and colleagues found that 71% of employees preferred several small exercise snacks, climbing 60 steps in three different sessions, over one intense HIIT (high intensity interval training) session of climbing 60 steps three times in one session.
"For them [the participants], it's easier to just go one time up and down the stairs and go back to sitting," says Marcotte-Chenard. "And because you spread it out throughout the day, it seems that people enjoy it a little bit more than if they do it in one single session." The researchers' study is unique for being conducted outside the laboratory, which could suggest that the research is more applicable to the real world.
Not all research agrees that home stair-climbing is the answer, with some suggesting it is insufficient physical activity to lower the risk of CVD mortality and premature death. Additionally, sufferers of knee osteoarthritis can find stairs to be a painful ordeal. And observational studies even find that some demographics, such as females and overweight individuals, are less likely to take the stairs where there is an alternative.
But for those able to tackle a staircase, choosing it over a lift or elevator could be a great way of getting some incidental exercise that will benefit both your body and mind. See you at the top.
--
For trusted insights into better health and wellbeing rooted in science, sign up to the Health Fix newsletter, while The Essential List delivers a handpicked selection of features and insights.
For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: The Black hair industry imports products from China. Here's what tariffs mean
Black women are starting to pay more for their hair care because of the Trump administration's tariffs on goods imported from China. Many Black women have hair types and workplace-favored styles that require careful attention. They can spend hundreds of dollars at salons each month on extensions, weaves, wigs and braids. Most hair salon tools and packaging is imported from China. Stylists are considering raising their prices while the the U.S. and China negotiate new trade agreements. But many dread what price increases will do for clients who are lower income and already strained by months of inflation on virtually everything else. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Norma Meras Swenson obituary
In 1958, Norma Meras Swenson, who has died aged 93, gave birth to her daughter, Sarah, in Boston, Massachusetts. The experience opened her eyes to how little agency American women had over something as natural as childbirth, and this set her up for a lifetime of activism. She became an expert in reproductive health and women's rights and the book she co-wrote, Our Bodies, Ourselves, changed the landscape of women's health. It brought into the open subjects such as contraception, birth and masturbation and has been compared to Dr Spock's Baby & Child Care in terms of impact. Since 1970, it has been through nine editions, sold more than 4m copies and has been translated into 31 languages. In 2012, it featured in the Library of Congress exhibition Books that Shaped America. Swenson's story began when she went into labour. She was offered the drug scopolamine and, not knowing what it was, she padded down the corridor to a pay phone to call Harvard University's medical library. She discovered it was given with morphine to induce 'twilight sleep'' in childbirth. Not wanting to be knocked out during such a momentous life event as giving birth, she refused it. She was appalled at the other women on the ward who were taking the drug and who were hallucinating, crying out and having their babies extracted with forceps. Swenson said: 'These women were not being helped, they were being controlled.' Scouting around for like-minded people afterwards, Swenson came across the Boston Association for Childbirth Education, one of the first organisations in the US to focus on natural childbirth. In 1964 she became its president, promoting discussion of issues such as breastfeeding. In 1969 she heard about a female liberation conference taking place at Emmanuel College in Boston and attended a 'women and their bodies' workshop. At this time, the only information on subjects such as menstruation and contraception was in medical textbooks, and a group of women at the workshop, who became the Boston Women's Health Collective, wanted to put information into the hands of ordinary women. They made a list of topics such as anatomy, birth control, pregnancy and menopause, pooled their experience, and in 1970 wrote a 192-page book. Having raised $1,500, they commissioned New England Free Press to publish it, first as Women and Their Bodies and later as Our Bodies, Ourselves to reflect women taking ownership of their bodies. It sold 250,000 copies by word of mouth, something the commercial publisher Simon & Schuster was quick to notice. They became its publisher for subsequent editions from 1972, with the collective insisting there should be a 70% discount for health clinics purchasing copies. Swenson was the oldest member of the collective and unlike some of the group she had a child. Her expertise in pregnancy and childbirth made her the perfect choice for writing the chapters on those subjects. As well as the original chapters, she contributed to later editions and to other titles, including Ourselves, Growing Older (1987) and Ourselves and Our Children (1978). Norma was born in Exeter, New Hampshire. Her father, Halford Meras, ran the family business – the town's furniture store – and her mother Nellie (nee Kenick) was its bookkeeper. Norma was an only child, who loved fashion and dancing, and her father encouraged her from an early age to be a free thinker, to challenge authority and to debate politics and civil rights. She attended Boston Girls' Latin school (now the Boston Latin Academy) and from childhood had an abiding interest in botany and nature. She studied at Tufts University in Massachusetts, majoring in sociology, and graduated in 1953. In 1956 she married John Swenson, a decorated second world war pilot, who sold insurance and was a postal worker. Her trajectory as a 1950s housewife however was interrupted in 1958 when her daughter was born and she found activism. Swenson remained heavily involved with the Boston Women's Health Collective all her life, its members becoming like family to her. Tall and beautifully dressed, she was an eloquent speaker, and, as the collective's first director of international programmes, she worked to support the women's groups around the world who were translating and adapting Our Bodies, Ourselves (eventually there were 34 foreign editions). She and another member of the group, Judy Norsigian, in 1977 went on a whirlwind trip to 10 European countries, forging connections with fellow activists and natural childbirth pioneers including Sheila Kitzinger. She also represented Our Bodies, Ourselves and the collective at the UN Conferences on Women between 1975 and 1995. Swenson was keen to educate herself as much as possible, so she undertook postgraduate studies in medical sociology at Brandeis University in 1977-78, followed by a master's degree in public health at Harvard University. She created and taught the course Women, Health and Development from a Global Perspective at the Harvard School of Public Health from 1998 to 2015. In later life, Swenson was a co-chair of the Latina Health Initiative Committee, supporting feminists in Puerto Rico. She spoke out about subjects such as sterilisation abuse and rape in care homes, and supported numerous causes including the Massachusetts Dignity Alliance and the Black Women's Health Imperative. Her husband died in 2002 and afterwards she reconnected with her former college sweetheart Leonard van Gaasbeek, remaining close friends with him until his death in 2019. She retained a gallant 'can-do' spirit even in old age: she joined the 2017 Women's March in Boston despite limited mobility, sending a message to colleagues, 'Have cane, will travel!' Swenson is survived by Sarah. Norma Lucille Meras Swenson, writer, sociologist and women's health activist, born 2 February 1932; died 11 May 2025


Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I tasted 13 vanilla ice creams – this budget supermarket tub beats the posh offerings
I did a double take when I looked at my tasting notes for this article. In front of me were 13 bowls of vanilla ice cream – no labels or brands visible, just a lineup of anonymous products (marked A to M) for me to taste and judge. Now, it was time for me to wipe my sticky face and fingers, open my laptop and reveal the labels on the tubs. One ice cream had stood out as too sweet and too strongly flavoured with an oddly woody vanilla taste that reminded me of an over-oaked chardonnay. I gave it a middling star rating accordingly, but when I checked which brand it was, I was surprised to discover it was a Häagen-Dazs tub – the very ice cream which had come top in my last tasting of posh vanilla ice cream two years ago. How could this be? Was the sugar buzz from tasting 13 ice creams addling my brain, or had its recipe changed? Happily, I still have my spreadsheet of data from 2023 (in which I record the prices, volumes, sugar content and more for each product – just some of the number crunching I do for all of my taste tests). I checked this year's Häagen-Dazs label against my notes, and sure enough, the ingredients had changed. While the price of the 400g tub has risen less than five per cent (roughly in line with inflation, but below the higher rate of food inflation) savings have been made elsewhere, it seems. The sugar content has gone up from 18.8g to 19.9g per 100g – enough to tip it from 'on the sweet side' (as I judged it to be in 2023) to cloying. Perhaps it's there to make up for the new ingredient – water – now listed alongside cream and condensed skimmed milk, sugar and egg yolk. More significantly, the vanilla extract used in the 2023 ice cream has been replaced with 'natural vanilla flavouring'. By law this must be made from 95 per cent vanilla, with the additional 5 per cent coming from natural sources (although these may be so highly refined they are unrecognisable from the original). The purpose of these extras (according to Neroliane, a French company that creates flavourings for the food industry), is to 'convey fresher, spicy, biscuity, buttery or even milky notes to the original vanilla.' Or, in the case of my Häagen-Dazs spoonful, woody notes. It's not a successful addition, and it's hard not to conclude that it's been made to cover up a switch to a lower quality vanilla. Talking of money saving, a favourite method of some manufacturers is to whip as much air into their ice cream as possible, so they need less of the mixture to fill a tub. This is called 'overrun' in the trade, and in this area Häagen-Dazs (which was approached for a comment) actually comes out shining, with the lowest overrun I've come across. Those who add the most air usually have to add emulsifiers – generally mono- and di-glycerides of fatty acids – to stop the mixture splitting. This puts the ice cream in the ultra-processed food (UPF) category, and also makes for an unpleasantly foamy consistency as it melts. In order to estimate how much of your tub is air, I've calculated the difference between the weight of the ice cream and the volume as a percentage (a high percentage signals more air in the mixture). This isn't a perfect equation but it's a decent approximation, and it allows you to understand where you're spending money on real ingredients – and where it's just all hot (or cold) air. Skip to: How we tasted All the ice cream was given time to soften slightly in the fridge. A scoop was taken from each tub and placed in a glass bowl identified with a letter A to M. I tasted all the ice creams 'blind'. In order to work out the weight of the product and its overrun (the amount of air added to the ice cream), I placed any that did not declare a weight on accurate professional digital scales, subtracting the weight of the tub (these products I have marked with an 'approx' figure). The taste test