logo
Court orders police officers to compensate demonstrators for use of excessive force

Court orders police officers to compensate demonstrators for use of excessive force

Yahoo2 days ago

The ruling followed a civil lawsuit filed by the two demonstrators, who alleged they were assaulted during a protest in Caesarea.
The commander of the Hadera police station, Chief-Superintendent Amit Pollak, and the commander of the Special Patrol Unit, Senior-Staff-Sergeant Major Eran Keslassi, have been ordered to compensate two demonstrators in a sum totaling NIS 30,000, the Hadera Magistrate's Court ruled on Wednesday.
The ruling followed a civil lawsuit filed by the demonstrators, who alleged they were assaulted during aprotest in Caesarea. The lawsuit proceeded after the State Attorney's Office waived the officers' immunity following a recommendation by Judge Yaakov Goldberg.
According to the ruling, Pollak, Keslassi, and the Israel Police are to pay NIS 30,000 to the demonstrators and to attorney Adam Seri, who represented them through the protest detainees' support network. The claim also noted that the police and the Interior Ministry failed to cooperate with Seri and withheld the officers' details, complicating the filing of the lawsuit.
Last week, the Police Investigation Department (PID) filed an indictment against Pollak for allegedly assaulting another citizen during a separate event in Caesarea and for obstruction of justice. The indictment states that Pollak ordered the forced removal of a truck carrying a political display, allegedly assaulted one of the demonstrators by grabbing his neck, and ordered the officers to arrest him.
The incident occurred in December 2023 near Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's residence inCaesarea. The demonstrators — Dganit Schatz, 62, of Hadera, and David Masad, 73, of Kibbutz Ma'ayan Zvi — claimed they were arrested without justification and held in custody for many hours, in violation of their constitutional rights. Schatz alleged that Pollak pushed her forcefully and yelled, 'You won't tell me 'shame,'' before instructing officers to arrest her.
According to Schatz, Pollak ordered the officers to arrest her without explanation. They allegedly forced her to the ground, grabbed her by all four limbs, and carried her into the patrol car 'like an object' in front of other demonstrators, humiliating her.
The claim also states that when defense attorney Orit Shalev tried to consult with Schatz privately, the officers refused and threatened to arrest the lawyer. Schatz was later questioned over offenses she claimed she did not commit, and she alleged that false accusations were made against her. She subsequently filed a complaint with the PID.
Masad, who was standing on the sidewalk and witnessed Schatz's arrest, claimed he was pushed by Keslassi after he protested the incident. He was later arrested, held at the station for about an hour and a half, and questioned on what he called false suspicions.
The officers argued that they acted lawfully and arrested thedemonstrators after they themselves allegedly acted violently. Schatz and Masad denied the allegations. During a pretrial hearing, Goldberg reviewed video footage of the incident before ruling that Pollak, Keslassi, and the Israel Police must pay compensation.
A statement from the protest detainees' support network said: 'For the sake of clarity, the legal fees will be donated to the detainees' support network. It's delightful that the Israel Police and its officers are contributing to our donations.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court orders police officers to compensate demonstrators for use of excessive force
Court orders police officers to compensate demonstrators for use of excessive force

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Court orders police officers to compensate demonstrators for use of excessive force

The ruling followed a civil lawsuit filed by the two demonstrators, who alleged they were assaulted during a protest in Caesarea. The commander of the Hadera police station, Chief-Superintendent Amit Pollak, and the commander of the Special Patrol Unit, Senior-Staff-Sergeant Major Eran Keslassi, have been ordered to compensate two demonstrators in a sum totaling NIS 30,000, the Hadera Magistrate's Court ruled on Wednesday. The ruling followed a civil lawsuit filed by the demonstrators, who alleged they were assaulted during aprotest in Caesarea. The lawsuit proceeded after the State Attorney's Office waived the officers' immunity following a recommendation by Judge Yaakov Goldberg. According to the ruling, Pollak, Keslassi, and the Israel Police are to pay NIS 30,000 to the demonstrators and to attorney Adam Seri, who represented them through the protest detainees' support network. The claim also noted that the police and the Interior Ministry failed to cooperate with Seri and withheld the officers' details, complicating the filing of the lawsuit. Last week, the Police Investigation Department (PID) filed an indictment against Pollak for allegedly assaulting another citizen during a separate event in Caesarea and for obstruction of justice. The indictment states that Pollak ordered the forced removal of a truck carrying a political display, allegedly assaulted one of the demonstrators by grabbing his neck, and ordered the officers to arrest him. The incident occurred in December 2023 near Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's residence inCaesarea. The demonstrators — Dganit Schatz, 62, of Hadera, and David Masad, 73, of Kibbutz Ma'ayan Zvi — claimed they were arrested without justification and held in custody for many hours, in violation of their constitutional rights. Schatz alleged that Pollak pushed her forcefully and yelled, 'You won't tell me 'shame,'' before instructing officers to arrest her. According to Schatz, Pollak ordered the officers to arrest her without explanation. They allegedly forced her to the ground, grabbed her by all four limbs, and carried her into the patrol car 'like an object' in front of other demonstrators, humiliating her. The claim also states that when defense attorney Orit Shalev tried to consult with Schatz privately, the officers refused and threatened to arrest the lawyer. Schatz was later questioned over offenses she claimed she did not commit, and she alleged that false accusations were made against her. She subsequently filed a complaint with the PID. Masad, who was standing on the sidewalk and witnessed Schatz's arrest, claimed he was pushed by Keslassi after he protested the incident. He was later arrested, held at the station for about an hour and a half, and questioned on what he called false suspicions. The officers argued that they acted lawfully and arrested thedemonstrators after they themselves allegedly acted violently. Schatz and Masad denied the allegations. During a pretrial hearing, Goldberg reviewed video footage of the incident before ruling that Pollak, Keslassi, and the Israel Police must pay compensation. A statement from the protest detainees' support network said: 'For the sake of clarity, the legal fees will be donated to the detainees' support network. It's delightful that the Israel Police and its officers are contributing to our donations.'

Scoop: Schatz notches 10th whip endorsement
Scoop: Schatz notches 10th whip endorsement

Axios

time2 days ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Schatz notches 10th whip endorsement

Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) is endorsing Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) to be the next Senate Democratic whip, the party's no. 2 position in the chamber, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Support is coalescing around Schatz for the gig while other potential candidates are publicly staying out of the race. Baldwin is the 10th Senate Democrat to endorse Schatz since he announced his bid in April. Between the lines: Baldwin, a woman representing a Midwest state, is the type of Democrat who might have been likely to support Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Min.) for whip if Klobuchar entered the race. But Klobuchar, at least publicly, has remained on the sidelines so far. She said in April that it was a "mistake" for Democrats to focus on the race to replace Durbin over a year out from the election. The big picture: Schatz, meanwhile, has been growing his support among Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer's (D-N.Y.) top lieutenants. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) — who, along with Baldwin, is a member of Schumer's leadership roster — has also endorsed Schatz. Booker and Sens. Jacky Rosen (D-Nv.) and Mark Kelly (D-Az.) are part of an internal whip team working to help Schatz win the nomination. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the current Senate Democratic whip, is retiring next year. Schatz also serves as Durbin's chief deputy whip this Congress, a subtle change that caught the eye of Senate insiders earlier this year. What they're saying: "Brian listens to his colleagues, knows how to build consensus, and gets that to deliver for working families, our caucus needs to be united," Baldwin said of Schatz in a statement to Axios.

Southern Israel resident convicted of 1 million NIS fraud through phishing
Southern Israel resident convicted of 1 million NIS fraud through phishing

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Southern Israel resident convicted of 1 million NIS fraud through phishing

Magistrates' Court Judge Anat Choleta found that the defendant exploited Bank Hapoalim's 'Deposit Envelope' service to commit fraud totalling nearly NIS 1 million. A resident of southern Israel has been convicted of aggravatedfraud and transactions in prohibited property, the Magistrates' Court ruled Wednesday morning. Magistrates' Court Judge Anat Choleta found that the defendant exploited Bank Hapoalim's 'Deposit Envelope' service to commit fraud totalling nearly one million shekels. According to the verdict, the defendant made 14 cash deposits using the bank's envelope service at four different branches. The service allows customers to declare a deposit amount online, place the cash in an envelope, and insert it into a machine at the branch. The declared amount is credited to the customer's account immediately, while the actual cash is counted within 48 hours. The court found that the defendant declared deposits totalling NIS 977,088.30 but actually deposited only NIS 50,129.50—a shortfall exceeding NIS 926,000. Immediately after his account was credited, he transferred a total of NIS 1,005,430 via Zahav transfers to various suppliers. Judge Choleta ruled that a series of circumstantial pieces of evidence formed a clear and incriminating picture. Security footage showed the defendant's son depositing envelopes that were visibly thinner than expected for the declared amounts. The gap between the declared and actual amounts exceeded NIS 900,000, with each envelope supposedly containing tens of thousands of shekels but actually containing only thousands. Three cash counters testified that every envelope contained significant discrepancies after triple counting. 'The testimonies regarding the counting process at the cash centre rule out any possibility of a counting error on the bank's part,' Choleta wrote. The southern district security officer for Bank Hapoalim testified that he reviewed the deposit videos and saw 'the depositor is holding an envelope that is far too thin compared to the declared amount.' He added that depositing envelopes at different branches delayed the detection of the discrepancies. The defendant claimed he placed the correct sums in the envelopes and gave them to his son to deposit, saying he did not know how the shortfall arose. A defense witness demonstrated how an envelope could be cut open and resealed to appear intact. Judge Choleta rejected claims of bank procedure violations or counting errors, concluding that 'the circumstantial evidence leads to one clear and reasonable conclusion: the defendant's guilt.' She noted that the defence 'did not present any real alternative scenario, nor did it provide any evidence or even preliminary evidence to support one.' During cross-examination, the defendant was asked about the thickness of the envelopes seen in the videos. When asked by the judge how thick a bundle of 300 one-hundred-shekel notes would be, he compared it to a pack of cigarettes and admitted the envelopes in the footage were thinner. Company employees testified that the defendant was financially motivated. The company's account had been restricted for several months, preventing payments by cheque or overdraft. Suppliers demanded immediate ZAHAV transfers to continue doing business, supporting the prosecution's case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store