
US FDA Approves KalVista's Oral Swelling Disorder Drug, Shares Rise
The FDA's decision follows an extended review of the drug last month due to heavy workloads and limited resources at the regulator.
Ekterly, which offers a convenient alternative to injectable treatments, is expected to be available by mid-July, KalVista's financial chief Nicole Sweeny said.
The wholesale acquisition cost for the drug will be $16,720 per dose compared to other on-demand treatments that cost between $11,000 and $17,000 per dose.
Other on-demand treatments for hereditary angioedema (HAE), which affects about 8,000 people in the United States, include CSL's Berinert, Takeda's Cinryze, and Pharming's Ruconest, which are administered intravenously, as well as injectables such as Takeda's Kalbitor and Firazyr.
The life-threatening condition causes sudden, dangerous swelling in the body, including the skin, digestive tract and upper respiratory system, due to deficiency in a protein known as C1 inhibitor.
KalVista CEO Ben Palleiko said the company anticipates U.S. sales of "the on-demand segment of the HAE market will grow by 70% (to) $1.2 billion by 2030 ... fueled by the introduction of Ekterly."
TD Cowen analyst Stacy Ku estimates peak U.S. sales of the drug at over $750 million, adding the brokerage believes "there should be high demand for Ekterly's convenience."
Approval of the drug was based on a trial in which it achieved the beginning of symptom relief in 1.6 hours, while a later study showed it could treat attacks in 10 minutes, the company said.
(Reporting by Puyaan Singh, Padmanabhan Ananthan and Siddhi Mahatole in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur and Tasim Zahid)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
America's dairy farmers and ice cream producers agree to quit using artificial colors
America's ice cream will be getting healthy again. U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brook Rollins, together with U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Mary Makary, made essentially this announcement on Monday. (See the video at the top of this article.) MAHA leaders, together with the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and dairy farmers, announced that artificial colors in ice cream products will be eliminated by the end of 2027. Sec. Rollins told Fox News Digital in a statement, "Each one of these endeavors helps families make better choices and pursue healthier lives." "I appreciate IDFA members for spearheading this new initiative and finding ways to promote President Trump's Make America Healthy Again agenda," she added. Michael Dykes, IDFA CEO, said they've reduced sugar by 60% in America's schools and flavored milk, which is the No. 1 product for children. "This announcement today represents over 40 individual ice cream companies," said Dykes. "It's the single largest effort of its kind." Sec. Kennedy commended major food manufacturers that have pledged to take artificial coloring out of their foods. "With this addition today of the dairymen and the dairy food producers, we now have about 35% of the American food industry that has made commitments," said RFK Jr. He added the stats are in addition to about 35% to 40% of the food industry, which was "already organic and healthy and chemical-free." Dairy farmers from Michigan, Illinois, Idaho and Indiana were at the press conference. Schwoeppe Dairy farm owner and fifth-generation dairy farmer Sam Schwoeppe of Indiana touted the benefits of consuming whole milk. Her parents were foster parents, she said, and she personally witnessed the importance of good nutrition in her life, making it her core to her mission "to feed children." "I'll never forget one of my brothers arriving [at] our family at the age of nine with gray hair, bald patches on his head and skin flaking off his body due to a lack of nutrition," she said. "After one month of regular meals, including the dense nutrition provided by whole milk and dairy products — and of course, our regular weekend ice cream parties — he transformed into a little freckled-faced, red-headed boy," said Schwoeppe. "It is essential we consume good, wholesome food products," she added. "Products containing real dairy are the most nutritious options, and even though ice cream is decadent and has calories, it sure beats the heck out of candy and soda pop for a sweet treat." Dairy products are a good source of essential nutrients such as calcium, potassium and vitamin D, according to the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines. Commissioner Makary also announced the FDA will be approving another natural food dye: gardenia blue. "The sickness of American kids is not a willpower problem. It's not their fault. We can do things that will make the food supply healthier, one step at a time," said Makary. In May, the FDA approved three natural-source colors in food items: galdieria extract blue, butterfly pea flower extract and calcium phosphate. The MAHA movement has spread to a number of local communities — with Stella's Homemade Ice Cream in South Carolina, plus King Cone in Plover, Wisconsin, doing away with artificial food dyes, Fox News Digital previously reported.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
HHS carries out mass firings across health agencies after Supreme Court decision
Thousands of employees across US federal health agencies received an email Monday afternoon telling them they were out of a job as of the close of business. The firings were originally communicated April 1 for most of the included employees, but they'd been delayed as a legal battle played out. That culminated in a US Supreme Court decision July 8 that, the US Department of Health and Human Services said in the email, means the agency 'is now permitted to move forward with a portion of its [reduction in force].' 'You are hereby notified that you are officially separated from HHS at the close of business on July 14, 2025,' read Monday's notice to dismissed HHS employees, according to copies obtained by CNN. 'Thank you for your service to the American people.' 'HHS previously announced our plans to transform this department to Make America Healthy Again and we intend to do just that,' HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said in an email to CNN after the Supreme Court's ruling last week. In a reorganization announced March 27, HHS eliminated 10,000 employees across agencies including the US Food and Drug Administration, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US National Institutes of Health; some have since gotten their jobs back, but the number losing employment Monday is in the thousands, a spokesperson for the agency confirmed. Some of those 10,000, though, are protected at least temporarily under a different court case, New York v. Kennedy, and are not being separated immediately, the spokesperson said. That includes employees at six units of the CDC — the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention; the National Center for Environmental Health; the Division of Reproductive Health; the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; the Office on Smoking and Health; and the National Center for Birth Defects and Development Disabilities — the Center for Tobacco Products at the FDA; the Office of Head Start; and the Division of Data and Technical Analysis under the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 'All employees previously notified on April 1 have been separated, except for those' to whom the temporary protection in New York v. Kennedy applies, the HHS spokesperson said. In that case, Judge Melissa DuBose of US District Court in Rhode Island granted a preliminary injunction request this month from a coalition of 19 states and the District of Columbia to halt the March 27 reorganization plan. Last week, the administration asked DuBose to narrow her ruling to the divisions cited by the HHS spokesperson, but the judge has yet to rule on that request. The layoffs will probably be challenged in court given that many HHS workers are still protected by DuBose's order, but the agency could argue that the Supreme Court ruling allows it to reduce staff, said Michael Fallings, a managing partner at Tully Rinckey who specializes in federal employment law. Also Monday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed with mass layoffs at another agency – the Department of Education – for now. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by a teachers union, school districts, states and education groups. Within two hours of that decision, the department sent notices to employees indicating that it's immediately resuming its plans and that the workers would be let go on August 1. 'They seem to be emboldened by the recent Supreme Court decisions that have been green-lighting the Trump administration's actions that other courts have stayed,' said Andrew Twinamatsiko, a director of the Center for Health Policy and the Law at the O'Neill Institute at Georgetown University, of HHS proceeding with the layoffs. In last week's Supreme Court ruling, the justices allowed federal agencies to proceed with their reduction-in-force, or RIF, plans, putting on hold a lower court order that had temporarily blocked President Donald Trump from taking those steps without approval from Congress. But the justices noted that 'we express no view on the legality of any Agency RIF and Reorganization Plan,' leaving open the possibility that it could rule against a specific agency's layoff plan in the future if the reductions appeared to make it impossible for the department to carry out its obligation under the law. Filed by a coalition of more than a dozen unions, nonprofits and local governments, that case stemmed from an executive order Trump signed in mid-February that kicked off the process of significantly reducing the size of federal agencies. CNN's John Fritze, Devan Cole and Sunlen Serfaty contributed to this report.


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
30 years later: What went wrong in the deadly 1995 Chicago heat wave, and what has changed since
The 1995 Chicago heat wave, which took place 30 years ago this week, remains the Chicago area's deadliest weather disaster. Heat indices over 100 degrees kept a hold on the city for five straight days that July. In the days and months that followed, City Hall faced intense criticism for being slow to respond. The Cook County Medical Examiner's office saw staggering numbers of heat-related deaths rising each day. Hospital emergency rooms filled up. Gov. Jim Edgar declared Cook County a disaster area. "It was terrible," said Jeffrey Foy. "There was no air over here." Foy lived in the since-demolished Rockwell Gardens public housing development on the city's West Side. Nearly 150 families there suffered like the rest of Chicago. Foy used two words to describe his old third-floor apartment. "Microwave — the oven," he said. In mid-July 1995, temperatures topped 100 degrees for five consecutive days, then stayed in the high 90's for several more. "Everybody in the building had their windows all the way up, curtains, back so they could get some kind of air in there," Foy said. Foy said the fans in the building were not of much use. "You can have the window and a door open and fan going, and you don't feel it," he said. "It was just that miserable." The heat was uncomfortable for most, but deadly for many. "We're really facing a heat-related disaster here," Cook County Medical Examiner Edmund Donoghue said at the time. "I've never seen anything like this in the history of the Cook County Medical Examiner's office." On an average night back then, the morgue received 17 bodies. Just on Friday, July 14, it received 87. The Medical Examiner's office was so overwhelmed with bodies, it had to ask the State of Illinois for refrigerated trucks to store all the extra bodies. The death toll that week topped out at 739. Most of them were elderly and who died alone, behind locked doors and sealed windows, protecting their property while jeopardizing their lives. "You can't imagine a city doing a worse job in a crisis," said Eric Klinenberg. Klinenberg criticized city leaders in his 2002 book, "Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago." "The City of Chicago had a heat emergency plan on the books that summer, and they didn't even use it," Klinenberg said. "They forgot that they had it." Seventy-three percent of the heat-related deaths were residents over the age of 65. More than half lived on the West and South sides of the city. "The mayor was on vacation. The Health Department commissioner was on vacation. The Fire Department commissioner, who manages paramedics — on vacation," Klinenberg said. "So the B team was running the City of Chicago." As the death count and the temperature continued to rise, Mayor Daley faced political heat as well. A week later, he formed a commission on extreme weather conditions — putting in place a new plan to better respond to emergencies. Thirty years later, the city says practices have changed. Kaila Lariviere is manager of emergency management services at the Chicago Office of Emergency Management and Communications — an office that was formed just months after the 1995 heat wave, and continues to be front and center in every emergency. Lariviere said if there is an emergency like the one seen in 1995, "We at OEMC start activating plans left and right. "Whether I'm talking to the Fire Department to open up hydrants, whether I'm talking to the Health Department because I need to know what the census is at certain hospitals in the area," said Lariviere, "maybe I'm talking to Salvation Army, 'Hey, can you bring a canteen with extra water and food to help bring relief?'" That collaboration with city agencies was on full display in late June 2025, as the city faced another stretch of intense heat. "Because we now have these extreme thresholds with the National Weather Service, we can act even sooner, even quicker," said Lariviere. "Those thresholds currently stand at between 100 to 105-degree heat index for three consecutive days." Lariviere was asked what the city has done to ensure something like the 1995 heat wave never happens again. "I'd like to say it's because we're ahead of the curve now, and we're able to get that messaging out right away," she said. "We're better at coordinating. We're better at talking across the hallway, and making sure that we're working with the people we need to, to save our city and to the best of our ability."