Utah 'No Kings' Protest Update: Man Released in Shooting Probe
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Arturo Gamboa, who was taken into custody after carrying a rifle at a "No Kings" protest in Utah last Saturday that ended in a fatal shooting, has been released as prosecutors continue to review evidence in the investigation.
Newsweek has reached out to the Salt Lake Countydistrict attorney's office, police department, and Gamboa's lawyer for comment via email on Saturday.
Why It Matters
Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39, was shot during a "No Kings" protest in Salt Lake City on June 14. He later died at the hospital, with his death marking the most serious incident among a series of coordinated demonstrations held in hundreds of cities last weekend to denounce President Donald Trump's leadership.
The police have said that Ah Loo was an "innocent bystander who was not the intended target of the gunfire." An armed security member, who was part of the event's "peacekeeping team" fired three rounds after seeing Gamboa with his rifle. "One round struck Gamboa, while another tragically wounded Mr. Ah Loo," the Salt Lake City Police Department said in a June 15 update.
What To Know
On June 14, police estimate around 10,000 people participated in Salt Lake City's "No Kings" protest. Just before 8 p.m. local time, police reported hearing gunfire, and "panic spread throughout the area," police chief Brian Redd said in a June 15 press release.
"Officers found a man who had been shot and immediately began life-saving efforts," the release said, but despite those efforts Ah Loo died at the hospital. He was a father of two, and a celebrity fashion designer.
Paramedics transported Gamboa to the hospital and then "detectives later booked Gamboa into the Salt Lake County Metro Jail on a charge of murder." From interviews with two of the event's "peacekeeping" team members, detectives were told that Gamboa exhibited suspicious behavior which led them to draw their firearms.
The "peacekeepers" reportedly told Gamboa to drop the weapon, but instead he "lifted the rifle and began running toward the crowd gathered on State Street, holding the weapon in a firing position," according to the police department's press release.
One of the "peacekeepers" fired three rounds, with one striking Gamboa, and another hitting Ah Loo. Gamboa did not fire his gun.
The district attorney's office said Friday that it was unable to make a decision on charges against Gamboa. Utah is a constitutional carry state, which allows adults who are legally allowed to obtain firearms can carry them in public.
On Friday, "detectives with the Salt Lake City Police Department's Homicide Squad presented their initial findings from the ongoing investigation," to the Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office for legal review, a Friday press release from the police department, which was sent to Newsweek, stated.
"This process, known as a case screening, is a key step in any criminal investigation. It serves to analyze legal issues, identify investigative needs, and ensures the matter is prepared for prosecution evaluation, all while detectives continue to investigate," it continued.
In Gamboa's release order, Judge James Blanch said he must live with his father and is barred from possessing firearms, limitations to last two months or if criminal charges are pressed against him.
Nationwide, other cities experienced violence during last week's protests.
In Portland, Oregon, officers deployed tear gas and flash grenades after demonstrators breached an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility, injuring four police officers. In Culpeper, Virginia, a 21-year-old man was arrested after allegedly driving his SUV into a dispersing crowd, striking at least one person.
Arturo Gamboa is taken away in handcuffs on a gurney during the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14.
Arturo Gamboa is taken away in handcuffs on a gurney during the 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14.
Scott G. Winterton/The Deseret News via AP)
What People Are Saying
Albert Gamboa, Arturo's father, told the Associated Press earlier this week his son is an "an innocent guy" who was "in the wrong place at the wrong time."
Utah Governor Spencer Cox wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on June 14: "The shooting at tonight's protest in Salt Lake City is a deeply troubling act of violence and has no place in our public square."
Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd said in a June 15 press release: "Our thoughts are with the family and friends of the 39-year-old man who was killed, and with the many community members who were impacted by this traumatic incident."
What Happens Next
Police are asking the public to share any relevant information, stating: "If you captured any footage, particularly from the moments immediately before, during, or after the shooting, or if you have video of the shooting itself, or the person arrested, please share that evidence with us."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
42 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Is the Big Winner of the Trump-Putin Summit
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The clear winner of the recent Anchorage summit was not the United States or Russia. Nor was it the European Union, NATO, or Ukraine, all directly affected by the war in Eastern Europe. The big winner, at least for the moment, is the People's Republic of China. And China's only military ally, North Korea, did not do too badly either. Both Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at their post-meeting press conference tried to create the impression of momentum toward ending the three-year-old conflict in Ukraine. Putin used the word "agreement" and Trump mentioned "great progress." Russian President Putin and President Donald Trump pose for a photo during the welcoming ceremony prior to the meeting on the war in Ukraine on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. Russian President Putin and President Donald Trump pose for a photo during the welcoming ceremony prior to the meeting on the war in Ukraine on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. Getty Images Nonetheless, it was clear that the summit was a disappointment for the American side. There was, for instance, no ceasefire, which Trump publicly said he wanted. "There's no deal until there's a deal," an uncharacteristically somber Trump said after the shorter-than-expected face-to-face with Putin. "We didn't get there." No, they didn't. And no deal is precisely what China was looking for. Beijing, from all indications, hopes that the war in Ukraine will continue indefinitely. Hong Kong's South China Morning Post reported that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign policy chief, on July 2 that China does not want Russia to lose because then the U.S. would focus on China. In addition to the continuation of the conflict, the Chinese leadership got something else on Friday. "For Beijing, the Alaska summit confirmed its core belief: The world is a stage for great-power bargains over spheres of influence," Charles Burton of the Prague-based Sinopsis think tank told Newsweek. China's regime, which has a top-down concept of the world, likes the idea of big countries, by themselves, settling the world's problems. "Now, there is a crucial precedent for a future summit between Trump and the Chinese leadership, where China would press for major concessions in East Asia," Burton said. One of those concessions would be American diplomatic recognition of North Korea, noted Burton, who was a Canadian diplomat in Beijing. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, China's only formal military ally, also has an interest in the continuation of the war in Ukraine. "The Kim regime is likely content to see the United States diplomatically engaged on other fronts," Greg Scarlatoiu, president and CEO of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, told Newsweek. "That will buy Kim Jong Un more time to continue his for-profit exportation of instability, violence, and tools of death." Kim has filled regime coffers via the sales of artillery shells and short-range ballistic missiles to Putin—28,000 containers of weapons according to one recent count. Kim also sent soldiers, up to 12,800 troops, to the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield late last year. Moreover, the North is dispatching perhaps 30,000 more of them now. That will be on top of combat engineers and miscellaneous workers. Russia, according to South Korean intelligence, is paying Kim $2,000 per month per trooper. Russia is reportedly transferring weapons tech to the North as well. Whatever Putin is paying or bartering, the Ukraine war has been a bonanza for the Kim regime. Yet a proverb from ancient China reminds us, "No feast lasts forever." Trump can end the Chinese banquet quickly if he imposes costs on Russia and its enablers. He will, for instance, have to hit China hard to cut off its flow of cash to Moscow. No cash for Putin means no war in Ukraine. On August 6, Trump by executive order imposed a 25 percent additional tariff on India for buying Russian oil, but he did not tariff China, which purchases even more of that commodity from Russia. Trump last Friday said he did not think he had to tariff China at this time. In a conversation with Fox News' Sean Hannity immediately after his meeting with Putin, the president said, "I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something. But we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Whether the meeting with Putin went well or not—we will know only later—Trump cannot entice bad actors with reason alone; he needs to give them incentives to stop doing what they're doing. For the moment, Russia and supporters are trying Trump's patience, seeing how far they can push him. As a result, the American leader is taking heat for what looks like weak diplomacy. My sense is that Trump is trying to be generous. There is, however, only so much generosity in global politics. Trump could end his indulgent policies soon, especially if Putin continues to be intransigent. "Trump is losing patience," said Burton, the former diplomat. "The Russians, Chinese, and friends should watch out. When Trump decides it's time to hit them, he is going to hit them really hard." Gordon G. Chang is the author of Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America and The Coming Collapse of China. Follow him on X @GordonGChang. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Grapples With Supreme Court Dilemma on Birthright Citizenship
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration is seeking more time in federal court as it considers how to bring a challenge to birthright citizenship before the U.S. Supreme Court. In a consent motion filed on August 19 in the District of Maryland, government lawyers requested an additional 30 days to respond to an amended complaint in CASA Inc. v. Trump. The case contests executive order 14160, titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship." The order denies citizenship at birth when the mother is unlawfully present (or lawfully but temporarily present) and the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Newsweek contacted the Department of Justice for comment by email outside regular working hours on Wednesday. Why It Matters The case goes to the core of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause, which for more than a century has guaranteed citizenship to almost everyone born on U.S. soil. A successful challenge could affect hundreds of thousands of children born each year to undocumented parents, while also testing the limits of presidential power to redefine constitutional rights through executive orders. With the Trump administration signaling that it plans to seek a Supreme Court review, the litigation has the potential to reshape immigration law and the broader debate over American identity. What To Know The plaintiffs, a coalition of immigrant-rights organizations led by CASA, amended their complaint in June. On July 18, the government's deadline to respond was extended to August 22. The new motion seeks to push that date back to September 22. According to the filing, the delay is tied to the administration's broader legal strategy. The Justice Department acknowledged that multiple lawsuits were pending against the executive order across different jurisdictions. To resolve the matter more definitively, the solicitor general is preparing to ask the Supreme Court to take up the issue in its next term. "To that end, the Solicitor General of the United States plans to seek certiorari expeditiously to enable the Supreme Court to settle the lawfulness of the Executive Order next Term, but he has not yet determined which case or combination of cases to take to the Court," government attorneys wrote. The administration emphasized that the extension request was not an attempt to stall the proceedings. "This request is not made for purposes of delay, and no party will be prejudiced by the relief requested herein, particularly because Plaintiffs consent to the same," the motion said. On August 7, the court in Maryland granted a classwide preliminary injunction, applying nationwide to members of the certified class. Birthright citizenship newspaper headlines on the U.S. Constitution. Birthright citizenship newspaper headlines on the U.S. Constitution. iStock / Getty Images Plus Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment Executive order 14160 has drawn criticism from immigrant advocacy groups, which argue that birthright citizenship is guaranteed under the 14th Amendment. The constitutional provision says, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." The administration, however, has contended that the clause does not extend to the children of undocumented immigrants. By moving toward a Supreme Court review, the administration appears to be seeking a definitive ruling on the scope of the citizenship clause. The outcome could have significant implications for immigration law and the legal status of U.S.-born children of noncitizen parents. What People Are Saying Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, criticizing the administration's approach in the Supreme Court, said on May 15: "Your argument … would turn our justice system into a 'catch me if you can' kind of regime, in which everybody has to have a lawyer and file a lawsuit in order for the government to stop violating people's rights." Justice Sonia Sotomayor, emphasizing constitutional precedent, added: "So, as far as I see it, this order violates four Supreme Court precedents." What Happens Next If the Trump administration's request for more time is approved, the government's deadline would move to September 22. For now, a nationwide injunction continues to block the order, leaving it unenforceable. Justice Department lawyers say they are considering which case to present to the Supreme Court for review in the next term, a move that could bring arguments before the justices in 2026. Both sides have agreed to the extension, and the government emphasized that no party would be harmed by the delay. While the extension keeps the litigation on hold, the broader fight over birthright citizenship is poised to escalate. On June 27, the court ruled on nationwide injunctions in Trump v. CASA but did not decide the merits of birthright citizenship. The administration now plans to seek a full review next term on the lawfulness of the executive order itself. If the court grants the review, it will put the question of the core citizenship clause before the justices in a way not seen since United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898).
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows US Military Plane off Chinese Coast
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Newsweek map shows a United States military plane—deployed in the western Pacific—flying close to China's coastline on two consecutive days, possibly for intelligence gathering. The U.S. Pacific Air Forces did not immediately respond to a written request for comment. Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry for comment via email. Why It Matters The U.S. Air Force operates a fleet of spy aircraft for different types of reconnaissance missions and deploys them to overseas locations—including Kadena Air Base on Okinawa, Japan's southwestern island near China and Taiwan—to collect intelligence on America's rivals. Beijing has accused the U.S. of conducting "close-in reconnaissance" of its territory, which has led to aerial encounters between the two militaries, with Chinese fighter jets intercepting American aircraft in what the Pentagon called an "unsafe and unprofessional" manner. What To Know Using open-source data from online service Flightradar24, Newsweek tracked two flights by a U.S. Air Force RC-135W aircraft, also known as Rivet Joint, on Monday and Tuesday. The reconnaissance aircraft is equipped with a sensor suite for detecting, identifying, and geolocating signals throughout the electromagnetic spectrum, providing "near real-time," on-scene intelligence collection, analysis, and dissemination capabilities, the Air Force said. Both spy flights were launched from Kadena Air Base. The first flight, lasting approximately six hours, saw the aircraft flying off China's eastern coastline—from north of the Taiwan Strait to south of the Shandong Peninsula—over the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea. The following day, the aircraft performed a six-hour flight over the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea; however, it did not fly as far south toward the Taiwan Strait as the previous flight. It returned to base after flying past Shanghai during the final portion of the flight. According to @MeNMyRC1, an open-source intelligence analyst on the social media platform X, formerly Twitter, who tracks U.S. spy planes, this particular Rivet Joint aircraft, with registration number "62-4135," was deployed to Okinawa from the U.S. mainland around mid-July. A United States RC-135V/W Rivet Joint aircraft takes off at Kadena Air Base in Japan on May 12, 2020. A United States RC-135V/W Rivet Joint aircraft takes off at Kadena Air Base in Japan on May 12, 2020. Staff Sgt. Benjamin Sutton/U.S. Air Force All Rivet Joint aircraft are permanently based at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska and operated by the 55th Wing. The unit previously told Newsweek that it has "global reach and enduring strategic impact" by maintaining forward-deployed aircraft around the world. What People Are Saying The U.S. Air Force 55th Wing previously told Newsweek: "While we do not disclose operational status or comment on specific interactions with foreign military aircraft for operational security, the 55th Wing remains steadfast in executing its mission with precision, professionalism, and strict adherence to international standards." The Pentagon said in its Chinese military power report 2024: "Since late 2023, the [Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA)] has reduced the number of coercive and risky air intercepts of U.S. platforms compared to the previous [two] years, when the PLA engaged in notably increased aggressive activity, particularly in the East and South China Seas." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the U.S. will enhance its surveillance of China as the country rapidly builds up its armed forces and expands its military presence in the western Pacific.
