logo
Roku Streaming Stick Plus review: Powered by the TV and perfect for travel

Roku Streaming Stick Plus review: Powered by the TV and perfect for travel

Engadget06-05-2025

Roku's streaming player lineup is a little easier to understand in 2025 than ever — but it's still a bit confusing. With the release of the Roku Streaming Stick and the Roku Streaming Stick Plus, there are now three streaming sticks and one set-top box in the company's streaming player family. Express models and ones with the plus symbols are no longer in the mix. The Roku Ultra set-top box is the most expensive at $100. The 2021 Streaming Stick 4K goes for $50, while the Streaming Stick and the Streaming Stick Plus cost $30 and $40, respectively. After reviewing the Streaming Stick Plus and comparing it to other streamers, I think it packs a decent amount of power (and Roku's convenient interface) into a small dongle.
Roku's new Streaming Stick Plus requires no wall outlet, making it ideal for unpredictable hotel TV situations and homes where plugs are scarce. $40 at Roku
Arguably the Streaming Stick Plus' biggest competition comes from within its family. The Streaming Stick 4K and the Streaming Stick Plus both support 4K image quality, despite the Plus not having the term in its name. The Stick 4K also supports Dolby Vision and has a longer-range Wi-Fi connection. Both connect through the Wi-Fi 5 standard, but the '4K' model has a built-in Wi-Fi extender within its USB power cable.
At this point, the Stick 4K is four years older than the Plus, and the new stick benefits from a few technological upgrades. For one, the Plus streamier is smaller thanks to the lack of Wi-Fi extender and power adapter. Roku's math claims the dongle itself is 35 percent smaller than the competition — but honestly none of these sticks are particularly large. I found that it was indeed smaller than the Amazon Fire TV Stick I tested. But the size reduction doesn't make a huge difference in everyday use — especially since they hide behind most TVs. The Roku Streaming Stick 4K (left) with it's cable, Wi-Fi extender and dongle. The Roku Streaming Stick Plus (right) with it's cable and dongle. (Amy Skorheim for Engadget)
Another upgrade is a little more significant: better power efficiency. Now you can use your TV's USB port to power the device instead of a wall adapter. The Plus doesn't even come with an adapter in the box, making it a more travel-ready package. Older Roku sticks allowed you to do this (and the 4K model can use USB power on some TVs) but this is the first 4K-enabled device that Roku actually recommends using without a power adapter. Since you don't need an open wall outlet nearby, the dongle will prove more flexible. It certainly would have come in handy during a recent trip in which my hotel room's TV was about 12 feet from the nearest available plug.
Both Sticks support Apple AirPlay and are compatible with Siri, Alexa and Google Assistant. They come with the same remote, which packs features like voice input and the ability to control the power and volume of your TV. They both showcase the same OS, with Roku's playful, purple interface, which I particularly like for live and free programming — as I outlined in our streaming devices guide. Amy Skorheim for Engadget
The Streaming Stick Plus is pretty fast for a $40 device. I have a Roku Ultra hooked up to another TV in my house and, when I performed the same actions on both, the Streaming Stick Plus was only a bit slower than the Ultra. For instance, Disney+ took a second or two to start on the Ultra, and just a half second or so longer on the Plus. Yes, there was a time difference, but the Streaming Stick Plus was never frustratingly slow.
I don't think anyone honestly expects a streaming stick to perform at the same level as most recent smart TVs. My set is relatively new and side-by-side comparisons showed a minor disparity between a dongle and a bigger, built-in CPU. Take the Netflix menu, for example. It's clear and crisp and vibrant via my TV's native Netflix app, but the same page was markedly fuzzier and more pixelated when I opened it on the Roku device.
That said, I only noted a slight difference in quality between the two when a show was actually playing. Sweeping shots of the sumptuous-yet-blood-stained White House interiors in The Residence were only the slightest bit grainier on the Roku. True video connoisseurs may note the disparity, but those who are just here to see Detective Cupp unnerve all the suspects won't likely notice. Amy Skorheim for Engadget
Something the size of a tube of squashed lipstick can't rival a good smart TV. But if you have an older screen or a cheaper set with a tedious interface, the Roku Streaming Stick Plus could make TV time more enjoyable. Comparable streaming sticks include Amazon's Fire TV Stick 4K, which is $10 more at full price (though it's often on sale). Between the two, I'd go with Roku's Streaming Stick Plus, as Roku's interface is far more helpful. This is also the stick I want to take with me on my next trip. I can plug it in at the Airbnb and, instead of logging in to whatever random apps the TV happens to have, I can watch more Doctor Who. I won't have to worry about where the nearest outlet is and I'll be spared the effort of typing in my stupidly long Disney+ password.
As for whether you should get this or Roku's other 4K-enabled streaming stick, I'd go with this one. The Roku Streaming Stick Plus is $10 cheaper and four years newer. The fact that it's powered by the TV means the dongle and the USB power cable fit out of sight so if you, like me, are opposed to the look of snaking wires everywhere, you'll be pleased. Of course, if you have a TV that supports Dolby Vision or your Wi-Fi router is really far away from your TV, then you can go with the Streaming Stick 4K — that's really the only major advantage that model has. Otherwise, the Streaming Stick Plus is a good pick for a cheap but modern streaming player.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Find Air Leaks in Your Home and Save Big on AC This Summer. Here's How I Do It
Find Air Leaks in Your Home and Save Big on AC This Summer. Here's How I Do It

CNET

time12 minutes ago

  • CNET

Find Air Leaks in Your Home and Save Big on AC This Summer. Here's How I Do It

Air conditioning can send your summer energy bills soaring, but there are smart ways to keep costs in check. Setting your thermostat to a steady, reasonable temperature helps -- but just as important is making sure all that hard-earned cool air isn't sneaking out through cracks, gaps, or poorly sealed windows and doors. It's not easy to maintain comfortable temperatures during extreme weather, but I developed a DIY ventilation system that brings in cool air at night and schedule smart blinds to block direct sunlight as much as possible. And never underestimate the power of fans. More recently, I found a new tool to find leaks where cool air is escaping causing the house to warm more and the AC to be less efficient: a thermal camera. I used the HSFTools Finder S2 thermal camera and conducted a DIY home energy audit to look for air leaks that were costing me precious dollars spent on energy.. These same leaks cause heat to escape during winter, so the strategy has year-round applications for lowering energy costs. A rundown of the HSFTools Finder S2 The Finder S2 thermal camera's USB-C connection means it doesn't need a bulky battery pack, instead relying on your phone for power. John Carlsen/CNET I'll hold off on an in-depth review of the HSFTools Finder S2, as I have limited experience with thermal cameras, but I'll mention a few features that helped with my energy audit. First, this thermal imager connects to the USB-C port on Android smartphones but doesn't support iPhones. (Apple users should consider checking out the Topdon TC002C instead.) I love the option to launch the app automatically when plugging in the camera. However, the Finder S2 requires a lot of power -- draining my phone's battery by about 4% after 10 minutes. While this won't affect short inspections of smaller homes, you'll need to recharge your phone after extended use. (For better battery life, I suggest getting a standalone handheld model if you use a thermal camera often.) I played around with the Finder S2 to get comfortable with its features, mostly taking pictures of my cat. John Carlsen/CNET Even if you turn on the Finder S2's Super Resolution mode, the overall resolution maxes out at 512x384 pixels, which is lower than standard 480p quality. It's more than enough to see temperature differences around windows during an energy audit but you may need to play around with the settings if you plan to use it for creative work. Enabling the Digital Camera setting shows a view from your phone's camera on the screen with the option to save images -- but not videos -- from both cameras simultaneously. As for videos, I couldn't get the Finder S2 to work unless I rotated the image 90 degrees in the app. You can adjust the Finder S2's colors, measurement tools and sensitivity in the HSFTools app. John Carlsen/CNET I appreciate the wide selection of color palettes in the HSFTools app. My favorite color setting is "white hot" because of the high contrast image compared to other modes. The app's outstanding measurement tools tell you the temperature of the hottest and coldest objects on the screen or of a specific point you select. I love taking the guesswork out of home improvement. You can get the Finder S2 for about $250 -- although it's often available for $170 -- which is typical among smartphone thermal camera accessories like the Flir One Gen 3 and Seek Thermal Compact. While the price is good for a midrange infrared camera, remember that you might only use it a handful of times -- it's often better to pay for a professional home energy audit. (Don't forget to check if your area has a free energy audit program.) Still, the HSFTools Finder S2 was more than adequate for my DIY home energy audit. How I used a thermal camera in my home energy audit My energy audit uncovered an uninsulated ceiling corner that might explain why my home gets so hot in the summer -- time to tell the landlord. John Carlsen/CNET After familiarizing myself with the thermal imager, I took a structured approach to finding problem areas. I followed this thermal imaging inspection guide from the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors. Read more: Stop Installing Your Thermostat Here. It's Costing You Money I started by turning off my HVAC system before shutting my windows and front door. InterNACHI's guide recommends testing on a day where the outdoor temperature difference is 15 to 20 F warmer (or cooler) than inside so I chose a rainy spring day for my audit. I was happy to see my window seals were in good condition. However, I discovered a small, drafty gap under my front door that I filled with foam backer rod from the hardware store. Fixing the air leak under my front door probably won't save much on my energy bills but it was an effortless DIY project. John Carlsen/CNET The actionable part of my home energy audit ends at doors and windows for now but there's plenty more for homeowners to look at. The Department of Energy suggests checking wherever you suspect air leaks or poor insulation, particularly fixtures, along the edges of rooms and between different building materials. While recaulking seals and replacing weatherstripping around windows are simple DIY projects, you'll need more money and time to upgrade insulation inside walls. You can check out Energy Star's Home Improvement Savings tool to see incentives, rebates and tax credits in your area. If you're a renter, consider telling your landlord about these resources.

This Robot Does My Least Favorite Outdoor Chore Without Having to be Asked
This Robot Does My Least Favorite Outdoor Chore Without Having to be Asked

CNET

time22 minutes ago

  • CNET

This Robot Does My Least Favorite Outdoor Chore Without Having to be Asked

CNET's key takeaways It's $799 at Amazon Best Buy Maytronics It has excellent suction power and remote scheduling at a reasonable price. Requires almost no effort or attention during the week. It lacks a dedicated waterline function but cleans walls and floors completely in 2 hours. The reason you have a pool is to enjoy it. Sure, care and maintenance are part of the package but they don't have to be a big part of it. Last summer -- my first summer as a pool and homeowner -- I vacuumed manually. It would take roughly an hour twice a week for the five months I keep it open. That's a grand sum of 60 hours for the season spent setting up to vacuum and vacuuming. This year, I'm saddled with an incredible automatic machine that cleans my entire pool for me. I tested 12 robot pool vacuums and landed on the Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus Wi-Fi. It hits all the marks for cleaning, scheduling via app, low maintenance, and it doesn't cost an outrageous sum. Pool cleaning is now something I barely think about. When the warm weather hits, I can count on sparkling water and a clean pool floor. My experience with the Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus Wi-Fi The Dolphin deftly cleans the pool floor and sides in about 2 hours. David Watsky/CNET Out of the box, the robot requires no setup other than plugging into a power source and connecting to Wi-Fi, a process that took me less than 5 minutes. Once it's connected, dropped in the pool, and a cleaning schedule is set, there's not much else to do. The CC Nautilus Plus Wi-Fi cleaned my pool in around 2 hours, picking up soggy leaves, dead bugs, gravel, and sand. It used its fierce scrubbing brushes and a suction rate of 4,500 gallons per hour to clean the floor and walls of my kidney bean-shaped pool. The cord occasionally hooked my skimmer bot, but it didn't cause any serious complications. David Watsky/CNET The only function it doesn't have is a dedicated waterline setting, but I've found most waterline cleaning features to be just OK. Plus, it's easy enough to brush the waterline manually every few weeks if you notice buildup. For me, spending several hundred dollars more for a model with waterline cleaning just isn't worth it. Being able to set a cleaning schedule from my device tipped this robot cleaner over the edge for me. David Watsky/CNET The Wi-Fi and app connectivity are what tipped this model over the top. Through the app, you can control the robot's cleaning schedules, and I found it had far fewer disconnections and glitches than other connected robot pool cleaners I tested. At 35 pounds, the robot is easy enough to pull out of the pool when it needs to be emptied and rinsed, roughly once a month. Its cord allows you to haul it in without a struggle. Speaking of the cord, the anti-tangle device with attached buoys kept it from looping around itself, although sometimes it gets caught up in my solar robot skimmer. A pool robot that filters water means far less stress on your expensive built-in equipment. David Watsky/CNET Pool filters are not cheap and can be difficult to clean, depending on the type. Having a robot cleaner that works daily will save your filter lots of work and prevent you from having to replace it as often. It'll also take some stress off your built-in pool pump and filtration system, sending less debris through the pipes to be filtered out. You can bypass the app and use the control box to start and stop the robot. David Watsky/CNET Cleaner water also means you'll spend less on chemicals due to a reduction in algae growth and better water chemistry balance. For a full breakdown, see my list of the best robot pool cleaners for 2025, tested for every type of pool. The specs Type : Corded : Corded Suction power : 4,500 gallons per hour : 4,500 gallons per hour Cleans : Floor, walls : Floor, walls Weight : 34.6 pounds : 34.6 pounds Cost : $799 : $799 Automatic daily cleaning : Yes : Yes App control: Yes CNET's buying advice I've tested dozens of pool robots and learned a few things along the way. David Watsky/CNET I have tested more than 12 pool-cleaning robots, and the Dolphin is my top recommendation. It does everything you need it to, including deep cleaning of the walls and floor on a schedule of your choosing. It's easy to use and maintain, and costs half the price of competitors. If you factor in how much time a robot pool cleaner saves or what you'd have to pay for professional vacuuming, this is as close to a no-brainer as purchases get for pool owners.

Roku vs. Comcast: Which Streaming Stock is the Better Investment?
Roku vs. Comcast: Which Streaming Stock is the Better Investment?

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Roku vs. Comcast: Which Streaming Stock is the Better Investment?

Roku ROKU and Comcast CMCSA are both active players in the fast-growing streaming market, each with a unique approach. Roku has built its platform around ad-supported streaming and user-friendly content discovery, while Comcast is expanding Peacock through a mix of premium content, live sports and strategic bundling across its broader media and broadband consumers spend more time streaming and advertisers shift dollars toward digital platforms, the key question is: Which company is better positioned to benefit in 2025? Let's compare their performance and strategies to find out. Roku's streaming platform showed strong growth in the first quarter of 2025, strengthening its position as a top player in the streaming space. Platform revenues rose 17% year over year to $881 million, supported by growth in both video advertising and streaming service distribution. Roku now reaches over half of all U.S. broadband households, with more than 125 million people using its Home Screen every day to start their TV experience.A big part of this success was The Roku Channel, which became the #2 app on the platform in the United States based on engagement. Streaming hours on the channel jumped 84% from last year, aided by personalized recommendations shown directly on the home screen. Over 85% of viewing came through these features rather than the app, showing how well Roku guides users to also continues to grow its streaming ecosystem by adding more content and making it easier for users to discover what to watch. Its library includes Roku Originals, live channels and easy access to popular subscription services, all in one more people watching content through streaming, Roku is in a strong position. Its growing user base, smart content discovery tools and focus on improving the streaming experience make it one of the most reliable platforms in today's digital viewing market. Comcast's streaming business, led by Peacock, continued to grow in the first quarter of 2025. Peacock delivered double-digit revenue growth and narrowed its year-over-year losses by more than $400 million. This improvement was supported by better monetization of paid subscribers, a price increase from 2024 and the addition of Charter subscribers, which helped the platform reach 41 million paid users by content strategy centers around a wide mix of programming, including NBCUniversal originals, next-day NBC and Bravo shows, Pay-One movies like Wicked and a strong lineup of live sports. This mix is designed to appeal to a broad audience and drive consistent streaming engagement across different user digital advertising on Peacock remained relatively stable, the platform is still not profitable. Total advertising revenues for NBCUniversal declined during the quarter due to the timing of sports events and comparisons to a strong political ad year. Even with bundling efforts and expanded ad formats, Peacock's financial performance remains under making clear progress, Peacock still requires heavy investment to stay competitive. Its growing sports portfolio, including new rights like the NBA, adds more cost in the short term. As a result, while subscriber numbers are rising, Peacock continues to operate at a loss, and its long-term path to profitability is still taking shape. In the trailing six months, Roku shares have lost 12.4% compared with Comcast's decline of 20.2%. This indicates relatively strong investor sentiment for Roku. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation standpoint, ROKU's current forward 12-month P/S ratio of 2.26X is ahead of CMCSA's 1.04X. Although ROKU is trading at a premium compared to CMCSA, the premium valuation reflects investor confidence in the company's growth potential for the rest of 2025. In contrast, CMCSA's current forward 12-month P/S ratio indicates more cautious market sentiment around its near-term performance. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ROKU's 2025 loss is pegged at 17 cents per share, which has narrowed by 2 cents over the past 30 days, indicating an 80.9% increase year over year. The consensus estimate for 2025 revenues is pinned at $4.55 billion, suggesting year-over-year growth of 10.54%. Roku, Inc. price-consensus-chart | Roku, Inc. Quote The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CMCSA's 2025 earnings is pegged at $4.35 per share, which has been revised downward by a penny over the past 30 days, indicating a 0.46% increase year over year. The consensus estimate for 2025 revenues is pinned at $122.07 billion, suggesting a year-over-year decline of 1.35%. Comcast Corporation price-consensus-chart | Comcast Corporation Quote The positive trend in ROKU's earnings estimates reflects investors' confidence in its growth, while the downward revision in CMCSA's earnings estimate reflects skepticism. Roku remains the stronger streaming bet for the rest of 2025. The company is growing steadily, with rising platform revenues, increased engagement on The Roku Channel and strong advertiser demand. Its ad tools and partnerships are helping improve monetization, especially among smaller businesses. These results have led to improved earnings expectations and steady investor Peacock, on the other hand, is still in the building phase. While subscriber numbers are growing and losses have narrowed, the platform is not yet profitable and continues to require heavy investment. Compared to Roku's focused, ad-driven model, Peacock's growth path is slower and more currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), whereas CMCSA has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Roku, Inc. (ROKU) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store