How innocent Jean Charles de Menezes was shot dead by police 20 years ago
On July 22, 20 years ago, electrician Jean Charles de Menezes left his home in Tulse Hill to fix a broken alarm.
Stopping to pick up a copy of Metro, the Brazilian national descended the stairs of Stockwell Tube Station and boarded the next train.
Unbeknownst to him, three officers – named only as Hotel 1, 2 and 3 – sat themselves around him. Moments later, he was shot seven times in the head by police, leaving his body 'unrecognisable'.
His devastated mum Maria has been pushing for prosecutions ever since, saying her son was 'educated and civilised' and 'always respected law and order'.
But what happened in those fatal few moments on the Tube, and why have the officers have not faced any disciplinary measures?
They wrongly thought the Jean Charles was part of the previous day's failed second wave of bomb attacks three weeks after the 7/7 terror attacks.
An address in Scotia Road, Tulse Hill, was written on a gym membership card found inside one of the bags where an undetonated bomb was hidden.
Police carried out extensive surveillance in the area, where Jean Charles lived in one of those flats with his two cousins.
As he left to respond to the faulty alarm, officers believed Jean Charles looked like the CCTV images of one of the bombing suspects Osman Hussain.
Cressida Dick, who later became Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ordered Jean Charles be prevented from entering the London Underground.
22 July 2005 Jean Charles de Menezes shot dead by police at Stockwell Tube station 17 July 2006 CPS says no officers will be prosecuted, but Met Police will be tried for breaching health and safety laws 1 November 2007 Met Police found guilty of breaching health and safety laws and fined 22 October 2008 Inquest under way – coroner rules out unlawful killing verdict a month later 12 December 2008 Inquest jury returns open verdict 16 November 2009 Met Police settles damages claim with family 10 June 2015 De Menezes family take legal challenge to European Court of Human Rights 30 March 2016 Family lose challenge over decision not to charge any police officer over the shooting
Officers followed him onto a bus and thought he was acting suspicious once he arrived at Brixton Station and found it was closed due to the previous day's bombings.
Jean Charles boarded the bus again to Stockwell Station, went down to the platform and got on the train.
Firearms officers boarded the train, with varying accounts of whether or not they spoke to the electrician or not.
They had all sat around him, and when Jean Charles stood up, an officer codenamed Hotel 3 grabbed, pinned his arms against his torso and pushed him back into his seat.
It is unclear what happens next. Two officers fired a total of 11 shots between them.
Seven of them landed in Jean Charles's head and his body was left 'unreconisable'.
Police said they had been told to fire directly at suspected suicide bomber's heads – which the Muslim Council of Britain described as a 'shoot-to-kill policy'.
Later investigation found the event had the 'hallmarks of a special forces operation, rather than a police one'.
No officers were prosecuted, but the Metropolitan Police force was fined for breaching health and safety laws.
Jean Charles's family took the force to the European Court of Human Rights in 2016 over the decision to not charge any officers.
But the family lost the challenge, with the force saying the circumstances around his death 'came at a time of unprecedented terrorist threat to London'.
They have also been subject to numerous public inquiries, and two separate reports by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.
The Met said: 'No officer sets out on duty intent on ending a life. Our sole purpose is the complete opposite – the protection and preservation of life – and we have taken extensive action to address the causes of this tragedy.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Man's barefoot shows how filthy the London Underground is
MORE: Porn star 'murdered couple, froze remains then took them to Clifton Suspension Bridge'
MORE: Moment Sycamore Gap tree is 'felled by two friends' shown to court
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
35 minutes ago
- Metro
Huge EastEnders twist as another major couple get engaged
This article contains spoilers for tomorrow's episode of EastEnders, which airs Friday at 7.30pm on BBC One or can be streamed now on iPlayer. Wedding bells are set to ring out across Albert Square once again, as a beloved couple decided to tie the knot. I am, of course, referring to Patrick and Yolande Trueman (Rudolph Walker and Angela Wynter), who recently won the British Soap Award for Best On-Screen Partnership. What a way to cap off the celebrations! Throughout this week's episodes of the soap, we've seen the couple struggle with intimacy in the wake of a horrific incident. Some of the serial's most harrowing scenes ever aired last year, when church-leader Pastor Clayton (Howard Saddler) sexually assaulted Yolande in a store room at the community centre. She bravely spoke up about her ordeal to friend Elaine Knight (Harriet Thorpe), and then found the courage to report his crime to the police. Unfortunately, due to a lack of evidence, there was little that they could do. However, soon after, a second survivor of his abuse came forward, with the CPS charging him with two counts of sexual assault. Their bravery was noted by a third woman, who also came forward, prompting Clayton to barge his way into Yolande's house in an attempt to get her to drop the charges. Later that night, the police arrived and she assumed he'd spread more vicious lies about her. They were actually there to reveal that Clayton had taken his own life. Since then, Yolande has tried to rebuild her life and reconnect with her Christian faith – something which she abandoned following the sexual assault. Earlier this week, Yolande went to run herself a bath and asked her life partner to give her a massage afterwards. Want to be the first to hear shocking EastEnders spoilers? Who's leaving Coronation Street? The latest gossip from Emmerdale? Join 10,000 soaps fans on Metro's WhatsApp Soaps community and get access to spoiler galleries, must-watch videos, and exclusive interviews. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications so you can see when we've just dropped the latest spoilers! Things turned frosty when he refused to touch her, later admitting that he didn't want her to draw any comparisons to her abuser. More Trending She was furious that he'd taken it upon himself to decide to eradicate their sex life based upon something that happened to her , and they seemed to reach the end of the road. However, after some words of wisdom from Denise Fox (Diane Parish), the pair reconciled. View More » As they danced slowly around the living room, Patrick wanted to cement his commitment by popping the question – and Yolande was more than happy to accept! If you've got a soap or TV story, video or pictures get in touch by emailing us soaps@ – we'd love to hear from you. Join the community by leaving a comment below and stay updated on all things soaps on our homepage. MORE: All 46 EastEnders pictures for next week as cheating crisis strikes MORE: All 61 EastEnders spoiler pictures for next week as diagnosis is confirmed
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Lord Brittan's widow blasts police watchdog for dropping probe into officer who pursued him over false VIP paedophile claims
The widow of Lord Brittan, whose husband was falsely accused of being part of a VIP paedophile ring in Westminster, said her trust in the Met and the police watchdog has been 'severely undermined'. An investigation into how former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse handled the claims has been dropped, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week. The probe was brought to an end by the watchdog after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police '. Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland - a Met investigation which he led into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. For nearly a decade, Operation Midland has been mired in allegations of criminality, misconduct and incompetence, yet not one officer involved in the fiasco has been held to account. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan, widow of the former home secretary, said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of 'closure'. She said: 'My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. 'I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence.' Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech, known as 'Nick' – real name – whose wild accusations of an Establishment paedophile ring were deemed 'credible and true' by the Met. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation, led by Mr Roundhouse, into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. The £2.5 million inquiry closed in March 2016 without any arrests or charges and Beech was later jailed for 18 years for perverting the course of justice, fraud and child sexual offences. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was 'no evidence' within the material provided from the Met that there was 'any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media' or which 'supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review'. Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. Mr Proctor said he was 'appalled' by the 'disgraceful decision' not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to 'demand a meeting and an explanation'. Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: 'What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. 'When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this.' In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: 'Our recent decision does not change our finding that - by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland - the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. 'During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.' A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We recognise the impact that this lengthy investigation and the prospect of a hearing will inevitably have had on former DAC Rodhouse. We are pleased the matter is now concluded. 'An assessment of the Met's email retention policy led to the assumption that emails sent and received before a certain date would no longer be on our systems. 'As soon as we became aware that some older material was still held, we informed the IOPC and arranged for it to be shared. Any impact this had on the investigation or proceedings was entirely unintentional.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Lord Brittan's widow slams closure of police probe after fake abuse claims against husband
The widow of former home secretary Lord Brittan, who was falsely accused of being part of a paedophile ring in Westminster, said her trust in the Met and the police watchdog has been "severely undermined" after an investigation into an officer over his handling of the claims was dropped. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week it had stopped the investigation into former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse after a "large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police". Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland - a Met investigation into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of "closure". She said: "My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. "I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence." Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech - later jailed for 18 years for what a judge called "cruel and callous" lies. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. The probe ended in 2016 without a single arrest after Beech made a series of baseless allegations, including of three murders. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was "no evidence" within the material provided from the Met that there was "any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media" or which "supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review". Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were "ill-founded and incorrect". Mr Proctor said he was "appalled" by the "disgraceful decision" not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to "demand a meeting and an explanation". Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: "What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. "When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this." In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: "Our recent decision does not change our finding that - by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique 's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland - the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. "During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force."
